Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:48:53 -0400 From: dave@hawk-systems.com (Dave) To: "Tom ONeil" <tom.oneil@tacni.com>, "Free" <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Frontpage Extensions - security and reliability assessment Message-ID: <DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNCEICIAAA.dave@hawk-systems.com> In-Reply-To: <3B89AB63.B2633D66@tacni.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FWIW - we gave up on FP on FreeBSD and put in a Win2K server. Making FP >work on unix felt.... dirty, somehow. I know, but I feel the same way about putting a Win2k server on our network... what do you do, offer a Network SLA and then a Win2k Server SLA to differentiate reliability and security :( At the same time I get about as much a feeling of "stability" from the frontpage extensions for *nix as I do from a Win2k server... needless to say that isn't great. > We have enough call for other M$ stuff that it became worth it to have >a separate machine. We have not as of yet... pushing the FBSD/Cisco/Redundancy aspect of things as our "thing" and have been gracefully outsourcing or passing on the few customers who were dying to work with FP or services on Win platform. Any positive solutions or feedback from anyone using frontpage extensions on FreeBSD/Apache? >> Reviewed Frontpage extensions and a myriad of security, reliability, >and general >> discontented reports. Have also tracked down some helpful resources like the >> rtr.com site. >> >> The general feeling is that adding FP extensions is going to create >a security >> and support headache. >> >> Looking for feedback, install suggestinos, particularly good >resources, hacks, >> patches, and anything else that may help us make an accurate >judgement on this. >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNCEICIAAA.dave>