Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:44:34 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: standards@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFR: add widely accepted _ISOC99_SOURCE Message-ID: <20030310104434.P70629@espresso.bsdmike.org> In-Reply-To: <20030310061548.GA85361@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:15:48AM %2B0300 References: <20030310061548.GA85361@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > Many programs (from ports too) defines _ISOC99_SOURCE to get C99 > functions, but we don't sense this define currently. Here is the fix for > review: Cool. I didn't realize there was an existing precedence, or I would have used it. > --- cdefs.h.bak Wed Oct 23 05:04:06 2002 > +++ cdefs.h Mon Mar 10 09:11:01 2003 > @@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ > #define __POSIX_VISIBLE 198808 > #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 0 > #endif /* _POSIX_C_SOURCE */ > +#ifdef _ISOC99_SOURCE > +#define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1999 > +#endif This part isn't needed... > #else > /*- > * Deal with _ANSI_SOURCE: > @@ -378,7 +381,7 @@ > #define __XSI_VISIBLE 0 > #define __BSD_VISIBLE 0 > #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1990 > -#elif defined(_C99_SOURCE) /* Localism to specify strict C99 env. */ > +#elif defined(_ISOC99_SOURCE) /* Strict C99 env. */ > #define __POSIX_VISIBLE 0 > #define __XSI_VISIBLE 0 > #define __BSD_VISIBLE 0 ...since the next line here is: #define __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1999 Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030310104434.P70629>