Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:06:14 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve LinuxThreads compatibility in rfork() Message-ID: <20110711150614.GV43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111641340.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> References: <CAOfDtXMe_pkBdAFpUdvzmfs38Re=nw_YBz4w0Va0naEcuak7iw@mail.gmail.com> <20110711123332.GS43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111455230.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711133342.GT43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111556000.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20110711142232.GU43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1107111641340.7134@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IX4edXMD7HczJcpd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >RFLINUXPTH was used by the linuxthreads port, that was popular in the > >time of FreeBSD 4.x and may be 5.x to run mysql. I will object against > >this breakage. >=20 > Do I understand correctly that API/ABI backward compatibility with=20 > previous FreeBSD releases w.r.t RFLINUXPTH is needed ? Yes, I think so. >=20 > The 1st patch satisfies this. I agree that SIGCHLD part > is not easily readable. The SIGCHLD part is ugly. This is why I am asking about possible ways to overcome this. --IX4edXMD7HczJcpd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4bEWYACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gP/QCeKk+yrsL0D5YH6TD0NiYlqHeH UxIAoL8ywZCzTIFuvWY3oXoVuXe8QLpc =cYjR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IX4edXMD7HczJcpd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110711150614.GV43872>