Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:33:05 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, "freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build Message-ID: <e462605b-463e-1530-928a-6d6302483ab5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrrYNTcqNCRXU5EVrNMH7rTpX4Ld6h25LWvRjWqC3NOWw@mail.gmail.com> References: <925D3E9A-4EF0-4B49-83D4-C9574170EB66@yahoo.com> <4b7cb935-7643-da6c-261a-d69e9f155c78@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfqerMwkpAQwYbbi7fKbv9vDT=rTj5kofyju54FXe_hOEw@mail.gmail.com> <27396a4d-7fe9-2540-dfd2-28ae75109e01@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfrrYNTcqNCRXU5EVrNMH7rTpX4Ld6h25LWvRjWqC3NOWw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/15/18 11:55 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:25 PM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org <mailto:jhb@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > On 10/15/18 11:06 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:20 AM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org <mailto:jhb@freebsd.org> <mailto:jhb@freebsd.org <mailto:jhb@freebsd.org>>> wrote: > > > > On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc > > > via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system after having > > > bootstrapped via (in part) base/binutils and the .txz > > > produced on the host (amd64). > > > > > > Looks like having both: > > > > > > /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-* > > > and: > > > /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-* > > > > > > in a powerpc64 environment confuses "phase: build-depends" > > > in poudriere for the devel/powerpc64-gcc build: > > > > Ah, I could see that. I had kept the longer binary names with the full tuple > > since the original base/binutils had them, but I've considered stripping them > > as we only really need /usr/bin/as, etc. for the base system. I hadn't gotten > > to the point of trying to build any ports with base/* as I'm still trying to > > just do a buildworld (and running poudriere in a qemu image of mips64 would > > be very unpleasant). I think probably base/binutils just needs to drop the > > names with a full tuple if possible. > > > > > > Having symlinks to the long names plays nicer with autoconf, of at least has in the past. Our build system doesn't care, though... > > I think it only plays nicer for the port. We've never had /usr/bin/x86_64-freebsd-ld > linked to /usr/bin/ld in base, and base/binutils' role is to provide /usr/bin/as, > /usr/bin/ld, etc. > > > The tools built by xdev did, though not that specific link... I do agree that if we do this, it's only of marginal benefit. The xdev tools are probably more inline with the devel/<arch>-binutils and devel/<arch>-gcc ports which do install those links to be cross-build friendly. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e462605b-463e-1530-928a-6d6302483ab5>