Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:56:18 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Patrick Hess <patrickhess@gmx.net>, Anthony Campbell <ac@acampbell.uk>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Permissions problem for sane Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom%2BgG9b1imVzL9nx6HQmTSHr0n8WXg%2B7J7VksgAhHyO5g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150806104335.GA27748@ithaca.acampbell.uk> <1876444.Yqz8SnZpVd@desk8.phess.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508061514330.24695@wonkity.com> <CAJ-Vmom%2BgG9b1imVzL9nx6HQmTSHr0n8WXg%2B7J7VksgAhHyO5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Why isn't this the default behaviour for the saned package? Would it > be possible to make it just be said default behaviour? Running a network daemon rather than just changing permissions? That's probably why. Can't say what the problem is for the OP, but I know for a fact that it works with the permissions right. My 1640SU has been in use for years that way.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775>