Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:58:27 -0700 From: Mike Porter <mupi@mknet.org> To: "Passki, Jonathan P" <jpasski@kpmg.com>, "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "'freebsd-ports@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg_version Message-ID: <00112910582702.11309@mukappa.home.com> In-Reply-To: <7799D023E51ED311BFB50008C75DD7B402881AEC@uschiexc05.kweb.us.kpmg.com> References: <7799D023E51ED311BFB50008C75DD7B402881AEC@uschiexc05.kweb.us.kpmg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Passki, Jonathan P wrote: > <rant> <snip..it's in the archives if anyone wants to read it again....> > </rant> > I have to agree with the rant, but I think we are straying off topic for - -stable, and need to either move it completely to -ports or go private. And I know I'm not one with time or expertise to be able to do much beyond contribute ideas, although I have been known to catch a few errors in c code from time to time.... Having said that...I am curious, since my previous *nix experience is Linux (mostly RedHat, but I have played with several different versions), if there is in the works any sort of "unified" interface. I know that RedHat (and debian too, IIRC), has an X interface to their package management system. While I don't necessarily think that X is the answer to everything (yeah, it's pretty, and graphical (doesn't that make it pretty graphic?? <(}; ) ) it does tend to be a bit slower than I like for running things under. I find myself using X so I can run Netscape and do thngs like read the handbook, etc, but switching over to a VC to do any "real" system work....it seems that an ncurses based package handler shouldn't be too difficult to handle, and could make installing ports a lot less painful. Consider it a "suggestion" rather than a rant, put it on the "wish list" or whatever. <rambling and otherwise thinking out loud> If I can help, I will, but I wish I had more time to play with this stuff, so I doubt I would be able to make much impact. It occurs to me that a perl script might be able to handle everyhting that has been discussed here, though TCL has the added advantage of being able to interface with Tk if run under X, (I guess perl::Tk does that, too) which could give you the flexibility of a single command, that could then run in graphical or curses-based depending on the environment it sees....given a year or so I might be able to write something like that. If someone else writes/has written a framework for this, I would be happy to interface with them and help polish the UI and test. </rambling> mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjolQ8MACgkQZ7GovTQbIm4RVQCfVvl0NLuajHOBIHQXZdUqPotM WRwAoIJGjWuRT1KmHjC3o6HqU4chS0Ng =OBWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00112910582702.11309>