Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:29:38 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package-recursive not installing port Message-ID: <542CF0D2.9090209@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <CAPTAQB%2Bxi8XdKmwkYARAo1Dk8AgzohnfM29g2gf1_71HJd6ToA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPTAQB%2Bxi8XdKmwkYARAo1Dk8AgzohnfM29g2gf1_71HJd6ToA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2014 07:16, Amitabh Kant wrote: > But postgresql92-server has not been installed on the system > root@test_pkg:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server # pkg info > dialog4ports-0.1.5_2 Console Interface to configure ports > gettext-0.18.3.1_1 GNU gettext package > gmake-3.82_2 GNU version of 'make' utility > indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page = index > libiconv-1.14_4 Character set conversion library > libxml2-2.9.1_1 XML parser library for GNOME > pkg-1.3.8_2 Package manager > pkgconf-0.9.7 Utility to help to configure compiler an= d > linker flags > postgresql92-client-9.2.9 PostgreSQL database (client) >=20 >=20 > I have now tested this with multiple ports (postgresql server, pgbounce= r, > nginx) with the same results. It seems even 10-RELEASE has the same > behaviour. Is this how it is meant to behave, because earlier creating > packages from ports used to install all the ports? It's expected that postgresql92-server will not be installed as a dependency of anything using postgresql92-client -- after all, the postgresql database instance you're using could easily be situated on a completely different machine. It's also the case that 'make package' nowadays does not install the package being built. This is a result of the switch to staging and is generally a very good thing. Basically, if you want to use that package, then explicitly install it rather than relying on side-effects of the now outmoded and distinctly sub-optimal behaviour the ports used to have. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJULPDSXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT/UoP/0kZeM9r3Nq8GyDv7I6uutDT SBcvT7raOHa9RaPJmKJfhM6Rr/BgJcbc3IyHMYbwXuswBeMdmRGRnBekwLUdgY6i afDr8yT5fj4oTayWf41+2qSmObKnHgW7nYdmYsn+NpFOPmvzhuj8w0XrahS+kr9s /5qXxavw9rW+m+inVzyrNDoksjCgdy/c6jVLPRupA+WjZl3JcaRF8nizc5KrRRf9 VUsrH4liZhOL/vT4tcIsNRDHnkpKzn+tRcd+9sJTHaNHz2Xxig8z4Na83izy50Yc EA6lAbbLTYdwXfaFbAmf+m6l2cSXV8+aD2/+3xadg/97Qs5Bfsnec/Cf0xw6Aq9O 754cFRIXETJMRH3buXUCX8u+6mqstH4W6kThjKkqNA33IBiI9HDvqdjcONNIi6if x+yhjkMGEHBmq8o5a0vKdS6185czR5JnzhPF9WJSH7y7RSzRRNBWeb2r0u9f2ZsW HRc5ABXLTif25gdbsvAq9gciZsGA7dECvdSZJOGQG2Eb48XrKokai0VIM6T+qT7d ztMxmWBsTKMtjrZ25PcFXjjlEPGqmlWrEjqk4b/5psvPVjn8tj9NYGoX9cXDiU84 xS7ig0N6b9yh8BISWiL79iqw+ex/Y07fX+ambX7XkFB+8Oifzn9I/j1R0lI4SFHH HIGRQSAbbGpS9eRjRxt6 =EMRz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XtLRkimft0kaofJS3f1lgaR2LpH3MDfal--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?542CF0D2.9090209>