Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:26:59 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mount.c Message-ID: <20040129142659.GA23750@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <20040129140955.GX47004@submonkey.net> References: <200401291316.i0TDGpbj052050@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040129132732.GB19899@FreeBSD.org.ua> <xzpu12e7sr7.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040129140955.GX47004@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:09:55PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:07:40PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > Did you mean -u here, because -a is not listed as allowed > > > in combination with the -o option? > > > > no, his patch makes > > > > # mount -u -o fstab -a -t ufs > > > > work as expected (i.e. restore the fstab flags on all ufs filesystems) > > > > previously, > > > > # mount -u -o fstab /specific/mount/point > > > > would work, but the -a version wouldn't. > > The manpage and usage bits should be updated to reflect this. I'm not > sure, but I think that's what Ruslan was getting at. > I don't get it..it is not specifically mentioned as forbidden. So it should work. What Ruslan meant (at least that is how I see it) is that -o fstab is only mentioned in combination with -u. That is correct. It still works with -a (without the -u), but specifying it is pointless as its net effect is nill. So I would not update the manual page. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040129142659.GA23750>