Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 09 Aug 1999 09:48:25 +0900
From:      Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To:        imp@village.org
Cc:        mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, sanpei@sanpei.org, iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [APM] kernel panic with apm command(Sotec WinBookPro). 
Message-ID:  <199908090044.JAA18560@tasogare.imasy.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:17:18 -0600" <199908090017.SAA02508@harmony.village.org>
References:  <199908090017.SAA02508@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> which should return be EINVAL.  ENOSYS is returned only when the
> system call itself isn't implemented.  Since ioctl is implemented on
> FreeBSD, returning it would be inappropriate.

OK, I'll correct it.
I was just charmed by the message `Function not implemented' :-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908090044.JAA18560>