From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 12 22:40:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F6016A418; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07B713C457; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7A420C2; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:40:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6EF20C1; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:40:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F1EC84493; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:40:02 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:40:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Fri\, 12 Oct 2007 08\:27\:47 +0000 \(UTC\)") Message-ID: <86d4vkj6ta.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:40:11 -0000 "Bjoern A. Zeeb" writes: > Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess > the question is more to Doug than to you. > > I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I > neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended on a threading > library but a caching nameserver. Going with a port for this > means supporting the ports infrastructure respectively an extra > installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done just extra pain;-) > So far it was easier to go with just base and live with the size of > named. I can't imagine a situation where you would want to run BIND but couldn't spare the disk space for libthr. Size in kB of named and its dependencies on -CURRENT: 1616 named 1584 libcrypto.so.5 1120 libc.so.7 80 libthr.so.3 On a production name server, /var/named alone would easily outwheigh libthr. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no