From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Tue Jun 28 15:24:23 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0D8B85BA4;
 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116652070;
 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:24:22 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u5SFMe0R024841
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from laptop.wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u5SFMcRj008885;
 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:38 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u5SFMXSO008882;
 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:33 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: laptop.wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
X-X-Sender: wojtek@laptop.wojtek.intra
To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users.
In-Reply-To: <CACpH0MdJ0YjtB-H5h-7u+dC+bbjVhN-Y7ejM7u7W-SL01qC3aA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606281722050.8870@laptop.wojtek.intra>
References: <CACpH0MdJ0YjtB-H5h-7u+dC+bbjVhN-Y7ejM7u7W-SL01qC3aA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (puchar.net [10.0.1.1]); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:24:23 -0000

> Correct me if I'm wrong, but amidst discussions of pNFS (among other
> things) I thought I should bring up something someone said to me: and that
> is (to quote him) "using NFS is too hard, I always fail."

Never had problems with NFS.  And i'm using in regularly.