From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 10:55:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2DE16A41F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from fly.ebs.gr (dslcustomer-239-113.vivodi.gr [83.171.239.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1270E43D53 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from ebs.gr (root@hal.ebs.gr [10.1.1.2]) by fly.ebs.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0KAt0AF005111; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:55:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Received: from [10.1.1.158] (ajax.ebs.gr [10.1.1.158]) by ebs.gr (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0KAtqHL077572; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:55:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@ebs.gr) Message-ID: <43D0C183.5050900@ebs.gr> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:54:59 +0200 From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: EBS Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Kiesel References: <1137336063.713.4.camel@boost.home.ahk> <1137338926.713.8.camel@boost.home.ahk> In-Reply-To: <1137338926.713.8.camel@boost.home.ahk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JBoss 4.0.* does not build (sometimes?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:55:04 -0000 Alex Kiesel wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 15:41 +0100, Alex Kiesel wrote: >> I do suspect, it's got nothing todo with the FreeBSD versions, but more >> with something else, I do not see. Both machines only have this single >> jdk installed - nothing else. > > It seems that suspiction was correct. I noticed that one the failing > machine, the port axis-1.2.2 was installed while on the other it wasn't. > > After removal of the port, the compile went through. JBoss seems to ship > an own version of Axis which was behind the port's version in the > classpath probably. > > So, I wonder if java/jboss4 should list axis-* as CONFLICTS? A better solution would be to patch the build process to not reference outside jars. Cheers, Panagiotis