Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:43:26 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Kaila <kaila@o-o.org> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010826134326.A29583@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108261453540.59262-100000@o-o.org>; from kaila@o-o.org on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 02:57:31PM -0500 References: <200108261958.f7QJwLr02345@mass.dis.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108261453540.59262-100000@o-o.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 02:57:31PM -0500, Kaila wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Mike Smith wrote: > > Naming linking it to csh broke things for people who weren't informed it was > happeneing, and then had to go and spend hours tracking down the problem and > fixing it. > How could you be uninformed about this change? The csh vs. tcsh bikeshed happen 16 months ago in the freebsd-current mailing list. Speaking up 16 months later is an unusual way to let the developers know you have an opinion on this change. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010826134326.A29583>