From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 23 08:53:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40598693 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (smtp-int-m.obspm.fr [145.238.187.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFBEDFB for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by smtp-int-m.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/SIO Observatoire de Paris - 07/2009) with ESMTP id r4N8rX3o022519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 May 2013 10:53:34 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:53:33 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Paul Kraus Subject: Re: ZFS install on a partition Message-ID: <20130523085333.GC1426@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <5FB78660-EDA4-40DB-8A0D-B0DE23A0FB6C@kraus-haus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5FB78660-EDA4-40DB-8A0D-B0DE23A0FB6C@kraus-haus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Miltered: at smtp-int-m.obspm.fr with ID 519DD90D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 519DD90D.000/145.238.184.233/pcjas.obspm.fr/pcjas.obspm.fr/ Cc: Liste FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:53:44 -0000 Le 17/05/2013 ? 20:03:30-0400, Paul Kraus a écrit > > ZFS is stable, it is NOT as tuned as UFS just due to age. UFS in all of it's various incarnations has been tuned far more than any filesystem has any right to be. I spent many years managing Solaris system and I was truly amazed at how tuned the Solaris version of UFS was. > > I have been running a number of 9.0 and 9.1 servers in production, all running ZFS for both OS and data, with no FS related issues. Have you ever try to update a ZFS Pool on 9.0 to 9.1 ? I've a server with a big zpool in 9.0 I'm wonder if it's good idea to upgrade to 9.1. If I lost the data I'm close to dead person. If I thinking to upgrade to 9.1 it's because I got small issue about NFSD, LACP. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 23 mai 2013 10:51:49 CEST