From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  9 08:00:55 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCCF16A4BF
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Sep 2003 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web40708.mail.yahoo.com (web40708.mail.yahoo.com
	[66.218.78.165])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 902BE43F75
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  9 Sep 2003 08:00:54 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from cykyc@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030909150054.30398.qmail@web40708.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [209.98.4.50] by web40708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 09 Sep 2003 08:00:54 PDT
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon Passki <cykyc@yahoo.com>
To: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net>,
	Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20030909004121.GA782@lewiz.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: pam_krb5 port question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cykyc@yahoo.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:00:55 -0000


--- Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk
> wrote:
> > Jon Passki wrote:
> > >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT
> Kerberos
> > >and not Heimdal?
> > 
> > KRB5_IMPL=heimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you
> fix this 
> > and send a patch to the port maintainer.
> 
> I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled...
> I just
> wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the
> Heimdal
> Kerberos provided in the base system.

My understanding is that the base systems builds pam_krb5 on
-STABLE.  Take a look at /usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5/*  If
MAKE_KERBEROS5 is set, the pam module should be built and
installed.  This port isn't necessary for the base system.  It
would only be necessary for the Heimdal or MIT ports.

Take care,

Jon


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com