From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:06:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8282C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:06:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FDD43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aerial_gus@prokyon.com) Received: from sarah2k ([69.164.85.247]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040711000645.CHN12887.mta10.adelphia.net@sarah2k> for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:06:45 -0400 Message-ID: <00be01c466da$eca50d40$6401a8c0@sarah2k> From: "aerial_gus" To: References: <000b01c466bb$161e2b90$3301a8c0@salvation><40F05040.50406@electricpincushion.com> <40F052A0.8010105@one-arm.com> <200407101402.05688.kstewart@owt.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:06:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Ftp server near me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:06:46 -0000 I had this question a couple years back. I did command line ftp logins until I found something I recognized, usually a school or university. I'm on the East Coast (US) so I got lucky with MIT, Perdue and UNC. Commercial-sited servers, your guess is as good as mine. I guess you could try to brute-force a solution w/ some combination of nslookup, traceroute etc and a six-pack... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Stewart" To: Cc: "DerDrache" ; "uidzero" Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 5:02 PM Subject: Re: Ftp server near me > On Saturday 10 July 2004 01:33 pm, uidzero wrote: > > DerDrache wrote: > > > My apologies. I did not read your original email as closely as I > > > should have. fastest_cvsup will only test cvsup servers. > > > > > > DerDrache wrote: > > >> fastest_cvsup is a simple program to use that can be found in the > > >> ports tree. I'd recommend it. > > >> > > >> /usr/ports/sysutils/fastest_cvsup > > >> > > >> DerDrache > > >> > > >> Joshua Lewis wrote: > > >>> All documentation tells you when running CVSUP or installing FBSD > > >>> from FTP > > >>> to use the FTP server closest to you. > > >>> > > >>> So how do you determine the best server. I recall reading a post > > >>> that said > > >>> run a command that will determine the closest server or fastest > > >>> server near > > >>> you. I however lost the page I printed out and can't remember the > > >>> web address. > > >>> > > >>> Any ideas how to find the fastest server near me? > > > > Ahh, the same here. I aoologize. > > > > I think I would have given the same answer. It was the only choice since > the Handbook no longer tells you where each mirror is located. All you > can do now, is choose an FTP mirror that is in a country close to you. > > Kent > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:10:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A90C16A4CF for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C94143D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aerial_gus@prokyon.com) Received: from sarah2k ([69.164.85.247]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040711001037.TWCU13168.mta11.adelphia.net@sarah2k> for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:10:37 -0400 Message-ID: <00d801c466db$7676e1b0$6401a8c0@sarah2k> From: "aerial_gus" To: References: <3780148504070915595f86842c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:10:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Installation/Boot-up help please... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:37 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Erickson" To: Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:59 PM Subject: Installation/Boot-up help please... > Dear Group, > > I am new to FreeBSD and am having a problem. I downloaded Disk 1 and 2 > of version 4.10 and go through the installation and everything seems > to be fine until I reboot. Then it says that it cannot load the kernel > or kernel.old. What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks in advance, > Jeff Erickson > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Did you set the disk bootable in the fdisk part of the install? The part where you create the partitions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:27:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997EB16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:27:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd3mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCF943D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:27:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aardvark@saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com) Received: from pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.21])2003))freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:21:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150]) by pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I0N00MLMVN3S480@pd3mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:21:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from francisco.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com (S010600609761a671.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.202.31]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I0N0064CVN3PK@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:21:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com [192.168.23.1]) by francisco.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6B0L0hJ029244; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:21:01 -0700 Received: from aardvark by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BjS5U-0003iK-1N; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:21:00 -0700 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:20:59 -0700 From: Saint Aardvark the Carpeted In-reply-to: <378014850407101528112fd2be@mail.gmail.com> Sender: aardvark To: Jeff Erickson Message-id: <20040711002059.GE7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i References: <378014850407101528112fd2be@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Person new to FreeBSD needs help... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:27:31 -0000 Jeff Erickson disturbed my sleep to write: > I am new to FreeBSD and am having a problem. I downloaded the ISOs of > Disk 1 and 2 > of version 4.10 and go through the installation and everything seems > to be fine until I reboot. Then it says that it cannot load the kernel > or kernel.old. What am I doing wrong? Very strange -- those files should've been copied over as part of the installation. Are you able to post the exact message you get? Does your installation span more than one disk? Is this a dual-boot machine? Is there anything at all unusual about your setup? -- Saint Aardvark the Carpeted aardvark@saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com Because the plural of Anecdote is Myth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:34:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF50316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52104.mail.yahoo.com (web52104.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA7CD43D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idfubar@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040711003455.5058.qmail@web52104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.85.251.250] by web52104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:34:55 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:34:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Rishi Chopra To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: 5.2.1 Install Error (Unable To Find Device Node) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:56 -0000 I'm getting an "Unable to find device node for /dev/da0s1b in /dev" error that is causing installation to abort. The disk is a 4x200GB IDE RAID array. Any idea what the problem might be? ===== Rishi Chopra http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~rchopra __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:34:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D19C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3D243D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6B0Ymi06584; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:34:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407110034.i6B0Ymi06584@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: roop.nanuwa@gmail.com (Roop Nanuwa) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:33:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <75f3f70504071016194bad7364@mail.gmail.com> from "Roop Nanuwa" at Jul 10, 2004 04:19:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How Critical Is It To Use an ISP Running FreeBSD or BSD/OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:58 -0000 > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:09:13 -0400, Bob Perry wrote: > > Hello, > > I remember reading in The Complete FreeBSD, by Greg Lehey, that you'll > > be better off with an ISP that runs FreeBSD or BSD/OS. Can anyone > > provide a scenario(s) where this would be most apparent? > > I don't know Greg's reasoning for that statement but it does seem > rather wrong to me. Would you judge a waitress on their choice of > shoes? Of course not, you'd > judge them based on their service. Would you decide on who to hire to build you > a fence based on what kind of screwdriver they use? > > Why would you choose an ISP based on what tool they use to provide you with a > service? Well, first it reflects on their judgement. If they run on FreeBSD, I give them credit for better jedgement. Secondly, if you have problems or questions, you are more likely to get an intelligent answer if they run one of the BSDs. If they run MS, they are more likely to just say they don't support anything different when you ask. ////jerry > > See how their service has been in the past and if their service meets > your needs, that's all there really is to it. Service with what? MS only or including other systems? ////jerry > > --roop > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 00:37:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7970616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:37:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from serv01.divms.uiowa.edu (serv01.divms.uiowa.edu [128.255.44.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3683743D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason-dusek@uiowa.edu) Received: from [128.255.35.93] ([128.255.35.93]) by serv01.divms.uiowa.edu with id i6B0bLJo010040 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:37:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <40F08C2A.2060004@uiowa.edu> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:39:06 -0500 From: Jason Dusek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040706 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <40F026E2.8000000@uiowa.edu> <20040710174109.GB7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> <40F05FD7.3000404@uiowa.edu> <20040710220312.GD7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> In-Reply-To: <20040710220312.GD7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.9 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: Can't Mount USB Flash Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:37:26 -0000 Hi, I have a Dell D600, and I count mount flash devices on it. They show up in dmesg. Here I put the drive in the top one, pull it out and stick it in the bottom one, and then put it back in the top one: ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected ugen0: detached ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected ugen0: detached ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 Strangely, they show up as the same address on the same device. When I try to mount ugen0, I get a message that sayeth: Block device required. What does this mean? What do I do? - Jason Saint Aardvark the Carpeted wrote: > Jason Dusek disturbed my sleep to write: > >>In that there must be something else wrong, because after trying a few >>permutations I was unable to get the drive on my D600 to work: >> >> 1 root # mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0 /cdrom >> mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error >> >> 2 root # mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0c /cdrom >> mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0c: No such file or directory > > > Huh...you should have /dev/acd0c already. Try going to /dev and > running: > > sh ./MAKEDEV acd > sh ./MAKEDEV cd > > and try it again. If it *still* doesn't work, I would wonder if there's > a problem with this particular disk. Is it a rewritable? Do you have > a known-good CD that you can try, or another machine you can try the > problematic disk on? > > Remember, /dev/cd0c is to be used if this is a DVD you're trying to > mount. (That said, I'm going by memory here, and you *may* be able > to get away with mounting a DVD using /dev/acd0c.) > > >>Do I need to create some directories for this to work? How will my >>computer know what directories to attach the drive to? > > > The mount command (or its variants like "mount_cd9660") usually takes > two arguments: the device you want to mount, and where you want to > mount it. (I'm ignoring other, hyphenated arguments like "-o rw" > and so on.) So for: > > mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0c /cdrom > > you're saying that you want the device /dev/acd0c to be made available at > the *already-existing* directory /cdrom. (So yes, the mount point -- the > directory you want to mount the device at -- has to be present already.) > > You can leave out one or the other argument (but not both) if there's > an entry for the device in /etc/fstab. For example, you might have this > entry: > > /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > > which would mean you could get away with either > > mount /cdrom > > or > > mount /dev/acd0c > > HTH, > Hugh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 01:01:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5FB16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:01:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linares.terra.com.br (linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C39C43D2F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) Received: from potosi.terra.com.br (potosi.terra.com.br [200.154.55.131]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE711DDC311; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:47 -0300 (BRT) Received: from zumba.com (unknown [200.138.46.134]) (authenticated user paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) by potosi.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC0637004C; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:47 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300 To: "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> From: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) Subject: Re: Flashplasyer plug-in for Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:01:50 -0000 Arjan, I running now: /usr/ports/www/linux-opera /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work correctly. Thanks, Paulo. On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue > wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 >> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: >> >> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: >> > >> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer >> > make install clean >> > it's ok >> > >> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path >> > the working path is: opera; >> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ >> > it's fine >> > >> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message >> below >> > occurs: >> >> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of opera >> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would >> expect >> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P >> >> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR install >> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. > > Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's > newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash > player. > > That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on > 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. > > Arjan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. > Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 01:23:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0D216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:23:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itapoa.terra.com.br (itapoa.terra.com.br [200.154.55.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D0643D39; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) Received: from estero.terra.com.br (estero.terra.com.br [200.154.55.138]) by itapoa.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639F0DD4493; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from zumba.com (2-224.ctame701-2.telepar.net.br [200.181.170.224]) (authenticated user paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) by estero.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DCC3C034; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:30 -0300 (BRT) To: "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:38 -0300 From: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) Subject: Re: Flashplasyer plug-in for Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:23:33 -0000 Ok! Linux-Opera is just fine with flashplayer now on freebsd 5.1. make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-opera make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin recompile and install /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and make /usr/ports/linuxpluginwrapper it'll runs ok! On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. wrote: > Arjan, > > I running now: > /usr/ports/www/linux-opera > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of > linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is > active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that > use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that > use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work > correctly. > > Thanks, > Paulo. > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen > wrote: > >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue >> wrote: >>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 >>> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: >>> >>> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: >>> > >>> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer >>> > make install clean >>> > it's ok >>> > >>> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path >>> > the working path is: opera; >>> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ >>> > it's fine >>> > >>> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message >>> below >>> > occurs: >>> >>> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of >>> opera >>> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would >>> expect >>> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P >>> >>> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR install >>> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. >> >> Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's >> newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash >> player. >> >> That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on >> 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. >> >> Arjan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. >> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 >> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ >> > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 01:34:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDDA16A51A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:34:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net (goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C4243D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry4@earthlink.net) Received: from dialup-4.250.48.24.dial1.weehawken1.level3.net ([4.250.48.24]) by goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BjTEj-0000Rt-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:34:37 -0700 Message-ID: <40F099AE.1020500@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:36:46 -0400 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40F07719.9060702@earthlink.net> <20040710192028.669d1bd7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200407101659.31979.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407101659.31979.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How Critical Is It To Use an ISP Running FreeBSD or BSD/OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 01:34:42 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: >On Saturday 10 July 2004 04:20 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > > >>Bob Perry wrote: >> >> >>>Hello, >>>I remember reading in The Complete FreeBSD, by Greg Lehey, that >>>you'll be better off with an ISP that runs FreeBSD or BSD/OS. Can >>>anyone provide a scenario(s) where this would be most apparent? >>> >>> >>If you have problems and call their tech support. >> >>A number of ISPs in the past, when I've had problems and called, they >>say, "do this with Windows" and when I say I'm not using Windows they >>reply that they don't support anything but, and therefore can't help >>me. That's been in spite of the fact that I've done everything >>reasonable to determine that the problem is _NOT_ on my end, they >>simply refuse to do _any_ diagnostic work if I wasn't using Windows. >> >>The situation seems to be getting better, and nowadays, I just lie >>and say I'm using Windows and execute the equivalent commands in >>FreeBSD and explain the result. >> >> >> >>>I don't know what OS my ISP uses but I do know that they only >>>support Windows and Mac platforms. I've run OS/2 and FreeBSD using >>>their email services and never really needed technical support. >>> >>> >>As long as you never need tech support, you'll probably never have a >>problem, nor care what OS your ISP uses. After all, the Internet was >>designed to be OS-independent ... when everything is working >>correctly! >> >> >> >>>Now, I'm considering a new ISP primarily due to cost. Also, >>>considering obtaining my own domain name and exploring web hosting. >>> >>>I assume that recommending an ISP is inappropriate but if you know >>>of any forums that have discussed ISPs for FreeBSD, feel free to >>>recommend them. >>> >>> >>I don't think it's inappropriate. >> >>I don't know of any nationwide ISPs that support/use FreeBSD, but if >>you're in the Pittsburgh, PA area, city-net is FreeBSD friendly. >>Otherwise, you could give your location and if someone knows a >>FreeBSD friendly ISP in your area, I'm sure he'll let you know. >> >> > >Look at their web page with Netcraft, it will tell you what their web >server is and I think that is a good clue as to what the rest of their >setup. > >Use "What's that site running" at >http://news.netcraft.com/ > > > > Clearly service and technical support are major issues and easily compromised if parties involved are speaking a different language. I will spend the time to locate an ISP that is capable of supporting FreeBSD. I did come across the FreeBSD ISP list earlier in my research but thought it was dedicated solely to those running ISPs. Will give it a second look. As previously mentioned, I intend to look for an ISP that is FreeBSD-friendly. I live in northern New Jersey in a small town adjacent to Boonton. Boonton always appears at the top of the list of ISP access numbers. Must be a major hub of sorts. BTW, I already had a bookmark on the netcraft website. Thanks everyone for your valued input. Bob Perry -- I've learned that whatever hits the fan will not be evenly distributed. FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p2 #0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 02:55:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:55:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from probsd.org (rrcs-midsouth-24-199-182-230.biz.rr.com [24.199.182.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F17943D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dana@coastal-law.org) Received: from probsd.org (probsd.org [192.168.1.4]) by probsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD4946570 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.1.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dgolden); by probsd.org with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2785.192.168.1.1.1089514540.squirrel@192.168.1.1> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:55:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "D Golden" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: excluding from tar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:55:41 -0000 I've created a tar archive of my entire system, but I want to exclude everything in /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE /usr/backup.tar when updating the archive. I've tried: 1. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc --exclude=/usr/ports --exclude=/usr/backup.tar 2. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc/* --exclude=/usr/ports/* --exclude=/usr/backup.tar 3. cd / && tar -vu -X /root/nodump --file /usr/backup.tar * and in /root/nodump I have 3 lines: /proc # Also tried /proc/* /usr/ports # Also tried /usr/ports/* /usr/backup.tar However, in all three examples, /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE get updated. What am I missing? Dana From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 03:00:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:00:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0D743D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from racerx.makeworld.com (racerx@racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) by makeworld.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6B30UEx054136 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:00:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) From: Chris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:00:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <2785.192.168.1.1.1089514540.squirrel@192.168.1.1> In-Reply-To: <2785.192.168.1.1.1089514540.squirrel@192.168.1.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407102200.30326.racerx@makeworld.com> X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com Subject: Re: excluding from tar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:00:35 -0000 On Saturday 10 July 2004 09:55 pm, D Golden wrote: > I've created a tar archive of my entire system, but I want to exclude > everything in /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE /usr/backup.tar when > updating the archive. I've tried: > > 1. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc > --exclude=/usr/ports --exclude=/usr/backup.tar > > 2. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc/* > --exclude=/usr/ports/* --exclude=/usr/backup.tar > > 3. cd / && tar -vu -X /root/nodump --file /usr/backup.tar * > > and in /root/nodump I have 3 lines: > > /proc # Also tried /proc/* > /usr/ports # Also tried /usr/ports/* > /usr/backup.tar > > However, in all three examples, /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE get > updated. > > What am I missing? > > Dana Here is what I use - hack to suit: tar -zcf racerx@${ver}`date +%m%d%y`.tgz --exclude-from /usr/home/backups/exclude.txt racerx/ Have all the excludes in the file /exclude.txt racerx# more exclude.txt /usr/home/backups/* /usr/home/racerx/Desktop/MP3/* /usr/home/racerx/downloads/* /usr/home/racerx/dcc/* > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Sat Jul 10 2004 at 03:02:53 daily.cvd is up to date (version: 400, sigs: 778, f-level: 2, builder: tkojm) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 03:08:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E83516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:08:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997EF43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:08:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([24.43.93.57]) by web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP <20040711030750.JGEN504061.web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@[192.168.2.100]>; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:07:50 -0400 From: Mike Jeays To: D Golden In-Reply-To: <2785.192.168.1.1.1089514540.squirrel@192.168.1.1> References: <2785.192.168.1.1.1089514540.squirrel@192.168.1.1> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1089515332.40098.4.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 10 Jul 2004 23:08:52 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at web02-imail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.43.93.57] using ID at Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:07:49 -0400 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: excluding from tar X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:08:54 -0000 On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 22:55, D Golden wrote: > I've created a tar archive of my entire system, but I want to exclude > everything in /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE /usr/backup.tar when > updating the archive. I've tried: > > 1. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc > --exclude=/usr/ports --exclude=/usr/backup.tar > > 2. cd / && tar -vu --file /usr/backup.tar * --exclude=/proc/* > --exclude=/usr/ports/* --exclude=/usr/backup.tar > > 3. cd / && tar -vu -X /root/nodump --file /usr/backup.tar * > > and in /root/nodump I have 3 lines: > > /proc # Also tried /proc/* > /usr/ports # Also tried /usr/ports/* > /usr/backup.tar > > However, in all three examples, /proc , /usr/ports, and the FILE get updated. > > What am I missing? > > Dana > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Tar removes the leading "/" from file names before doing the comparison, so you have to leave them out in the --exclude strings. Try usr/ports/*, for example, instead of /usr/ports/*. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 03:21:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D42F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69B743D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@pursued-with.net) Received: from [10.0.0.42] (babelfish.pursued-with.net [10.0.0.42]) by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9231D158B for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <200407110034.i6B0Ymi06584@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <200407110034.i6B0Ymi06584@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevin Stevens Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:23:54 -0700 To: FreeBSD-Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Re: How Critical Is It To Use an ISP Running FreeBSD or BSD/OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:21:37 -0000 On Jul 10, 2004, at 17:33, Jerry McAllister wrote: >> >> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:09:13 -0400, Bob Perry >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I remember reading in The Complete FreeBSD, by Greg Lehey, that >>> you'll >>> be better off with an ISP that runs FreeBSD or BSD/OS. Can anyone >>> provide a scenario(s) where this would be most apparent? >> >> I don't know Greg's reasoning for that statement but it does seem >> rather wrong to me. Would you judge a waitress on their choice of >> shoes? Of course not, you'd >> judge them based on their service. Would you decide on who to hire to >> build you >> a fence based on what kind of screwdriver they use? >> >> Why would you choose an ISP based on what tool they use to provide >> you with a >> service? > > Well, first it reflects on their judgement. If they run on FreeBSD, I > give them credit for better jedgement. Secondly, if you have problems > or questions, you are more likely to get an intelligent answer if they > run one of the BSDs. If they run MS, they are more likely to just say > they don't support anything different when you ask. In an ISP of any size, the CS reps will be almost totally divorced from the infrastructure team. What OS' they support for customers has very little to do with what they run on the backside. KeS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 04:08:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEF116A4CF for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:08:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from serv01.divms.uiowa.edu (serv01.divms.uiowa.edu [128.255.44.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3381943D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:08:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason-dusek@uiowa.edu) Received: from [128.255.35.93] ([128.255.35.93]) by serv01.divms.uiowa.edu with id i6B48aRx027371 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:08:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <40F0BDAD.2090507@uiowa.edu> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:10:21 -0500 From: Jason Dusek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040706 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.9 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Subject: reinstall world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:08:41 -0000 Hi, I gave my entire laptop's hard drive to FreeBSD, but I am beginning to have second thoughts - a lot of my devices don't work. I think I might try dual booting FreeBSD and, say, Gentoo. So this will probably work, because I'm only using a small portion of the disk at present: 17 root # df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 247 123 104 54% / devfs 0 0 0 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1g 8931 0 8216 0% /home /dev/ad0s1e 989 0 910 0% /tmp /dev/ad0s1f 24790 3621 19186 16% /usr /dev/ad0s1d 989 37 872 4% /var What is a good way to make space on my disk? If I just repartition /usr and /home, I'll probably screw them up. So if I tar up each of the partitions, and maybe etc and some other junk as well, and then: 1. Reformat and reinstall. Put on Gentoo and BSD. 2. Go into the BSD slice and nuke everything, then unpack my tarballs. do I have a good chance of everything working right? - Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 05:22:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C277516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:22:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nekulturny.org (S0106004001438e5b.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.47.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491F443D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@nekulturny.org) Received: from nekulturny.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nekulturny.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6B5MTj5021853; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:22:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from flowers@nekulturny.org) Received: (from flowers@localhost) by nekulturny.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6B5MSl0021852; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:22:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from flowers) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:22:28 -0600 From: Danny MacMillan To: Kristian Holdich Message-ID: <20040711052228.GA587@procyon.nekulturny.org> References: <40F00DDD.7772.12F6CBB@localhost> <1089468142.26300.46.camel@slide.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1089468142.26300.46.camel@slide.hopto.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Kjell Midtseter cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbieish Desktop Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:22:31 -0000 On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 08:02:22AM -0600, Kristian Holdich wrote: > > ... > > There's one glaring problem with that, if for some reason you need to go > into single user mode under FreeBSD's default slicing scheme root wont > have a shell as /usr isn't mounted. It's always good practice to keep > the shell root uses in /sbin or /bin. > > ... If your concern is that you won't be able to log in to single-user mode, consider that you will be prompted for a shell in any case (at least I am). If your concern is that you would like to have bash available in single user mode as well, make sure it is statically linked. If you will be installing from ports, the following should work (if I'm reading the Makefile correctly): cd /usr/ports/shells/bash2 make -DWANT_STATIC_BASH install clean -- Danny MacMillan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 05:30:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C5016A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:30:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.hknet.com (smtp4.hknet.com [202.67.240.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A123943D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kinux@hknet.com) Received: from winxp (vp202100.kln.uac68.hknet.com [203.169.202.100]) by smtp4.hknet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 22BFE37EBC for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:18 +0800 (HKT) Message-ID: <01c901c46708$2998b710$4c22fea9@winxp> From: "kinux" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:22 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: upgrade failure.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:30:20 -0000 Hi, i have install freebsd 4.9 on a old AMD box, i have been cvsup download = the source code, then upgrade it to 4.10 stable but failure at=20 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dtest i give following error cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs = -Wstrict-prototypes -W missing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual = -fformat-extensions -an si -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include = -I/usr/src/sys/co ntrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include = opt_global. h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 = /usr/src/sys/isofs/cd9660/cd9660_node.c cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/people. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Then i comment out CD9660 two line in kernel as no CD_ROM on my box. make clean =3D=3D> recompile But error come again. =3D=3D=3D> md cc -O -pipe -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/people/opt_global.h -D_KERNEL = -Wall - Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes = -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpo inter-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE = -nostdi nc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -Wall = -Wredundant-d ecls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes = -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -c = /usr/src/sys/modules/md/../.. /dev/md/md.c cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/md. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/people. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D i Comment out the two line in kernel with MD make clean =3D=3D> recompile and the next error.. =3D=3D=3D> accf_http cc -O -pipe -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/people/opt_global.h -D_KERNEL = -Wall - Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes = -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpo inter-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE = -nostdi nc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -Wall = -Wredundant-d ecls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes = -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -c = /usr/src/sys/modules/accf_htt p/../../netinet/accf_http.c cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/accf_http. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/people. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This time i have no idea on this error, it seems the compiler problem OR = hardware problem, not sure... %dmesg | grep CPU CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (350.80-MHz 586-class CPU) in my kernel machine i386 #cpu I386_CPU #cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU #cpu I686_CPU ident test maxusers 64 =20 What will be the problem?? Does it need to edit something in = /etc/make.conf for AMD CPU or setting something on gcc?? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 05:33:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:33:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drifthost.com (drifthost.com [66.90.65.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741BB43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:33:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from Steve (dsl-203-142-133-217.syd.directcorp.net.au [203.142.133.217]) by drifthost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCBDFE9A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:30:43 +1000 (EST) From: "Steven Adams" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:33:43 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRnCKDUAZLYbkA2RQCzQ4PptpUUZQ== Message-Id: <20040711053043.6DCBDFE9A@drifthost.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: HDD Sizes reported wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:33:50 -0000 Hey, I have a LSI MegaRaid Raid card with 5x 36gig raid 5 scsi drives.. This gives me 144gig of useable space. 133 GIG if u do the 1024 bytes calucation. So really its 133gig of useable space all up. Now my /home is getting reported at 108gig(which is right) But for some reason its saying 97gig free and 2.4 gig used.. Im confussed where the other 8.5gig or so is gone?? First I thought it counted the bytes in 1000 not 1024.. But even saying that I should have more space then I have.. /dev/amrd0s1a 2.9G 50M 2.6G 2% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/amrd0s1h 108G 2.4G 97G 2% /home /dev/amrd0s1g 871M 34K 801M 0% /tmp /dev/amrd0s1d 4.4G 1.2G 2.8G 31% /usr /dev/amrd0s1e 1.9G 27M 1.8G 1% /var /dev/amrd0s1f 13G 2.1M 12G 0% /var/log Thanks Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 05:49:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFE616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:49:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C20043D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6B5nCIm055398; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:49:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:49:12 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Steven Adams Message-ID: <20040711054912.GB95931@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040711053043.6DCBDFE9A@drifthost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040711053043.6DCBDFE9A@drifthost.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HDD Sizes reported wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:49:15 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 11), Steven Adams said: > I have a LSI MegaRaid Raid card with 5x 36gig raid 5 scsi drives.. > > Now my /home is getting reported at 108gig(which is right) But for > some reason its saying 97gig free and 2.4 gig used.. > > Im confussed where the other 8.5gig or so is gone?? > > /dev/amrd0s1h 108G 2.4G 97G 2% /home First, I recommend not using the -h option when trying to total things up. You lose lots of precision. Second, the df values don't total up because 8% is reserved on ffs filesystems so the disk allocation algorithms stay efficient. You can lower it with tunefs but as the disk gets closer to 100%, performance rapidly degrades and files will get fragmented. Root can use that 8% which gives you the added benefit that if a user fills up a drive it doesn't keep root processes from working. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DISK-MORE-THAN-FULL -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 06:24:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620CD16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:24:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drifthost.com (drifthost.com [66.90.65.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BB543D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from Steve (dsl-203-142-133-217.syd.directcorp.net.au [203.142.133.217]) by drifthost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605DBFE9A; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:21:43 +1000 (EST) From: "Steven Adams" To: "'Dan Nelson'" Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:24:48 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040711054912.GB95931@dan.emsphone.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRnCl692QCykRqATsuFGEJ9a/bnDgABUiqQ Message-Id: <20040711062143.605DBFE9A@drifthost.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HDD Sizes reported wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:24:48 -0000 Thanks Dan I was looking through the handbook and just found it as I got the email :).. Think ill leave it as 8% as speed is important to this server. /Steve -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] Sent: Sunday, 11 July 2004 3:49 PM To: Steven Adams Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HDD Sizes reported wrong? In the last episode (Jul 11), Steven Adams said: > I have a LSI MegaRaid Raid card with 5x 36gig raid 5 scsi drives.. > > Now my /home is getting reported at 108gig(which is right) But for > some reason its saying 97gig free and 2.4 gig used.. > > Im confussed where the other 8.5gig or so is gone?? > > /dev/amrd0s1h 108G 2.4G 97G 2% /home First, I recommend not using the -h option when trying to total things up. You lose lots of precision. Second, the df values don't total up because 8% is reserved on ffs filesystems so the disk allocation algorithms stay efficient. You can lower it with tunefs but as the disk gets closer to 100%, performance rapidly degrades and files will get fragmented. Root can use that 8% which gives you the added benefit that if a user fills up a drive it doesn't keep root processes from working. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DISK-MORE-TH AN-FULL -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 07:10:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B4F16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9227543D2F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AF3AE096; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51654-06; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50694AE08E; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040711071007.50694AE08E@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-06-20 - 2004-07-10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:10:15 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 23-Jun : USENIX'04 ATC I'll be there! http://freebsddiary.org/usenix-atc-2004.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 07:25:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCB216A4D1 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:25:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drifthost.com (drifthost.com [66.90.65.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1011D43D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from Steve (dsl-203-142-133-217.syd.directcorp.net.au [203.142.133.217]) by drifthost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27566FE9A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:22:38 +1000 (EST) From: "Steven Adams" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:25:40 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRnGETiYUYTFgipTrG27jyt5bDdCg== Message-Id: <20040711072238.27566FE9A@drifthost.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:25:43 -0000 Hey, Reading from the FreeBSD Handbook I have compiled a new kernel that works fine. In my config file I commented out a few things I don't need eg USB etc. But for some reason when it booted back up into the new kernel, from ps aux it shows usb is up and running.. /boot/kernel shows that usb.ko is there. I don't understand why its included which I commented it out Am I doing something wrong? Thanks Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 08:01:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FC216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:01:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BEC43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:01:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3AF80F8; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:01:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92576-04; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:01:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F4680EB; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:01:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40F0F3B8.3060009@wcborstel.nl> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:00:56 +0200 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Stevens References: <200407110034.i6B0Ymi06584@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How Critical Is It To Use an ISP Running FreeBSD or BSD/OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:01:06 -0000 Kevin Stevens wrote: > > [snip] > In an ISP of any size, the CS reps will be almost totally divorced > from the infrastructure team. What OS' they support for customers has > very little to do with what they run on the backside. > > KeS True there. They only support Bill's software and a Mac just because it are the two most used OS'. (You can't say that from Linux because every distribution is different and has different paths and such) For example, here in the Netherlands we have several ISPs where the service desk employees simply have a list in fromt of them with questions, but know nothing about computers at all. You can't expect of them to figure out how to get your connection up and running with all those Linux distributions, or BSD projects. Would be rather a PITA if one has an HP-UX, AIX or ALPHA machine serving as an internet gateway, don't you think? Anyway, my ISP (Demon, for the Dutch folks on the list) is running FreeBSD (at least, their webservers. Not really sure about the rest), and they don't give support on FreeBSD either. They only support Windows and Mac as well. Which makes sense to me though. They have skilled folks on their service desk, but still you can't expect of them to know various of *NIX flavors. So it got a little bit long, but at least you have my two cents. Cheers, Jorn > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > . > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 09:51:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C2D16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:51:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D66443D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjholdich@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([82.35.58.248]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:51:39 +0100 From: Kristian Holdich To: Danny MacMillan In-Reply-To: <20040711052228.GA587@procyon.nekulturny.org> References: <40F00DDD.7772.12F6CBB@localhost> <1089468142.26300.46.camel@slide.hopto.org> <20040711052228.GA587@procyon.nekulturny.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1089539442.49338.3.camel@slide.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:50:42 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2004 09:51:40.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA4A6240:01C4672C] cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Newbieish Desktop Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:51:25 -0000 On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 06:22, Danny MacMillan wrote: > If your concern is that you won't be able to log in to single-user mode, > consider that you will be prompted for a shell in any case (at least I > am). If your concern is that you would like to have bash available in > single user mode as well, make sure it is statically linked. If you will > be installing from ports, the following should work (if I'm reading the > Makefile correctly): > > cd /usr/ports/shells/bash2 > make -DWANT_STATIC_BASH install clean That makes sense, will double check it next time I do a reboot. I don't care about having bash in single user mode, just prefer it in day to day use. It's been a while since I've used *BSD but seem to remember some other Unixes were less forgiving... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 10:44:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:44:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356DC43D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (52.80-202-129.nextgentel.com [80.202.129.52]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CF96862; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:45:15 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <40F198BE.1070704@broadpark.no> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:45:02 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: nb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanley Wright References: <20040711024443.1530.qmail@web14311.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040711024443.1530.qmail@web14311.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:44:46 -0000 Stanley Wright wrote: > Hello Henrik, > > Thanks. > > The mouse now works. I needed to choose the "Microsoft" protocol and > choose /dev/cuaa0 and disable the mouse daemon in the console. > > Now that I've fixed the mouse the only other problem is the internet. > My external modem connects fine but when connected I cant load any web > pages. It says error loading xyz.com (example) and even if i try > accessing an Ip address i get the same error. Any ideas? > > If u ever visit the Caribbean remember that I owe u a favour. > > Stan. You're very welcome. What is the output of ifconfig, and what does your ppp.conf look like? Been a while since I used dialup ( ;-) ), but the way I remember it that whole setup leaves plenty of room for misconfiguration. -Henrik W Lund From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 10:49:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE3D16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:49:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5344443D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6BAmLH5008672; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:48:21 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:49:06 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040711072238.27566FE9A@drifthost.com> In-Reply-To: <20040711072238.27566FE9A@drifthost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407110349.06999.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Steven Adams Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:49:09 -0000 On Sunday 11 July 2004 12:25 am, Steven Adams wrote: > Hey, > > > > Reading from the FreeBSD Handbook I have compiled a new kernel that > works fine. > > > > In my config file I commented out a few things I don't need eg USB > etc. > > > > But for some reason when it booted back up into the new kernel, from > ps aux it shows usb is up and running.. > > > > /boot/kernel shows that usb.ko is there. > > > > I don't understand why its included which I commented it out > > > > Am I doing something wrong? > > Did you do a "make kernel" to build and install the new kernel? Kent > > Thanks > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 11:14:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBA416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:14:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDFB543D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:14:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 72so132217rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.72 with SMTP id t72mr12017rne; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:14:10 +0200 From: Arjan Van Leeuwen To: Steven Adams In-Reply-To: <20040711072238.27566FE9A@drifthost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040711072238.27566FE9A@drifthost.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:14:11 -0000 Hi Steve, On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:25:40 +1000, Steven Adams wrote: > Hey, > > Reading from the FreeBSD Handbook I have compiled a new kernel that works > fine. > > In my config file I commented out a few things I don't need eg USB etc. > > But for some reason when it booted back up into the new kernel, from ps aux > it shows usb is up and running.. You mean that the program usbd is running. This is a userland program that detects new USB devices and starts some predefined sequence of commands when a certain device enters the system. You can turn it off by adding usbd_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf. > > /boot/kernel shows that usb.ko is there. > > I don't understand why its included which I commented it out There's a difference between 'compiling something into the kernel' and using a kernel module. usb.ko is a kernel loadable module - a module that you can load with kldload if you need it. It's not compiled into the kernel. When you had 'device usb' in your kernel, usb would be compiled into the kernel and you'd never need to load the kernel loadable module for it. Now, you've removed usb from your kernel configuration file, so usb support is not in your kernel. Should you need it later, you can always load the module. If the module is not loaded, it doesn't take up any resources (except for the hard drive space it uses), so it shouldn't bother you. If you really don't want to compile any modules at all when building your kernel (for example, to save time when building a kernel), add NO_MODULES=true to /etc/make.conf. Arjan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 11:17:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645416A4CF for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACEE443D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 72so132320rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.32 with SMTP id t32mr268905rne; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:17:29 +0200 From: Arjan Van Leeuwen To: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> cc: "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Flashplasyer plug-in for Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:17:31 -0000 Hi Paolo, You don't need the linuxpluginwrapper if you're using linux-opera, only if you're using FreeBSD Opera. In that last case, it will only work on FreeBSD 4.x, that's why you received a message that flash support was unavailable. linux-opera should work with linux-flashplugin{6,7} out of the box. Arjan On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:38 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. wrote: > Ok! >=20 > Linux-Opera is just fine with flashplayer now on freebsd 5.1. >=20 > make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-opera > make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin > recompile and install /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and > make /usr/ports/linuxpluginwrapper >=20 > it'll runs ok! >=20 > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. >=20 >=20 > wrote: >=20 > > Arjan, > > > > I running now: > > /usr/ports/www/linux-opera > > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin > > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > > > I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of > > linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is > > active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that > > use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that > > use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work > > correctly. > > > > Thanks, > > Paulo. > > > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue > >> wrote: > >>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 > >>> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: > >>> > >>> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: > >>> > > >>> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer > >>> > make install clean > >>> > it's ok > >>> > > >>> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path > >>> > the working path is: opera; > >>> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ > >>> > it's fine > >>> > > >>> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message > >>> below > >>> > occurs: > >>> > >>> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of > >>> opera > >>> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would > >>> expect > >>> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P > >>> > >>> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR insta= ll > >>> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. > >> > >> Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's > >> newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash > >> player. > >> > >> That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on > >> 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. > >> > >> Arjan > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. > >> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Vers=E3o: 1.5.2 > >> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ > >> > > > > > > >=20 > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 12:09:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:09:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drifthost.com (drifthost.com [66.90.65.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C2343D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from Steve (dsl-203-142-133-217.syd.directcorp.net.au [203.142.133.217]) by drifthost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18D6FE9A; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:06:49 +1000 (EST) From: "Steven Adams" To: "'Arjan Van Leeuwen'" Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:09:54 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRnN9Ipdp9/h7qLSaOaDOYb17p5vwAB6TCw Message-Id: <20040711120649.A18D6FE9A@drifthost.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:09:55 -0000 Hi, Ive already disabled usbd_enable=no in /etc/rc.conf But still I get theses root 399 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? DL Sat04PM 0:00.03 (usb0) root 400 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? DL Sat04PM 0:00.00 (usbtask) And yes I ran make install, I know it worked because I also compiled in quota support which is now working and wasn't previously. I am a 5year slackware linux user just moved over to FreeBSD so im used to the linux kernel, that's why its confused me a little. FreeBSD is looking great tho.. :) But yeh wondering how I get rid of them 2 processes. Thanks Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Arjan Van Leeuwen Sent: Sunday, 11 July 2004 9:14 PM To: Steven Adams Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules Hi Steve, On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:25:40 +1000, Steven Adams wrote: > Hey, > > Reading from the FreeBSD Handbook I have compiled a new kernel that works > fine. > > In my config file I commented out a few things I don't need eg USB etc. > > But for some reason when it booted back up into the new kernel, from ps aux > it shows usb is up and running.. You mean that the program usbd is running. This is a userland program that detects new USB devices and starts some predefined sequence of commands when a certain device enters the system. You can turn it off by adding usbd_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf. > > /boot/kernel shows that usb.ko is there. > > I don't understand why its included which I commented it out There's a difference between 'compiling something into the kernel' and using a kernel module. usb.ko is a kernel loadable module - a module that you can load with kldload if you need it. It's not compiled into the kernel. When you had 'device usb' in your kernel, usb would be compiled into the kernel and you'd never need to load the kernel loadable module for it. Now, you've removed usb from your kernel configuration file, so usb support is not in your kernel. Should you need it later, you can always load the module. If the module is not loaded, it doesn't take up any resources (except for the hard drive space it uses), so it shouldn't bother you. If you really don't want to compile any modules at all when building your kernel (for example, to save time when building a kernel), add NO_MODULES=true to /etc/make.conf. Arjan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 06:35:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A9116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51803.mail.yahoo.com (web51803.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACE5C43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:35:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) Message-ID: <20040711063515.43248.qmail@web51803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.168.166.82] by web51803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:35:15 CST Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:35:15 +0800 (CST) From: =?big5?q?Patrick=20Dung?= To: Lowell Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:38:49 +0000 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 06:35:17 -0000 My last mail is waiting for the mailing list approval. But it was already some days, so I sent it again. --- Patrick Dung ¤º®e¡G> --- Lowell Gilbert > ¤º®e¡G> > Patrick Dung writes: > > > > > Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time > > > But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create > > > /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). > > > Running devfs at boot time cannot set the > > /dev/bpf1, > > > which is not present. > > > > Running devfs(8) at boot time will set rules that > > will be > > automatically applied to bpf1 when it is created. > > What do your devfs > > rules look like? > > > > own bpf* root:wheel > perm bpf* 0660 > > _________________________________________________________ ¥²±þ§Þ¡B¶¼ºq¡B¤p¬P¬P... ®öº©¹aÁn ±¡¤ß³sô http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 12:44:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:44:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-09.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F10B43D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gaspar.kiraly@iprimus.com) Received: from 03-127.147.popsite.net ([64.24.178.127] helo=win98) by smtp-09.primus.ca with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Bjdlx-0007qf-0A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:49:38 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01c46745$cbd736e0$0201a8c0@my.domain> From: "Gaspar Kiraly" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:51:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Firewall rules for local lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:44:32 -0000 Hello, I have a quick question for you: I am in the process of setting up ipfw for my server and a small LAN of = two pcs. The FreeBSD server is used as an internet gateway with a dial up = connection (ppp -auto -alias demand). My network connection is working fine, however I am getting more and = more junk mail lately. It looks like some sites are sniffing out my e-mail address, my pc = configs, etc. Hence, I'd like to setup a firewall. I found many good examples, however they deal with a one pc (FreeBSD) = one network card setup. For ex: do I need to add "divert" and "bridge" to the Kernel config = file? How do I set up different rules for for each nic? I'd like to be able to access the FreeBSD server from my local LAN w/o = any restrictions but I do not want the internet sites to do the same = with my server and LAN. Would you have an example setup for this = scenario? The FreeBSD server is also setup to provide address resolution = for the internet. I'd appreciate any help. Gaspar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 13:30:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2294516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA1B43D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from [192.168.254.3] (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4790F4AD85; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40F141F2.1060500@cordula.ws> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:34:42 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040710) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gaspar Kiraly References: <000a01c46745$cbd736e0$0201a8c0@my.domain> In-Reply-To: <000a01c46745$cbd736e0$0201a8c0@my.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewall rules for local lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:58 -0000 Gaspar Kiraly wrote: >I am in the process of setting up ipfw for my server and a small LAN of two pcs. >The FreeBSD server is used as an internet gateway with a dial up connection (ppp -auto -alias demand). >My network connection is working fine, however I am getting more and more junk mail lately. >It looks like some sites are sniffing out my e-mail address, my pc configs, etc. >Hence, I'd like to setup a firewall. >I found many good examples, however they deal with a one pc (FreeBSD) one network card setup. >For ex: do I need to add "divert" and "bridge" to the Kernel config file? How do I set up different rules for for each nic? >I'd like to be able to access the FreeBSD server from my local LAN w/o any restrictions but I do not want the internet sites to do the same with my server and LAN. Would you have an example setup for this scenario? The FreeBSD server is also setup to provide address resolution for the internet. > > You don't need divert or bridge, because ppp(1) has built-in packed filtering. Have a look at ppp(1) man page, esp. the section "packet filtering." Don't forget to enable ppp NAT and to set up your box as a gateway in /etc/rc.conf: hostname="your.hostname.tld" gateway_enable="YES" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_profile="your-isp-profile" ppp_user="root" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="YES" named_enable="YES" named_flags="-u bind -g bind" Don't forget to add your filter rules in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf. >I'd appreciate any help. > >Gaspar > > -cpghost. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 13:46:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BB916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C55F43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from brillig.panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B0A4872A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:46:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01011587pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.181.2]) by brillig.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921DF2AA10 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:46:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bjeef-0002Np-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:46:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:46:09 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20040711134609.GA9126@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 09:42:41 up 43 days, 10:31, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: /usr/share/dict/words X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:46:12 -0000 I'm building a couple of new machines this weekend. Normally I do "install minimum possible", then cvsup and do a make buildworld / make installworld sequence. This time as I was building various ports, I was told that /usr/share/dict/words needed to be installed. This has always been installed by the make installworld before. Has something changed about this? (STABLE). -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 13:49:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C14A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:49:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3CE43D53 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:49:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6BDng7X082953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:49:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6BDngHU082952; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:49:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:49:42 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Steven Adams Message-ID: <20040711134942.GA82763@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Steven Adams , 'Arjan Van Leeuwen' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040711120649.A18D6FE9A@drifthost.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040711120649.A18D6FE9A@drifthost.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:49:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: 'Arjan Van Leeuwen' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Recompile, Does not exclude modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:49:52 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:09:54PM +1000, Steven Adams wrote: > Ive already disabled usbd_enable=3Dno in /etc/rc.conf >=20 > But still I get theses >=20 > root 399 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? DL Sat04PM 0:00.03 (usb0) > root 400 0.0 0.0 0 12 ?? DL Sat04PM 0:00.00 (usbtask) >=20 > And yes I ran make install, I know it worked because I also compiled in > quota support which is now working and wasn't previously. >=20 > I am a 5year slackware linux user just moved over to FreeBSD so im used to > the linux kernel, that's why its confused me a little. FreeBSD is looking > great tho.. :) >=20 > But yeh wondering how I get rid of them 2 processes. Those are not ordinary processes. Rather they are kernel threads (or some such description) -- along the same lines as the vmdaemon, swapper or syncer threads. In order to get rid of them, you'ld have to compile a custom kernel with all of the usb support ripped out *and* you'ld have to take steps to prevent the kernel autoloading a usb.ko kernel module on boot up. If you have inadvertently loaded a usb kld module -- use kldstat(8) to see if that is the case -- then you should be able to unload it with kldunload(8), so long as it's not actually busy doing stuff. On the whole though, I wouldn't bother too much about those usb kernel thread things. They're generally harmless and they don't have any impact on the rest of the system if there are no USB peripherals in use. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8UV2iD657aJF7eIRAtDvAKCWZBrli/L6+e1/u0KWu/yrnq2eaACfX+ZG 9XiJfbSGqF5tANadRK+552E= =GcbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 14:00:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D32816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBF243D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6BE030w083067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:00:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6BE03t3083066 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:00:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:00:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20040711140003.GB82763@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Free BSD Questions list References: <20040711134609.GA9126@teddy.fas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040711134609.GA9126@teddy.fas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:00:03 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: /usr/share/dict/words X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:00:08 -0000 --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 09:46:09AM -0400, stan wrote: > I'm building a couple of new machines this weekend. >=20 > Normally I do "install minimum possible", then cvsup and do a make > buildworld / make installworld sequence. >=20 > This time as I was building various ports, I was told that > /usr/share/dict/words needed to be installed. >=20 > This has always been installed by the make installworld before. Has > something changed about this? (STABLE). No. /usr/share/dict/words should be a sym-link to web2 in that directory. That's just copied from /usr/src/share/dict/web2 during the installworld process. % ls -l /usr/share/dict=20 total 3462 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1545 Nov 22 2002 README -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 620 Nov 22 2002 eign -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1190 May 9 2003 freebsd -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8640 Nov 22 2002 propernames -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2493082 May 16 2003 web2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1012730 Nov 22 2002 web2a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jul 5 17:05 words@ -> web2 Looks like something went wrong during your cvsup / buildworld / installworld process. (Which I hope is rather more than that basic outline -- you should build and install a kernel as well and generally follow the instructions in /usr/src/UPDATING and the Handbook) Suggest you check that you haven't run out of disk space anywhere, that you delete everything under /usr/obj (you will need to use chflags(1) on some of the contents to remove the immutable bits), re-cvsup and try again. Check the compilation output for errors as you go. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8UfjiD657aJF7eIRAvoSAJ9Zq+6EnJ4oEsKcjTYuNq2tp7nxbgCaApkz yeS2EoAROlrMpSxGbW8pCCM= =iMty -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 14:34:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B3C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:34:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2048C43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:16510 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BjfOz-000Mmz-QH; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:34:01 +0000 Message-ID: <40F14FD9.4090005@zonnet.nl> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:34:01 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040628 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Crist References: <000101c465af$10817be0$6501a8c0@Nomad> In-Reply-To: <000101c465af$10817be0$6501a8c0@Nomad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rack-Mount Server cases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:34:03 -0000 Hi Eric, > What do you prefer for a 2U rack mount server case? I want to keep the > cost down, but I want something that looks nice and is functional. As much as I wonder how "something that looks nice" could be added to the wishlist for a rackmount server, here's my two cents. I've been using Chieftec's 1U cases for a while now. I'm sure there are better cases around, but, in comparison to one el cheapo Mapower I laid my hands on last year, they're rugged and offer great (exceptional?) value for money. I'd buy a Chieftec 2U without blinking. Also, due to pretty low costs, you could have a spare around. > Also, a good UPS rack mount? Sorry, can't help you there, other than that I've heard one UPS professional mutter that APC's offerings are 'pieces of sh*t'. HTH and good luck... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 14:35:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE9D16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:35:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.adelphia.net (mta2.adelphia.net [68.168.78.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326043D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:35:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040711143017.SCLU14365.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:30:17 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "Gaspar Kiraly" , Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:30:18 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <000a01c46745$cbd736e0$0201a8c0@my.domain> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Firewall rules for local lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:35:38 -0000 Here is a rewrite of the FreeBSD handbook firewall section with examples that will answer all your questions. www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gaspar Kiraly Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 8:52 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Firewall rules for local lan Hello, I have a quick question for you: I am in the process of setting up ipfw for my server and a small LAN of two pcs. The FreeBSD server is used as an internet gateway with a dial up connection (ppp -auto -alias demand). My network connection is working fine, however I am getting more and more junk mail lately. It looks like some sites are sniffing out my e-mail address, my pc configs, etc. Hence, I'd like to setup a firewall. I found many good examples, however they deal with a one pc (FreeBSD) one network card setup. For ex: do I need to add "divert" and "bridge" to the Kernel config file? How do I set up different rules for for each nic? I'd like to be able to access the FreeBSD server from my local LAN w/o any restrictions but I do not want the internet sites to do the same with my server and LAN. Would you have an example setup for this scenario? The FreeBSD server is also setup to provide address resolution for the internet. I'd appreciate any help. Gaspar _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:04:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C56E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:04:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freeode.co.uk (freeode.co.uk [213.162.123.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E743D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:04:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spam-trap@freeode.co.uk) Received: from lexx (lexx.freeode.co.uk [10.253.253.2]) by mail.freeode.co.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6BF4AN5058913; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:04:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from spam-trap@freeode.co.uk) From: John Murphy To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:04:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20040708225422.18fe2b55@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040708225422.18fe2b55@localhost> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Connecting a USB Zip drive -- whatever am I doing wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sub01@freeode.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:04:16 -0000 epilogue wrote: >### uname -a >FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p1 i386 > >### relevant lines from kernel >device vpo >device scbus >device da >device umass >device uhci # uhci related entries show up in dmesg >device usb >device ugen Do you have 'device pass'? Just a guess, sorry if it doesn't help. -- John. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:10:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DC116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net (lakermmtao09.cox.net [68.230.240.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A394843D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james.coulter@cox.net) Received: from sabrina ([68.1.41.123]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040711151042.VTQZ12076.lakermmtao09.cox.net@sabrina> for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:10:42 -0400 From: "James A. Coulter" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:10:41 -0500 Message-ID: <002e01c46759$3b9b72d0$5700a8c0@sabrina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: NEWBIE: Logging into Cox Cable service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:45 -0000 I am running FreeBSD 4.10 and am trying to connect to my Cox ISP via a = an Ethernet nic and cable modem. I have DHCP for the nic enabled in /etc/rc.conf and can obtain an IP = address from my Windows 98 gateway, but when I connect the nic to the cable = modem and reboot I do not get a response from the cox DHCP server. The nic shows active in ifconfig, but no IP is assigned to it. I suspect the Cox DHCP server is expecting a username and password from dhclient.conf I googled and the closest answer I found was a short article in the = FreeBSD Diary published in 2000 that gave this as an example dhclient.conf: interface "de0" { send host-name "cr123456-a"; request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name-servers, domain-name, time-servers; require domain-name-servers; } I tried substituting my own interface and looked up the hostname info = cox provided to my Windows 98 box and swapped the computer names, but no = luck. Is my hunch correct? When I set up my Windows boxes to connect to Cox = with their CD, it always asked for the main account username and password =96 = so I=92m guessing when the dhcp client sends out its request for an = address, the Cox DHCP server is expecting a username and password. Can anyone tell me how to send the username and password? TIA, Jim C. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.718 / Virus Database: 474 - Release Date: 7/9/2004 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:20:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FDA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:20:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nhinsights.com (nhinsights.com [216.122.242.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2B243D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:20:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@computersthatrock.com) Received: from inigo (home.nhinsights.com [69.161.61.161]) by nhinsights.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i6BFJOX34909 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:19:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@computersthatrock.com) From: "Rob" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:19:30 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <2062.66.63.96.19.1089492130.squirrel@new.host.name> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Sendmail upgrade advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@computersthatrock.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:20:01 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the advice. Although convoluted, I had managed to read through some of the documentation and tried to perform the first steps of the install (as you kindly described below). However, the install failed on the first step of sh Build in the sendmail directory. This is why I was asking for help because of this error I received at sh Build. build: Can't open build: No such file or directory %sh Build Configuration: pfx=, os=FreeBSD, rel=4.4-RELEASE, rbase=4, rroot=4.4-RELEASE, arch=i386, sfx=, variant=optimized Using M4=/usr/bin/m4 Creating /usr/home/rob/sendmail-8.13.0/obj.FreeBSD.4.4-RELEASE.i386/sendmail using /usr/home/rob/sendmail-8.13.0/devtools/OS/FreeBSD sed: 1: "s/ //g ": unterminated substitute pattern sed: 1: "s/ //g ": unterminated substitute pattern ERROR: /usr/bin/m4 failed; You may need a newer version of M4, at least as new as System V or GNU It was also suggested that I build my own ports tree but I don't really have the disk space for that. Is it possible to build a ports tree with just one port perhaps? If so, how do I go about doing that? Thanks again. -----Original Message----- From: Brent Bailey [mailto:mrb@bmyster.com] Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 4:42 PM To: epilogue Cc: freebsd@computersthatrock.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail upgrade advice hope this helps im going to use 8.12.10 as an example....i think the instructions are referring to this: when you unpack sendmail-8.x.x it makes a dir called sendmail.8.x.x (whatever the version name) cd into that dir. theres a INSTALL file that pretty much says everthign i said here....but oh well...who reads instructions anyway you will also see a dir oddly enough called "sendmail" cd into that ....that is where you run the sh Build then it wants you to go to the cf/cf dir todo so do: cd ../cf/cf ........ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:26:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9693316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:26:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freeode.co.uk (freeode.co.uk [213.162.123.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E688343D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:26:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spam-trap@freeode.co.uk) Received: from lexx (lexx.freeode.co.uk [10.253.253.2]) by mail.freeode.co.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6BFQaN5058980; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:26:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from spam-trap@freeode.co.uk) From: John Murphy To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:26:36 +0100 Message-ID: <3jm2f05p1pcoibm9qqve8v4j9e0gajd3gv@4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: blade@aknet.kg Subject: Re: Problem with hardware OX16PCI954 8-ports serial X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sub01@freeode.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:26:47 -0000 Harchenko Andrew wrote: >I have FreeBSD 4.9 and try to install multiport card OX16PCI954 8-ports >serial. And I have some problem 4 ports >works normaly. But other don't work. > >dmesg >.... >puc0: port >0xa800-0xa81f,0xb000-0xb01f mem >0xf2000000-0xf2000fff,0xf2800000-0xf2800fff irq 9 at device 10.0 on pci2 >sio4: type 16550A >sio5: type 16550A >sio6: type 16550A >sio7: type 16550A >chip0: port >0xa000-0xa01f,0xa400-0xa41f mem >0xf1000000-0xf1000fff,0xf1800000-0xf1800fff irq 9 at device 10.1 on pci2 >.... > > >I compiled kernel with follow options > >options COM_MULTIPORT >device puc >options PUC_FASTINTR > > >What's wrong? man 4 puc says: If the PUC_FASTINTR option is used the driver will try to use fast inter- rupts. This should lower the interrupt latency and should be used if the sio(4) driver reports silo overflow errors. It cannot be used if the interrupt is shared. So try a kernel without the PUC_FASTINTR option. Also ensure you have sio* devices in /dev for the other four ports. -- John. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:38:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B2116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mediamonks.com (siripandita.mediamonks.net [62.192.127.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1D243D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@mediamonks.net) Received: from manrikigusari [82.197.206.247] by mediamonks.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AED13820200; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:37:53 +0200 From: "Terrence Koeman" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:37:52 +0200 Organization: MediaMonks B.V. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <200407082101652.SM07768@mail.indatacorp.com> Thread-Index: AcRlBExxLjOVXySdQn6GqmQHfSnYrgACOxUgAACm+kAAAYCVIAAAxfaAAI7uNyA= Message-Id: <200407111737133.SM07768@manrikigusari> X-Info: This e-mail was scanned for spam and viruses by mail.mediamonks.net. X-Info: Please send abuse reports about this e-mail to abuse@mediamonks.net. cc: ecrist@secure-computing.net cc: rgrafton@indatacorp.com cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org cc: info@mvcg.net cc: nkinkade@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub Subject: RE: Network configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: root@mediamonks.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:38:22 -0000 Hi, Thank you all for the help and time. I finally got it all working with bits from most emails. I'll include my configuration here for others in the same situation (any comments are welcome): It's now: -------------- | SDSL Modem | | Bridged | -------------- | -------------------------- | xl1: 217.1.1.155, DHCP | | Freebsd Box | | xl0: UP, no ip | -------------------------- | ---------- |---------------| SWITCH |---------------| | ---------- | | | | ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- | C1: 217.1.1.156 | | C2: 217.1.1.157 | | C3: 217.1.1.158 | ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- (Notice the switch of xl1 and xl0, this made it work). xl1 and xl0 are bridged so that all clients have full internet connectivity. Additionally the clients share the available bandwidth fairly, with ssh, telnet, dns and http having a higher priority than other traffic. Using a private ip on xl0 and adding natd is still possible for use in the future. FreeBSD samsara.mediamonks.net 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #5: Sat Jul 10 22:13:16 CEST 2004 terrence@samsara.mediamonks.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMSARA i386 ************************************ /sys/i386/conf/SAMSARA: machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident SAMSARA options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options INET # InterNETworking options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options HZ=5000 options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 options DUMMYNET options BRIDGE device isa device pci device fdc device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device vga # VGA video card driver device sc device npx device miibus # MII bus support device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') device random # Entropy device device loop # Network loopback device ether # Ethernet support device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device bpf # Berkeley packet filter ************************************ /etc/rc.conf: hostname="samsara.mediamonks.net" ifconfig_xl1="DHCP" ifconfig_xl0="UP" jail_enable="NO" kldxref_enable="NO" kern_securelevel="3" kern_securelevel_enable="YES" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall" firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.rules" firewall_quiet="NO" firewall_logging="YES" firewall_flags="" nfs_server_enable="NO" gateway_enable="NO" syslogd_flags="-ss" sendmail_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" squid_enable="NO" apache2_enable="YES" oidentd_enable="YES" snmpd_enable="YES" snmpd_flags="-a -Lsd -p /var/run/snmpd.pid 127.0.0.1:161" ************************************ /etc/sysctl.conf: security.bsd.see_other_uids=0 security.bsd.see_other_gids=0 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65535 net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0 net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1 net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=xl0,xl1 net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 ************************************ /etc/ipfw.rules: enable one_pass #incoming bandwidth pipe 1 config bw 4500kbits/s queue 10Kbytes #outgoing bandwidth pipe 2 config bw 4500kbits/s queue 10Kbytes #incoming queues, group on dst-host queue 10 config pipe 1 weight 50 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff #icmp queue 11 config pipe 1 weight 99 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff #ssh, telnet, dns, http queue 12 config pipe 1 weight 40 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff #all other ip #outgoing queues, group on src-host queue 20 config pipe 2 weight 50 mask src-ip 0xffffffff #icmp queue 21 config pipe 2 weight 99 mask src-ip 0xffffffff #ssh, telnet, dns, http queue 22 config pipe 2 weight 40 mask src-ip 0xffffffff #all other ip #queues for local system queue 30 config pipe 1 weight 50 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 31 config pipe 2 weight 50 mask src-ip 0xffffffff #allow traffic on loopback interface add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 #deny lost/hostile packets to the loopback addresses, return host unreach add 00110 unreach host log logamount 20 ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 via any #deny any private address, return host unreach add 00301 unreach host log logamount 20 ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in via any add 00302 unreach host log logamount 20 ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in via any add 00303 unreach host log logamount 20 ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in via any #deny windows networking, return RST add 00500 reset log logamount 20 ip from any to any 135,137-139 via any #for bridged traffic, skip add skipto 20000 ip from any to any via any bridged #** natd divert is possible here, if xl0 gets a private IP. ** #deny packets with a source address known on a different interface, return host unreach add 00800 unreach host log logamount 20 ip from any to any not verrevpath in # for non-bridged traffic, skip add skipto 30000 ip from any to any via any #push bridged traffic in appropriate queues add 20000 queue 10 icmp from any to any in recv xl1 add 20100 queue 11 ip from any 22,23,53,80 to any in recv xl1 add 20200 queue 11 ip from any to any 22,23,53,80 in recv xl1 add 20300 queue 12 ip from any to any in recv xl1 add 21000 queue 20 icmp from any to any in recv xl0 add 21100 queue 21 ip from any to any 22,23,53,80 in recv xl0 add 21200 queue 21 ip from any 22,23,53,80 to any in recv xl0 add 21300 queue 22 ip from any to any in recv xl0 add skipto 50000 log logamount 20 ip from any to any via any #push non-bridged (local) traffic in appropriate queues add 30000 queue 30 icmp from any to any in recv xl1 add 30100 queue 30 ip from any to any in recv xl1 add 31000 queue 31 icmp from any to any out xmit xl1 add 31100 queue 31 ip from any to any out xmit xl1 add 50000 pass all from any to any I hope this helps someone in the future :) -- Regards, Terrence Koeman MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com) Please quote all replies in correspondence. > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Grafton [mailto:rgrafton@indatacorp.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 21:04 > To: root@mediamonks.net > Subject: RE: Network configuration > > I setup a little home network using my FreeBSD box as the > 'router'. There > are two boxes on my internal LAN that I wanted to have access > to from the > internet as well as provide full internet access to all internal > clients/servers. > > Like I said, I recompiled my kernel with the nat options. > I'll list the > steps here, if you've already performed them then at least I > got in some > typing practice. > > Install the kernel sources. Insert your install disk and from > the command > line run /stand/sysinstall. > Select the Configure option then the Distributions option then src and > finally sys. > Once the sources are installed you will go to > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf. Within > this directory are two files, GENERIC and LINT. Make a copy > of GENERIC with > a name of your choosing. Edit the GENERIC copy and add the > following lines: > options IPFIREWALL > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE > options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10 > options IPDIVERT > > Save the modified file and compile your kernel. This is done by doing: > config > cd ../../ > make > make install > reboot > > Now you'll edit your /etc/rc.conf file. > Add these lines to it: > gateway_enable="YES" > ifconfig_xl0="inet 217.1.1.155 netmask " > ifconfig_xl0_alias0="inet 217.1.1.155 netmask " > ifconfig_xl0_alias1="inet 217.1.1.156 netmask " > ifconfig_xl0_alias2="inet 217.1.1.157 netmask " > ifconfig_xl0_alias3="inet 217.1.1.158 netmask " > ifconfig_xl1="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > firewall_type="OPEN" > firewall_quiet="YES" > firewall_logging="YES" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="xl0" > natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" (explained below) > > Now create the /etc/natd.conf file with these lines: > same ports yes > dynamic yes > redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.2 217.1.1.156 > redirect_port udp 192.168.1.2 217.1.1.156 > redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.3 217.1.1.157 > redirect_port udp 192.168.1.3 217.1.1.157 > redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.4 217.1.1.158 > redirect_port udp 192.168.1.5 217.1.1.158 > > The redirect_port has this syntax: > redirect_port tcp > redirect_port udp > > -------------- > | SDSL Modem | > | Bridged | > -------------- > | > -------------------------- > | xl0: 217.1.1.155 | > | xl0: 217.1.1.156 | > | xl0: 217.1.1.157 | > | xl0: 217.1.1.158 | > | | > | Freebsd Box | > | | > | xl1: 192.168.1.1 | > -------------------------- > | > ---------- > |---------------| SWITCH |---------------| > | ---------- | > | | | > ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- > | C1: 192.168.1.2 | | C2: 192.168.1.3 | | C3: 192.168.1.4 | > ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- > > Once these changes are made you can run /etc/netstart. This > little script is > great, anytime that you make network config changes you can > run this instead > of having to restart the whole system. > > All of your internal clients will now need to have > 192.168.1.1 listed as > their default router/gateway. > > Whew! Did that help? > > -Randy > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terrence Koeman [mailto:root@mediamonks.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:12 AM > To: rgrafton@indatacorp.com > Subject: RE: Network configuration > > Well, I can do the firewall part. It's just the gateway thing > I can't figure > out. > > The three 'clients' have to have a public IP address because they are > actually servers. > > I need; > -the three servers to have full internet connectivity, in and out > -the possibility to manipulate/block/prioritize the packets > to and from them > -the freebsd box needs to have an external IP address for access > > Currently I have no idea what to bind to xl1, what method to > use to get the > packets out (routing, bridging?), and what gateway to use on the > 'clients'... > > Any help would be really appreciated. > > -- > Regards, > Terrence Koeman > > MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com) > Please quote all replies in correspondence. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Randy Grafton [mailto:rgrafton@indatacorp.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 19:32 > > To: root@mediamonks.net > > Subject: RE: Network configuration > > > > I would recommend that your start out open and then start > > closing things up. > > > > I'm not an ipfw expert but I can get you going with the > > gateway thing. Since you said that you have nat running, I > > assume that you recompiled your kernel? > > If not then email me back and I'll provide a quick how to. > > > > Why are you looking to make the clients available from the internet? > > Your answer to this question could open some other > > possibilities for configuration. > > > > -Randy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > > Terrence Koeman > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:03 AM > > To: Barbish3@adelphia.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: RE: Network configuration > > > > I haven't got any real config right now as I'm not sure about > > how to start with this. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Terrence Koeman > > > > MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com) > > Please quote all replies in correspondence. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: JJB [mailto:Barbish3@adelphia.net] > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 17:58 > > > To: root@mediamonks.net > > > Subject: RE: Network configuration > > > > > > Post the full content of your rc.conf file and your ipfw rule set. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Terrence > > > Koeman > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:10 AM > > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: Network configuration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have been busy setting up a network the last 3 days, > but I cannot > > > get it working. > > > > > > Basically I have no clue what has to be setup etc. and if I need > > > bridging or not. > > > > > > The situation is as follows: > > > > > > -------------- > > > | SDSL Modem | > > > | Bridged | > > > -------------- > > > | > > > -------------------------- > > > | xl0: 217.1.1.155 | > > > | | > > > | Freebsd Box | > > > | | > > > | xl1 | > > > -------------------------- > > > | > > > ---------- > > > |---------------| SWITCH |---------------| > > > | ---------- | > > > | | | > > > ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- > > > | C1: 217.1.1.156 | | C2: 217.1.1.157 | | C3: 217.1.1.158 | > > > ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- > > > > > > > > > The FreeBSD box has full internet connectivity and I can > > also get NAT > > > working, but the thing is that I need those non-private > > IP's bound to > > > the clients and I need ipfw between the clients and the > > modem. Also I > > > need the FreeBSD machine to have a non-private IP address. > > I have no > > > clue as to getting the packets from those clients to the > > internet. I > > > tried bridging xl0 and xl1 and using 217.1.1.155 as > > gateway, but that > > > didn't work. > > > > > > Maybe someone that knows how to do something like this can > > shed some > > > light on it for me? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Terrence Koeman > > > > > > MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.com) > > > Please quote all replies in correspondence. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 15:43:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E7016A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:43:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdx.chatusa.com (pdx.ChatUSA.com [205.238.41.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53D943D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from longterm@pdx.chatusa.com) Received: from dannewxp (xmax.TeleSat.net [205.238.42.202] (may be forged)) by pdx.chatusa.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA26402 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000201c4675d$d7165140$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> From: "Dan" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:50:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd How to you set up AP mode and if to route to eithernet port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:43:44 -0000 How to you set up AP mode and ip to route to eithernet port ath0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 ether 00:0d:88:c8:7e:92 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps = (autoselect ) status: associated ssid wifi-1 1:wifi-1 channel 3 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 wepmode OFF weptxkey 1 ath1: flags=3D8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:0d:88:c8:7e:9a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 wepmode OFF weptxkey 1 rl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 options=3D8 inet 205.238.47.5 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 205.238.47.15 ether 00:10:dc:56:ec:60 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active plip0: flags=3D8810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=3D8008 mtu 16384 Telesat International Ltd. Dan Berge From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 16:30:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC47216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:30:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2DB43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:30:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seanyd@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d19so301126rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.71.13 with SMTP id t13mr85711rna; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:29:47 -0500 From: Sean Dicks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:30:04 -0000 I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong? Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 16:43:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656A816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:43:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033A843D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from [192.168.254.3] (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837D94ADCE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:47:23 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040710) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Dicks References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:43:37 -0000 Sean Dicks wrote: >I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it >doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong? > > You probably didn't configure the resolver library correctly. In /etc/resolv.conf, you need to add the name server entries: /etc/resolv.conf: domain example.com nameserver 1.2.3.4 nameserver 5.6.7.8 Pinging the name servers using their IP addresses doesn't test the resolver at all. While that is the most likely cause, it is also possible that you just bought a domain (or changed its records), and it can take up to 72 hours for the DNS entries to propagate throught the net. Another reason is that you (or your net admin) blocked ICMP at the firewall level, so you can't expect a reply to a ping. You can test this easily by pinging, say, www.altavista.com or another site that replies to pings. Other reasons are possible too. >Sean > cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 16:52:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C897716A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:52:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42FEE43D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dcpaq2@sbcglobal.net) Received: from unknown (HELO monster2500) (dcpaq2@sbcglobal.net@68.75.234.222 with login) by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2004 16:52:04 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c46767$6770e1c0$0201a8c0@monster2500> From: "Doug Paquette" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:52:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Backing up files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:52:14 -0000 Group, I am extremely new to Free BSD and Im sorry for the probably basic = questions but I need to know. I am installing some mods to my phpbb message board and I have been told = to "backup" my stuff before I install these mods incase something should = go wrong. I am wondering what the command line would be to accomplish this? My current webmaster who has been doing the work for me has been = extremely busy the past few weeks and has no time to help me right now = so im forced to learn this on my own. The files he has been creating end in .tar.gz and .bak. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks much Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:05:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB24D16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:05:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DBE243D4C for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so7784485cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.74 with SMTP id w74mr62487cwb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f7050407111005248a04f9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:05:46 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: "James A. Coulter" In-Reply-To: <002e01c46759$3b9b72d0$5700a8c0@sabrina> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <002e01c46759$3b9b72d0$5700a8c0@sabrina> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NEWBIE: Logging into Cox Cable service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:05:46 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:10:41 -0500, James A. Coulter wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 4.10 and am trying to connect to my Cox ISP via a an > Ethernet nic and cable modem. > > I have DHCP for the nic enabled in /etc/rc.conf and can obtain an IP address > from my Windows 98 gateway, but when I connect the nic to the cable modem > and reboot I do not get a response from the cox DHCP server. Cox.net is different from many other ISPs in that it only allows connections based upon registered MAC addresses. If you're not familiar with them, MAC addresses are globally unique identifiers assigned to each and every NIC. I believe the Cox.net setup CD that you speak of registers the MAC address with Cox for you. Of course, the NIC in your FreeBSD box has a different MAC address than the one in your Win98 box so Cox is saying "hey, this is not the computer that's allowed to be connecting to our service!" To resolve this problem, either call up their tech support and ask them to add your FreeBSD NIC's MAC address to your allowed list or see if you can do it yourself by going to cox's account administration webpage. If you don't know the MAC address of your FreeBSD NIC, you can view it by running 'dmesg' and looking at the line where the system loads your NIC. It'll be listed there. --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:11:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2B616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:11:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E21C43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so7789553cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.23 with SMTP id w23mr62657cwb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040711101146816429@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:11:57 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Jason Dusek In-Reply-To: <40F08C2A.2060004@uiowa.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <40F026E2.8000000@uiowa.edu> <20040710174109.GB7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> <40F05FD7.3000404@uiowa.edu><40F08C2A.2060004@uiowa.edu> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't Mount USB Flash Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:11:57 -0000 On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:39:06 -0500, Jason Dusek wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Dell D600, and I count mount flash devices on it. They show up in > dmesg. Here I put the drive in the top one, pull it out and stick it in the > bottom one, and then put it back in the top one: > > ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 > ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > ugen0: detached > ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 > ugen0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > ugen0: detached > ugen0: SanDisk Corporation Cruzer Mini, rev 2.00/0.10, addr 2 > > Strangely, they show up as the same address on the same device. When I try to > mount ugen0, I get a message that sayeth: > > Block device required. > > What does this mean? What do I do? Hi Jason, Check out this page which is a great walk through on getting what you need set up: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200305/cfmount.html In particular, you need to mount the corresponding 'da' device, not the ugen device. --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:19:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2363116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:19:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBD8443D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so7794898cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.40 with SMTP id w40mr62918cwb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f70504071110197c13874@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:35 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: kinux In-Reply-To: <01c901c46708$2998b710$4c22fea9@winxp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01c901c46708$2998b710$4c22fea9@winxp> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade failure.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:19:36 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:30:22 +0800, kinux wrote: > Hi, > > i have install freebsd 4.9 on a old AMD box, i have been cvsup download the > source code, then upgrade it to 4.10 stable but failure at ...snip... > What will be the problem?? Does it need to edit something in /etc/make.conf for >AMD CPU or setting something on gcc?? > Generally, when I've come across this type of error it is a result of faulty hardware. I would suggest running a program like memtest86 or benchmark software that would stress your system somewhat. I'd wager that your system is less than stable when put under any sort of load (as occurrs when compiling a kernel). --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:21:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0238C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:21:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp10.hccnet.nl (smtp10.hccnet.nl [62.251.0.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19D43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from loiein@hccnet.nl) Received: from sky by smtp10.hccnet.nl via fia195-88.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.88.195] with SMTP id i6BHKrqU018793 (8.12.10/2.05); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:20:54 +0200 (MET DST) From: "loiein" To: "Doug Paquette" , Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <001301c46767$6770e1c0$0201a8c0@monster2500> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Backing up files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:21:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Doug Paquette > Sent: zondag 11 juli 2004 18:52 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Backing up files > > > Group, > > I am extremely new to Free BSD and Im sorry for the probably > basic questions but I need to know. > > I am installing some mods to my phpbb message board and I have > been told to "backup" my stuff before I install these mods incase > something should go wrong. > > I am wondering what the command line would be to accomplish this? > > My current webmaster who has been doing the work for me has been > extremely busy the past few weeks and has no time to help me > right now so im forced to learn this on my own. > > The files he has been creating end in .tar.gz and .bak. > > Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. > .tar is the standard extension for a TAR-file, see http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/tar.html or 'man tar' .gz is the extension for GNU-zip, see http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/gzip.html or 'man gzip' a file that ends in .tar.gz is a zipped-tar-file... so, you have to first unZIP it, and then unTAR it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:30:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083B616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:30:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727E843D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:30:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i6BHTsIG003413; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:29:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks To: "James A. Coulter" Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:33:50 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <002e01c46759$3b9b72d0$5700a8c0@sabrina> In-Reply-To: <002e01c46759$3b9b72d0$5700a8c0@sabrina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407111233.50291.ecrist@secure-computing.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NEWBIE: Logging into Cox Cable service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@secure-computing.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:30:02 -0000 On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:10, you wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 4.10 and am trying to connect to my Cox ISP via a an > Ethernet nic and cable modem. > > I have DHCP for the nic enabled in /etc/rc.conf and can obtain an IP > address from my Windows 98 gateway, but when I connect the nic to the cab= le > modem and reboot I do not get a response from the cox DHCP server. > > The nic shows active in ifconfig, but no IP is assigned to it. > > I suspect the Cox DHCP server is expecting a username and password from > dhclient.conf > > I googled and the closest answer I found was a short article in the FreeB= SD > Diary published in 2000 that gave this as an example dhclient.conf: > > interface "de0" { > send host-name "cr123456-a"; > request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name-servers, > domain-name, time-servers; > require domain-name-servers; > } > > I tried substituting my own interface and looked up the hostname info cox > provided to my Windows 98 box and swapped the computer names, but no luck. > > Is my hunch correct? When I set up my Windows boxes to connect to Cox wi= th > their CD, it always asked for the main account username and password =96 = so > I=92m guessing when the dhcp client sends out its request for an address,= the > Cox DHCP server is expecting a username and password. > > Can anyone tell me how to send the username and password? > > TIA, > > Jim C. Jim, Many cable providers require that you register the MAC address of the NIC=20 interfaces you connect to their cable modems. Many used to do this, and ha= ve=20 gotten away from it, as it causes problems such that you're experiencing no= w. =20 When you had your service installed, did the service just work, or did you= =20 have to go to a web page and type some things in, first? =20 I know that if you use an internet gateway device, such as a Linksys model,= =20 they usually have a feature called MAC Address Cloning to defeat this. =20 To confirm this is your issue, try swapping network cards between the=20 computers. You should find that you're now able to obtain an IP address. HTH =2D-=20 Eric F Crist Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry, and the world WILL turn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:35:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A22516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E78A43D4C for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 20872 invoked by uid 513); 11 Jul 2004 17:34:18 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.77008 secs); 11 Jul 2004 17:34:18 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 11 Jul 2004 17:34:17 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:35:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Doug Paquette In-Reply-To: <001301c46767$6770e1c0$0201a8c0@monster2500> Message-ID: <20040711193049.I1513@pukruppa.net> References: <001301c46767$6770e1c0$0201a8c0@monster2500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backing up files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:14 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Doug Paquette wrote: > Group, > > I am extremely new to Free BSD and Im sorry for the probably basic questions but I need to know. > > I am installing some mods to my phpbb message board and I have been told to "backup" my stuff before I install these mods incase something should go wrong. > > I am wondering what the command line would be to accomplish this? > > My current webmaster who has been doing the work for me has been extremely busy the past few weeks and has no time to help me right now so im forced to learn this on my own. > > The files he has been creating end in .tar.gz and .bak. To backup a directory in .tar.gz format you can do # tar -c directory -f directory.tar # gzip directory.tar To decompress and unpack it do # tar zxf directory.tar.gz Regards, Uli. > > Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks much > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:35:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B4916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA1143D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seanyd@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d19so302804rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.9.12 with SMTP id 12mr92130rni; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:35:02 -0500 From: Sean Dicks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:35:21 -0000 I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in /etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.org" I see right nameservers on it. Doesn't that mean it has propagated? Sean On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:47:23 +0200, cpghost wrote: > > > Sean Dicks wrote: > > >I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it > >doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong? > > > > > You probably didn't configure the resolver library correctly. > In /etc/resolv.conf, you need to add the name server entries: > > /etc/resolv.conf: > domain example.com > nameserver 1.2.3.4 > nameserver 5.6.7.8 > > Pinging the name servers using their IP addresses doesn't > test the resolver at all. > > While that is the most likely cause, it is also possible that > you just bought a domain (or changed its records), and it > can take up to 72 hours for the DNS entries to propagate > throught the net. > > Another reason is that you (or your net admin) blocked > ICMP at the firewall level, so you can't expect a reply > to a ping. You can test this easily by pinging, say, > www.altavista.com or another site that replies to pings. > > Other reasons are possible too. > > >Sean > > > cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:52:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDDB16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:52:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B1443D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:52:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i6BHqCoa003499; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:52:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:56:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407111256.09120.ecrist@secure-computing.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: Sean Dicks Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@secure-computing.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:52:19 -0000 On Sunday 11 July 2004 12:35, Sean Dicks wrote: > I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in > /etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete > the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain > today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.org" I see right nameservers on > it. Doesn't that mean it has propagated? > > Sean No, it doesn't. I can successfully perform a whois from here on your domain, but an nslookup/dig both fail. Give it 72 hours to propagate across the net. While the whois server for your domain is correct, the root servers for the .org TLD have not been updated to know where to look for that domain's information. If it's still not working 3 days from now, let us know and we'll see if we can help you from there. -- Eric F Crist Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry, and the world WILL turn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACDA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E975943D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i6BHtKbC022909 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:21 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (166-18.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.18.166]) with ESMTP id i6BHtG9k022866; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:16 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6836689D; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:14 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040709064558.GA14282@lori.mine.nu> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:28 -0000 On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:24:16PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 2004-07-09 01:45 am, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > > Anyway, I would very much like to see FreeBSD supporting both of them > > (AFAIK, they would be the only one who do). > > Out of curiosity, why would you like to see them continue to support > XFree86? Why not? At the moment, differences between the two are small, but in the future they probably will both have interesting new features. The Ports also offer multiple shells, multiple window managers, ... so why not multiple X-servers? > It seems that most (all?) new development is moving toward X.org > and the XFree86 seems slated for stagnation and obsolescence. Political > issues aside, I think that X.org is where all of the action is. I don't see why. XFree86 has been offering us the best free X-server for years. It always worked fine for me. And why would BSD care about a GPL-incompatible licese? GH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:00:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4178316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:00:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web81405.mail.yahoo.com (web81405.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B402043D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jam_man@sbcglobal.net) Message-ID: <20040711180004.59484.qmail@web81405.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.23.103.47] by web81405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:00:04 PDT Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:00:04 -0700 (PDT) From: jam man To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: SATA support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:00:06 -0000 I will be using a silicon image (integrated) raid controller in my new system for sata. Does anyone have a link to a list of supported sata controllers for freebsd? Also, has anyone besides me know about the new maxtor maxline III hard drives? They use NCQ (native command queuing) to gain performance especially in multithredded applications. Is NCQ supported in freebsd? Is it even in linux? Thanks for any replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:09:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A9E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:09:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A201F43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from [192.168.254.3] (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD5F4ACDD; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40F1832A.9000302@cordula.ws> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:12:58 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040710) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Dicks References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:09:11 -0000 Sean Dicks wrote: >I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in >/etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete >the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain >today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.org" I see right nameservers on >it. Doesn't that mean it has propagated? > > The WHOIS and DNS databases are distinct, and not necessarily synchronized. You need to wait until your domain is added to the .ORG zone file of the master .ORG DNS Server (that normally happens every 12 hours from the PIR registry, IIRC [I can be wrong here!]). It can then take up to 72 hours to propagate to the other .ORG DNS slaves, and also to your ISPs DNS servers. Just give it some time to propagate. % dig rimouski-undernet.org ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> rimouski-undernet.org ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend: Operation timed out Yep, not yet visible here... -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:11:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF85816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:11:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [81.255.84.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9AC43D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:11:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virusgate.meiway.com [81.255.84.76]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 4D675471835 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:14:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.MEIWay.com [127.0.0.1]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7812338661A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) X-AV-Checked: Sun Jul 11 20:18:01 2004 virusgate.meiway.com Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [81.255.84.73]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8073865C3 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from tx2.Go2France.com [24.227.147.227] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id A1C0436404B4; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:06:56 +0200 Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040711130345.0434ea48@81.255.84.73> X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@81.255.84.73 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:10:18 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad In-Reply-To: <200407111256.09120.ecrist@secure-computing.net> References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <40F16F1B.3070103@cordula.ws> <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> <200407111256.09120.ecrist@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:11:03 -0000 >No, it doesn't. I can successfully perform a whois from here on your domain, >but an nslookup/dig both fail. Give it 72 hours to propagate across the net. propagation is a bogus idea when applied to DNS. Like WMD and "immediate threat" when applied to Iraq. As soon as the delegation and glue data for domain.tld is present in the .tld servers, that data is instantaneously available across all of Internet. dig @NS_auth_for_tld domain.tld any Forget about whois data, it is operationally irrelevant for DNS operation. whois protocol with whois servers, dns protocol with dns servers, ne'ver the twain meet. Len _____________________________________________________________________ http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:16:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F5616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:16:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from northwindcom.dyndns.org (135-203-237-24.gci.net [24.237.203.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C4843D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org) Received: from localhost.dyndns.org (localhost.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by northwindcom.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586A22667 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:16:53 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:16:52 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407111016.52453.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> Subject: Errors building xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:16:54 -0000 Hi, I am running into build problems with xorg, xorg server bails with the following: making all in lib/font/FreeType... making all in lib/font/FreeType/module... rm -f libfreetype.so cc -o libfreetype.so -shared -Wl,-rpath /usr/X11R6/lib xttcap.o ftfuncs.o ftenc.o fttools.o ftmodule.o -lfreetype /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfreetype collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xc/lib/font/FreeType/module. *** Error code 1 lfreetype is in that path, and ldconfig -r also shows it. anyone have a suggestion how to fix this? I'm running -current from Friday. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:23:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2D916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:23:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (front-door.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2786043D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i6BINHRu003602; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:23:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:27:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <5ef172bb04071110354d96f906@mail.gmail.com> <40F1832A.9000302@cordula.ws> In-Reply-To: <40F1832A.9000302@cordula.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407111327.13716.ecrist@secure-computing.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72 on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: Sean Dicks cc: cpghost Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@secure-computing.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:23:32 -0000 On Sunday 11 July 2004 13:12, cpghost wrote: > Just give it some time to propagate. > > % dig rimouski-undernet.org > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> rimouski-undernet.org > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; res_nsend: Operation timed out > > Yep, not yet visible here... > > -cpghost. Something I didn't think about at my last reply, are you sure your DNS server is set up correctly? Does it resolve it's own domains correctly, and is it able to answer queries about other domains? I would check that while you were waiting for propagation. -- Eric F Crist Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry, and the world WILL turn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:24:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9400216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:24:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C8943D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:24:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bjizy-0001cA-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:24:26 +0200 Received: from pd951f877.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.81.248.119]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:24:26 +0200 Received: from kai by pd951f877.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:24:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Kai Grossjohann Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:24:23 +0200 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <86llhqpfl4.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd951f877.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EMAZL8IZcy3D/B4sHvp6CfqsLvY= Sender: news Subject: Perl port: How to compile with debugging support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:24:28 -0000 Is there a way to tell the system to always compile Perl with debugging support? I gather that I can specify make args in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, but when reading the Perl port's Makefile, I can't find a knob to twiddle for debugging support. For the time being, I shall hack the Makefile. tia, Kai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:26:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9630416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net (colossus.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5751843D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from laptop (81-178-100-243.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.100.243]) by colossus.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 15E351C000B6 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:26:08 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <000d01c46774$81152390$f800000a@laptop> From: "Markie" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:24:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: ACPI Blacklist question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:26:10 -0000 Hello, I'm not sure whether I should have posted this to questions or current (since it's an issue with a recent current) or some other list, but hear me out and perhaps point me in the right direction? I recently upgraded a play about box from an older current to one .. a day before the preemption issues arose. All is well, except I found the box would no longer shutdown automatically using shutdown -p and hitting the power button would just put the box into a sort of suspend or sleep state. Well, just now I looked at dmesg and came across this message "ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor.".. I believe this is most likely the cause. I can't remember exactly what BIOS or motherboard is in there but I can have a look if that is needed. Can anyone tell me why it's been blacklisted anyway? I didn't used to have any problems with it at all on the older CURRENT. In fact I was quite impressed that I could turn it off, cleanly, by just hitting the power button! I'll mess around and see if I can get ACPI loaded anyway somehow and see if there's any ill effects with it. Well anyway, thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:37:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C27416A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linares.terra.com.br (linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986A243D1F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) Received: from estero.terra.com.br (estero.terra.com.br [200.154.55.138]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6621DDC629; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from zumba.com (2-224.ctame701-2.telepar.net.br [200.181.170.224]) (authenticated user paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) by estero.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528D73C017; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:30 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:46 -0300 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org" References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> From: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) Subject: Sounds on Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:33 -0000 Hi Arjan, you're right. I removed linuxpluginwrapper and flash plugin keeps ok. But sounds not working on Opera yet on flash web pages as much as java applets, only images. The "Enable sound in web pages" are checked in preferences. what's happen with it. Paulo. On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:17:29 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > You don't need the linuxpluginwrapper if you're using linux-opera, > only if you're using FreeBSD Opera. In that last case, it will only > work on FreeBSD 4.x, that's why you received a message that flash > support was unavailable. > > linux-opera should work with linux-flashplugin{6,7} out of the box. > > Arjan > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:38 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. > wrote: >> Ok! >> >> Linux-Opera is just fine with flashplayer now on freebsd 5.1. >> >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> recompile and install /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and >> make /usr/ports/linuxpluginwrapper >> >> it'll runs ok! >> >> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Arjan, >> > >> > I running now: >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper >> > >> > I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of >> > linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is >> > active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that >> > use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that >> > use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work >> > correctly. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Paulo. >> > >> > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 >> >>> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: >> >>> > >> >>> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer >> >>> > make install clean >> >>> > it's ok >> >>> > >> >>> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path >> >>> > the working path is: opera; >> >>> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ >> >>> > it's fine >> >>> > >> >>> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message >> >>> below >> >>> > occurs: >> >>> >> >>> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of >> >>> opera >> >>> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would >> >>> expect >> >>> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P >> >>> >> >>> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR >> install >> >>> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. >> >> >> >> Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's >> >> newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash >> >> player. >> >> >> >> That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on >> >> 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. >> >> >> >> Arjan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. >> >> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 >> >> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. > Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:43:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271C116A4D1 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from velocity.velocitynet.net (cidvss.com [204.188.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67FD643D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech@fast-net-usa.com) Received: (qmail 9489 invoked by uid 110); 11 Jul 2004 19:48:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 9476 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2004 19:48:01 -0000 Received: from exprod5mx32.postini.com (HELO psmtp.com) (12.158.34.187) by asiantrader.com.sg with SMTP; 11 Jul 2004 19:48:01 -0000 Received: from source ([216.136.204.119]) by exprod5mx32.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:43:56 CDT Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD90258DC4; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B12216A502; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:42:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C27416A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linares.terra.com.br (linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986A243D1F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) Received: from estero.terra.com.br (estero.terra.com.br [200.154.55.138]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6621DDC629; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from zumba.com (2-224.ctame701-2.telepar.net.br [200.181.170.224]) (authenticated user paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) by estero.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528D73C017; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:30 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:46 -0300 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org" References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> From: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:100.0000 C:51.8443 ) X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:8.0000) s gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m C X-pstn-addresses: from [2524/104] X-SpamGuard: checked Subject: SPAM MESSAGE - Sounds on Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:59 -0000 Hi Arjan, you're right. I removed linuxpluginwrapper and flash plugin keeps ok. But sounds not working on Opera yet on flash web pages as much as java applets, only images. The "Enable sound in web pages" are checked in preferences. what's happen with it. Paulo. On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:17:29 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > You don't need the linuxpluginwrapper if you're using linux-opera, > only if you're using FreeBSD Opera. In that last case, it will only > work on FreeBSD 4.x, that's why you received a message that flash > support was unavailable. > > linux-opera should work with linux-flashplugin{6,7} out of the box. > > Arjan > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:38 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. > wrote: >> Ok! >> >> Linux-Opera is just fine with flashplayer now on freebsd 5.1. >> >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> recompile and install /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and >> make /usr/ports/linuxpluginwrapper >> >> it'll runs ok! >> >> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Arjan, >> > >> > I running now: >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper >> > >> > I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of >> > linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is >> > active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that >> > use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that >> > use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work >> > correctly. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Paulo. >> > >> > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 >> >>> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: >> >>> > >> >>> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer >> >>> > make install clean >> >>> > it's ok >> >>> > >> >>> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path >> >>> > the working path is: opera; >> >>> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ >> >>> > it's fine >> >>> > >> >>> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message >> >>> below >> >>> > occurs: >> >>> >> >>> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of >> >>> opera >> >>> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would >> >>> expect >> >>> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P >> >>> >> >>> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR >> install >> >>> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. >> >> >> >> Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's >> >> newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash >> >> player. >> >> >> >> That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on >> >> 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. >> >> >> >> Arjan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. >> >> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 >> >> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. > Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:45:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F32B16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:45:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net (colossus.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC743D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from laptop (81-178-100-243.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.100.243]) by colossus.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B244C1C0006E for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:45:55 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <001f01c46777$43b45f40$f800000a@laptop> From: "Markie" To: References: <000d01c46774$81152390$f800000a@laptop> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:45:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: ACPI Blacklist question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:45:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markie" To: Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: ACPI Blacklist question | Hello, | | I'm not sure whether I should have posted this to questions or current (since | it's an issue with a recent current) or some other list, but hear me out and | perhaps point me in the right direction? | | I recently upgraded a play about box from an older current to one .. a day | before the preemption issues arose. All is well, except I found the box would no | longer shutdown automatically using shutdown -p and hitting the power button | would just put the box into a sort of suspend or sleep state. | | Well, just now I looked at dmesg and came across this message "ACPI disabled by | blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor.".. I believe this is most likely the | cause. I can't remember exactly what BIOS or motherboard is in there but I can | have a look if that is needed. Can anyone tell me why it's been blacklisted I meant why it MIGHT have been blacklisted, oops! | anyway? I didn't used to have any problems with it at all on the older CURRENT. | In fact I was quite impressed that I could turn it off, cleanly, by just hitting | the power button! I'll mess around and see if I can get ACPI loaded anyway | somehow and see if there's any ill effects with it. I set hint.acpi.0.disabled="0" in /boot/device.hints and it seems fine, just like with the previous current. It shutdown via the power button and switches off automatically again anyway :-) | | Well anyway, thanks in advance! | | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:48:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DF616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hornet.wiznet.ca (hornet.wiznet.ca [216.138.223.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A6743D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:48:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@nomad.lets.net) Received: from nomad.lets.net (H74.C220.tor.velocet.net [216.138.220.74]) by hornet.wiznet.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id EB32031E94F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 70219 invoked by uid 1008); 11 Jul 2004 19:29:09 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:29:09 -0400 From: Steve Shorter To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040711192909.GA70190@nomad.lets.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: serious vinum bug in 4-10 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:48:12 -0000 Howdy! I have 4 identical disks, labels etc are also identical. It looks like vinum after reboot does not recognize drives properly, as it did immedialtely after initial configuration. One drive/subdisk in each plex isn't recognized, and the other one is duplicated, which destroys the mirror. I created 2 vinum volumes with # vinum create -f /etc/vinum.raid1 and the following config file drive data0 device /dev/da0d drive data1 device /dev/da1d drive data2 device /dev/da2d drive data3 device /dev/da3d volume mq0 setupstate plex org concat sd length 0 drive data0 plex org concat sd length 0 drive data2 volume mq1 setupstate plex org concat sd length 0 drive data1 plex org concat sd length 0 drive data3 after running # vinum lv -r -v I get (correctly) Volume mq0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Flags: 2 plexes Read policy: round robin Plex mq0.p0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq0 Plex mq0.p1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq0 Subdisk mq0.p0.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq0.p0 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data0 (/dev/da0d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Subdisk mq0.p1.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq0.p1 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data2 (/dev/da2d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Volume mq1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Flags: 2 plexes Read policy: round robin Plex mq1.p0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq1 Plex mq1.p1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq1 Subdisk mq1.p0.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq1.p0 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data1 (/dev/da1d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Subdisk mq1.p1.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq1.p1 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data3 (/dev/da3d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) After rebooting the system and running # vinum lv -r -v I get the following incorrect configuration. Notice that drives data0 and data1 are missing and drives data2 and data3 are duplicated where data0 and data1 should be. Volume mq0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Flags: 2 plexes Read policy: round robin Plex mq0.p0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq0 Plex mq0.p1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: flaky Organization: concat Part of volume mq0 Subdisk mq0.p0.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq0.p0 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data2 (/dev/da2d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Subdisk mq0.p1.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: reborn Plex mq0.p1 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data2 (/dev/da2d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Volume mq1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Flags: 2 plexes Read policy: round robin Plex mq1.p0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: up Organization: concat Part of volume mq1 Plex mq1.p1: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) Subdisks: 1 State: flaky Organization: concat Part of volume mq1 Subdisk mq1.p0.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: up Plex mq1.p0 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data3 (/dev/da3d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Subdisk mq1.p1.s0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) State: reborn Plex mq1.p1 at offset 0 (0 B) Drive data3 (/dev/da3d) at offset 135680 (132 kB) Ideas? -steve "The age of the Internet has a right to its own music" http://www.linuxsuite.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 18:54:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16AB16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:54:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [81.255.84.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B2C43D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:54:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virusgate.meiway.com [81.255.84.76]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 40B74471898 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:57:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.MEIWay.com [127.0.0.1]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 71EFA386688 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:01:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) X-AV-Checked: Sun Jul 11 21:01:05 2004 virusgate.meiway.com Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [81.255.84.73]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682EA38661A for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:01:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from tx2.Go2France.com [24.227.147.227] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id ABD833A304C2; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:50:00 +0200 Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040711134443.035b7ba8@81.255.84.73> X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@81.255.84.73 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:53:22 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad In-Reply-To: <200407111328.28485.ecrist@secure-computing.net> References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <200407111256.09120.ecrist@secure-computing.net> <6.1.1.1.2.20040711130345.0434ea48@81.255.84.73> <200407111328.28485.ecrist@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:54:07 -0000 >Perhaps you need to do some research on the subject. perhaps you need to clarify your vagary .... >There are a series of DNS systems ??? For a public domain.tld, the only two servers involved are : 1. the servers authoritative for .tld to publish the delegation and glue records for domain.tld. 2. the servers authoritative for domain.tld to answer authoritatively. Period. There are NO other servers involved, nor is there any "propagation". >a domain needs to be added to before it will function correctly. >This is known as propagation. the misnomer propagation is used by people who think DNS data needs time to be available, to "propagate", over several days or a week, for all of Internet. This is pure BS. There is no such concept in DNS. Len _____________________________________________________________________ http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:08:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9634C16A4D2 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:08:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECECF43D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i6BJ8SIZ003481 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:08:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c46779$125f5d80$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: portupgrade index generation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:08:31 -0000 Hello, I'm running a 5.2.1 system with portupgrade on it. I'm trying to update my ports and am getting an index generation error when i run: portsdb -Uu I've deleted the entire ports tree, and rerun cvsup, refetched the entire tree, reran portsdb -Uu and am still getting the same index generation error, this is not occurring on the same package, which leads me to believe i've got a corrupted database somewhere, no idea where. Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:10:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC2C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:10:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from velocity.velocitynet.net (tonybongo.com [204.188.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5137D43D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:10:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech@fast-net-usa.com) Received: (qmail 9468 invoked by uid 110); 11 Jul 2004 19:48:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 9454 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2004 19:48:00 -0000 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (216.136.204.119) by fantasyhost.net with SMTP; 11 Jul 2004 19:48:00 -0000 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608F58DC0; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7013816A603; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:42:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C27416A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linares.terra.com.br (linares.terra.com.br [200.154.55.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986A243D1F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:37:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) Received: from estero.terra.com.br (estero.terra.com.br [200.154.55.138]) by linares.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6621DDC629; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from zumba.com (2-224.ctame701-2.telepar.net.br [200.181.170.224]) (authenticated user paulofonsecajr@terra.com.br) by estero.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528D73C017; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:30 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:37:46 -0300 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-www@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org" References: <20040709232917.7f1f68d1@localhost> From: "Paulo Fonseca Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-SpamGuard: checked Subject: SPAM MESSAGE - Sounds on Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:10:39 -0000 Hi Arjan, you're right. I removed linuxpluginwrapper and flash plugin keeps ok. But sounds not working on Opera yet on flash web pages as much as java applets, only images. The "Enable sound in web pages" are checked in preferences. what's happen with it. Paulo. On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:17:29 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > You don't need the linuxpluginwrapper if you're using linux-opera, > only if you're using FreeBSD Opera. In that last case, it will only > work on FreeBSD 4.x, that's why you received a message that flash > support was unavailable. > > linux-opera should work with linux-flashplugin{6,7} out of the box. > > Arjan > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:23:38 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. > wrote: >> Ok! >> >> Linux-Opera is just fine with flashplayer now on freebsd 5.1. >> >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> make install on /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> recompile and install /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf and >> make /usr/ports/linuxpluginwrapper >> >> it'll runs ok! >> >> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:01:56 -0300, Paulo Fonseca Jr. >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Arjan, >> > >> > I running now: >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >> > /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin >> > /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper >> > >> > I received the message "Flash6 with Opera is not avilable." on make of >> > linuxpluginwrapper, but in browser, the shockwave flash plugin is >> > active. I set up my browser to identify as Mozilla but web pages that >> > use flash do not work fine. Can you send me some web page address that >> > use flash ? www.globo.com or www.cursoaprovacao.com.br not work >> > correctly. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Paulo. >> > >> > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0200, Arjan Van Leeuwen >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:29:17 -0400, epilogue >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:14 -0300 >> >>> "Paulo Fonseca Jr." wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > I'm trying to enable flash plug-in on freebsd 5.1 like this: >> >>> > >> >>> > 1) cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplayer >> >>> > make install clean >> >>> > it's ok >> >>> > >> >>> > 2) Tools -> Preferences -> Plug-ins -> Change path >> >>> > the working path is: opera; >> >>> > /usr/X11R6/share/opera/plugins:/usr/local/lib/flash/ >> >>> > it's fine >> >>> > >> >>> > 3) when opera starts with "opera -debugplugin" command the message >> >>> below >> >>> > occurs: >> >>> >> >>> judging by the command above, you're using the 'native' version of >> >>> opera >> >>> (that is to say, opera for freebsd). is there any reason you would >> >>> expect >> >>> the LINUX-flashplayer to work? :P >> >>> >> >>> try /usr/ports/www/flashpluginwrapper for the native version OR >> install >> >>> /usr/ports/www/linux-opera. either should solve your problem. >> >> >> >> Use www/linuxpluginwrapper instead of www/flashpluginwrapper - it's >> >> newer, better maintained and supports a newer version of the Flash >> >> player. >> >> >> >> That said, it doesn't work with native Opera on FreeBSD 5.x - only on >> >> 4.x. So if you want Flash in Opera on FreeBSD 5.x, use linux-opera. >> >> >> >> Arjan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. >> >> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 >> >> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. > Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/07/2004 / Versão: 1.5.2 > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:11:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D58A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:11:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geofront.co.uk (port-179.dolphin.c4l.co.uk [80.253.114.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4DA43D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:11:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (82-35-149-117.cable.ubr04.enfi.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.149.117]) by geofront.co.uk (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i6BJE2YQ001762 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:14:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Message-ID: <40F190DF.2060701@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:11:27 +0100 From: Mike Woods User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040628) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Recomendations for a USB2 card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:11:46 -0000 Can someone recomend me a usb2 pci card, the MSI one that came with my K7D Master-L (ironicly to correct usb issues with the board) is giving me no end of problems with umass devices and frankly i've had enough so if someone can recomend me a known goood usb2 card id be greatfull, it needs to have 4 external ports and at least one internaly. Ta Muchly in advance. ----------------- Mike Woods IT Technician From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:34:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664A516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:34:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mbox-o00.iijmio.jp (mbox-o00.iijmio.jp [210.138.144.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD1E43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:34:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fmysh@iijmio-mail.jp) Received: MIO O00 id i6BJYrWn002637; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:34:53 +0900 (JST) Received: MMS R01 from prime.quad.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) for (authenticated) id i6BJYqHk028756; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:34:53 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:34:52 +0900 From: TAOKA Fumiyoshi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040712043452.08a1260e.fmysh@iijmio-mail.jp> In-Reply-To: <000501c46779$125f5d80$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <000501c46779$125f5d80$0200a8c0@satellite> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade index generation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:34:55 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:36 -0400 "dave" wrote: > I've deleted the entire ports tree, and rerun cvsup, refetched the entire > tree, reran portsdb -Uu and am still getting the same index generation > error, this is not occurring on the same package, which leads me to believe > i've got a corrupted database somewhere, no idea where. > Any help appreciated. # rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db # portsdb -Uu If this doesn't solve the problem, then you should show error messages. -- TAOKA Fumiyoshi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:43:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A9416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4ED743D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so7936815cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.56 with SMTP id w56mr67005cwb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040711124344dd53bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Geert Hendrickx In-Reply-To: <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:29 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:14 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > I don't see why. XFree86 has been offering us the best free X-server > for years. It always worked fine for me. > > And why would BSD care about a GPL-incompatible licese? > It has been providing the best X-Server for years but that does not necessarily mean it's that good. The development team, I hear, is not very welcoming of updates, fixes and suggestions. That's the main reason the x.org team split, it's so they could increase the integration of new features into the source tree at a greater pace. The X server as it stands now isn't even more feature packed than what Win98's GDI could do. I don't think anyone really cares about the licensing issue, as far as I can tell. People have an opinion on it but it hasn't driven anyone --roop From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:46:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4B816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:46:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525BF43D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6BJkW5P086328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:46:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6BJkWd6086327; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:46:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:46:31 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Len Conrad Message-ID: <20040711194631.GA86108@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Len Conrad , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5ef172bb040711092955912d06@mail.gmail.com> <200407111256.09120.ecrist@secure-computing.net> <6.1.1.1.2.20040711130345.0434ea48@81.255.84.73> <200407111328.28485.ecrist@secure-computing.net> <6.1.1.1.2.20040711134443.035b7ba8@81.255.84.73> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20040711134443.035b7ba8@81.255.84.73> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:46:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:46:38 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Len Conrad wrote: =20 > >a domain needs to be added to before it will function correctly. > >This is known as propagation. >=20 > the misnomer propagation is used by people who think DNS data needs time = to=20 > be available, to "propagate", over several days or a week, for all of=20 > Internet. This is pure BS. There is no such concept in DNS. For a brand new domain, you are exactly correct, or indeed for an RR added to an existing domain. For modification to any RR within a previously existing domain there may well be a delay perceived by the end user while waiting out the TTL of any old data cached in various servers between him and the authoritative servers. Those TTLs are typically somewhere between an hour and several days. It's not actually a propagation delay, but the effect is much the same. As the administrator of a zone, you can avoid or mitigate the delay by dropping the TTL on any zone sufficiently far in advance of any important changes. You will see DNS traffic to your server increase somewhat as network caches invalidate their stored data more often, but that's the price of getting the fresh data out there promptly. The worst case is where the NS records in the parent zone are modified to point to a new set of authoritative servers, but the previous authoritative servers are neither shut down nor loaded with the up to date zone data. A cache may keep referring back to the old servers and refreshing itself with what it has no way of telling is old data for some time. It's a good idea when changing the servers for a domain to make sure both the old and the new servers carry the latest zone data for some suitable overlap period. Cheers, Matthew=09 --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8ZkXiD657aJF7eIRAkMSAJ9ot97G9rm/Jh6nz3ORdfGOgd+oSwCgk9bU Z1+X23Vbem6LW80nom8d/zc= =690j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 20:57:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DB916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:57:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA5D443D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:57:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jperickson@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d19so307864rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.102.75 with SMTP id z75mr5208rnb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <378014850407111357c9085bc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:57:12 -0600 From: Jeff Erickson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040711002059.GE7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <378014850407101528112fd2be@mail.gmail.com> <20040711002059.GE7692@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> Subject: RE: Person new to FreeBSD needs help... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:57:33 -0000 This is a one hard drive system, and it is a single boot system. I can't say what the exact message is, because I replaced the "broken" FreeBSD with Debian (which was what was on it before) until I figure out what is going wrong, but it wasn't far from "unable to load kernel, trying kernel.old... unable to load kernel.old" and then it went to the "ok" prompt of what I am assuming to be the bootloader that FreeBSD put on. Thanks again, Jeff Erickson ---------- Reply message ---------- From: Saint Aardvark the Carpeted Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:20:59 -0700 Subject: Re: Person new to FreeBSD needs help... To: Jeff Erickson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Jeff Erickson disturbed my sleep to write: > I am new to FreeBSD and am having a problem. I downloaded the ISOs of > Disk 1 and 2 > of version 4.10 and go through the installation and everything seems > to be fine until I reboot. Then it says that it cannot load the kernel > or kernel.old. What am I doing wrong? Very strange -- those files should've been copied over as part of the installation. Are you able to post the exact message you get? Does your installation span more than one disk? Is this a dual-boot machine? Is there anything at all unusual about your setup? -- Saint Aardvark the Carpeted aardvark@saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com Because the plural of Anecdote is Myth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:01:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C892616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:01:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71A2643D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jperickson@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d19so307939rnf for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.71.13 with SMTP id t13mr114602rna; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37801485040711140023754b8c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:00:47 -0600 From: Jeff Erickson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <011201c466dd$694f3260$6401a8c0@sarah2k> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <011201c466dd$694f3260$6401a8c0@sarah2k> Subject: Fwd: Fw: Installation/Boot-up help please... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:01:04 -0000 I did set it to bootable. The partition had the flags C and A when I left the first stage. Thanks, Jeff Erickson ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: aerial_gus Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:24:21 -0400 Subject: Fw: Installation/Boot-up help please... To: "\"Jeff Erickson\"" Shoulda forwarded this to you as well as sent it to the list... I see that you asked twice > Did you set the disk bootable in the fdisk part of the install? The part > where you create the partitions? ----- Original Message ----- From: "aerial_gus" To: Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 8:10 PM Subject: Re: Installation/Boot-up help please... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Erickson" > To: > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:59 PM > Subject: Installation/Boot-up help please... > > > > Dear Group, > > > > I am new to FreeBSD and am having a problem. I downloaded Disk 1 and 2 > > of version 4.10 and go through the installation and everything seems > > to be fine until I reboot. Then it says that it cannot load the kernel > > or kernel.old. What am I doing wrong? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Jeff Erickson > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Did you set the disk bootable in the fdisk part of the install? The part > where you create the partitions? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:10:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ACF16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:10:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8485D43D1F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2051E2BD42; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:10:10 +1000 (EST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901FE511F8; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:40:07 +0930 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by wantadilla.lemis.com (8.12.11/8.12.6/Submit) id i6BLA1jV084764; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:40:01 +0930 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:40:01 +0930 From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" To: Steve Shorter Message-ID: <20040711211001.GZ14202@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20040711192909.GA70190@nomad.lets.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+vcRm3WFmV0Q/ShD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040711192909.GA70190@nomad.lets.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: serious vinum bug in 4-10 RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:10:13 -0000 --+vcRm3WFmV0Q/ShD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 11 July 2004 at 15:29:09 -0400, Steve Shorter wrote: > Howdy! > > I have 4 identical disks, labels etc are also identical. > > It looks like vinum after reboot does not recognize drives > properly, as it did immedialtely after initial configuration. > One drive/subdisk in each plex isn't recognized, and the other one > is duplicated, which destroys the mirror. > > I created 2 vinum volumes with > > # vinum create -f /etc/vinum.raid1 > > and the following config file > > drive data0 device /dev/da0d > drive data1 device /dev/da1d > drive data2 device /dev/da2d > drive data3 device /dev/da3d > I get (correctly) > > Volume mq0: Size: 18341345792 bytes (17491 MB) And no drives? > # vinum lv -r -v > > I get the following incorrect configuration. Notice that > drives data0 and data1 are missing and drives data2 and data3 are > duplicated where data0 and data1 should be. I see no drives. > Ideas? http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --+vcRm3WFmV0Q/ShD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA8aypIubykFB6QiMRAuHhAJ9mWGGB70NobZjIm+vQ08wlGy7AwgCdG9PO DR7pYlc4AAzf903bcPfwb68= =fA6r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+vcRm3WFmV0Q/ShD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:27:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AEF16A4CF for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:27:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E46343D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i6BLRIJW013142; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:27:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000801c4678c$77b046a0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: "TAOKA Fumiyoshi" , References: <000501c46779$125f5d80$0200a8c0@satellite> <20040712043452.08a1260e.fmysh@iijmio-mail.jp> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:17:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: portupgrade index generation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:27:23 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the reply. I tried your suggestion, but i am still getting a problem. Again it's not failing with any one particular package, that part seems to be random, but just before the failure i am getting the message: "error junk pointer to high to make sense" and then it stops. I have never seen an error like this. Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:28:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718E416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (lakermmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0170443D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.71.51]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040711212803.ZLF3786.lakermmtao03.cox.net@dolphin.local.net> for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:28:03 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6BLS237017248 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@dolphin.local.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by dolphin.local.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6BLS2fJ017243 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:28:02 -0500 From: Conrad Sabatier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040711212802.GA5473@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Formatting anomaly in sys...NOTES/LINT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:04 -0000 Why is it that the field separator in "device" lines differs from that in "options" lines in NOTES/LINT? I'm referring to the use of "device\t\t" and "options \t". Don't mean to be a hair-splitter, but why is this? Seems it would be better to keep a consistent format throughout. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 21:42:43 2004 R