From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Nov 21  1:20:16 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC74837B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from evil.ki.iif.hu (evil.ki.iif.hu [193.225.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC7E43E4A
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:20:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mohacsi@evil.ki.iif.hu)
Received: (qmail 45511 invoked by uid 1023); 21 Nov 2002 09:20:10 -0000
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:20:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Janos Mohacsi <mohacsi@niif.hu>
X-X-Sender: mohacsi@evil.ki.iif.hu
To: arch@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>,
	<kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
Subject: TCP ECN merge possible from ALTQ? 
Message-ID: <20021121095741.C48490-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello to all,

	Is it possible to merge from ALTQ the TCP_ECN part to the
FreeBSD-current later to FreeBSD-stable?

	Luigi I have seen your and Alfred Perlstein comments on TCP SACK.
What do you think about TCP_ECN? Is it worth including in the FreeBSD?
According to measurement of Sally Floyd, It is worth using it.
	What do you think merging to -current?
Best Regards,
		Janos Mohacsi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message