Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 07:26:41 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, rb@gid.co.uk, jdp@polstra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Spurious SIGXCPU Message-ID: <199806102126.HAA15894@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <24713.897482082@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Jun 10, 98 02:34:42 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > If you look with ps does the time consumption look sane for this process ? I wasn't looking at the time. After rebuilding both world and a kernel, the same program ran to completion without a sig 24. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806102126.HAA15894>