From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 22:07:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD6616A46B for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5A713C442 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from host-121.int.kcilink.com (host-121.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.121]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A546A8A009 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:51:21 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kcilink.com; s=kci0709; t=1201816281; bh=DJ/7oGlbTIHWa6Ro+JGnEZv/7o2p8LJev1mXdw9 BUjY=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References: X-Mailer; b=QojeSgGzOep24a0MGJNm8AUa8stcxpVPOkGkbV6hrmKPvJC0XlOJKu H06YhfKKYsqD3rF5D+LKZrXTURL1y2Y0Jxj3ZSGvK08L88BJWwz1pHswERB2adht6Qf npUda9fWthiKDnEENxfEuzlmU1qcj7Mlm1Iyyy6Y6SaIgejY3k= Message-Id: <8BC7BE2B-6820-43F0-A91D-6FB98DAC9067@kcilink.com> From: Vivek Khera To: FreeBSD Ports In-Reply-To: <048997FB3012013C73148867@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:51:21 -0500 References: <2E5E730F2C630876A866F1F0@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <3CC34DA7-F3B7-4AC5-B34B-6C269ED0A133@khera.org> <048997FB3012013C73148867@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Subject: Re: Question about non-standard CPAN port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:07:42 -0000 On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > One other question. Should the PORTNAME be lower case even though > the DISTNAME is not? Or does it matter? Portname for perl ports is generally upper/lower case mix as the name of the perl module itself. I don't think it needs to be smashed to lower case. Just do a pkg_info and see all the p5-* ports... I like to name them to match what DISTNAME needs to fetch the file, so I don't have to explicitly set DISTNAME.