Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Sep 1997 14:49:17 -0700
From:      Don Wilde <don@PartsNow.com>
To:        David Kelly <dkelly@fly.HiWAAY.net>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 8" Floppy drive?
Message-ID:  <341EFEDD.5FE6@PartsNow.com>
References:  <199709161522.KAA26984@fly.HiWAAY.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey, what a challenge!

	First, you get your boss to sleuth-out the answers to what format and
what computer they were rigged to. The programmer or MIS type who
managed the machine is still alive, so if you have employee files back
that far you might have luck with FOUR11.com.
	Second, you can verify the drive manufacturer's specs. Many libraries
still have microfilm libraries which would include the tech magazines
such as Electronic Design which published specs on such drives. If it's
a name brand like Digital or IBM, of course, your search will be much
narrower. If it is a Shugart, it's more likely that it could be any
number of formats. 
	ID'ing the sector size and track width would be more tricky, but if I
remember right the spindle speed was fixed. That being the case, and the
cable pinout being known, a good technician with a scope should be able
to find the tracks by probing at the output of the sense amp. Most of
the 8" drives used steppers to go between tracks across the platter, so
track width should be easy to pinpoint. From here you could get to data,
but unless it's ASCII or there's enough ASCII to help you get an idea of
the data format, you'll still need to know the original software that
wrote it. DBASE II, Peachtree, ??? Anyway, the data is reachable and you
can get it into a computer by sinply running the drive through all
tracks and reading the amplified data in through an ADC board. Knowing
the OS will tell you what besides Track 0 contains file table data.
Finally, 50 disks of data from those days is not much in today's terms.
Once you have it in a system -- in whatever format -- you can then
reduce it to ASCII or at least the binary pattern stored in digital form
and decode from there.
	I think my first suggestion is the best, though. Remember that this IS
only 15 years back, even though the technology is stone age. Those of us
dinosaurs who do remember those days can still byte!
-- 
  oooOOO O O O o * * *  *   *   *
 o     ___       _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ ___==_
 V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde [don@PartsNow.com] [http://www.PartsNow.com ]
/oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo--ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo--oo



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?341EFEDD.5FE6>