From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 24 23:59:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA18687 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 23:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sympatico.ca (ppp6551.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.208.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA18676; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 23:59:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: (from tim@localhost) by sympatico.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA22493; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 02:59:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Message-ID: <19980725025918.A22475@ca> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 02:59:18 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: andy@icc.surw.chel.su, tg@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ports/converters/ptoc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does ports/converters/ptoc strike anyone other than me as being in like, a totally wrong category? devel, yes, but why converters? It's probably not supposed to be in x11, either. [The thing is a Pascal compiler!] -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message