From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Jan 13 10:38:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9E415BCE for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:35:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA95205 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:15:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.org (emulation@FreeBSD.org) To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:15:26 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <387E163E.16722C62@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problems with linux_base-6.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Applies to: FreeBSD-stable I've gotten a number of reports of breakages caused by installing linux_base-6.1. The problem is not in the port itself, but in the linux kernel module and more specifically in the absent of the rt_sigsuspend syscall (syscall #179). I've just committed an implementation for the syscall. Please update your sources on the next suitable moment and recompile the kernel and/or linux kernel module. If there are still problems caused by using linux_base-6.1 instead of linux_base-5.2, post a description (as detailed as possible) of the problem to emulation@FreeBSD.org. Thanks, -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message