Date: 27 Oct 2001 03:47:33 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <xzp1yjprgzu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.011026182323.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > My bad. C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to > Garrett. Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't. Chapter and verse, please. All I have is the final draft of C99, and all it says about the width of time_t is that it is an arithmetic type "capable of representing times" (7.23.1). There is no mention at all of the word "long" in section 7.23. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1yjprgzu.fsf>