From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 21 6:34:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 382D837B491 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 06:34:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 961 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Feb 2001 14:32:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:32:34 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Alan Clegg Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mod_ssl port Message-ID: <20010221163234.D98551@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Clegg , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010221092937.G9523@diskfarm.firehouse.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010221092937.G9523@diskfarm.firehouse.net>; from abc@firehouse.net on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:29:37AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:29:37AM -0500, Alan Clegg wrote: > Are there any plans to create a "mod_ssl" only port? I'm having a bitch of > a time getting apache13-fp and apache13-modssl to play nicely together. I don't think this is possible, without compiling the stock Apache port with SSL support. It's been mentioned quite a few times on this list that the SSL module needs an Apache binary compiled with the extended API support, and then some. G'luck, Peter -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message