From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 13:29:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DA106566C for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from angel.ticketswitch.com (angel.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE0C8FC16 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [10.50.50.2] (helo=smaug.rattatosk) by angel.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JWtgy-000JBu-OB; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:56 +0000 Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.50.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by smaug.rattatosk with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JWtgy-0007O3-MI; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:56 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JWtgy-0000Ug-Ld; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:56 +0000 To: andy@xecu.net, Mark_Andrews@isc.org In-Reply-To: <20080305082031.E37745@shell.xecu.net> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:56 +0000 Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:29:59 -0000 O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line... > In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks. ...I fail to see how not wanting to enable it leads to you wanting to remove it from the kernel entirely ? That is the bit I don't understand about all of this discussion. Theres probably hundereds of bits in the kernel you havent enabled and don't use, why specificly do you want an option to take IPV6 out ? I am genuinely piuzzled - why isn't "ipv6_enabled="NO" sufficient ? That's what I do on IPv4 networks and it works fine for me. -pete.