Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:58:08 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, itojun@iijlab.net Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Will FreeBSD ever see native IPv6 ?? Message-ID: <19990727225808.H5283@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <71662.932744033@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 08:33:53AM -0700 References: <9128.932724101@coconut.itojun.org> <71662.932744033@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> various researchers and early-adopters, all of which can go to the > KAME site and grab the patches to 3.2-stable if they want to play now, > today. If we haven't done a good enough job of making that clear and > are suffering from defections to other *BSDs because of this, then we > just need to get the word out better. :-) Since KAME is probably closest to unified, I think we need to point people to the "offical" IPv6 patch set. The problem is the IPv6 wanting user does not know which of the available stacks to go with. It is easy to feel one would have to download 3 different stacks and experiement with all to determine which one works well. Lets help these people out. How about adding this to 3.3's RELEASE notes and a pointer from our website? (maybe also http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/install.html) -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990727225808.H5283>