Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:14:13 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <19980131121413.28219@lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <19980131023641.18792@follo.net>; from Eivind Eklund on Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 02:36:41AM %2B0100 References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19980131023641.18792@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 02:36:41AM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> <<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> said: >> >>> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's >>> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and >>> X.25 code have all been fixed... >> >> But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to >> real users. > > Hey! I'm probably going to have to either revive X.25 or drop a project, as > TCP/IP over the ISDN D-channel is supposedly implemented encapsulated in > X.25. Are you sure you're not confusing it with X.75? I've never heard of X.25 being used at that level. And though X.75 encapsulation is available for ISDN, it's by no means the preferred method. Raw HDLC is much more efficient. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980131121413.28219>