Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 09:35:32 -0600 From: jacks@sage-american.com To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> Cc: daniel.chayvialle@laposte.net, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20011130093532.010dd790@mail.sage-american.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111300938330.67007-100000@xena.gsicomp.on.c a> References: <3.0.5.32.20011130072600.010dd790@mail.sage-american.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hmmmm.... maybe it's because I'm using the named daemon...?? My new PPPoE DSL hookup has been working fine for almost a week now with both enabled.... you were very helpful during my setup... Anyway, nat is enabled in my ppp and natd in rc.conf.... At 09:39 AM 11.30.2001 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: >On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 jacks@sage-american.com wrote: > >> Daniel: I don't think NETGRAPH is taken care of at all on the fly in 4.2... >> it started with 4.3 or 4.4. Anyway, it's best to put those 4 lines in the >> kernel rather than letting it do it on the fly... >> >> nat should be enabled in ppp, but put natd lines in your rc.conf too (as >> per /etc/defaults/rc.conf).... > >Actually, no. You can only use PPP's NAT facility *or* /sbin/natd (aka >natd_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf.) Attempting to use both at the same >time will just cause problems. If you don't have any special >requirements, PPP's NAT will work just fine. > >-- >Matt Emmerton > > > Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Server Admin Sage-American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20011130093532.010dd790>