Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:56:27 +0200 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Dmitry Kolosov <onyx@z-up.ru> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Battery charge limiting Message-ID: <20111020125627.GU25600@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <201110201644.25653.onyx@z-up.ru> References: <201110182335.15862.onyx@z-up.ru> <201110201434.50399.onyx@z-up.ru> <20111020105558.GB3818@izebigyomicsoda.praudit.hu> <201110201644.25653.onyx@z-up.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LDKKMwhyHHnvsTPO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0400, Dmitry Kolosov wrote: > > for thinkpads, there is no need to reverse any win32 stuff.. there is a > > linux driver that accesses the EC and is able to get/set battery > > parameters (among other stuff, like HDAPS) called tp_smapi > > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/tpctl/) >=20 > Ok. It looks like not every EC capable to be controlled, there is some ki= nd of=20 > active and passive ECs. How we can guess the one IS capable? May be prese= nce=20 > of some ACPI methods is the symptom of such capabilities? Any suggestions? If anyone likes to port tpctl, there's already a version of the Active Protection System hdaps: http://www.nupfel.de/data/hdaps.tar.gz That results in a 404, but I've uploaded a copy of it to http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/hdaps.tgz --LDKKMwhyHHnvsTPO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6gGnsACgkQKc512sD3afjDLACfUG47txV/a9Mt/UPYn/lv3FLw ZKMAnixilHU7FGou3RX36YqIYtnBnQNF =DDUo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LDKKMwhyHHnvsTPO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111020125627.GU25600>