Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:09:44 +0200 From: martinko <martinkov@pobox.sk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Incorrect inline documentation in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf Message-ID: <e1e718$ali$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <442A9976.2010400@dial.pipex.com> References: <5fbf03c20603290220l358768fy@mail.gmail.com> <442A9072.8070500@dial.pipex.com> <5fbf03c20603290623g33ccce0dy@mail.gmail.com> <442A9976.2010400@dial.pipex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Spil Oss wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, that makes it very clear for me. >> >> Would it be a good idea to make that specific in the pkgtools.conf >> file? There must be more FreeBSD newbies that can run into the same >> trouble. >> >> > It seems like a good idea to me but you'd want to get the idea to the > author of portupgrade et al. > > --Alex > and note that portupgrade also handles differently ports depending on whether they're being installed directly or indirectly (because of dependency, eg via metaport), and when a package is being installed for the first time or it's being upgraded. :( this behaviour is rather inconsistent and confuses a lot and makes it difficult to easily manage your compilation process and options management, imho. :-( m.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e1e718$ali$1>