Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:49:13 +1100 From: George Abdelmalik <gabdelmalik@uniridge.com.au> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtc(1): reproducible segmentation fault Message-ID: <20151024224913.GA5266@barney.uniridge.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1445618437.91534.13.camel@freebsd.org> References: <562A3FE5.8020809@uniridge.com.au> <F6FF4D7B-C380-4410-8A4D-6E376DF76C7D@gmail.com> <1445618437.91534.13.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40:37AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Don't cc me. I looked at the in-tree dtc code once and decided it's > too flawed to try to maintain, and it supports only a subset of the > full dts syntax. That's why we switched back to using the gnu dtc for > buildkernel. But I just discovered that for some reason gnu is not the > copy of dtc that gets installed, it's just the one that gets used > during a buildkernel. > > So basically if you do 'dtc -v' and the result is 0.4.0, that's too > limited to compile modern dts files, and if the result is 1.4.0 that's > the gnu dtc that should work fine, and if it doesn't we probably need > to report the problem upstream. > > -- Ian > Thanks Ian, The GPL dtc worked fine. I was actually wanting to compiler the in-tree zedbaord.dts file. I'd successfully done it some time back in June but must have been using the GPL dtc without realising it. George.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151024224913.GA5266>