From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 10 18:10:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9966D16A405 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5C543D46 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:10:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FT0q4-0006xx-Nj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:10:12 +0200 Received: from r5k20.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:10:12 +0200 Received: from martinkov by r5k20.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:10:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:09:44 +0200 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <5fbf03c20603290220l358768fy@mail.gmail.com> <442A9072.8070500@dial.pipex.com> <5fbf03c20603290623g33ccce0dy@mail.gmail.com> <442A9976.2010400@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k20.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051205 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <442A9976.2010400@dial.pipex.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Incorrect inline documentation in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:10:34 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Spil Oss wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, that makes it very clear for me. >> >> Would it be a good idea to make that specific in the pkgtools.conf >> file? There must be more FreeBSD newbies that can run into the same >> trouble. >> >> > It seems like a good idea to me but you'd want to get the idea to the > author of portupgrade et al. > > --Alex > and note that portupgrade also handles differently ports depending on whether they're being installed directly or indirectly (because of dependency, eg via metaport), and when a package is being installed for the first time or it's being upgraded. :( this behaviour is rather inconsistent and confuses a lot and makes it difficult to easily manage your compilation process and options management, imho. :-( m.