From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 13:02:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4436EA12B68 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clint@clintarmstrong.net) Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3D21BA8 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clint@clintarmstrong.net) Received: by iofz202 with SMTP id z202so44401710iof.2 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:02:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=clintarmstrong.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=caTd3jRUPjwvjzoZGJPGIIKoGdck/dqP90guvMWIjBs=; b=g1jo6LK2QmDp7pyvNTJkAwLUcGUn6P9doeGKC4R46U3pZJX0fA+XtfiXAtVUmL1CHa 2k39cLoVQKuDqqFN0soiYifCAM5nbpzGdtwVHclvLezdXmjBfKEvdcxHr189kPk/zBrh WwDYAA8B4zxMqjUGa0JqZ7Aa5VT6wOkWIsbYI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=caTd3jRUPjwvjzoZGJPGIIKoGdck/dqP90guvMWIjBs=; b=MVCpCIc8qUS6QWgnLGdNHQ39FeO7ul1vAfslhwdPHDKY68UiSIbYN7tfas/2110y60 j4R8Aeloq0CJCck5v07W6XkiAL4BU1ch3LdifPi0bToC2ns/7myzBTjhyhHAuOK6x0Qi YfL9saMRRvDW3G7iNwaULzE5p/euyat5JqAlqrgS47tH/nDnQ0GhKzMxbVYRJrjrlcH3 8QfWV4fLqiWDqF32172Ckn2TaWPaEuaBR9fKLpgf6FxZiUGdIojyVFKLei1zr8T4qhdD 53w3NSJL5GTA+SE6XVroNjyFKEoRuRLzxjoPPG42RHeMP5AkiQ19r8UIaH9HhDcTdmfn 0zlg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQllxb4hwZRrfHw6W1Iw4Tm/1SjMaN7FQfDtlGSfMd4AK9lP57jxc1Hptp7uL6fg/Sl0KRkA X-Received: by 10.107.132.138 with SMTP id o10mr3233214ioi.176.1446123742352; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:02:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49230.128.135.52.6.1446047977.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <56310570.4080900@gmail.com> <1446057716.1158.27.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <61253.128.135.52.6.1446063930.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <56313886.8060109@quip.cz> <1790D059-5FB1-4CBB-BC4E-FFFC4CFD32FE@netzkommune.com> <56320EDA.3090101@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <56320EDA.3090101@quip.cz> From: Clint Armstrong Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:02:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc/jail.conf documentation? To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Philip Jocks Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:02:23 -0000 I didn't have stability trouble with unionfs, but I only used it for a few weeks before I switched to using zfs clones because I wanted to delegate zfs datasets to jails. To upgrade, I basically didn't, instead I'd just create a new upgraded base then change the jail fstab to point to the new base. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 08:19 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Clint Armstrong wrote on 10/29/2015 12:53: > > A little while ago I wrote up an overview of how I build jails using > > jail.conf at http://clinta.github.io/freebsd-jails-the-hard-way/. > > I noticed your are using unionfs. Is it working without any problems? > Every time (in the past) I read that somebody tried it, it always has > some problems with stability etc. > > And what you are using to update / upgrade modified system files in > thinjail1? (if nullfs ro shared base is updated / upgraded) > > Miroslav Lachman >