From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 15:01:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 7EB3837B404; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B0F37B401; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B7A43F75; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4DM1Vm2075768; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4DM1UkZ075767; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 15:01:29 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20030513220129.GA75616@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200305130209.h4D294xs053232@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Perforce Change Reviews cc: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 31043 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 22:01:38 -0000 On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:35:50PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 13-May-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=31043 > > > > Change 31043 by peter@peter_hammer on 2003/05/12 19:08:19 > > > > And now for something completely different... i386 binary emulation! > > This was submitted by p4/i386 on the amd64 box itself! > > Can we possibly have a shared compat/ia32? Not by that name. > syscalls.master should be able to be shared for example. I certainly hope so -- we must make sure these stay in sync. -- David P.S. Peter is lucky he isn't answering his cell phone -- he'd just have gotten a "Yipie!!!" scream in his ear.