From owner-freebsd-security Sat May 22 4:23:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601ED14C96 for ; Sat, 22 May 1999 04:23:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilmar@ws-ilmar.ints.ru) Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru (ws-ilmar.ints.ru [194.67.173.16]) by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA25616; Sat, 22 May 1999 15:23:09 +0400 (MSD) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws-ilmar.ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA32769; Sat, 22 May 1999 15:23:08 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 15:23:08 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: Warner Losh Cc: posix1e@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: secure deletion In-Reply-To: <199905220836.CAA02030@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 22 May 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > I think that what people are saying, if I understand them correctly, > is that it would be desirable if an entire file system could be told > to do the shredding delete. This would make it useful for a > filesystem mounted on /tmp, for example. You mean _all_ files on that filesystem? Maybe use inheritance - setting bit on directory will automatically wipe all deleting files on it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message