From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 10 14:26:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA22646 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:26:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA22577 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by cimlogic.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.7) id HAA15894; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 07:26:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199806102126.HAA15894@cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: Spurious SIGXCPU In-Reply-To: <24713.897482082@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Jun 10, 98 02:34:42 pm" To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 07:26:41 +1000 (EST) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, rb@gid.co.uk, jdp@polstra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > If you look with ps does the time consumption look sane for this process ? I wasn't looking at the time. After rebuilding both world and a kernel, the same program ran to completion without a sig 24. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message