Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:56:16 +1000 (EST)
From:      John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
To:        imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Cc:        nate@mt.sri.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CVS tree (was Re: Annother patch for Mozilla)
Message-ID:  <199804022356.JAA15701@cimlogic.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <199804022342.QAA17351@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Apr 2, 98 04:42:08 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199804022316.QAA20439@mt.sri.com> Nate Williams writes:
> : I agree totally.  I think having a FreeBSD cvs tree is a *great* idea,
> : and would save the Netscape folks time to have a 'organized' place to
> : get tested patches from (vs. having to wade through the masses of
> : patches coming in.)
> 
> I too agree.  This model has proven to be a good one in the past.  Who
> would host this and how could one get ctm/cvsup access to it :-)

The normal cvs tree on freefall should be OK. Just put it somewhere
that isn't included in any of the existing collections.
Like /c/ncvs/shared/mozilla

-- 
John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org
CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804022356.JAA15701>