Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:54:54 -0500 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Tools/scripts README README.portsearch ports/Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl Message-ID: <20111227215454.GA81075@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgk0Ym3Aa%2By3x53MpYhSA1DOFJgLD6whmOA6i=sNKf32ew@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112270332.pBR3WPZc022687@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111227142755.GA62363@atarininja.org> <CAF6rxgk0Ym3Aa%2By3x53MpYhSA1DOFJgLD6whmOA6i=sNKf32ew@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 01:55:28PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:32:25AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> eadler ?? ?? ??2011-12-27 03:32:25 UTC > >> > >> ?? FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> ?? Modified files: > >> ?? ?? . ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??UPDATING > >> ?? ?? Tools/scripts ?? ?? ?? ??README README.portsearch > >> ?? ?? Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl > >> ?? Log: > >> ?? - Remove some old duplicate words. They were getting in way of finding newer ones. > >> > >> ?? Revision ??Changes ?? ??Path > >> ?? 1.23 ?? ?? ??+2 -2 ?? ?? ??ports/Tools/scripts/README > >> http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/Tools/scripts/README.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23 > >> | --- ports/Tools/scripts/README ?? ?? ??2010/01/29 14:52:45 ?? ?? 1.22 > >> | +++ ports/Tools/scripts/README ?? ?? ??2011/12/27 03:32:25 ?? ?? 1.23 > >> | @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > >> | -$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.22 2010/01/29 14:52:45 kuriyama Exp $ > >> | +$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.23 2011/12/27 03:32:25 eadler Exp $ > >> | > >> | ??ardiff ?? ?? - compare two archives easily > >> | ??addport ?? ??- replacement for easy-import > >> | @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ portsearch - A utility for searching the > >> | ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? fields. This option behaves differently to the other op- > >> | ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? tions, see the EXAMPLES section > >> | > >> | - ?? ?? ??-f file ?? ??Use the index file file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX > >> | + ?? ?? ??-f file ?? ??Use the index file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX > > > > I don't think this was a duplicate word. It's letting you know that it > > expects to find an INDEX file named "file" (for whatever you specify). > > > I thought about that but I'm reading the sentence use the index "file" > instead of ... > In other words "file" is a type of "index" instead of a type of "index file". Normally there is a way to denote that the second instance of the word "file" maps directly to the argument "file", usually via some kind of typesetting. We don't have that possibility here, and there are clearly at least two ways to interpret that sentence, so I'd suggest we come up with an alternative way that makes it clear what is intended. -f index_file Use the index file, index_file, instead of /usr/ports/INDEX. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111227215454.GA81075>