Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:45:09 -0500
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-net@shapeshifter.se>
Subject:   Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
Message-ID:  <20060824224509.GD40213@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <B70BC65E-A460-4BC8-8363-A5835E65A276@mac.com>
References:  <F77EE4452C54A9609A58CD03@garrett.local> <44EE1E48.6000006@shapeshifter.se> <D2886A30-B6C5-4F53-995B-91B96CD58592@mac.com> <44EE23E7.2010800@shapeshifter.se> <B70BC65E-A460-4BC8-8363-A5835E65A276@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NtwzykIc2mflq5ck
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:21:41PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> >>Queries to 254.169.in-addr.arpa MUST return NXDOMAIN (or RCODE 3, =20
> >>to choose a non-BIND specific term).
> >
> >We're talking about mDNS here, not DNS. I would argue that because
> >mDNS is link-local it makes perfect sense to be able to resolve
> >254.169.in-addr.arpa using mDNS.
>=20
> True, agreed-- that's in part (b) of what I quoted.  The specific =20
> part is:
>=20
> "Names that are resolvable only on the local link (such as through =20
> use of
> protocols such as Link Local Multicast Name Resolution [LLMNR]) MUST NOT
> be used in off-link communication."
>=20
> What this means is that the hostname-to-address mapping for =20
> 254.169.in-addr.arpa addresses must be unique per interface.  If you =20
> have two interfaces which are connected to different LLA subnets, =20
> 169.254.1.1 might map to hostnameA on one, and that same IP might be =20
> hostnameB on the other.

Hmm, that seems to argue for some further namespace mangling so forward
lookups make sense.  From that perspective the namespace really should
be xxx.<interface>.local internally and xxx.local on the wire.  Actually
doing that would probably cause all sorts of problems though. :(

-- Brooks

--NtwzykIc2mflq5ck
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFE7iv1XY6L6fI4GtQRAjMVAJ4+KuzBkl9Yz3cl6utDAXzcFShCUgCg4UAg
a1zXs96+/xoUn7OiZhOlDbE=
=b3/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NtwzykIc2mflq5ck--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060824224509.GD40213>