From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 17:23:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DCE16A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:23:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amsfep20-int.chello.nl (amsfep12-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B28143D2F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:23:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from prisma.rainbow-runner.nl ([84.119.207.55]) by amsfep20-int.chello.nlESMTP <20040824172352.UNOG8513.amsfep20-int.chello.nl@prisma.rainbow-runner.nl>; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:23:52 +0200 Received: by prisma.rainbow-runner.nl (Postfix, from userid 2006) id 3A7AB211B; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [192.168.1.5]) by prisma.rainbow-runner.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8192120; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:21:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Koop Mast To: "Shawn K. Quinn" In-Reply-To: <200408232106.08925.skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net> References: <200408232106.08925.skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:23:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1093368226.587.16.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.93FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on prisma.rainbow-runner.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtheora in graphics, not multimedia? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 17:23:56 -0000 On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 21:06 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > Maybe this only makes sense to me, but I just now noticed libtheora is > categorized under graphics. To me, it makes more sense for video codecs > like this to be under multimedia. Or is theer something I'm missing? > This is a question that I would send to the maintainer (me in this case). I'm aware of this. After I found the dirac codec in multimedia/, I got the idea to ask for a repro-copy of libtheora to multimedia. Koop