Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 09:58:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191455] x11-fm/doublecmd: no remember editors/lazarus dependency Message-ID: <bug-191455-13-s3YaAJijOw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191455-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191455-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191455 --- Comment #7 from Be=C3=B1at Gonzalez Etxepare <bbtruk@users.sourceforge.= net> --- Because each revision in the ports tree works as a single unit. Things may change in a port between revisions, and every other port which has a depend= ency on it has to be aware of this change. As an example, you can see that lazarus port recently changed its install location from /usr/local/share/lazarus/ (until v1.2) to /usr/local/share/lazarus-{VERSION}/ (starting from v1.2.4). Now, imagine you have lazarus v1.2 installed and try to update doublecmd po= rt (to v0.5.10_1) without updating lazarus port first. Doublecmd port would be unable to find your lazarus installation directory (it would search in /usr/local/share/lazarus-{VERSION}/ instead of /usr/local/share/lazarus/) a= nd the build process would fail. This is the reason why updating a single port without its dependencies is a= bad idea. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191455-13-s3YaAJijOw>