Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:23:15 +0200 From: "Ivo Vachkov" <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com> To: "Niki Denev" <nike_d@cytexbg.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bridge and stp defaults Message-ID: <f85d6aa70712170023m20d916c3pe691e6426737b9eb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2e77fc10712131524v706cdec8y18288efe458745c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <2e77fc10712131524v706cdec8y18288efe458745c9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not > enabled by default on them? > Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days? There are several reasons not to enable STP on a bridge port unless you're absolutely aware of what's happening here: http://unilans.net/phrack/61/p61-0x0c_Fun_with_Spanning_Tree_Protocol.txt > Regards, > Niki > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- "UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity." Dennis Ritchie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f85d6aa70712170023m20d916c3pe691e6426737b9eb>