Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 May 2006 08:20:39 +0200
From:      Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
To:        RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
Cc:        krion@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pan2 and KDE require confilicting pcre ports
Message-ID:  <20060504082039.4a709e38.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605031308.45445.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
References:  <200605031308.45445.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Thu__4_May_2006_08_20_39_+0200_k2NH36fWujMG1gk_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 3 May 2006 13:08:44 +0100
RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> wrote:

> Pan2 now depends on the UTF8 slave-port of pcre, kdelibs3 depends on the=
=20
> ordinary pcre port, and the two conflict.
>=20
> What's the best way to deal with this? Will building pcre  WITH_UTF8 brea=
k=20
> anything that doesn't need UTF8?

I wonder too so I've cc'ed the maintainer to try to obtain an answer.

--=20
Jean-Yves Lefort

jylefort@FreeBSD.org
http://lefort.be.eu.org/

--Signature=_Thu__4_May_2006_08_20_39_+0200_k2NH36fWujMG1gk_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEWZ1EyzD7UaO4AGoRAvZ1AJ9Yg20t//f/tfIITgKO+76SDMNofACfdVxr
rY88HcyDD/I1EMktUSPZcvU=
=0jq/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__4_May_2006_08_20_39_+0200_k2NH36fWujMG1gk_--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060504082039.4a709e38.jylefort>