From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 00:12:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78EA86D3 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250F3B83 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s8E0CKIM079881; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:12:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5414DD64.7040902@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:12:20 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: minor question .... References: <5414AF66.80606@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5414AF66.80606@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:12:21 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:23 -0000 > .... I usually have long login sessions (weeks, maybe months), 99% of > which are spent in rxvt shells, either on this machine or logged into > other boxen on my LAN. I login as regular user. On 1 desktop, I open > an rxvt session, su to root, then (try to) duplicate that shell using > the following CLI commands: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:45:35pm] 325 % ( rxvt -sl 5000 -fn > -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) > rxvt: No match. [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:45:42pm] 326 % which rxvt > /usr/local/bin/rxvt [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:45:49pm] 327 % ( > /usr/local/bin/rxvt -sl 5000 -fn > -*-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-17-*-100-100-*-100-*-* & ) > /usr/local/bin/rxvt: No match. [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:53:56pm] 328 % > > also tried: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:54:49pm] 329 % ( rxvt & ) [root@kabini1, > /etc, 3:55:21pm] 330 % No protocol specified rxvt: can't open display > :0 > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:55:23pm] 330 % > > This worked AOK under FC14, apropos of little, but doesn't work under > FBSD 9.3 .... Any clues as to why not ? It save me a bunch of > clicking the rxvt icon, clicking the maximize button on the new > window, & su-ing to root (3 steps instead of 1, grrrrr ....) .... > obviously not show stopping, but irritating .... Same problem as > regular user .... Any clues appreciated .... Sorry about the red-herring earlier, didn't understand what you were saying. The su doesn't preserve the environment of the xterm process, which includes the DISPLAY variable, so it doesn't know where to display. The fontpath may have a similar problem. After doing the su, do whatever is the right thing in your shell to export the DISPLAY environment variable. doing the su. I'm basing this on the behavior I see using xterm, which should be the same if I understand what rxvt does correctly. You might try testing by leaving off the font param. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 06:20:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBE2C2C for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4891CB7C for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:20:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.98.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 36617905; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:20:10 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8E6K6Qe032913; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:20:09 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.9/8.14.7/Submit) id s8E6K6iX032912; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Message-ID: <20140914062006.GA32633@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140902132318.GA86135@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903144836.GA14568@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20140903205449.GB3259@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903211809.GA3731@aerie.jexium-island.net> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:20:16 -0000 Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > > alternatively: > > > > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 > > (not in "VT100") "XTerm*keyboardType: vt220" turns out to have an unpleasant side effect. The "+" key on the numeric keypad now prints "," instead of "+". -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 06:27:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3051FCF9; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B80AC26; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v6so2943096lbi.13 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:27:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=S2lrqsKpaTcdzWI4awQIPylzkNNpVR2x139XEtbhqe8=; b=flMDJriteOAjY3GILezAojBXqW4xcQ4HWfwl73lp8PLWQjcbjf6UemI9RK6o9OqTK2 FRQlOkqTh5JhDX9ZLOgKZGQJQXdFn6XGvoijGuKxJxReE+JBoXCVSWrOSisVBU1+6QZa UAC7upfO3i4TQwkQ44NcFD3+V4+zUymdQ9g2wKQKNxiJ5rwUIyIbBTfZzZihCWHDZI2C 6Va4rdJN0fHFCg8dxd+5F9EEqp0w6i2faYbhEJrHyHFZa3fP41cS9oMgU3xpAmoSBl3U B4nRD/uEgDX4LJEX6g39D4XseLRdaoexWlpeLzFkNY/e6BTdyy6onWIvtGWat/ZyUnuD EeTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.114.227 with SMTP id jj3mr18912253lbb.39.1410676026191; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.132 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:27:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:27:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD and WiDi / Miracast / WiFi Direct HDMI streaming From: Waitman Gobble To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:27:09 -0000 On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > ok.. one thing - it seems OpenWFD was dropped and the dev started a new > project 'MiracleCast'.. the other day I *thought* I saw that MiracleCast > had a dependency on SystemD, which I don't see at the moment (that could > potentially cause trouble lol). > > http://dvdhrm.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/on-wifi-democratic-republics-and-miracles/ > > anyway I suppose it would be better to work on porting that instead of > OpenWFD. > > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:25 PM, CeDeROM wrote: >> > I have ordered a Streamcast dongle from Google, lets give it a try :-) >> >> Sorry, I have refernced a CHROMECAST device :-) >> >> http://www.google.com/chrome/devices/chromecast/ >> >> -- >> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >> > > > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > 510-830-7975 > yeah. configure: error: Package requirements (libudev libsystemd >= 213) were not met: Package libudev was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libudev.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libudev', required by 'world', not found Package 'libsystemd', required by 'world', not found -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 07:12:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8FE14B; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4724F78; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mc6so3060317lab.17 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LORVT0g0UCbaaS/yFaB2tyINzQyQ5oC/mrtrgrpcqv8=; b=fmFj5t5CI0Tn+N45philVrQUp9o5FlbwKucp1A+wQD/8nXMRyRnFRi4iNMI6Oy2ZKB nufHHRYliDHs3QQbL4CrISRSUt46RB3IVBqRFu4zQ0NXvgKqxkOYoz0z3a7ZMaZSri8e ZtNQ1vHi151hshGtyhCQ6YBhh1xG5w7nHDXWjpRleEBrsry7IxEDnI8oTBKy72Bc2DFY qH/FwjPpZO8De7EdAg/OAJIbItfo3Ym/D5dcbxQr3GUSqW8YKI6CAyP67OR59WUf3Au9 Trpg5m6XYdoHkPWgsNygrCkyUvZr1jDjn1jWwokeqBdtCSGst1DAGmj/dPfSQGuf+mx/ A0oA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.33.74 with SMTP id p10mr19028333lbi.0.1410678732212; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.132 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:12:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD and WiDi / Miracast / WiFi Direct HDMI streaming From: Waitman Gobble To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:12:15 -0000 On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Waitman Gobble > wrote: > >> ok.. one thing - it seems OpenWFD was dropped and the dev started a new >> project 'MiracleCast'.. the other day I *thought* I saw that MiracleCast >> had a dependency on SystemD, which I don't see at the moment (that could >> potentially cause trouble lol). >> >> http://dvdhrm.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/on-wifi-democratic-republics-and-miracles/ >> >> anyway I suppose it would be better to work on porting that instead of >> OpenWFD. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, CeDeROM wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:25 PM, CeDeROM wrote: >>> > I have ordered a Streamcast dongle from Google, lets give it a try :-) >>> >>> Sorry, I have refernced a CHROMECAST device :-) >>> >>> http://www.google.com/chrome/devices/chromecast/ >>> >>> -- >>> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Waitman Gobble >> San Jose California USA >> 510-830-7975 >> > > > yeah. > configure: error: Package requirements (libudev libsystemd >= 213) were > not met: > > Package libudev was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libudev.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > Package 'libudev', required by 'world', not found > Package 'libsystemd', required by 'world', not found > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > 510-830-7975 > ... with some intensive hacking we can maybe make it work :) it's a start anyway. getting rid of the systemd stuff and switching logging functions to syslog(3) miracled builds (but seriously no doubt hours more work involved to do something useful). :) this is just really a simple shell around the important guts. # clang -o miracled miracled.c # ./miracled -help miracled [OPTIONS...] ... Remote-display Management-daemon. -h --help Show this help --version Show package version -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 08:01:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565337B4; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA827396; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:01:42 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= To: Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:01:41 +0200 Subject: RE: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Topic: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Index: Ac/Pn3ZsBMkNFjzwTES1U2+8gvbTdgAUXfbA Message-ID: References: <5414C0A0.8090806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5414C0A0.8090806@FreeBSD.org> Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:01:47 -0000 PiANCj4gV2hhdCBoYXBwZW5zIGlmIHlvdToNCj4gDQo+ICAgIHBrZyBkZWxldGUgLWFmDQoNCkRv bmUNCg0KPiAgICBwa2cgYm9vdHN0cmFwDQoNCnBrZyBib290c3RyYXANClRoZSBwYWNrYWdlIG1h bmFnZW1lbnQgdG9vbCBpcyBub3QgeWV0IGluc3RhbGxlZCBvbiB5b3VyIHN5c3RlbS4NCkRvIHlv dSB3YW50IHRvIGZldGNoIGFuZCBpbnN0YWxsIGl0IG5vdz8gW3kvTl06IHkNCkJvb3RzdHJhcHBp bmcgcGtnIGZyb20gcGtnK2h0dHA6Ly9wa2cuRnJlZUJTRC5vcmcvZnJlZWJzZDoxMDp4ODY6NjQv bGF0ZXN0LCBwbGVhc2Ugd2FpdC4uLg0KVmVyaWZ5aW5nIHNpZ25hdHVyZSB3aXRoIHRydXN0ZWQg Y2VydGlmaWNhdGUgcGtnLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnLjIwMTMxMDIzMDEuLi4gZG9uZQ0KSW5zdGFsbGlu ZyBwa2ctMS4zLjc6IDEwMCUNCk1lc3NhZ2UgZm9yIHBrZy0xLjMuNzoNCiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIHVw Z3JhZGluZyBmcm9tIHRoZSBvbGQgcGFja2FnZSBmb3JtYXQsIGZpcnN0IHJ1bjoNCg0KICAjIHBr ZzJuZyANCg0KPiAgICBwa2cgaW5zdGFsbCBmaXJlZm94DQoNCkhtbW0sIGFuZCAyIGRheSB0byBp bnN0YWxsIGZyb20gcG9ydHM6DQoNCkZldGNoaW5nIGd0a3NvdXJjZXZpZXcyLTIuMTAuNV80LnR4 ejogMTAwJSAgNTYwIEtCIDU3My4xay9zICAgIDAwOjAxDQpGZXRjaGluZyB4ZmNlNC1ub3RpZnlk LTAuMi40LnR4ejogMTAwJSAgIDY2IEtCICA2Ny43ay9zICAgIDAwOjAxDQpGZXRjaGluZyBvcmFn ZS00LjEwLjBfMi50eHo6IDEwMCUgICAgMiBNQiAgIDEuN00vcyAgICAwMDowMQ0KQ2hlY2tpbmcg aW50ZWdyaXR5Li4uIGRvbmUgKDEgY29uZmxpY3RpbmcpDQpwa2c6IENhbm5vdCBzb2x2ZSBwcm9i bGVtIHVzaW5nIFNBVCBzb2x2ZXI6DQpjYW5ub3QgaW5zdGFsbCBwYWNrYWdlIHhmY2V+eDExLXdt L3hmY2U0LCByZW1vdmUgaXQgZnJvbSByZXF1ZXN0PyBbWS9uXTogeQ0KQ2hlY2tpbmcgaW50ZWdy aXR5Li4uIGRvbmUgKDAgY29uZmxpY3RpbmcpDQpDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aCB0aGUgZXhpc3Rpbmcg cGFja2FnZXMgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIGZvdW5kLg0KT25lIG1vcmUgc29sdmVyIGl0ZXJhdGlvbiBpcyBu ZWVkZWQgdG8gcmVzb2x2ZSB0aGVtLg0KDQphbmQNCg0KRmV0Y2hpbmcgZmlyZWZveC0zMi4wXzEs MS50eHo6IDEwMCUgICAzMSBNQiAgIDQuMU0vcyAgICAwMDowOA0KRmV0Y2hpbmcgbnNzLTMuMTcu dHh6OiAxMDAlICAgIDIgTUIgICAxLjdNL3MgICAgMDA6MDENCkZldGNoaW5nIG5zcHItNC4xMC43 LnR4ejogMTAwJSAgMjg1IEtCIDI5MS43ay9zICAgIDAwOjAxDQpGZXRjaGluZyBsaWJ2NGwtMC44 LjhfMi50eHo6IDEwMCUgICA5MyBLQiAgOTUuNmsvcyAgICAwMDowMQ0KRmV0Y2hpbmcgZ3N0cmVh bWVyMS1wbHVnaW5zLWdvb2QtMS4yLjQudHh6OiAxMDAlICAgIDEgTUIgICAxLjFNL3MgICAgMDA6 MDENCkZldGNoaW5nIGdzdHJlYW1lcjEtcGx1Z2lucy0xLjIuNC50eHo6IDEwMCUgICAgMSBNQiAg IDEuMU0vcyAgICAwMDowMQ0KRmV0Y2hpbmcgZ3N0cmVhbWVyMS0xLjIuNC50eHo6IDEwMCUgICAg MSBNQiAgIDEuMU0vcyAgICAwMDowMQ0KRmV0Y2hpbmcgZ3N0cmVhbWVyMS1saWJhdi0xLjIuNF8x LnR4ejogMTAwJSAgICAyIE1CICAgMi42TS9zICAgIDAwOjAxDQpDaGVja2luZyBpbnRlZ3JpdHku Li4gZG9uZSAoMSBjb25mbGljdGluZykNCnBrZzogQ2Fubm90IHNvbHZlIHByb2JsZW0gdXNpbmcg U0FUIHNvbHZlcjoNCmNhbm5vdCBpbnN0YWxsIHBhY2thZ2UgZmlyZWZveH53d3cvZmlyZWZveCwg cmVtb3ZlIGl0IGZyb20gcmVxdWVzdD8gW1kvbl06DQoNCjotKCgoDQoNClJhZGVrDQoNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 08:50:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7964E5D; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F31B905; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jd19so1765589oac.27 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PSNr+X4nHItT3ZwxdYrqZS0+47AdFKjkw5mrMOmCwcE=; b=k2yjP/q+8dbzq01rMzaO3Cml9/gnxfG3JPqiIRdeHrdKl2ZTB1hYnAoDBWWbETIUu1 XxnnbNNAi9G4AN+CIaFDrY8toSq6cAtFZjB591KGU6gU9Dl5vnyno2Twql+DXiZt3uzJ A5baf/8ZSZ0/A8hgNj3/1mSeHqZQsxAMlgtuk9diSUIuSkBQGH9cAqLtloFzMHYjNMuu f16hkf64c0oQDmjJVh0mnVy0fCn8CdRvXKFu4SjxzkesZ6W1clmzAmJ0wGsh97biAA+k 4ETfufYh4f4b+Ml+xsKSFljea4NU1nDbgcjwKsFOdYcObc10FxeGh4aPSndfUBr41Tmr IrpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.175.166 with SMTP id cb6mr798656oec.64.1410684654665; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.58.196 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:50:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:50:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JpCwGup7TAwpTDwzYLDzSB25DEA Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD and WiDi / Miracast / WiFi Direct HDMI streaming From: CeDeROM To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:50:55 -0000 On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> yeah. >> configure: error: Package requirements (libudev libsystemd >= 213) were >> not met: > > ... with some intensive hacking we can maybe make it work :) > it's a start anyway. getting rid of the systemd stuff and switching logging > functions to syslog(3) miracled builds (but seriously no doubt hours more > work involved to do something useful). :) this is just really a simple shell > around the important guts. Cool :-) Maybe some layer could be added to make it OS independent? When I finish patching u3g module to make 3g modem work on my new machine I'll get into it :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 08:57:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 075C114A for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x248.google.com (mail-vc0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4ED9D2 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f200.google.com with SMTP id ij19so8347244vcb.3 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NqhCP5BZqrBFZLtngvFKk9MkwW1/saYAkPKKUPlYXlw=; b=KeTXso+KKeHMDPgzIJiavEcXEiO89qqpFg3j3eZeT3dtAD0t4gZ/Q0rlVtFo9PlcSC fFFFy8fPe7mIO1CDZdpLEA88hIApidRl/oFQzj/4fbR3e6FyjOw6r29gXhqZpKRGb0Kf yA4yebR3Zh8IPOe3aA9HGJBQfi6d/JR5thj8lbotcRZrl4p054GCjiOZsQXfTtjAhyGB KXjqpGu6iDQZBrkz/K8bxAzOZjdc93UUIrfRzF0CofRxXmMafAJc53bzJSnIZ/KZvqxo vVdzAGBa7jm1kQTc/2Tw9FGhqDPFv4ZCPn4EyLBkoDW5oLucd4uHY3T8yiOahZv3YQKn mQRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.4.41 with SMTP id 29mr10963497yhi.25.1410685023829; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001a1132f59cbc4949050302b389@google.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:57:03 +0000 Subject: www.freebsd.org From: "Aileen | brandroot.net" To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:57:05 -0000 Hi, My name is Aileen and I am an Online Strategist. I've been tracking the success of your website while doing some research on your industry--I'm impressed with your company, but there are some real opportunities for growth that you currently are missing. Are you interested in several proven strategies to use content and social media to drive relevant traffic to your site? In 20 minutes I can show you how to fuel your brand and generate more revenue from search engines and social networks. This is a real value which comes free of charge. I'd like to follow up about this with a quick phone call. Can I call you this week to discuss your campaign? Thank you Best regards, Aileen Sr. Web Developer / SEO Expert BrandRoot SEO LTD. Hong Kong | China | Australia | New Zealand Disclaimer: This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. All quotes received from BrandRoot by email are informal and not binding until a formal quote is agreed upon by both the parties. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 13:41:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A5D199 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9FF841 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n12so2739197wgh.5 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:41:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:references:from :mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=ktYuIAlCMA1tEJX7iYaxVZKBW4Sa66snv7P3+ukSt+E=; b=Lpobpq1nv5QeBYmvGvd43CO88BQfMamgkF8+MybCO/SDgnyhk1tuoPwFLNLaT3PL/g YzK+T/ScxtU8psBS3dILQIou5VHQwDR0oVJLT8VstvN7dg3JEijIKwMi01A0fKaUhfDZ Vsj/0Ubt4BZ+sBNzTL0QV4xCbF/YhrrCR4x14IQxfbbyhgPO4b3kKHRXHVMaQE6wH2tW Qw0kdG1qBhc5FItMEZS+un4f7FObeYxJkeMx0DbsJJSdcyBQgssgSTCxBENdk9A5v55v 6IcL7T36kFMoRyDN7OSdoQgsyoOfos/Uf+GbCLfPbRST1H5k7hRkJNo5G/DZDMeWPtF5 3CpA== X-Received: by 10.181.27.197 with SMTP id ji5mr5575579wid.54.1410702062694; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm7279076wik.8.2014.09.14.06.41.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> From: atar Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:40:36 +0300 To: Derek Ragona X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:41:05 -0000 Hi! Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd if=3DFreeBSD-i386-disc1.= iso of=3DmyUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick bootable like it would does= for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference between CDROM and an USB? Regards, Atar. =D7=91-10 =D7=91=D7=A1=D7=A4=D7=98 2014, =D7=91=D7=A9=D7=A2=D7=94 19:34, ata= r =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91/=D7=94: > I know about the 'memstick.img' version but I want just the ISO versions b= ecause they have more softwares installed on them right from the package and= I want to use them just from my USB stick. >=20 >> There are memory stick versions which will dd just fine. >>=20 >> -Derek >>=20 >> At 10:58 AM 9/10/2014, atar wrote: >>> Hi! >>>=20 >>> Just wanted to know please if there's an option to use the ISO versions o= f FreeBSD from a USB stick since when I tried to copy the ISO file into my U= SB stick with the dd command it didn't work. >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>>=20 >>> Atar. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" >>>=20 >>> --=20 >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >>=20 >>=20 >> =09 >> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus prot= ection is active. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is=20 >> believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 14:53:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A78A3B for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D27EC8 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q9so1528684ykb.11 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jRzeRh+PCeQgcfT+BnSw5AmE1zyIJ4bk8LK5/RLvVqw=; b=JLBJif7zfdqdUkrtMqHVdLI7TqvWBWCKrgD/9o+gwy+eHwApd6fyuDRX4ZnSr3Be14 rDKnt0eVYyvObLarP/sETi2BsTdFjIx5n6372hgCSJu+PGRo3OdQy90IImWqfTnd1LzQ 33wn38BsOya3fE6+Pj3DnO3hzdhFSlbv+SXTobh8vjwnPdic4M9kgS/5zOIBWfalf9ZY Mqk9m6AqxgxiL/+2RyNU+soC0av7aIGFhUeQp2+CkfSSFzpRzEiUTxo/kdoVOT0Xvi0w PAIN+YTC1wzHHYkm1U4MtTKI01fWoFtrbKKmvl/un9JlmHi3PHCTvBeEfv/qKn9p4T/L RbSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.150.46 with SMTP id y34mr1014964yhj.77.1410706390953; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.218.197 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:53:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: atar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Derek Ragona X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:53:12 -0000 On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:40 AM, atar wrote: > Hi! > > Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd > if=3DFreeBSD-i386-disc1.iso of=3DmyUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick > bootable like it would does for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference > between CDROM and an USB? > > Regards, > > Atar. > > =D7=91-10 =D7=91=D7=A1=D7=A4=D7=98 2014, =D7=91=D7=A9=D7=A2=D7=94 19:34, = atar =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91/=D7=94: > > > I know about the 'memstick.img' version but I want just the ISO version= s > because they have more softwares installed on them right from the package > and I want to use them just from my USB stick. > > > >> There are memory stick versions which will dd just fine. > >> > >> -Derek > >> > >> At 10:58 AM 9/10/2014, atar wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Just wanted to know please if there's an option to use the ISO > versions of FreeBSD from a USB stick since when I tried to copy the ISO > file into my USB stick with the dd command it didn't work. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Atar. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> -- > >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and > >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >>> believed to be clean. > >> > >> > >> > >> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >> believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMG_%28file_format%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_image Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 15:52:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D73A9DA for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com (mail-yh0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DA6672 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 29so1596730yhl.37 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:mime-version :content-type; bh=t5Du0cwbj0Zdp/T4oT57a7/7Tty1pweP9Kx9U20PfwU=; b=GhkFEQzxxfhw0GuD77LUHipPdNq/Ey9YNe1G+MfbhCm/2eENsieHBBqt0Ro9XRlboi DgCqZwsgHsLJSg3A7YjHX/YODQ6BSZv3DEl+qH3lRIYtB3pn7luQHA7dQcPOjWnKQYdM dqn0d1CFvM2LvV/k0PW353schj36iHXgFxdT0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=t5Du0cwbj0Zdp/T4oT57a7/7Tty1pweP9Kx9U20PfwU=; b=Ysrdw7QWrQyXyzZ2//npIOktWL5OMMB2pIPfP+M/Mlhuf2BpB+99j7bknvgejLJYzP 0BgJQxSyp7cDsMf6T+4+Y4QVNG5ORqEb61pmHInqNDDXJ/BlTHJACu35Uih+0bwRycgD Wjy1xhcsEQuEXIgczQnQA7rNGQTl/+oJnf2u5meXJNs2ou05Jh/y/Z44bXwlLaO8zfNm QsWiNGHTIKZbE+yqjxfLZe6L72fLZVh9JVxrdxFVbGkpsT3ZxInncZUV1GPC+VRfHP7Q Ag7696uHHnrlvqhUre9KlLKqplF8PoR6IR5T51sAmj959LNV0V1ElobbV+Wwe5N9FPwB VMoA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxRv8IXv/Nz4GofVSyt2ohQIcaAKkUPtlN15n+NLdJE8+i3F/6YmOCkvstSc7aCqE6V3Nw X-Received: by 10.236.91.74 with SMTP id g50mr26707463yhf.59.1410709919811; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o25sm4193767yhd.30.2014.09.14.08.51.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.104.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3hwwDt3RDWz3DlVy for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:51:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:51:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: User questions Subject: Convert system to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20140914115150.1adb766c@scorpio> Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/uT1jGGFfeJmNMXjteGIUa6."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:52:01 -0000 --Sig_/uT1jGGFfeJmNMXjteGIUa6. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:47:55 -0400 =EF=BB=BFI have a chance to get an HP Envy with 32.0 GB memory, 64-bit syst= em with an Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz. I can get the unit for free at a fire sale (long story). It is using the Intel=C2=AE Rapid Storage Technol= ogy software with RAID 5 with three 1,863 GB HDs. This is currently being run on a Win-8.1 system. If I wanted to turn this into a FreeBSD machine, and I am not even sure if all of the hardware in this unit is supported by FreeBSD, how would I go about duplicating this setup? Obviously, the Intel software would not work under FreeBSD. What would/could I use to replace it with the same functionality? --=20 Jerry --Sig_/uT1jGGFfeJmNMXjteGIUa6. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUFbmdAAoJEElTsHIJnX8ea04H/2wbiCA2iQbyjaFlCdH0/YMV gI4wceeOaKdeFBl3Op2fa1TSy/8ydh0MAzkmVHgO8fusqUK8QyE64QV9/yoCzqXU cWDJ6su8/Hbux6/iUBO1dtI5S1P88KkKs9BP49hdxMdEl3iQDae7/+hYMOKOzxB/ D10jcNZvfxjMURWhqdWN65dasNdRvkVMKXWp41Cftk9FGntfhguLrEGSROJZkIWp dVvlYQXLiVycHdcgiHvMCOwVVL7vREQt7jSbCudMrlt/FjajsdQy/v5tZesgvcXS CQmc7yx3EL/YM5OlyAmbgLHeM7aoKtyhttO/4GgOcnxSpq1Ba8MGSSgOx06xk6Q= =uMHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/uT1jGGFfeJmNMXjteGIUa6.-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 16:00:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683E0F44 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03AB16D5 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([95.91.231.167]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJBEo-1XVw2c1YdO-002pB5 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:00:08 +0200 Message-ID: <5415BB87.2020307@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:00:07 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User questions Subject: Re: Convert system to FreeBSD References: <20140914115150.1adb766c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20140914115150.1adb766c@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5aRVDZGSMHzt9GyDqilnRhhqyzMVpRxoEoKZEj2gtz1Z6mn/4y2 ZuKEOn1eVdTEKAyDFwKYQy9xw/nsOPxeaAWsFHDErUnZlTMFSO4ucmsE6rghEmigIXLZgpH YLb7bjcKPWX3UEORDFJ1UTIPVXK/fkA70wWwbLOifgey2LtFccPlhUF8olP90bleGlWcSEK NKX4vGym4nb2RS99/VFRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:00:12 -0000 On 14.09.2014 17:51, Jerry wrote: > Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:47:55 -0400 > > I have a chance to get an HP Envy with 32.0 GB memory, 64-bit system with an > Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz. I can get the unit for free at > a fire sale (long story). It is using the Intel® Rapid Storage Technology > software with RAID 5 with three 1,863 GB HDs. This is currently being run on > a Win-8.1 system. > > If I wanted to turn this into a FreeBSD machine, and I am not even sure if > all of the hardware in this unit is supported by FreeBSD, how would I go > about duplicating this setup? Obviously, the Intel software would not work > under FreeBSD. What would/could I use to replace it with the same > functionality? > What is the system doing? Just a database or a webserver? Will you use zfs? Start it with FreeBSD install cd as a livecd and look, what is working. Best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 16:30:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D81364F; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1033C9A7; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29705; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:29:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 19:13:44 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:30:06 -0000 Everyone: I just installed FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE on an Asus EeeBox B202 (which comes with Linux). This particular version of the product comes with a JMicron gigabit Ethernet adapter that uses the jme(4) driver. Because it only has one port and I need several, I've set it up with multiple VLANs, which are trunked out to a little Netgear VLAN switch. Unfortunately, the interface is bouncing up and down every few minutes: Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to UP Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_1: link state changed to UP Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_2: link state changed to UP Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_3: link state changed to UP Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to DOWN Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_1: link state changed to DOWN Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_2: link state changed to DOWN Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_3: link state changed to DOWN Sep 13 12:50:43 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to UP ... The problem didn't seem to occur with the bundled Linux distro. Has anyone else seen this problem? Know of a fix? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 17:20:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A2B1B7 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74543DCB for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8EHKIsD029694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:20:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8EHKDhQ029630; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:20:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:20:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: atar Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:20:18 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Derek Ragona X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:20:29 -0000 On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, atar wrote: > Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd > if=FreeBSD-i386-disc1.iso of=myUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick > bootable like it would does for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference > between CDROM and an USB? [top-posting deleted, please don't do that] dd just copies bytes from one place to another. An ISO image file is not bootable from a hard disk or USB stick, which require a different format and bootcode. Some Linux systems use install files that are dual-purpose and can work from CD or USB. FreeBSD does not do that. Some writing utilities can take apart an ISO image and convert it to a bootable USB stick. I don't know if any of those work for FreeBSD ISO images any more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 17:44:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 000811D8 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-nf-201.his.com (smtp-nf-201.his.com [216.194.248.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B9A104 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cuda201.his.com (cuda201.his.com [216.194.248.226]) by smtp-nf-201.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2CC61251 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:49 -0400 (EDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1410716687-061c410fec1023e60001-jLrpzn Received: from smtp-nf-202.his.com (smtp-nf-202.his.com [216.194.251.28]) by cuda201.his.com with ESMTP id 5TqJcDZLS5OrPHlt; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: dickey@his.com X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 216.194.251.28 Received: from mail-sterling.his.com (mail-sterling.his.com [216.194.248.141]) by smtp-nf-202.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C0460107; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sterling.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE394770001; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail-sterling.his.com Received: from mail-sterling.his.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-sterling.his.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5qmtoEX06vn; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-sterling.his.com (mail-sterling.his.com [216.194.248.141]) by mail-sterling.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500B73F80002; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:44:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey To: Victor Sudakov Message-ID: <2009674505.24205895.1410716682239.JavaMail.root@his.com> In-Reply-To: <20140914062006.GA32633@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [96.231.164.156] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.6_GA_2926 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/7.2.6_GA_2926) X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-nf-202.his.com[216.194.251.28] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1410716687 X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.his.com:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: pass (his.com: domain of dickey@his.com designates 216.194.248.141 as permitted sender) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at his.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.9476 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:44:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Victor Sudakov" | To: "Thomas Dickey" | Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org | Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 2:20:06 AM | Subject: Re: xterm, screen and the "Home" and "End" keys | | Thomas Dickey wrote: | > > | > > alternatively: | > > | > > XTerm*keyboardType: vt220 | > | > (not in "VT100") | | "XTerm*keyboardType: vt220" turns out to have an unpleasant side | effect. The "+" key on the numeric keypad now prints "," instead of | "+". hmm - I did forget about that, but it is documented: http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.faq.html#xterm_keypad -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 18:28:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE38715D for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B9F6A2 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id r6U71o0010mv7h0016UWyc; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:28:30 +0000 Received: from Curly-Sr.dbis.net ([50.183.226.175]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r6UV1o00X3nhSLa3X6UVV3; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:28:30 +0000 Message-ID: <5415DE49.9070500@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:28:25 -0600 From: Dave Babb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Proxy Server Question DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1410719310; bh=/7ctTPf9nhy9+iciWvCOg6nsiZcs3UHO3Yg5KuQ0EeE=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=RAFb1H4BOdOEvsPLU/FWwgBhZqqBE4jnz9tCqaKpUD92DVOdqFw0c9rKb90n+y3v8 r8yIiLHlw90NpGF0nsNC0kBYk2fY8k3pqALnT4xbMveYMltQln5G2/Ug4+BjRCVdh2 gMcIndjVBZv1EmcNbiHqxUndBJxhbHng17kFUcuA0Hw3uzkJ4DM+TswSxXLB0hw2CF QQmus04i/c4HW0eSUzJr8KJk/k0/wp9EpWZfNCD1zK5fsEy34qOiKbaLqtipdHMrqA AOMKVUQORnaVOV50ONy9ylvMqzw/TPf6v/0YUhQdiKMvSfgSiejNN2yNnjQ39jB/KZ BJ1epu/Ft1j5w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:28:33 -0000 I am in need of a proxy server for a project. Does anyone have a favorite proxy server they use? Or is there an unspoken FreeBSD favorite for a proxy server that is considered "best practice"? Thank you for any pointers, Sincerely and respectfully, Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 18:41:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569D84B8 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:44:76:96:27:212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352AA88A for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r6bV1o0051Y3wxoAE6hmnL; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:41:46 +0000 Received: from Curly-Sr.dbis.net ([50.183.226.175]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r6hk1o00Q3nhSLa8b6hlAg; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:41:45 +0000 Message-ID: <5415E165.8060508@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:41:41 -0600 From: Dave Babb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proxy Server Question References: <5415DE49.9070500@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1410720106; bh=EkY0drny37mC+YxWTMSXUjjTMarUvEHJEwEgzfEk6U0=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=wR3YOUSbUWmckWjwSl6hr0wQi3nNhwHB2aqFtyn/w8fVPydBQehiFR94Z7UxcUKY7 QJupWnCwQvsMSSWx/MDfmi2RG75ujvn88PtZgsw0bmAQ1qY5YeLIB9m+qnIClF9x0H n3PkYiZL5DlOkJr2x1VWXLbNx26XANPzQ6vxhLUdqKpOrn1MRHiZ7N4klw13nzex8L Vntj8ARrGXJmrWODiAfWhSIZvJmb4aCHY2TNjOOPuTwVnRS65iVY3VmCPNOlH4CfIt y1TlKOB9DoAVOeR/e61h++xcQBxasJoJuJMc15RmLgZuHuvQrwjNMNG7T5GA4YowAa 21j8ljiZA1KOQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:41:47 -0000 OK. fair enough. Project: I have been awarded a project in which I am changing out an entire cities infrastructure to be based upon FreeBSD. They will have their ISP demark, which then gets fed into a physical firewall appliance bolted to the wall, which then feeds the FreeBSD server containing the proxy server into NIC #0. NIC #1 (on a different subnet) will then feed the attached devices of the city, PC's, smart devices, printers via a 16 port switch. The purpose of the proxy servers is to put a configurable layer of proxy between the average city user, and the internet at large. Currently the city is infected with a lot of Windows virus', mainly do to the users (at this time) having unmanaged, unfiltered access to the Internet..... Thanks! Sincerely and respectfully, Dave On 09/14/14 12:31, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Depends on what you mean by project and whether you have read about > Squid as a proxy server:) > > On 14 September 2014 21:28, Dave Babb > wrote: > > I am in need of a proxy server for a project. > > Does anyone have a favorite proxy server they use? > > Or is there an unspoken FreeBSD favorite for a proxy server that > is considered "best practice"? > > > Thank you for any pointers, > > > Sincerely and respectfully, > > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254733744121/+254722743223 > "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:09:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5430C58 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C65EAAD for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ge10so3382396lab.26 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nnW2bLf3m6tvihT6aTC1N0UZtBMqMIa+VFnUhefncS4=; b=AA/LwjW5VdsUrsPGt5wsXykJgtKJE7PMfumNeu0NNNhuOtfoFzkCP9ZDMaWd8Kf4LF FMmBlmZII761ejnUivxJ4zbwYX7UQieAn775iDnpakfkJTxA7gKILA4CVYFJpctJDcDl SAdGIXu5bBf4hFn9xYq2HwHqZ/7iRzDaj1lTJi9oFY/bOvtjxyEYO8PUM2WeG0NiLgCj NjeVausH9DL6N0dfVhoCLOTaYTTOChnCHifMMnKu3nSCLPOkQaDrkwiPPwEq5Q9BUofH TinS2JwZOLPmTSuN+YSXpuy/4VwL35t3XnTU+/GQU3VhXEXH/rem5RigIQunmzrKq9oF yBkQ== X-Received: by 10.152.116.80 with SMTP id ju16mr3978726lab.73.1410721774767; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.8.41 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:08:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5415E165.8060508@comcast.net> References: <5415DE49.9070500@comcast.net> <5415E165.8060508@comcast.net> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:08:54 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proxy Server Question To: Dave Babb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:09:37 -0000 On 14 September 2014 21:41, Dave Babb wrote: > OK. fair enough. > > Project: I have been awarded a project in which I am changing out an > entire cities infrastructure to be based upon FreeBSD. They will have their > ISP demark, which then gets fed into a physical firewall appliance bolted > to the wall, which then feeds the FreeBSD server containing the proxy > server into NIC #0. > > NIC #1 (on a different subnet) will then feed the attached devices of the > city, PC's, smart devices, printers via a 16 port switch. > > The purpose of the proxy servers is to put a configurable layer of proxy > between the average city user, and the internet at large. Currently the > city is infected with a lot of Windows virus', mainly do to the users (at > this time) having unmanaged, unfiltered access to the Internet..... > > So, besides the proxying, what else do you want to achieve in the FreeBSD box? How many users are you looking at handling on your network? Squid will be able to do the proxying for you, but what else you need to achieve, with the number of client devices you expect to handle simultaneously will determine what you will install and the sizing of this proxy machine. Besides, you will also need failover for this machine so that you minimize on downtime. I am thinking a good start will be thinking of an appliance - like those done by the pfSense guys. If you are not going for an appliance and want to get your hands dirty, you can do it too, though with a city, I am sure there is a budget for a suitable appliance. My advise - head over to the pfSense forums for a solution. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:10:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CCC6DC9 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554BCB3E for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTExC-0003FY-9Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:18 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:18 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:55:04 -0400 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:10:33 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, atar wrote: > >> Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd >> if=FreeBSD-i386-disc1.iso of=myUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick >> bootable like it would does for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference >> between CDROM and an USB? > > [top-posting deleted, please don't do that] > > dd just copies bytes from one place to another. An ISO image file is > not bootable from a hard disk or USB stick, which require a different > format and bootcode. > > Some Linux systems use install files that are dual-purpose and can work > from CD or USB. FreeBSD does not do that. > > Some writing utilities can take apart an ISO image and convert it to a > bootable USB stick. I don't know if any of those work for FreeBSD ISO > images any more. There is an FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/ Haven't used this approach yet myself (been meaning to try it), but I believe dd'ing this image to the USB stick is what will work. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:24:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D5C146 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85ABEC57 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.153.182] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XTFPL-0004G9-GG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:24:23 +0200 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:24:19 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. Message-ID: <20140914192419.GA1559@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.153.182 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:24:32 -0000 El día Sunday, September 14, 2014 a las 02:55:04PM -0400, Michael Powell escribió: > Warren Block wrote: > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, atar wrote: > > > >> Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd > >> if=FreeBSD-i386-disc1.iso of=myUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick > >> bootable like it would does for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference > >> between CDROM and an USB? I always test new versions of FreeBSD on USB keys, right now while typing I run a 11-CURRENT with KDE ... and mutt as MUA booted from an USB key, while the disk in the laptop has still an older FreeBSD. The procedure to creat a boot-able USB key is simple: - make a file system on it - mount it to /mnt - do 'make installkernel' and 'make installworld' with DESTDIR=/mnt - enrich the file system in /mnt with some stuff (for example install packages into it with 'chroot /mnt pkg install ...') - unmount and reboot even better, if you do not use an USB key directly, but do all the above to a mdconfig file system (a file system in a normal plain file) and copy later the result with dd(1) to the real USB key; let me know if you need a detailed procedure of it. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:32:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EEFF605 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tivas.info (85.234.217.139.static.edpnet.net [85.234.217.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BDE8D32 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([192.168.3.104]) by mail.tivas.info (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8EJRaHU015226 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:27:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bram@diomedia.be) Message-ID: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:27:35 +0200 From: Bram Van Steenlandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Listen queue guestion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:32:28 -0000 Hi, I'm porting an plc automation system to freebsd and while doing so I got errors like these: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8000cecc870: Listen queue overflow: 76 already in queue awaiting acceptance With the help of netstat I've found the problem, 2 programs communicate with ipc file like sockets and the "client" was connecting too fast (it was connecting and disconnecting in a small for loop). Still, on linux this worked and there will be cases where I may bump in to this limit again (a lot of different programs communicate with one master program over ipc). I've found kern.ipc.somaxconn but this seems to be only for TCP connections. Is there a sysctl or kernel parameter that allows me to set this queue a bit larger ? Thx Bram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:47:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B6A89B for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD716E4B for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id r7hW1o0020S2fkC017ntEi; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:47:54 +0000 Received: from Curly-Sr.dbis.net ([50.183.226.175]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id r7ns1o0043nhSLa8V7ntty; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:47:53 +0000 Message-ID: <5415F0E4.5070004@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:47:48 -0600 From: Dave Babb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: Proxy Server Question References: <5415DE49.9070500@comcast.net> <5415E165.8060508@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1410724074; bh=9/U8B9FB9ZPqskHPZPzH77j025+6jxIHYry9hTOpUP8=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=WSp2necI3k4E/L1yvtrL6zXErqyHaPqATYkf26GPIiM+Rcq12NEKHb6ieX9PSfFgK YLo53eTKqgfzvC/MUaWU0mesgW6nv3IRlniRV8l+LKNe8NkG2s7S0LzZaYSLrX9u/q HZNWr/RFZkwVOjuyOBYtmbrO5CHcr3XZyP+Zsi+ZMc5Q+IlJUKDYCLy3Q9H5hJ+Goi QCNvCoZuYKGzlh+Ip9EjlGhx7OKF2R5FmtwzWa/hEQNijCnrQdtWvooSVZwtTgXGQB RJrR8v8m6dVMMU/wWC1ZRnighGNRyE3pGQze3jGjvUPUGnWfFp1gi/F3hxipk8OzFb P1YEyCkAO0o1w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:47:56 -0000 Thank you for the reply... I do appreciate feedback. The proxy server in the FreeBSD box is the failover. The city has purchased a physical firewall appliance to bolt to the wall...And in case it fails......the server will be backup. There will be no automatic failover.....by design. This is a small city of < 2k people. City users < 10. I have already read about squid.....The main purpose of the email was to ascertain which proxy server is considered "best practice" in the FreeBSD world. I'll configure it all...I just don't want to deploy a package that the FreeBSD community would consider "bad form". I come from a 20+ year relationship with Linux......I fired Linux as a technology in Q1 of this year (long story)...including for my clients. I am < 1 year on FreeBSD. So what I know in Linux... I have come to understand does not necessarily apply to FreeBSD. This particular subject is my due-dilligence to ensure I am deploying a mainstream proxy as the FreeBSD community would define it. Again, Thank you for your reply, Sincerely and respectfully, Dave On 09/14/14 13:08, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On 14 September 2014 21:41, Dave Babb > wrote: > > OK. fair enough. > > Project: I have been awarded a project in which I am changing out > an entire cities infrastructure to be based upon FreeBSD. They > will have their ISP demark, which then gets fed into a physical > firewall appliance bolted to the wall, which then feeds the > FreeBSD server containing the proxy server into NIC #0. > > NIC #1 (on a different subnet) will then feed the attached devices > of the city, PC's, smart devices, printers via a 16 port switch. > > The purpose of the proxy servers is to put a configurable layer of > proxy between the average city user, and the internet at large. > Currently the city is infected with a lot of Windows virus', > mainly do to the users (at this time) having unmanaged, unfiltered > access to the Internet..... > > > So, besides the proxying, what else do you want to achieve in the > FreeBSD box? How many users are you looking at handling on your > network? Squid will be able to do the proxying for you, but what else > you need to achieve, with the number of client devices you expect to > handle simultaneously will determine what you will install and the > sizing of this proxy machine. Besides, you will also need failover for > this machine so that you minimize on downtime. I am thinking a good > start will be thinking of an appliance - like those done by the > pfSense guys. If you are not going for an > appliance and want to get your hands dirty, you can do it too, though > with a city, I am sure there is a budget for a suitable appliance. My > advise - head over to the pfSense forums for a solution. > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254733744121/+254722743223 > "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 19:57:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC203A2F for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tivas.info (85.234.217.139.static.edpnet.net [85.234.217.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A21F14 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([192.168.3.104]) by mail.tivas.info (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8EJvsQw016104 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:57:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bram@diomedia.be) Message-ID: <5415F341.9090004@diomedia.be> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:57:53 +0200 From: Bram Van Steenlandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ufdti issues - compile kernel without module Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:57:56 -0000 Hi, I'm porting a plc/automation system from linux to freebsd and while doing so I've discovered some issues with uftdi (the system use a couple of rs485 connections). Under linux I'v used the ftdi adapters as com ports, they show up as /dev/ttyUSB0 etc, this works mostly ok. With freebsd, I've found that while ufdti works it's much slower than it's linux counterpart, with linux the Tx/Rx leds are flashing rapidly, I can poll a plc 10 times per second, with freebsd this was about 2 times per second, serial parameters are the same. I've found other reports online from people who experience similar issues. I then tried porting the application so that it uses libftdi (in serial mode), when using libftdi performance was very good also on freebsd. So the problem must be the uftdi kernel module (I think). You can't use libftdi if you have the uftdi kernel module loaded. I did not succeed in building a kernel without the uftdi module, deleting it from /boot/kernel works but probably isn't "the way". I've tried: to put WITHOUT_MODULES=uftdi in /etc/make.conf but this makes no difference, when running make buildkernel it still build the module. Is there a way to do this ? Or does freebsd have it's own blacklist system ? I've found various information online and I've tried various things but I can't seem to get this to work. thx Bram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 20:55:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D25913 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661316CA for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 131so1632831ykp.35 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zPStwHhNSuxuZ/DtQjndnE6olVHXVsrhqsHe7Lo7//o=; b=hrLibIZtsXYmFqJITI1bJNn4NJuMdnwZY4R81Y64kmA7fUOiz1AUPbcoBaM/y6koDO PRc4SRPiw71Ndu9eaipp/g7SgqloKUIJqtwEbLit47XyTABVAG9McGdiG9EEgs91n9uN YSKU2HGJ0dM4oj412EPM+m70/Oe3QAb3wi61cN3gFTbLHHJ5Rg0wc8mj2vkngAtRLz5S H224POfCFuHPfEb5Nmbyg8CH6NOtUBUAZKbFeFBtDRo7AXQ3DLTXuhQhkzgq8gGVKQs/ izHTggLij++1pdrRgFueN7ALL4UTxFrozDggJ5B6gS75n39wI+3x/HFlg4bjdm3ANQOk Nfgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.201.20 with SMTP id a20mr29607259yho.10.1410728144576; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.218.197 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140914192419.GA1559@tiny-r269739> References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <20140914192419.GA1559@tiny-r269739> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:55:45 -0000 On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Sunday, September 14, 2014 a las 02:55:04PM -0400, Michael Po= well > escribi=C3=B3: > > > Warren Block wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, atar wrote: > > > > > >> Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd > > >> if=3DFreeBSD-i386-disc1.iso of=3DmyUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB s= tick > > >> bootable like it would does for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the differenc= e > > >> between CDROM and an USB? > > I always test new versions of FreeBSD on USB keys, right now while > typing I run a 11-CURRENT with KDE ... and mutt as MUA booted from an USB > key, while the disk in the laptop has still an older FreeBSD. > > The procedure to creat a boot-able USB key is simple: > > - make a file system on it > - mount it to /mnt > - do 'make installkernel' and 'make installworld' with DESTDIR=3D/mnt > - enrich the file system in /mnt with some stuff (for example install > packages into it with 'chroot /mnt pkg install ...') > - unmount and reboot > > even better, if you do not use an USB key directly, but do all the above > to a mdconfig file system (a file system in a normal plain file) and > copy later the result with dd(1) to the real USB key; > > let me know if you need a detailed procedure of it. > > HIH > > matthias > > -- > Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: > E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail > WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments > phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards > | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaig= n > > > Dear Matthias , If you supply such an algorithm , me and other people may use it to generate boot-able USB sticks with some installed packages . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 21:04:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D062ABBC for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2D7ED for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8EKtAJ0001397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Port/Package Upgrade Question Message-Id: Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:10 -0700 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:04:21 -0000 I have a number of systems that I need to upgrade to 9.3. I have one = system that is the development/test system. Its already at 9.3 and it = has a number of ports/packages installed that need to be on the = production systems. In the past I have built packages for each in = /usr/ports/packages/All and then just mounted that directory via NFS on = the production machines and used pkg_add to install them on the = production machines. =20 Some of these are packages in that they use the default configuration. = Unfortunately, some of them have to be compiled via the ports system as = they use non-standard options. I have made a package for each of them. None of the production systems have pkg on them. They all use the old = packages stuff. I suspect I will first need to convert them over to the = pkg system. Thats not a big deal as its a fairly quick process. = However, how do I then upgrade the ports/packages from the test system? = The production systems can't be used to recompile the ports as that = would involve too much down time.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 21:05:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD76C46 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF0D7FB for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e89so3005624qgf.24 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EbXbvwWaVdpNyZTu5mITHwomVBjZaRqdiIcWMzIeSPI=; b=cCk2clivtJjqL/juWBLYkn9/VhSJk4eTxH48XA9KtU9sJO3Zv2GmWxYsr65v8wpNOt oWFjEb8B4C4+gAz4+7vWFY8zQwQFinlmd9zww/A2JljQ/2meBqnui7tSNfJ7fDY09vch yw38XcPyW4Rg3ex7/10YZKazIfPMz9uyLgA7ekYFVJY2cDEZCAquIW4EZBTcd4/eFvC0 7KbgdKkOzeGkBMm5g72Q64T/XStN+bwmYjU8HKeXMzThBR9SCvVQ2XItDw9YdYgWasng 3F8FdMC6UoSFgIDjh2DpxhCYiYgbSaVf/prP0DcVRhqomuLNAdJH+L4hwBJNoQakpusK M9Cw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.36.4 with SMTP id r4mr31021257qad.69.1410728702150; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> References: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:05:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bY93kUo8iWX8HC60GxVAe8wyV3A Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listen queue guestion From: Adrian Chadd To: Bram Van Steenlandt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:05:03 -0000 Hi! What kind of sockets is it specifically using? -a On 14 September 2014 12:27, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm porting an plc automation system to freebsd and while doing so I got > errors like these: > sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8000cecc870: Listen queue overflow: 76 already in > queue awaiting acceptance > > With the help of netstat I've found the problem, 2 programs communicate with > ipc file like sockets and the "client" was connecting too fast (it was > connecting and disconnecting in a small for loop). > > Still, on linux this worked and there will be cases where I may bump in to > this limit again (a lot of different programs communicate with one master > program over ipc). > > I've found kern.ipc.somaxconn but this seems to be only for TCP connections. > > Is there a sysctl or kernel parameter that allows me to set this queue a bit > larger ? > > Thx > Bram > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 22:32:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB571103 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EE4F34 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home (slackbox.xs4all.nl [83.162.243.5]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s8EMWHkd098037; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:32:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D5F40123C9; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:32:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:32:17 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: Port/Package Upgrade Question Message-ID: <20140914223217.GA12127@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Hardie , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:32:29 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 01:55:10PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > I have a number of systems that I need to upgrade to 9.3. I have one sys= tem > that is the development/test system. Its already at 9.3 and it has a num= ber > of ports/packages installed that need to be on the production systems. In > the past I have built packages for each in /usr/ports/packages/All and th= en > just mounted that directory via NFS on the production machines and used > pkg_add to install them on the production machines. > However, how > do I then upgrade the ports/packages from the test system? The production > systems can't be used to recompile the ports as that would involve too mu= ch > down time. If you can live with all production systems having the same stuff installed, copy `/usr/local`, `/var/db/ports` and `/var/db/pkg` from the development system to each of the productions systems. Mind that you probably have to either skip `/usr/local/etc` or install the correct config files for each machine locally. Use e.g. tar/nc for the initial install because they're both in the base system. For later updates it is probably faster to use rsync. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUFhdxAAoJEED21dyjijPgvlQQAKpeAcvOG1KdKtb2VNAsGH30 GvG//7IwOLMMqjeUD0W/JK35uxib64SIRFusduQ+rjQ9h/ZM4NiKeS9T1BDP09+y hgSEPeZ9I2RpXNwyLLtXqPwmTTIU/TO3yZm07WbnT/1OjgcEa1hMFnLDP7cF5wth P0lgHT8wgrsi30PU0VZzfRq62svb3Zaghoo22f8CYOtSGXf3XdJgTX9rgbkwb7yn JaX3Z17DZhncrkBiJlD2lFaza+NXLyjtrOSEEIZyRv9M/2cHoNEq8PsoI3YoNymD MDQS3rTyBEbQ2+YnumzRBTcf8jMfWbpYHPv66+CQuUpO+36v/2tirBy6gTgUbSz2 wCtxQpTFv2wf2z/rW0jt79BDMZRwAGS5XacataRs+XIX8/YVlxtBFFCeyJYCBXSz KsAqr/dgRXZnP9sKUuy/32R/vpKdJudZvWTnuJ6O+ey1XJyz0Uq0PiYkG+W51g0A +9wilrXyTn+DjxQPBv5Xqm8mavq6gnMMm1CDu+S/w4k35kNW0ceWtgSoDgEl2K9J o6AWEaxf7NeWk3fc4v49mGqAsfag2Ghrns6QV16EW7pWALj57+xSUybIyoHJrdWr Dtb9v6Pkc9OR+oDdyvZbKp14RrTS+5p4+p+GFqoQAu5Oa0AjJa2FR/037SqoNI1o Ihv1wG5b9Kx391mwCU4s =99/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 23:30:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944A818A for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spring-chicken-am.twitter.com (spring-chicken-am.twitter.com [199.16.156.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9C56B2 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:30:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=twitter.com; s=dkim-201406; t=1410737413; bh=+w1xdTe93V23sE6/ZwLokfCHRHYBXFsJ2oczhAaqEBI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=HYhsjda5EROVGIdMnnAdAQ4gcQiILKZMAYND92d6X14++UNkc7GoCZmsRz/mvqbJv 2vzJ18r2bTM+RoYYNtpuhMwqa247bByy2a+LyoUyYtxt8LtrAYL5csB54FK6kkD/tn 3vPbBwZM1yzo+0b9YnjyvVD9s6Y61ipRZDIyhlg/WFRjfkKJTvkmUwmeo4E1Ulv5n2 GDQFBusnTS7KCV3MHk0vqvctCOGTDgOSDYrN9lMNtGfCj6cbykFUM52TFIW9Ib6tcd PKUQNbTwjVH6SDO4wIe3jHcUASFCDPiQFZiJ1cXPvM8/wyTavbm9MxWRv7d9VpZ7TS LZ0rejGC+uvfA== X-MSFBL: cXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnQGF0bGEtYXFsLTM3LXNyMS1FdmVyeXRoaW5n LjE3MkBFdmVyeXRoaW5nQHF1ZXN0aW9uc1xAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmdcQDE4XEAyNzcw NTczOTYxXEAwXEBhZDY1MTAwNWJjZDBkMjI2MDc0OTcwZWQ3Y2I2ODJkYjcyNGFl MDQ0 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:30:13 +0000 From: Twitter To: Plemmons Gertrudis Subject: Confirm your Twitter account, gertrudisgc624! MIME-Version: 1.0 Feedback-ID: 16481b2a2bd9895cc9f3f73eb2:1d4a1426:none:twitterESP Message-ID: <63.85.26424.50526145@twitter.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:30:25 -0000 Plemmons Gertrudis, Please confirm your Twitter account ------------------------ Confirming your account will give you full access to Twitter and all future notifications will be sent to this email address. Confirm your account now: https://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/gertrudisgc624/A3CG7-3FHD6-141073 -- Forgot your Twitter password? Get instructions on how to reset it: https://twitter.com/account/resend_password Need help? https://support.twitter.com If you received this message in error and did not sign up for a Twitter account, click on the url below: https://twitter.com/account/not_my_account/gertrudisgc624/A3CG7-3FHD6-141073 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 05:12:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD21B862 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899C99E4 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.19.80] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XTOam-0005Gs-SR; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:12:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:12:42 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. Message-ID: <20140915051242.GA1175@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Mehmet Erol Sanliturk , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <20140914192419.GA1559@tiny-r269739> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 93.104.19.80 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:12:53 -0000 El día Sunday, September 14, 2014 a las 01:55:44PM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk escribió: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > I always test new versions of FreeBSD on USB keys, right now while > > typing I run a 11-CURRENT with KDE ... and mutt as MUA booted from an USB > > key, while the disk in the laptop has still an older FreeBSD. > > > > The procedure to creat a boot-able USB key is simple: > > > > - make a file system on it > > - mount it to /mnt > > - do 'make installkernel' and 'make installworld' with DESTDIR=/mnt > > - enrich the file system in /mnt with some stuff (for example install > > packages into it with 'chroot /mnt pkg install ...') > > - unmount and reboot > > > > even better, if you do not use an USB key directly, but do all the above > > to a mdconfig file system (a file system in a normal plain file) and > > copy later the result with dd(1) to the real USB key; > > > > let me know if you need a detailed procedure of it. > > > > Dear Matthias , > > > If you supply such an algorithm , me and other people may use it to > generate boot-able USB sticks with some installed packages . > > Thank you very much . > > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk here it comes; comments are always welcome; matthias $Id: buildingImage.txt,v 1.15 2014/08/15 17:39:21 guru Exp $ Building bootable FreeBSD/i386 USB keys This small howto file describes how to build and enrich bootable USB keys. Some ideas are stolen from: http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/10/building-bootable-freebsdi386-images.html File operations, esp. of a large amount of small files, are very SLOW on USB keys. That's why we use in general the following procedure: 1. dd(1) the complete /dev/da0 to a plain file, an image of the USB key; 2. use mdconfig(8) to make a memory disk of this file and mount(8) it; 3. do everything of the formatting and installation in this virtual disk; 4. unmount(8) it and dd(1) it back to the USB key; here we go (use for /dev/da0 what your key is in /var/log/messages): check the size of your USB key with: # dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=8m 1878+1 records in 1878+1 records out 15758000128 bytes transferred in 783.312179 secs (20117139 bytes/sec) note: this step is essential to define an image which later fits again to the real USB key; my "16 Gbyte" keys vary between 1868 and 1914 blocks of 8m (which is ofc lesse than 16 GByte); that's why I decided to use always the number 1860 for my keys of this "16 marketing GBytes". now we create an empty large disk file of this size 1860 blocks of 8m: # dd if=/dev/zero of=da0.r269739 bs=8m count=1860 attach the file da0.r269739 as a memory disk: # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f da0.r269739 md0 now we use the normal procedure to create a bootable UFS on /dev/md0: # fdisk -I md0 # fdisk -B md0 # bsdlabel -w md0s1 auto # bsdlabel -B md0s1 # bsdlabel -e md0s1 # edit the disk label and change partition "a" from "unused" to "4.2BSD" build the file system: # newfs /dev/md0s1a # mount /dev/md0s1a /mnt note: if your running host system is older than 20121201 (see src/UPDATING) you must add some new user if you try to install 'head': # pw useradd -n auditdistd -g audit -c "Auditdistd unprivileged user" -d /var/empty -s /usr/sbin/nologin install the system from your host which must have been compiled in /usr/src; if you compiled it in another place check for MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX below; # cd /usr/src # make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt # make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt KERNCONF=GENERIC INSTALL_NODEBUG=t # make distrib-dirs DESTDIR=/mnt # make distribution DESTDIR=/mnt the new system in /mnt needs some files to start: # echo /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw,noatime 1 1 > /mnt/etc/fstab # cp /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf /mnt/etc # cat < /mnt/etc/rc.conf tmpmfs="YES" tmpsize="128m" wlans_ath0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" ifconfig_bge0="DHCP" hostname=tiny-r269739 sshd_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" hald_enable="YES" vboxguest_enable="YES" vboxservice_enable="YES" keymap="german.iso" # powerd powerd_enable="YES" powerd_flags="-a max -b adp" performance_cx_lowest_cx_lowest="Cmax" economy_cx_lowest="Cmax" EOF # cat < /mnt/boot/loader.conf kern.cam.boot_delay="10000" kern.cam.scsi_delay="3000" hint.p4tcc.0.disabled=1 hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled=1 EOF to use the above created USB key to install another system (the EeePC for example, or the Acer) we need 'src' and 'obj' as well on the key: # cd /usr # cp -Rp src /mnt/usr # cp -Rp obj /mnt/usr but remove the SVN control files from the copied soure tree: # rm -rf /mnt/usr/src/.svn enrich the USB key with the prepared packages: # cd /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/freebsd-head-ports-head/All # cp -p * /mnt/PKGDIR o run later # cd /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/freebsd-head-ports-head/All # rsync -avz . /mnt/PKGDIR as well we need in 11-CURRENT now the new pkg(8) command; we compile the old way ports-mgmt/pkg-devel and install only 'pkg-static' into the /mnt system: # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel # make install # chroot /mnt mkdir -p /usr/local/sbin # cp -p /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static /mnt/usr/local/sbin let's see if this works: # chroot /mnt /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static help first we have to build the 'repo' from the directory of all packages; we run: # chroot /mnt pkg-static repo /PKGDIR Creating repository in /PKGDIR: 83% ... Packing files for repository: 100% the recent version of pkg(8) needs in any case the definition of the respository; we create the myrepo.conf file as: # chroot /mnt mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos # vim /mnt/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/myrepo.conf # cat /mnt/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/myrepo.conf FreeBSD: { url: "file:/PKGDIR", enabled: true, } now we are able to install any stuff (and its dependencies), here as an example 'autoconf-2.69' and its dependencies: # chroot /mnt pkg-static -R /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ install autoconf-2.69 Updating repository catalogue FreeBSD repository is up-to-date All repositories are up-to-date The following 5 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: autoconf: 2.69 indexinfo: 0.2 perl5: 5.16.3_11 m4: 1.4.17_1,1 autoconf-wrapper: 20131203 The process will require 45 MB more space 13 MB to be downloaded Proceed with this action [y/N]: y Fetching autoconf-2.69.txz: 100% of 529 KB Fetching indexinfo-0.2.txz: 100% of 6 KB Fetching perl5-5.16.3_11.txz: 100% of 12 MB Fetching m4-1.4.17_1,1.txz: 100% of 183 KB Fetching autoconf-wrapper-20131203.txz: 100% of 4 KB Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) [1/5] Installing indexinfo-0.2: 100% [2/5] Installing perl5-5.16.3_11: 100% [3/5] Installing m4-1.4.17_1,1: 100% [4/5] Installing autoconf-wrapper-20131203: 100% [5/5] Installing autoconf-2.69: 100% are they really there?: # chroot /mnt pkg-static info autoconf-2.69 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-wrapper-20131203 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page index m4-1.4.17_1,1 GNU m4 perl5-5.16.3_11 Practical Extraction and Report Language later, when the system we building in /mnt is booted, we can use pkg-static directly with the same repo, we do: # pkg-static -R /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ install foo-x.x copy some initial xorg.conf files to see what we can make use of them later: # cp /etc/X11/xorg.* /mnt/etc/X11 add an unpriv user 'guru' (for beeing able to SSH-in): # chroot /mnt /usr/sbin/adduser and enrich its HOME with files to bringup KDE: # cp -p ~guru/.xinitrc /mnt/home/guru # cp -p ~guru/.xserverrc /mnt/home/guru umount the key, detach the memory disk and copy the image back with dd(1) to the USB device: # umount /mnt # mdconfig -d -u md0 # dd if=da0.r269739 of=/dev/da0 bs=8m soem more hints for special cases: If we have the real USB device locally, but the image on a laptop without USB ports, one may use: # ssh -C root@10.49.8.36 dd of=/dev/da1 bs=8m < da0-r269739 0+823717 records in 1868+0 records out 15669919744 bytes transferred in 12135.626342 secs (1291233 bytes/sec) # (i.e. around 3h 17min) To write the image from the VM to Ubuntu's USB port: $ ssh -C 192.168.2.102 $ sudo chmod 0666 /dev/sdb $ ssh -C 192.168.2.102 dd of=/dev/sdb bs=8M < da0-r269739 MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX hints to compile in and install from some other places: If you want to build world and kernel out of SVN in 'src' and into 'obj', but in some other place as /usr/[src|obj], for example in /home/guru/head/[src|obj] use this procedure: # mkdir -p /home/guru/head/obj # MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/home/guru/head/obj ; export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX # cd /home/guru/head # svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src # cd /home/guru/head/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC ... if you have built the kernel and world in some other place as /usr/src: # MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/home/guru/head/obj ; export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX # cd /home/guru/head/src # make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt # make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt KERNCONF=GENERIC INSTALL_NODEBUG=t # make distrib-dirs DESTDIR=/mnt # make distribution DESTDIR=/mnt ... to use the key to install other system, you must have 'src' and 'obj' again in the correct places; do: # mkdir -p /mnt/usr/home/guru/head/ # cd /mnt # ln -s usr/home home # cd /home/guru/head/ # cp -Rp src /mnt/home/guru/head/ # 40 mins # cp -Rp obj /mnt/home/guru/head/ # 20 mins -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 05:45:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451FFBCD for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out3.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out3.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFA7C68 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:44:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEKALd7FlTLzilT/2dsb2JhbABfgw2BKrMaAQEGnmwBgRMWeIQEAQEDATo/BQsLDQETJQ8FGDETiDYHuWkBF4V8iVEHgy6BHQWPN41QhzBBjU+DcCsvgkoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,525,1406563200"; d="scan'208";a="34015220" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([203.206.41.83]) by icp-osb-irony-out3.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2014 13:44:51 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 55534855; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:44:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:44:51 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: torrent recommendation Message-ID: <20140915054451.GA63743@ozzmosis.com> References: <54147E6D.7020200@dreamchaser.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54147E6D.7020200@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:45:01 -0000 On Sat 2014-09-13 11:27:09 UTC-0600, Gary Aitken (freebsd@dreamchaser.org) wrote: > I've never dealt with a torrent download but now need to get something that is > only available in that form. > > Looking for recommendations of a simple way to go in terms of a ports client. www/aria2 for one-off torrent downloads. By default will seed until your ratio reaches 1:1, unless you cancel seeding and exit with Ctrl+C. net-p2p/rtorrent for a minimalist curses UI, allowing multiple torrent downloads & seeding within the one program. Good for long-term seeding. net-p2p/deluge if you prefer a graphical (X11) UI. All three support magnet URIs. Regards Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 05:48:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932FDC84 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pochta-mx.canmos.ru (pochta-mx.canmos.ru [89.107.127.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B22AC8C for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pochta-mx.canmos.ru (pochta-mx.canmos.ru [89.107.127.240]) by pochta-mx.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15542BCEA1B; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:40:10 +0400 (MSK) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-pochta_20120910 (2011-06-06) on pochta.canmos.ru X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2-pochta_20120910 Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: 105@5798000.ru) by pochta-mx.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:40:10 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:39:21 +0400 (MSK) From: "Igor V. Ruzanov" To: Maaroufi Houcine Subject: Re: Hi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-GPG-PUBLIC-KEY: 1024D/494AF6DC 2008-03-20 Igor V. Ruzanov X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: A723 B6CC 11ED A4E2 1909 C4DC 6EDE 9089 494A F6DC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:48:05 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html learn English |Hi, please I need some documentation about freeBSD ... I'm a fun of BSD |OS. if docs can be in frensh it could be better. thanks. best regards. |maaaroufi H |_______________________________________________ |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list |http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | +-------------------------------------------+ ! CANMOS ISP Network ! +-------------------------------------------+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: igorr@canmos.ru ! +-------------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 05:52:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453D7D39 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net [74.53.216.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17989D2A for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [173.193.161.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196B03F405B for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2697F131068 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:51:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bCOQh4lq_qBx for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egeria.internal (114.179.70.115.static.exetel.com.au [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BAC6131067 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54167E7B.9070804@calorieking.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:51:55 +0800 From: Gregory Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: torrent recommendation References: <54147E6D.7020200@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <54147E6D.7020200@dreamchaser.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-ID: 196B03F405B.0383C X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-15, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-From: gregory.orange@calorieking.com X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-Watermark: 1411365123.97694@RA+L3ybNaTkc0mSapcJxbg X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 05:52:19 -0000 On 14/09/14 01:27, Gary Aitken wrote: > Looking for recommendations of a simple way to go in terms of a ports client. I've been using transmission-cli and transmission-daemon (with the transmission-remote command line tool) for maintaining torrents (service with a CLI to access it). Mine is on an Ubuntu box, but I do see a newer version than mine (2.82 cf 2.51) is available in ports net-p2p/transmission* HTH, Greg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 06:08:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2601CEB0; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA788E18; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ft15so5460449pdb.32 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:08:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ifUKvEKArAla8oEsnZJ0bQmsTVb7q2PX/VcO1BpN0bM=; b=An0QuMvov3RLrQ7EsLFBFAxSNzloDITpqlAFQFNXAnkDnzlhuyaOAEWGeLDPct2RsE 2s4jJ0C0j4cuGXA1S1wN36gH9UIX+reGABVuNldioUcdovYKWAA1/FUusM/wO4gYLuBo u19atWN5Hf4qKrjN2uTEowosicVyKZBYM9HQZE2Ae5IXIYOUJydN8kaFddBT61Mtwf8X XGKJ4+x9CHvFB1ddmvDsYNNufLVrAL4pKJ6kRv72UcyryusFqB687nnGFQ36n2TZPtpN wqM2FqhlbqklPAY2IToOoqP6CbKzS3kjRrJQfxOyAtlgZF2yFwp8Qu/AWEegiOnGoMJU yFVA== X-Received: by 10.66.141.197 with SMTP id rq5mr2218516pab.124.1410761310549; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([106.247.248.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qy10sm10285421pbb.47.2014.09.14.23.08.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:08:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Yonghyeon PYUN X-Google-Original-From: "Yonghyeon PYUN" Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:08:19 +0900 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:08:19 +0900 To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Message-ID: <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:08:31 -0000 On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:13:44PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > Everyone: > > I just installed FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE on an Asus EeeBox B202 (which > comes with Linux). This particular version of the product comes > with a JMicron gigabit Ethernet adapter that uses the jme(4) > driver. Because it only has one port and I need several, I've set > it up with multiple VLANs, which are trunked out to a little > Netgear VLAN switch. > > Unfortunately, the interface is bouncing up and down every few minutes: > > Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to UP > Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_1: link state changed to > UP > Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_2: link state changed to > UP > Sep 13 12:44:44 testbed kernel: jme0_3: link state changed to > UP > Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to > DOWN > Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_1: link state > changed to DOWN > Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_2: link state > changed to DOWN > Sep 13 12:50:04 testbed kernel: jme0_3: link state > changed to DOWN > Sep 13 12:50:43 testbed kernel: jme0: link state changed to UP > ... > > The problem didn't seem to occur with the bundled Linux distro. Has > anyone else seen this problem? Know of a fix? > Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to know exact chip revision? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 06:44:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625D07FA; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tivas.info (85.234.217.139.static.edpnet.net [85.234.217.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D48208; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([192.168.3.104]) by mail.tivas.info (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8F6igrL035580; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:44:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bram@diomedia.be) Message-ID: <54168ADA.6050204@diomedia.be> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:44:42 +0200 From: Bram Van Steenlandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: adrian@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Listen queue guestion References: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:44:48 -0000 Hi, I use python, here the parameters are (socket.AF_UNIX,socket.SOCK_STREAM) Bram op 14-09-14 23:05, Adrian Chadd schreef: > Hi! > > What kind of sockets is it specifically using? > > > -a > > > On 14 September 2014 12:27, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm porting an plc automation system to freebsd and while doing so I got >> errors like these: >> sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8000cecc870: Listen queue overflow: 76 already in >> queue awaiting acceptance >> >> With the help of netstat I've found the problem, 2 programs communicate with >> ipc file like sockets and the "client" was connecting too fast (it was >> connecting and disconnecting in a small for loop). >> >> Still, on linux this worked and there will be cases where I may bump in to >> this limit again (a lot of different programs communicate with one master >> program over ipc). >> >> I've found kern.ipc.somaxconn but this seems to be only for TCP connections. >> >> Is there a sysctl or kernel parameter that allows me to set this queue a bit >> larger ? >> >> Thx >> Bram >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 07:44:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9AF92A for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A98E9CA for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 79so1858121ykr.22 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:44:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2h96/6sBF9M7TEwZ5hDm/RWug5hWWPCXFDbpveForlY=; b=MRQfy4JKYa6EXFusNmKNwnZaejSrzVAqobrzK/FjIqe1ZURjRVZuhIa1v2w5d0dYQq UaPVE6CF9MWnrerQdlxeF3NGbk6ziUh1rGwfAOLDppJaWDo42pT7Eu0BwIMNTljeqFhu r/BEmByJh2D/Cl7KHDak047foUOm9Ot1WmSGWI5br/fAiTJ0b+enrk7M6pwGtCpwGQIy xv4RppxXK4z9ITauQb49s1TpC9udSwktUopXatJ9HV9gPxyAmXJW8/+nYkIwrA4PQjbu W/S1CcNqXWGWMdO/r9ycxJtAWZwtch4x0aqvLrm8YEH+LHPwbWdk4Ce5r1PklKG+dmPS 75cQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.13.38 with SMTP id a26mr31511634yha.23.1410767051101; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.218.197 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:44:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140915051242.GA1175@tiny-r269739> References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <20140914192419.GA1559@tiny-r269739> <20140915051242.GA1175@tiny-r269739> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:44:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Matthias Apitz , Mehmet Erol Sanliturk , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:12 -0000 On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Sunday, September 14, 2014 a las 01:55:44PM -0700, Mehmet Ero= l > Sanliturk escribi=C3=B3: > > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matthias Apitz > wrote: > > > > > I always test new versions of FreeBSD on USB keys, right now while > > > typing I run a 11-CURRENT with KDE ... and mutt as MUA booted from an > USB > > > key, while the disk in the laptop has still an older FreeBSD. > > > > > > The procedure to creat a boot-able USB key is simple: > > > > > > - make a file system on it > > > - mount it to /mnt > > > - do 'make installkernel' and 'make installworld' with DESTDIR=3D/mnt > > > - enrich the file system in /mnt with some stuff (for example install > > > packages into it with 'chroot /mnt pkg install ...') > > > - unmount and reboot > > > > > > even better, if you do not use an USB key directly, but do all the > above > > > to a mdconfig file system (a file system in a normal plain file) and > > > copy later the result with dd(1) to the real USB key; > > > > > > let me know if you need a detailed procedure of it. > > > > > > > Dear Matthias , > > > > > > If you supply such an algorithm , me and other people may use it to > > generate boot-able USB sticks with some installed packages . > > > > Thank you very much . > > > > > > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > > here it comes; comments are always welcome; > > matthias > > > $Id: buildingImage.txt,v 1.15 2014/08/15 17:39:21 guru Exp $ > > Building bootable FreeBSD/i386 USB keys > > > This small howto file describes how to build and enrich bootable USB keys= . > Some ideas are stolen from: > > http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/10/building-bootable-freebsdi386-images.h= tml > > File operations, esp. of a large amount of small files, are very SLOW > on USB keys. That's why we use in general the following procedure: > > 1. dd(1) the complete /dev/da0 to a plain file, an image of the USB key; > 2. use mdconfig(8) to make a memory disk of this file and mount(8) it; > 3. do everything of the formatting and installation in this virtual disk; > 4. unmount(8) it and dd(1) it back to the USB key; > > here we go (use for /dev/da0 what your key is in /var/log/messages): > > check the size of your USB key with: > > # dd if=3D/dev/da0 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D8m > 1878+1 records in > 1878+1 records out > 15758000128 bytes transferred in 783.312179 secs (20117139 bytes/sec) > > note: this step is essential to define an image which later fits again to > the > real USB key; my "16 Gbyte" keys vary between 1868 and 1914 blocks of 8m > (which is ofc lesse than 16 GByte); that's why I decided to use always th= e > number 1860 for my keys of this "16 marketing GBytes". > > now we create an empty large disk file of this size 1860 blocks of 8m: > > # dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dda0.r269739 bs=3D8m count=3D1860 > > attach the file da0.r269739 as a memory disk: > > # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f da0.r269739 > md0 > > now we use the normal procedure to create a bootable UFS on /dev/md0: > > # fdisk -I md0 > # fdisk -B md0 > # bsdlabel -w md0s1 auto > # bsdlabel -B md0s1 > # bsdlabel -e md0s1 # edit the disk label and change partition "a" from > "unused" to "4.2BSD" > > build the file system: > > # newfs /dev/md0s1a > # mount /dev/md0s1a /mnt > > note: if your running host system is older than 20121201 (see > src/UPDATING) you > must add some new user if you try to install 'head': > > # pw useradd -n auditdistd -g audit -c "Auditdistd unprivileged user" -d > /var/empty -s /usr/sbin/nologin > > install the system from your host which must have been compiled > in /usr/src; if you compiled it in another place check for MAKEOBJDIRPREF= IX > below; > > # cd /usr/src > # make installworld DESTDIR=3D/mnt > # make installkernel DESTDIR=3D/mnt KERNCONF=3DGENERIC INSTALL_NODEBUG=3D= t > # make distrib-dirs DESTDIR=3D/mnt > # make distribution DESTDIR=3D/mnt > > the new system in /mnt needs some files to start: > > # echo /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw,noatime 1 1 > /mnt/etc/fstab > # cp /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf /mnt/etc > > # cat < /mnt/etc/rc.conf > tmpmfs=3D"YES" > tmpsize=3D"128m" > wlans_ath0=3D"wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"WPA DHCP" > ifconfig_bge0=3D"DHCP" > hostname=3Dtiny-r269739 > sshd_enable=3D"YES" > moused_enable=3D"YES" > dbus_enable=3D"YES" > hald_enable=3D"YES" > vboxguest_enable=3D"YES" > vboxservice_enable=3D"YES" > keymap=3D"german.iso" > # powerd > powerd_enable=3D"YES" > powerd_flags=3D"-a max -b adp" > performance_cx_lowest_cx_lowest=3D"Cmax" > economy_cx_lowest=3D"Cmax" > EOF > > # cat < /mnt/boot/loader.conf > kern.cam.boot_delay=3D"10000" > kern.cam.scsi_delay=3D"3000" > hint.p4tcc.0.disabled=3D1 > hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled=3D1 > EOF > > to use the above created USB key to install another system (the EeePC for > example, or the Acer) we need 'src' and 'obj' as well on the key: > > # cd /usr > # cp -Rp src /mnt/usr > # cp -Rp obj /mnt/usr > > but remove the SVN control files from the copied soure tree: > > # rm -rf /mnt/usr/src/.svn > > enrich the USB key with the prepared packages: > > # cd /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/freebsd-head-ports-head/All > # cp -p * /mnt/PKGDIR > > o run later > > # cd /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/freebsd-head-ports-head/All > # rsync -avz . /mnt/PKGDIR > > as well we need in 11-CURRENT now the new pkg(8) command; we compile > the old way ports-mgmt/pkg-devel and install only 'pkg-static' into > the /mnt system: > > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel > # make install > # chroot /mnt mkdir -p /usr/local/sbin > # cp -p /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static /mnt/usr/local/sbin > > let's see if this works: > > # chroot /mnt /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static help > > first we have to build the 'repo' from the directory of all > packages; we run: > > # chroot /mnt pkg-static repo /PKGDIR > Creating repository in /PKGDIR: 83% > ... > Packing files for repository: 100% > > the recent version of pkg(8) needs in any case the definition > of the respository; we create the myrepo.conf file as: > > # chroot /mnt mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos > # vim /mnt/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/myrepo.conf > # cat /mnt/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/myrepo.conf > > FreeBSD: { > url: "file:/PKGDIR", > enabled: true, > } > > now we are able to install any stuff (and its dependencies), here > as an example 'autoconf-2.69' and its dependencies: > > # chroot /mnt pkg-static -R /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ install > autoconf-2.69 > Updating repository catalogue > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date > All repositories are up-to-date > The following 5 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > autoconf: 2.69 > indexinfo: 0.2 > perl5: 5.16.3_11 > m4: 1.4.17_1,1 > autoconf-wrapper: 20131203 > > The process will require 45 MB more space > 13 MB to be downloaded > > Proceed with this action [y/N]: y > Fetching autoconf-2.69.txz: 100% of 529 KB > Fetching indexinfo-0.2.txz: 100% of 6 KB > Fetching perl5-5.16.3_11.txz: 100% of 12 MB > Fetching m4-1.4.17_1,1.txz: 100% of 183 KB > Fetching autoconf-wrapper-20131203.txz: 100% of 4 KB > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > [1/5] Installing indexinfo-0.2: 100% > [2/5] Installing perl5-5.16.3_11: 100% > [3/5] Installing m4-1.4.17_1,1: 100% > [4/5] Installing autoconf-wrapper-20131203: 100% > [5/5] Installing autoconf-2.69: 100% > > are they really there?: > > # chroot /mnt pkg-static info > autoconf-2.69 Automatically configure source code on man= y > Un*x platforms > autoconf-wrapper-20131203 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf > indexinfo-0.2 Utility to regenerate the GNU info page > index > m4-1.4.17_1,1 GNU m4 > perl5-5.16.3_11 Practical Extraction and Report Language > > later, when the system we building in /mnt is booted, we can use > pkg-static directly with the same repo, we do: > > # pkg-static -R /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ install foo-x.x > > copy some initial xorg.conf files to see what we can make use > of them later: > > # cp /etc/X11/xorg.* /mnt/etc/X11 > > add an unpriv user 'guru' (for beeing able to SSH-in): > > # chroot /mnt /usr/sbin/adduser > > and enrich its HOME with files to bringup KDE: > > # cp -p ~guru/.xinitrc /mnt/home/guru > # cp -p ~guru/.xserverrc /mnt/home/guru > > umount the key, detach the memory disk and copy the image back > with dd(1) to the USB device: > > # umount /mnt > # mdconfig -d -u md0 > # dd if=3Dda0.r269739 of=3D/dev/da0 bs=3D8m > > > soem more hints for special cases: > > If we have the real USB device locally, but the image on a laptop > without USB ports, one may use: > > # ssh -C root@10.49.8.36 dd of=3D/dev/da1 bs=3D8m < da0-r269739 > 0+823717 records in > 1868+0 records out > 15669919744 bytes transferred in 12135.626342 secs (1291233 bytes/sec) > # > (i.e. around 3h 17min) > > To write the image from the VM to Ubuntu's USB port: > > $ ssh -C 192.168.2.102 > $ sudo chmod 0666 /dev/sdb > $ ssh -C 192.168.2.102 dd of=3D/dev/sdb bs=3D8M < da0-r269739 > > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX hints to compile in and install from some other places: > > If you want to build world and kernel out of SVN in 'src' and into 'obj', > but in > some other place as /usr/[src|obj], for example in > /home/guru/head/[src|obj] > use this procedure: > > # mkdir -p /home/guru/head/obj > # MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/home/guru/head/obj ; export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX > # cd /home/guru/head > # svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src > > # cd /home/guru/head/src > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC > ... > > if you have built the kernel and world in some other place as /usr/src: > > # MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=3D/home/guru/head/obj ; export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX > # cd /home/guru/head/src > # make installworld DESTDIR=3D/mnt > # make installkernel DESTDIR=3D/mnt KERNCONF=3DGENERIC INSTALL_NODEBUG=3D= t > # make distrib-dirs DESTDIR=3D/mnt > # make distribution DESTDIR=3D/mnt > ... > > to use the key to install other system, you must have 'src' and 'obj' > again in the correct places; do: > > # mkdir -p /mnt/usr/home/guru/head/ > # cd /mnt > # ln -s usr/home home > > # cd /home/guru/head/ > # cp -Rp src /mnt/home/guru/head/ # 40 mins > # cp -Rp obj /mnt/home/guru/head/ # 20 mins > > > -- > Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: > E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail > WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments > phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards > | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaig= n > Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 08:07:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4FCC2A3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net [74.53.216.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C85C15 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [173.193.161.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303293F4137 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBAB13106A for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bP2zk-qsMfXV for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egeria.internal (114.179.70.115.static.exetel.com.au [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86410131069 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:07:30 +0800 From: Gregory Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Remove distribution sets Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-ID: 303293F4137.CAC5B X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-15, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-From: gregory.orange@calorieking.com X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-Watermark: 1411373257.55253@xFe7lhb9iFVvabFTb7nUOw X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:07:54 -0000 Hi all, Can one remove distribution sets from FreeBSD 8.x? I've got a 8.3 machine with too much on it[1], but don't have control over the installation of the OS. I'd like to remove everything except kernel and base, but the only method I've found[2] is not complete. TIA, Greg. [1] Per freebsd-update -r 8.4-RELEASE upgrade: src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin world/base world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages world/proflibs [2] https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=1136 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 08:54:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCB0F1E for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net (mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net [205.201.135.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3354144 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:54:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=cisco-vanessa=3Dhcyxxx.com@mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net; bh=5nVlcLSo+VFsEv7bqMJCQ9TKIpQ=; b=m3mVuRBsV11RInhr499P8mmdQzdbfF2vwMjeguBcgg8Gwb65lzYVK/jQH5F6ZffqIqDJbMRBg4V6 R+uCj+8bdGc56OT9NCRZPrEKwpRHFVp8luWjNZC+ltgZFs71/DGsB6eHtehrbo9zghLAUWcOZlOA vyLvQz1cn9bNTPhNosM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net; b=IzmmB/JYFJzzWhiba08X6F5rxupsAvULALUHqqV3LVJSvxoiqaLlqnpEBHy6HNZQ+UNjDJyZ0MtE 6u6pGgxAysfJ1V/SDGbk1Fx/AvjleevO2Drn5AzXqDnVkphAd4W0Gzz4rK7tfU/MG1R1Z6TErTLY IB55FDAe1+Gu2O+Hghk=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net id h2qkik1mr1oe for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:53:54 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Cisco=20network=20device=20hot=20sale=21=21=21?= From: =?utf-8?Q?vanessa?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?vanessa?= To: =?utf-8?Q??= Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:53:54 +0000 Message-ID: <55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91c22e8f0de0.20140915085344@mail71.atl51.rsgsv.net> X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CIDf6c5a3e281c22e8f0de0** X-Campaign: mailchimp55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91.f6c5a3e281 X-campaignid: mailchimp55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91.f6c5a3e281 X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91&id=f6c5a3e281&e=c22e8f0de0 X-MC-User: 55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91 X-Feedback-ID: 33327973:33327973.539889:us9:mc X-Accounttype: ff Sender: "vanessa" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:54:02 -0000 ------------------------------------------------------------ New & Original Cisco network devices! ** One-minute Massage ------------------------------------------------------------ ** Sale $ ------------------------------------------------------------ Item Price(FOB Beijing) WS-C2960-48TC-L $700.00 WS-C2960S-24PS-L $1=2C300.00 WS-C2960X-48TS-L $1=2C795.00 WS-C3560X-24P-S $1=2C465.00 WS-C3750X-48T-S $3=2C085.00 CISCO1941/K9 $825.00 ASA5520-BUN-K9 $2=2C445.00 GLC-LH-SMD=3D $115.00 WS-C6509-E $4=2C760.00 WS-X6704-10GE $4=2C015.00 Contact person:Vanessa Skype:vanessa-3580 Email:cisco-vanessa@hcyxxx.com WhatsApp:0086-13651243580 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This email was sent to questions@freebsd.org (mailto:questions@freebsd.org) why did I get this? (http://hcyxxx.us9.list-manage.com/about?u=3D55edc5663= 8c8bb1a89b436c91&id=3Df678334250&e=3Dc22e8f0de0&c=3Df6c5a3e281) unsubscr= ibe from this list (http://hcyxxx.us9.list-manage2.com/unsubscribe?u=3D55e= dc56638c8bb1a89b436c91&id=3Df678334250&e=3Dc22e8f0de0&c=3Df6c5a3e281) up= date subscription preferences (http://hcyxxx.us9.list-manage.com/profile?u= =3D55edc56638c8bb1a89b436c91&id=3Df678334250&e=3Dc22e8f0de0) asia information international technology HK ltd =C2=B7 USD50000000.00 =C2= =B7 Beijing=2C 8 100000 =C2=B7 China Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=3Dfreemium_newsletter&= utm_medium=3Demail&utm_campaign=3Dmonkey_rewards&aid=3D55edc56638c8bb1a89b= 436c91&afl=3D1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 10:09:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147FC785 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD17AEF for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0A23CEE7; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:09:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8FA9mUA002430; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:09:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:09:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gregory Orange Subject: Re: Remove distribution sets Message-Id: <20140915120948.569f5458.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> References: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:09:59 -0000 On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:07:30 +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: > Can one remove distribution sets from FreeBSD 8.x? The system doesn't provide a _dedicated_ means to do this. Basically it's possible to manually remove (delete) things when you _know_ what you are doing. Removing manpages is such a possible task that probably won't hurt. Have a usable source tree at hand, so you can "make install" if you accidentally removed something important, that's why don't remove "make". ;-) The best way to tune an installation is at install time. When installing from source, adjusting /etc/src.conf and /etc/make.conf, and following the path described in the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile, it's relatively easy, especially see the "delete-old" and "delete-old-libs" steps. It's also possible to "prepare" a stripped-down system elsewhere and then use it to replace the installation in question. A comparable way is provided via freebsd-update where parts to be subject of an update can be selected using its configuration file; see "man freebsd-update.conf" for the "Components" keyword. Probably you won't save much disk space anyway... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 11:42:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F5D192 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bvgsvcs.net (mail.bvgsvcs.net [197.221.16.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD8F769 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.amavis.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC3E1C85; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:42:46 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bvgsvcs.net Received: from mail.bvgsvcs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.bvgsvcs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8oJYZu+RJn1U; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:42:46 +0200 (SAST) Received: from penguin.localnet (unknown [196.1.1.18]) by mail.bvgsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400091C81; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:42:46 +0200 (SAST) From: Coert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:42:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.2 (Linux/3.13.0-24-generic; KDE/4.13.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: Jamie Griffin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:42:58 -0000 On Thursday 11 September 2014 14:50:19 Jamie Griffin wrote: > On 11/09/2014 10:48, Coert wrote: > > On Monday 08 September 2014 10:45:43 Radek Krej=C4=8Da wrote: > >> Hello, > >>=20 > >> I am trying to install my computer today (new hardware) and I cann= ot > >> install a lot of packages, eg. firefox, thunderbird, chromium, xfc= e, > >> libreoffice. > >>=20 > >> All is falling on message: > >>=20 > >> Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting) > >> pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: > >> cannot install package firefox~www/firefox, remove it from request= ? > >> [Y/n]: > >>=20 > >> All the same... > >>=20 > >> I have deleted all packages and problem is still the same. > >>=20 > >> Radek >=20 > This was a real PITA for me too; although, it should be fixed now wit= h > pkg version 1.3.7. What version are you using? Upgraded to version 1.3.7, was on an older one indeed. Was running 1.2.4_1 Still having issues though, for now I just stick to release/0 and pkg version 1.2.4_1 Going to try an upgrade later > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freeb= sd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 12:40:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C1AE6A for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841CACE5 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:40:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlUGACHdFlRR8YDT/2dsb2JhbABggw2BKtI5AYEVF3iEBAEBBDocIxALDgoJJQ8qHgYTiEIBuisYj00HhEsBBJhCBYRAlUCDYDsvgkoBAQE Received: from 211.128-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.128.211]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2014 14:40:38 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8FCeYs6004260; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:40:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:40:34 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: Port/Package Upgrade Question Message-ID: <20140915144034.58b7c848@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:40:47 -0000 On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:10 -0700 Doug Hardie wrote: > I have a number of systems that I need to upgrade to 9.3. I have one > system that is the development/test system. Its already at 9.3 and it > has a number of ports/packages installed that need to be on the > production systems. In the past I have built packages for each in > /usr/ports/packages/All and then just mounted that directory via NFS > on the production machines and used pkg_add to install them on the > production machines. > > Some of these are packages in that they use the default configuration. > Unfortunately, some of them have to be compiled via the ports system > as they use non-standard options. I have made a package for each of > them. > > None of the production systems have pkg on them. They all use the > old packages stuff. I suspect I will first need to convert them over > to the pkg system. Thats not a big deal as its a fairly quick process. > However, how do I then upgrade the ports/packages from the test system? > The production systems can't be used to recompile the ports as that > would involve too much down time. Same as before just "pkg add" instead of "pkg_add". See man pkg-add for more details. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 13:19:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764496EC for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021B9BC for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q5so2126927wiv.12 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:references:from :in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to:mime-version; bh=NOXiL2jzkMGDNGbZnHdmSdcfr8j/sIW9a+FjM78UYL8=; b=IPS+MQoXmuQfRVP+G6akYuIsO72sKcoNR4PmDiza8e9LYIGytLEOG/nD6Tv4EqDI3l wZBDRqir48C05h7exPJcrUplfhp+Nx2RhLBjwft356PW/MfGv27DiYHtb3U8uBxa15qG uO2ncaDTdokg7uowhUgwEPJKX1K4HiQ8uw9ZLz6ZdlZ0EvF85CbeJ9T+WGZQk7NEzkS4 FAViBatxRvo/a7zLJo0PowBUyt5vnUvPhhKKpVMvv/z79Sc8tIbQr7IJPvv9S4sJHpzH ZWEBakJXKyR4LNzNrso28umngDA8C+5UEsTFeXIsfKnq4u3n+RpT5KLkI5tTnaXk2hw8 AHjg== X-Received: by 10.181.13.105 with SMTP id ex9mr9110496wid.58.1410787134084; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wm8sm14737764wjb.40.2014.09.15.06.18.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. References: <4D32ABC9-D0D0-48D2-98D3-FF1D72A4261E@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20140910111010.052bfb38@mail.computinginnovations.com> From: atar In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <3B3FBADD-B5B6-4B98-8BD6-701F6F8D21D7@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:18:24 +0300 To: Warren Block Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Derek Ragona X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:19:01 -0000 Hi! Just yesterday I've read your article from your site: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html and I would want to know if you've written an article on how to build an 'im= g' file which has the same content as the 'disc1.iso' file but that will be b= ootable from a USB stick. In addition, I'll be happy if you can tell me in more detail why does even a= fter that I've extracted the content of the 'disc1.iso' file to a regular fo= lder and then 'reassemble' it with the command (on Linux): 'xorriso -dev /tm= p/my_FreeBSD_iso.iso -boot_image any system_area=3Dboot/boot0 -add /path/to/= the/extracted/disc1.iso/folder' and copy the new ISO file into my USB stick w= ith the dd command and then I reboot my PC and I see the boot prompt of the b= oot0 boot manager but I don't get an option to boot the FreeBSD system I've j= ust created. What's going wrong here? Regards, Atar. > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, atar wrote: >=20 >> Just wanted to know please why does the command 'dd if=3DFreeBSD-i386-dis= c1.iso of=3DmyUSB-stick' doesn't make the USB stick bootable like it would d= oes for CDROMs or DVDs? What's the difference between CDROM and an USB? >=20 > [top-posting deleted, please don't do that] >=20 > dd just copies bytes from one place to another. An ISO image file is not b= ootable from a hard disk or USB stick, which require a different format and b= ootcode. >=20 > Some Linux systems use install files that are dual-purpose and can work fr= om CD or USB. FreeBSD does not do that. >=20 > Some writing utilities can take apart an ISO image and convert it to a boo= table USB stick. I don't know if any of those work for FreeBSD ISO images a= ny more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 14:41:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C19E33 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB42CB40 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t60so4100801wes.11 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:40:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SBXlai7q1uW1GfQDd+PqovxJTssfLx2T6Pdj8AApn6o=; b=AuT1imaxUbGYtx5noeMaHpKBnsC8OF/ZOVqkte0/RSKximM3r5RJ83QZHoVm4187Sk Mqf3/iRTkJE7+EOobKiUpC4YuA22Yz2V90YUfxgDcBu7LMI5L4EUuRienyEHu2eKYKFJ V6Ycd+9GKa8ghl7zIhcDRx2V6pZSh6/QqgzJE/P8pqM+OyUnOEzZ9BFNOsYbmzGirXdz HA8k7qKK0KWEIu015dNNwLS3ji42uVkhhQSvd6QTvUVuHH6Iwcf2Jb1O2FBFedd2Zc8K 8ZldhLztDEcDgafdv42CW33RAhH8mKuanMf4AopiTOINaqazO7suN6O3YJgm3MpBxTY3 QarA== X-Received: by 10.180.73.6 with SMTP id h6mr23661927wiv.65.1410792058854; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([94.195.197.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw6sm15019100wjb.18.2014.09.15.07.40.57 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:40:56 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: S + J for /tmp and /var and /? Message-ID: <20140915154056.50ead271@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20140913081905.1de2006c.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20140910090947.4941336b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140913033102.GA10967@neutralgood.org> <20140913081905.1de2006c.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:41:01 -0000 On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:19:05 +0200 O. Hartmann wrote: > The problem is that clients like xpdf open by default all PDFs > in /tmp and not /var/tmp (which is still mapped to disk in all my > configurations) and with lots PDFs open, the box starts swapping > pretty quickly with only 4GB RAM and ZFS. Even with 8 GB RAM its a > kind of problematic, when we deal with larger temporary files taken > from simulations, opened by vi or other editors and stored > temporarily in /tmp. I've been using tmpfs since I had 1.5 GB of RAM, and I never noticed a slowdown with swapping due to tmpfs, except a little bit while the page daemon did the writing. I've used it with more than 2xRAM swapped out. Maybe ZFS isn't leaving it enough memory. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 14:47:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F5031C; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D5FC45; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA08325; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:47:12 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:19:37 -0600 To: pyunyh@gmail.com From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... In-Reply-To: <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:47:17 -0000 At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to >know exact chip revision? Here you are. jme0: port 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 jme0: MSIX count : 8 jme0: MSI count : 8 jme0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI-X vectors (8 supported) msi: routing MSI-X IRQ 256 to local APIC 0 vector 52 jme0: using IRQ 256 for MSI-X jme0: Using 1 MSIX messages. jme0: PCI device revision : 0x0250 jme0: Chip revision : 0x11 jme0: ethernet hardware address not found in EEPROM. jme0: PHY is at address 1. jme0: Read request size : 512 bytes. jme0: TLP payload size : 128 bytes. miibus0: on jme0 jmphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 jmphy0: OUI 0x00d831, model 0x0021, rev. 1 jmphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX -flow-master, auto, auto-flow jme0: bpf attached jme0: Ethernet address: e0:cb:4e:54:23:ac I do not particularly like JMicron chips (their faulty SSD controllers have cost me a lot of time and money), but that's what's on the motherboard of this Asus. So, I need to find a way to make it work. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 15:10:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5622E99D for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D4EEAD for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b17so4851378lan.32 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BsJAsXZSwHXFn8tj3PKHIgdn5S+FMzq/OkSFJgmQb9k=; b=ImIyHKoaKa5wHTEUy2UPwo94j+SUNJguvdhPQBS1f7qbuwLfIxq9nsGE95EG7jRQWy RGLq3Z3wE++azsxyreJ41WTnM9D50fkQsn+IoxLs5tt5E/H2FYAK+jk89TyM527vpy04 43XCNE2nBGWHnIFrzNyyS16KzEE7y6ECyIhDeJit/qF/ZdcXY1gITAIBg29gGv5nwZxT QZaawGpGt8YwGyIgbtp0Ex1xLNzsqCyMshsr9pxzI7k40ahwyOHJYVl7cfBDti2HCAZv vpCVYZW/sIaBwO0a4OeIeDurDMyQLG5LUXxtx1lic2l5kQ/OFtODlL2NyDGjP1mC/Fuc cKnA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.200 with SMTP id ri8mr3951398lbb.84.1410793800861; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.151.41 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:10:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: re-subscribe missed deadline activation From: William Lassiter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:10:03 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 15:24:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC8919F; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59B9130; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id uy5so2637173obc.1 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:24:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DlP/13RcYpJk/DQBdbT1nCy2gJKMlkvLy6ah2dvurPw=; b=Nk5b6bmCQ/AiQEgULn0iUcb1viUD4CsCHH93QtUk6sVsDkwhbVtUOSoynP9iYl6ctV 4frSfRgNeveeC7IK//me5jMQfUR6DdDohx9oOoqKlwhGB0Rf3r+97uZ5Mp97uAMNqx/I Ss97SqhKczlfqJv7JyXltRwjOIVJVqfEo5kqRRZHRQxwSflwPk70c/gLRbJaesjWIFe0 RVF9dIx8Rmas0wdQtudszcqI9LVAHAJzSBKfBKFSz1IZn9TUQDCPOdDddda38fgE8T9/ soysDR88/zgZG0rH1/ZQ7tOvKg7wKasBOj/aaQZJjQ5M9XtPeoWemmB+1vH/PR9GsFbZ PPSQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.142.165 with SMTP id rx5mr13405140oeb.5.1410794217271; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.58.196 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:16:57 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BvFx9GV_CZdR-X5uX85LvmnQuTI Message-ID: Subject: U3G QDL firmware loader for GOBI2000/HP_UN2420 MiniPCI/USB 3G/GPS From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:24:09 -0000 Hello world! :-) I have changed my machine, there is a built-in GOBI2000 / HP UN2420 3G/GPS module installable as MiniPCI card and visible as USB device. I have added its VID/PID to the usbdevs and u3g.c module, so after recompilation it gets recognised by u3g module and apropriate /dev/cuaU* device shows up.. The problem is that device does not store firmware inside non-volatile memory, so user needs to upload it after power-on. I have the firmware files. I can test modem with success after reboot from Win7 which uploads firmware into device. Still, I need to upload the firmware somehow on my FreeBSD. The upload protocol is QDL and /dev/cuaU0 shows up waiting for command. Which utility can I use to upload firmware with QDL? I have seen one post [1] regarding this problem in the past but the QDL utility was not named explicitly. Any hints welcome! :-) Tomek [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2010-October/009384.html -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 15:30:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E5B8CD for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8AF1EE for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s8FFSZOk035601; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:28:36 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:28:35 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Michael Sierchio Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20140911224106.X61666@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, atar , Derek Ragona , Darren Pilgrim X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:30:20 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 536, Issue 5, Message: 25 On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:16:22 -0400 Michael Sierchio writes: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:34 PM, atar wrote: > > I know about the 'memstick.img' version but I want just the ISO > > versions because they have more softwares installed on them right > > from the package and I want to use them just from my USB stick. > > There are tools that make an ISO image into a bootable USB stick. > > http://bit.ly/1rX250x The LMGTFY page that points to falsely insists my JS isn't enabled, and googling 'iso to usb freebsd' found plenty of mostly dead ends and red herrings - you may be luckier :) What works[*] is the below script by Darren Pilgrim, derived from the /usr/src/release scripts with a tar joiner. I just used it to make a 2GB FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1-memstick.img .. not yet installed. ======== #!/bin/sh # originally by Darren Pilgrim 17/12/13 from http://pastebin.com/fzgVaCgW # smithi@nimnet.asn.au 22/2/14 for FreeBSD 8.2-R (no makefs label option) # compaction & extra paranoia 23/6/14; rm 8.2 hack, quit() tidyup 11/9/14 PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin export PATH if [ -z "$*" ]; then echo `basename $0 [dvd1 img] [dvd1 dir] [memstick img] [memstick dir]` echo ' [dvd1 img] is the dvd1 image to convert' echo ' [dvd1 dir] is the mountpoint for the dvd1 image' echo ' [memstick img] is name of the memstick image file to create' echo ' [memstick dir] is temporary work directory for memstick contents' exit 1 fi quit() { echo "$1" ; exit 1 ; } [ `id -u` -ne 0 ] && quit "This script must be run as root" [ ! -f $1 ] && quit "Source dvd1 image $1 does not exist" [ ! -d $2 ] && quit "dvd1 dir mountpoint $2 must be a directory" [ -e $3 ] && quit "Memstick img file $3 already exists" [ ! -d $4 ] && quit "Memstick dir $4 not an existing directory" [ `du -sm $4 | awk '{print $1}'` -gt 2 ] && quit "Memstick dir $4 not empty" unit=`mdconfig -f $1` || quit "dvd1 img mdconfig fail" mount_cd9660 /dev/$unit $2 || quit "mount_cd9660 fail" tar cf - -C $2 . | tar xpf - -C $4 || quit "tar pipeline fail" umount $2 && mdconfig -d -u $unit || quit "Could not umount dvd1" echo '/dev/ufs/FreeBSD_Install / ufs ro,noatime 1 1' > $4/etc/fstab makefs -B little -o label=FreeBSD_Install $3 $4 || quit "makefs fail" unit=`mdconfig -f $3` || quit "memstick img mdconfig fail" gpart create -s BSD $unit || quit "gpart create -s BSD fail" gpart bootcode -b $4/boot/boot $unit || quit "gpart bootcode fail" gpart add -t freebsd-ufs $unit || quit "gpart add -t freebsd-ufs fail" mdconfig -d -u $unit echo "Memstick image $3 created:" ; ls -l $3 ======= [*] These images boot and install FreeBSD fine, however with 10.0-R, bsdconfig failed to install included packages, due to relying on how it _detected_ its media not as a CD/DVD but as USB/other, and so not pointing pkg(8) to its local package repository - thus needing an online connection, rather contrary to the point of a DVD[-like] install .. When I can find a spare box to test on, I hope to try a patch to fix this - unless 9.3-R is already updated from 10.0-R in this respect? So with 10-R, as things stand, this won't work for atar's primary aim. Once installed and rebooted, you could perhaps add its packages/All/ to a properly pre-configured local repo then install pkgs from that, but I don't grok pkg(8) at all well yet .. fortunately, others do. I've just seen Matthias Apitz' post; more complicated but thorough. If atar works through that there's lots to be learned. The above is more just for moving a release from .iso to .img format fairly quickly. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 15:51:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1ED7279 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429497A3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id va2so1116047obc.17 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:51:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x3UHlB26EjlgK0jGNexbl3+C8rYWnvKUtUV7Eaj3bu8=; b=dViE0TbEuUAtXNls6bFIOxPMuWyr88Jk7PBFOkLAmU9Tf8iV7/oIkToQT3DAHFHkRq MWjJ1sZZbL4FMFiFpM6ONiiLp28Yo5A0cKTkq0KYI+WAD/btHkHzmrBL0UFwlokBX1ed QlxPu6fMqd5Z23G3skkyN0C+q9MyoIuL+MJi/mK9xGVHXuZ8ptpOpdtjyZGkEuDrkVjp bMgAwUAp93aGjiNJK1xKRWhD9BDD8z7cgMvps7/XLL7Z43vPBuUPQ35voutlKZh+MhKC bVqlQSUJaght1WqjmE9t2bWGJN8A6xzb90spWy07ZNqDPd07leSxpvtMHdiwy99AWUef 0SuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnL9f4JT+hIpodxOPGAnH1Ppd95x/A+wq7kaRWgfkQ8X2EyMh3JRQFZ1zVpl84XWpDxljsn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.236.65 with SMTP id us1mr28729205obc.38.1410795863842; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140910203722.GB20274@slackbox.erewhon.home> References: <20140910090947.4941336b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140910203722.GB20274@slackbox.erewhon.home> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 08:44:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: S + J for /tmp and /var and /? From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:51:36 -0000 On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Roland Smith wrote: > You should definitely disable journaling when you want to make snapshots, e.g. > to dump a live filesystem. Quote https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewFAQs: > > If you want to use snapshot (dump -L) then disable the soft updates > journal for that filesystem This one wrinkle alone makes S + J unusable for me on any system I build, and I'd argue that enabling journaling by default is a mistake. - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 16:26:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F404DF06 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D7DBA2 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q58so4352266wes.9 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=qMBAjQv85kzJHd+9ue5nB8TfmZojMPPP3S+2FlUuIj8=; b=hDTSxvG7O0CVuZ7WmlmjMROJ2z3NtT+vqmIK8iPWf3WMke6KsJIjnbvu0JAPB8x/ul OADx70PJENAVk5H2DBVf9Mt2FEw/wFB2jZzW/MSX8sgUMBOKhUfgfsHj0RLB5CcReIFV YhWfsNBZAhHxirTz6Mp9S+1fA2JpCMjLdlfjaJoeA7UKiUPthf55/1/2V06d24QbKCCH HFsPaY0pVsnYJwYYxDGOJ3xOkqJxxppCavj8KibyTk7sepIrLJ+6Q1NLCV1KdQRRvkUM BaF3kKdIXRXaCNYNImPtLzU2X7ZOOiO60S3VxeAgsrNKwS2kpiu/ypgrMg6O3G9Puw85 bbsQ== X-Received: by 10.180.97.101 with SMTP id dz5mr24480269wib.52.1410798416561; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.2] ([62.219.134.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ka3sm15349021wjc.3.2014.09.15.09.26.54 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT) References: <20140911224106.X61666@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <20140911224106.X61666@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10B500) From: atar Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:26:51 +0300 To: Ian Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Michael Sierchio , Darren Pilgrim , Derek Ragona , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:59 -0000 Thanks for your great detail response! You've written: > I've just seen Matthias Apitz' post; more complicated but thorough. Can you point me to this post's URL? Also, I'll be glad to hear if you succeeded to boot the 'img' file which you= 've created with the above script from an USB stick. Regards, Atar. > I've just seen Matthias Apitz' post; more complicated but thorough. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:11:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82169874 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rc2.surewest.net (rc2.surewest.net [66.60.130.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668EFA6F for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.surewest.net ([66.60.130.145]) by rc2.surewest.net ({af05c03d-e86d-4922-90cb-b2bd72ac7e37}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20140915180821397 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:08:21 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from webmail.mycci.net (webmail.mycci.net [66.60.130.47]) by smtp3.surewest.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7D5896F5 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:08:19 -0700 From: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net To: Freebsd questions Subject: Please help with bash, clang, and gdb Message-ID: <0a25d1f33a72a97d809538c6d23ee07b@surewest.net> X-Sender: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net User-Agent: Consolidated Webmail/0.9.5 X-MAG-OUTBOUND: surewest.redcondor.net@66.60.130.145/32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:11:43 -0000 Greetings dear FreeBSD enthusiast. I have written a character mode c-language program that is supposed to read data from a text file on a floppy disk, perform calculations on that data, then write the result to another text file on the same floppy disk. The operating system is FreeBSD 9.1. The computer is a Hewlett-Packard xw4400 workstation equipped with a Pentium D microprocessor. The D processor has only a single core. I insert the floppy disk, then type as follows: mount -t msdosfs -w /dev/fd0 /mnt clang -x c -g /mnt/ProgName.c > mnt/CompOut.txt 2>&1 I do not understand the syntax of the last four characters of the second line, but they somehow cause bash to redirect the output of clang orginially directed to the monitor screen to the specified file. The output file from clang is generated. It contains one warning, and no errors. If I then type at the prompt /root/a.out /mnt/BmIn0001.txt the a.out program prints to the monitor screen instructions to the user, which are followed immediatedly by the prompt symbol. The source-code line to open the input file is as follows: if ((InpFileHand = fopen (argv[1], "rb"))==NULL) { printf ("nCould not open file %s.", argv [1]); exit (11); } The source-code line to open the output file is as follows: if ((OutpFileHand = fopen (OutpFileName, "wt")) == NULL) { printf ("nCould not open file %s", OutpFileName); fcloseall(); exit (25); } where OutpFileName is an array of char read from the input file. If I enter the following wait $! echo $? the exit code of 0 is displayed. An exit code of 0 is generated by the last line of the program. If the program failed to open either file, an error code of either 11 or 25 should have been produced. Even though the a.out program exitted normally as far as the operating system is concerned, the indicator on the floppy drive never lights, causing me to believe that the program failed to read the input file. When I enter cd /mnt ls the expected output file is shown to be absent. How did my program get all of the way from beginning to end without opening the files, yet not exit with expected codes of 11 or 25? Attempting to answer this question, I then enter at the prompt gdb /root/a.out then, at the gdb prompt, enter set args /mnt/BmIn0001.txt gdb fails with an error code of 0177. I research this error code with the aid of Google, and am informed that it indicates that, under p-threads, the libraries were loaded in an incorrect order. My program is intended to be a c language, not c++ language program, with all libraries loaded with the executable and linked statically. The only libraries referenced in the program are stdio, stdlib, math, and time. The only library functions called are printf(), fprintf(), fopen(), fcloseall(), fgetc(), ungetc(), fwrite(), sqrtr(), time(), and ctime(). What do any of these have to do with p-threads? I realize that this is a long message, and that programmers may have more important responsibilities than helping newbies. Is there a FreeBSD developer who is familiar with these three programs who might be willing to identify my error(s)? Any and all suggestions are appreciated. Sincerely, Newby Lee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:13:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E15AC35 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from COL004-OMC4S6.hotmail.com (col004-omc4s6.hotmail.com [65.55.34.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FFDAA7 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from COL128-W17 ([65.55.34.199]) by COL004-OMC4S6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22724); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:13:51 -0700 X-TMN: [rHPRoO8gYrhW0S8laa2JSSJDcal2Yn+9] X-Originating-Email: [jordantboland@live.com] Message-ID: From: Jordan Boland To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: linux-crashplan (relies on forbidden port: linux-f10-expat) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:13:51 -0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2014 18:13:51.0381 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD767C50:01CFD110] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:13:52 -0000 Hi Everyone=2C I'd like to implement Crashplan=2C and was pleased to find some notes onlin= e from others who have it running using the Linux ABI. Crashplan requires = a Linux JRE=2C which in turn requires linux-f10-expat=2C which has been for= bidden (http://www.freshports.org/vuxml.php?vid=3D5f030587-e39a-11de-881e-0= 01aa0166822). Running `make -DNO_IGNORE` against linux-f10-expat fails with "error 1" - I= can't find any information on this error (I think the expectation is that = make will provide a message=2C but it doesn't). Do I have any options left? There might not be a lot of us looking at Cras= hplan in particular=2C but all of the linux-compatible JREs require the lin= ux-f10-expat port=2C so I thought there should be someone else talking abou= t it=2C but I seem to be mistaken about that. Thank you for your help=2C -Jordan = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:45:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78356936 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED1E8DBA for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s8FIhdNn044215; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:43:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:43:39 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: atar Subject: Re: Using the ISO releases on USB sticks. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20140916041230.I61666@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20140911224106.X61666@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Michael Sierchio , Darren Pilgrim , Derek Ragona , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:45:14 -0000 On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:26:51 +0300, atar wrote: > Thanks for your great detail response! > > You've written: > > > I've just seen Matthias Apitz' post; more complicated but thorough. > > > Can you point me to this post's URL? Well sure, but it's just a couple of messages earlier than these ones with the same subject, so I'm wondering why you missed it? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-September/261025.html Use the [thread] link from there to see if you missed any others? > Also, I'll be glad to hear if you succeeded to boot the 'img' file > which you've created with the above script from an USB stick. Sure; I used this to make a 10.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1-memstick.img which booted and installed fine, modulo the packages issue mentioned; after that I installed 9.2-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1-memstick.img on a Thinkpad X200, including the DVD packages as 9.2-R still used the old pkg_add tools. In case not obvious, you still need to dd the .img to the memstick :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:58:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0743C12 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7B6ECF for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02EF3CEC4 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8FIZRSw003507; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:35:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:35:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net Subject: Re: Please help with bash, clang, and gdb Message-Id: <20140915203527.482fbc37.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <0a25d1f33a72a97d809538c6d23ee07b@surewest.net> References: <0a25d1f33a72a97d809538c6d23ee07b@surewest.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:58:39 -0000 On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:08:19 -0700, leeoliveshackelford@surewest.net wrote: > I insert the floppy disk, then type as follows: > > mount -t msdosfs -w /dev/fd0 /mnt Note that FAT (the MS-DOS file system) is not able to work with standard permissions (such as BSD, Unix and Linux). That's why you should mask the +x attributes on files. Use this in /etc/fstab: /dev/fd0 /floppy msdosfs rw,noauto,noatime,-m=644,-M=755 0 0 Then just use mount /floppy See "man mount_msdosfs" for details about the flags. > clang -x c -g /mnt/ProgName.c > mnt/CompOut.txt 2>&1 > > I do not understand the syntax of the last four characters of the second > line, but they somehow cause bash to redirect the output of clang > orginially directed to the monitor screen to the specified file. The numbers in this quite common construct refer to the file descriptor numbers: 0 is stdin (standard input, usually the console keyboard), 1 is stdout (standard output, usually the console screen), and 2 is stderr (standard error, usually the console screen as well). What you see here is: put the standard error messages into standard output, and redirect both of them into the file CompOut.txt. Make sure that the result is what you think it is. :-) Oh, and also note this: FAT does not have case-sensitive file names (no lowercase or CamelCase), so watch your file names carefully. It _might_ be that you have to specify them in UPPERCASE according to the "8.3 convention". > The > output file from clang is generated. It contains one warning, and no > errors. If I then type at the prompt > > /root/a.out /mnt/BmIn0001.txt > > the a.out program prints to the monitor screen instructions to the user, > which are followed immediatedly by the prompt symbol. The source-code > line to open the input file is as follows: > > if ((InpFileHand = fopen (argv[1], "rb"))==NULL) > { > printf ("nCould not open file %s.", argv [1]); > exit (11); > } According to "man 3 fopen", there is no "b". I know that this means "binary", but I remember this from writing DOS programs. On Unix, probably using open() instead of fopen() is better (as you want to work at character level? See "man 2 open" and "man 3 fopen" for comparison. And someone ate the \ infront of the first character 'n'. Probably that was your webmailer which treats backslashes as unacceptable characters.\n :-) Side note: You could use fprintf(stderr, ) to signal an error and print an error message, so your error messages don't (accidentally) mix with normal program output (and you can see them even with output redirection). Maybe using perror() is even better suited because it will look up the error message text for you; see "man 3 perror" for details. > The source-code line to open the output file is as follows: > > if ((OutpFileHand = fopen (OutpFileName, "wt")) == NULL) > { > printf ("nCould not open file %s", OutpFileName); > fcloseall(); > exit (25); > } > > where OutpFileName is an array of char read from the input file. If I > enter the following > > wait $! > echo $? > > the exit code of 0 is displayed. An exit code of 0 is generated by the > last line of the program. If the program failed to open either file, an > error code of either 11 or 25 should have been produced. Even though the > a.out program exitted normally as far as the operating system is > concerned, the indicator on the floppy drive never lights, causing me to > believe that the program failed to read the input file. Yes, this is a reasonable conclusion. The if-branches are never entered. You could rewrite the if block like this, just for testing and to state clearly what you are doing (example taken from a DOS program I wrote to deal with the MBR): mbr = fopen(MBRFILE, "wb"); if(!mbr) { fprintf(stderr, "fopen()"); exit(1); } /* here code for when the file opening was successful */ I admit that the error message isn't very helpful, it should include the program name, and (most important) the _file name_ that the program was unable to fopen. :-) This also makes it easy to step through your program with a debugger. > When I enter > > cd /mnt > ls > > the expected output file is shown to be absent. How did my program get > all of the way from beginning to end without opening the files, yet not > exit with expected codes of 11 or 25? Probably a confusion of == and !=, because it seems to do the exact opposite of what you think it should be doing. :-) > Attempting to answer this > question, I then enter at the prompt > > gdb /root/a.out > > then, at the gdb prompt, enter > > set args /mnt/BmIn0001.txt > > gdb fails with an error code of 0177. I research this error code with > the aid of Google, and am informed that it indicates that, under > p-threads, the libraries were loaded in an incorrect order. My program > is intended to be a c language, not c++ language program, with all > libraries loaded with the executable and linked statically. The only > libraries referenced in the program are stdio, stdlib, math, and time. > The only library functions called are printf(), fprintf(), fopen(), > fcloseall(), fgetc(), ungetc(), fwrite(), sqrtr(), time(), and ctime(). > What do any of these have to do with p-threads? This might be a preset somewhere. You can use "truss " to examine what it tries to open and what return codes the related functions (!) return, and which libraries are being loaded at the beginning. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 19:07:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E800BD75 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8DDFB6 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8FJ79e4025916 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:07:11 GMT Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:07:09 +0000 (UTC) From: John Case X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org To: Charles Swiger Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... In-Reply-To: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD - X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:07:23 -0000 On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Charles Swiger wrote: > If you want to improve security, however, either 2-factor auth or OPIE / > one-time passwords would be better than SSH key+passphrase. Ok, thanks - but SSH key+passphrase is still much better than just plain old password, yes ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 19:09:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AA0EFA; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29D69FD1; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8FJ9kh9003170 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:09:47 GMT Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) From: John Case X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... In-Reply-To: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: matthew@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:09:52 -0000 > Key based auth is definitely the better choice out of those two. Ok, agreed. However, just out of curiousity - let's pretend that sshd *did* allow you to use both an SSH key and a UNIX password at the same time ... would that be more or less secure than using an SSH key with a built-in passphrase ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 19:13:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77DB14 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in7.apple.com (mail-out7.apple.com [17.151.62.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C43B10F for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in7.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 98.66.31401.74A37145; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay7.apple.com ([17.128.113.101]) by local.mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTP id <0NBY004MVIPQZ9L0@local.mail-out.apple.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11973e16-f793b6d000007aa9-29-54173a479973 Received: from [17.149.234.247] (Unknown_Domain [17.149.234.247]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id F8.6F.19908.03A37145; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:13:11 -0700 Message-id: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> To: John Case X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON3OWNfdSjzE4P19E4uXXzexODB6zPg0 nyWAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr48TjwoK/zBX/v9k3ME5k7mLk5JAQMJFY8uABG4QtJnHh3nog m4tDSGAWk8S7tqWMIAleAUGJH5PvsXQxcnAwC8hLHDwvCxJmFtCS+P6olQWifimTRPe7f3BD lzdMhEr0M0ksvrEJbIOwQLTE6YtTGUEGsQmoSUyYyAMS5hRwlfhw/D47iM0ioCrRt/kcI8QC XYmmG2+hbrCSWNc/Ceq4jYwSU3e/YgJJiAjISDx4tIgRYrG8xIcPx9lBiiQEPrNKHP4/lXUC o/AsJE/MQnhiFpInFjAyr2IUyk3MzNHNzDPXSywoyEnVS87P3cQICWGxHYwPV1kdYhTgYFTi 4T0xQSxEiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjjvI0vxECGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2Mx5PT v/1x1kqI+5j49Y9YwrXdZ2MSTvwvYGae6mfIpNMreCH5nGDklZ6SB+IXox9mf73BEfRvt0B8 deSV6gnbN4W9mxzsE/Fs7vR0ccb+R2oi3Zyc/ctnd5mvD2X19mZgqfykkb+H+QNL/N9tp3gK vT/vT9zHGiwiuMDsJpNFDkub+8zHb84rsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAD2F/0EICAAA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOPXVd11DK/EQgw8dbBZHZkRYvPy6icWB yWPGp/ksHj+nTmUMYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyrg+YwdLQQ9LxarDDewNjHOZuxg5OSQETCSW N0xkgbDFJC7cW8/WxcjFISTQzyTxaV0jK0iCWUBL4sa/l0wgNq+AgcSSXZvAmoUFIiUWPtoC VMPBwSagJjFhIg9ImFPAVeLNvw1gJSwCqhJ9m88xQozRlWi68RbK1pZYtvA1M8RIK4nuhZtY IPauZZRoOPuBDSQhIiAj8eDRIkaI4+QlPnw4zj6BkX8WkpNmITlpFpK5CxiZVzEKFKXmJFaa 6yUWFOSk6iXn525iBIVcQ2HqDsbG5VaHGAU4GJV4eAv6xEKEWBPLiitzDzFKcDArifCGa4mH CPGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREue9/1gwREggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cAYnzIn7Mmq 4JyrK6r339F/Khu3/8th7u/R4bZKj5/qd0ddSKl0+PPLofDKA1V2sXrL4vVPYj7teP95w7O/ h0qvljDs0hWVTlvKq3P017nHzfJd987kaN96Oe+bs/O970W3Np44LGDfP+fWkZaXGp/VzEPa rrN+11RP2PUt4drFx7tWhZqcypP8rcRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAJNoCy41AgAA Cc: FreeBSD - X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:13:12 -0000 On Sep 15, 2014, at 12:07 PM, John Case wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Charles Swiger wrote: >> If you want to improve security, however, either 2-factor auth or OPIE / one-time passwords would be better than SSH key+passphrase. > > > Ok, thanks - but SSH key+passphrase is still much better than just plain old password, yes ? Yes, it's better. However, the default storage that SSH uses for private keys with a passphrase isn't as strong as it could be. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 20:27:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5514A723 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF0FB10 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i7so2044365oag.33 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:27:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=FMUEQPJ91ghXpVeDd8nL7rdbi93yKaN1935RR7ZByiA=; b=Cv/wvJeDKRbI4uKJr9sjaF71Kynl13iM9EQXg5tiSC4PJ3hLoFXVATHu9kDwjhhSbR qKsSr6sF78tISZSHRlcHKdL09ClAGcUWT5rmgpnEAdBCOzHxqoIncE7/H5N//UlCoOe8 YhcMn94aAfcna0gS/8Jwpx7qUHRYKBy68uH6aWglY6xbwrijcha5tMf2f59EIBqup2La EawFHx6qzzOBrfD/6sbwNlEzKCr4gcVdh/MAaO+cxg/P1qtOjV5MWXDi+D9RLELwS+5y LxMKg2lS/9T2KHFYiseVXUVJamu3AvXpNwqVc6fO61r0sIIHV+RI6Jb3G0ADRXFTnBcI PlfA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbb34mislN7v451T/2+wUs/YOnR+cGzpPBdjznikXC46PwuOEJ7nfv9m0y/bbOUsSrOKZ+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.96.65 with SMTP id dq1mr30328676oeb.33.1410812862616; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:27:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:27:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... From: Michael Sierchio Cc: FreeBSD - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:50 -0000 On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Sep 15, 2014, at 12:07 PM, John Case wrote: >> Ok, thanks - but SSH key+passphrase is still much better than just plain old password, yes ? > > Yes, it's better. However, the default storage that SSH uses for private keys with a passphrase isn't as strong as it could be. Agreed. Though there are different kinds of threats. Disabling password auth means no brute force password attempt will work. If you do as I do and store your encrypted SSH key on a secure (assume for the moment that's true :-) USB vault, and add it to an ssh-agent on the local host, and enable agent forwarding - we've come close to SSO with reasonable security. Newer versions of OpenSSH support pam-google-authenticator, which is a very nice way of accomplishing multifactor authentication. I tend to use this everywhere. Central management is left as an exercise for the reader (pam_url on Linux is a possible starting point). - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 21:38:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA7CA73; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A31C2FD; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XTdyp-003PW2-JB>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:38:39 +0200 Received: from g225156093.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.156.93] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XTdyp-002qEl-FH>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:38:39 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:38:33 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions Subject: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/g=4P0.97jFvESnuZ38v==ax"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.156.93 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:38:48 -0000 --Sig_/g=4P0.97jFvESnuZ38v==ax Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Lenovo = E540 notebook fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The NIC = shows up as active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". =46rom a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I get a = result with missing packets: ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D26 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.114 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D41 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.130 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D60 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D80 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D100 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.105 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D116 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.135 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D136 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.091 ms DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results. I us= ed another Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf) and = that system gets DHCP offer and is online. Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a defectiv= e NIC, so I'll ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results definititely= would indicate a broken NIC.=20 Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a WiFi= NIC, but it doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success).=20 pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste fro= m that immature vt() terminal. Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD CURREN= T using NIC and Wifi? Please CC me. Regards oh [...] none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0xff0000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x522710e= c rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, enabl= ed cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 00000001004ce000 re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec rev=3D= 0x10 hdr=3D0x00 subclass =3D ethernet cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 di sabled(L0s/L1) cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 class =3D network cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 --Sig_/g=4P0.97jFvESnuZ38v==ax Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUF1xeAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8OtYH/3cx5wUeiG67EjkTWH5e/pD9 Z3gdVlgXgx7I878Q6WsTPm7XKCizJAFu3bQgq6PUnLRZDkix29d7jOIBz1z/lf9K t8n8JpgOYmGc7ny86o/04C/zlvut/dIV50LCFYaYuL1gF16PWZfrIJicFgofH+k/ L4TrMIYfl3zKo9NXvaZAUp1Kn7WCDd9lO1XU0X2gfhQyv3xUTPaFh+pzMWPxOJ4Z ErFRzqjGidCVGv9bZMf+dSTFEuJszL1yDJk0YdBObX8yhWqC6GUFlDeEpTRowv5c O0m1xi5KGRpkzB6k0GTEI4XxaEFye+XNp0Jbd0PHxaPatyq5Q04umFJnsZwzl94= =R61u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/g=4P0.97jFvESnuZ38v==ax-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 22:30:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FDD46C for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA639AF5 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.109]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2014 16:30:52 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=rlpOHkmR3aalKarM4GIWLuzCr1F3/0x4+1dImnr+a3g= c=1 sm=1 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=wZdVXPOajDIA:10 a=PkdmNeFNFVAA:10 a=2nVR-lrW0_4A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=5mcg790sAAAA:8 a=vGidUZf0D5rf8mZjs_sA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=V9bHfo9xCFkA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO cds005.dcs.int.inet) ([10.0.141.22]) by pd2mr2so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2014 16:30:52 -0600 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:30:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Dale Scott To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1847909706.35003025.1410820252624.JavaMail.root@cds005> In-Reply-To: <977289790.34989520.1410819079508.JavaMail.root@cds005> Subject: courier-authdaemond rc script doesn't report correct status MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [147.108.253.252] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (ZimbraWebClient - [unknown] (Win)/7.1.4_GA_2555) Cc: dalescott@shaw.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:30:59 -0000 Hi, I installed courier-authlib-0.66.1 from the binary package, added "courier_authdaemond_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, and started it using "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond start". However, "courier-authdaemond status" reports courier_authdaemond is *not* running. "ps faxd | grep courier" shows courier-authdaemond is running, /var/run/authdaemond/pid exists with correct pid value, and "courier-authdaemond stop" stops the daemon and deletes the pid file. Could the status option for the courier_authdaemond rc script actually be broken, or perhaps I'm just missing something really stupid? Regards, Dale --- dalescott.net Transparency with Trust From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 23:50:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA05119A for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9620D204 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.15.184.248] by 3capp-mailcom-lxa06.server.lan (via HTTP); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:50:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: "Dutch Ingraham" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Issue With Ports vs. Packages Versioning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:50:28 +0200 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aTWlw2/fZDJVq4/DcGSiCxue0GCm6ompvk+cyGo5M2v GO5tWpS3uV4NDy8VIetvtljEKoh/DgkddFwbFWbjvncenFmFIi n5xXb7QlEdKz6N2yKTk3GaOoLs2IQIfffpzDYhU6Aj78El9hAN s+nEYYE83uLvZwWOtHUlRGrqbl+ppEK6K9at4l/56prJ9ejpeU c/vkNlX9zvGiFiLqBITWTEVn5f0xCRWNW/3KQ3YSJGtetIN0kB FyG0cKnLwEmG9kRnjeTNgMv6nR4tatmLsra2n7GITC+IHrESwj 97pX18xdKJBte8BPjLdP7BfbKGr X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:50:29 -0000 Greetings: I have two desktop units both running FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE from the same ISO. On one, ports are updated with svn (I'll refer to it as the SVN unit) and the other uses portsnap (the PORTSNAP unit). I update both daily. On Sept. 12, the update to the SVN unit borked xorg so that if I open any x-application in my window manager (dwm), except xterm, the server crashes with a segfault. While trying to diagnose this issue, I switched daily use to the PORTSNAP unit. After a few days of fetching/updating and portmaster telling me there were no updates, I started looking at ports versus package versions. Also thrown into the mix was an update to the base system, to p9. On the PORTSNAP unit: root@stoa:~ # pkg version -l "<" dri-7.6.1_5,2 < libGL-7.6.1_5 < libdrm-2.4.17_2,1 < xf86-video-ati-6.14.6_4 < xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_9 < xorg-server-1.7.7_14,1 < but: root@stoa:~ # portmaster -ad ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> All ports are up to date root@stoa:~ # root@stoa:~ # freebsd-version -ku 10.0-RELEASE-p7 10.0-RELEASE-p8 root@stoa:~ # I have the same versions and portmaster result on the SVN unit. Googling around brought me to this[1] exchange, which reflects my understanding that WITH_NEW_XORG was only necessary on pre-10.0 versions. If WITH_NEW_XORG is not the issue, could someone describe what may be the problem? If it is the issue, is the solution as easy as adding that to make.conf and updating? I don't know if this is what borked the SVN unit, but I would like to work out this issue first, then go from there. (I've already rebuilt all xf86- drivers and, when that failed to correct the issue, rebuilt all 570 ports, which also failed to solve the problem, so I'm pretty much out of ideas anyway.) In addition, are differing patches in base correct? Any/all help is appreciated. [1]http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/HEADS-UP-WITH-NEW-XORG-is-now-\ the-default-on-FreeBSD-10-and-9-stable-td5904196.html#a5904376 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 01:19:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2DD4E1; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24B67C14; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id w7so5597281lbi.31 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=douMW4nGqc4rgzbNjApMiPdnu2ax3Uiy0iPMMnVAaLg=; b=R3lsrW48nrdFwF7MjD8FuZQfmk/EnsL29CrMQM1kDMZsrABIag/sTf7rZO3z5OprbC 5r4S0oNmo1n+3mJvKVC5kLjQQtE5TlfP1lsF69KUaFtmQFzmrkBd4lJNs7miWpwpaaGO vcuzzBOb9Yo0LA3W1CoQngsiOLCzdlZV4olS0x3bdJtiLLax/QhvWV8d3yJdqtJU7a7r z639OXwK933BHFnhD57i7G/WmBAskdTXYslWJ1nwDSYCbKuL77fg1a0CkU2j2mmRxDBI 0XjELFOZcdwSLckRm3UzqEvf9JU9TbwzPHt2lggecuWyMxjYAUbHW62gITrE/tiV+h18 os6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.75.233 with SMTP id f9mr6919505lbw.102.1410830373049; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.64.97 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:19:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:19:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G9S-0R3CG3fF8Ufzw74t386hKD0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI From: Kevin Oberman To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:19:36 -0000 On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT > (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Lenovo > E540 notebook > fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The NIC > shows up as > active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". > > From a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I get a > result with > missing packets: > > ping: sendto: Host is down > ping: sendto: Host is down > ping: sendto: Host is down > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=0.130 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=60 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=80 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=100 ttl=64 time=0.105 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=116 ttl=64 time=0.135 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=136 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms > > DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. > > I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results. I > used another > Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf) and > that system > gets DHCP offer and is online. > > Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a > defective NIC, so I'll > ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results > definititely would > indicate a broken NIC. > > Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a > WiFi NIC, but it > doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success). > > pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste > from that immature > vt() terminal. > > Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD > CURRENT using NIC > and Wifi? > > Please CC me. > > > Regards > oh > > > [...] > > none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=0xff0000 card=0x502817aa chip=0x522710ec > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > > > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, enabled > > > cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > > > cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > > > cap 10[70] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) > > > speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) > > > ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected > > > ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00000001004ce000 > > > re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x502817aa chip=0x816810ec rev=0x10 > hdr=0x00 > > > subclass = ethernet > > > cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current > D0 > di sabled(L0s/L1) > > > cap 11[b0] = MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > > ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected > > > > ecap 001e[178] = unknown 1 > > > class = network > > > cap 05[d0] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > > > ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 > I can't comment on the WiFi, I have little Asus box using an 8111/8168B and it works fine with the driver in 10.1-BETA. The driver in 10.0 recognizes the device, but did not work. I do notice that your NIC has a rev of 0x10 while mine is 0x0c. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 01:25:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0EA28B6; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com (mail-qc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE77CDA; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o8so4886401qcw.22 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oujqBQwzJlHcZY5HsqIOEU+QdS6Oks60BLEwx4+IZEg=; b=ZR0cLc2vkMvP9jRdz6ja+wRvrK4/ocjJEEmj4TisEcEdon98IxYTB5ASiwGOBNl8xZ d3gdMCI5KHs0a/AmNfpz8PDRCR7wg88QazXx4Kgz0ox/WAHQGJv0WKhS9fXothBkzEYm AfZyA/fXbtjjzBGxhYC3Y1eftuio7pC9p24PWBFZ7pCEOSbATjQ6W5L9jbKNpW/s8HuX 4Ulu82PpAVObWFvI3tDyF2h2ZUnFQOTnFiFKRBe9PvHGvpN+E/frzbO0iXffhBtWpggk aNGku4N9o3S6hOK8LYVBAHFQfnlEuoYEg86i4oLDRzYzhqR/85+cLKBkJ2prjumhaxUo yzBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.75.73 with SMTP id x9mr42446587qaj.63.1410830734355; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4EMQrS9B241qXw7eLfx8kt3CJpg Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI From: Adrian Chadd To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:25:35 -0000 Hi, Try updating to the latest -HEAD. It at least makes dhclient behave better. -a On 15 September 2014 18:19, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > >> >> Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT >> (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Lenovo >> E540 notebook >> fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The NIC >> shows up as >> active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". >> >> From a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I get a >> result with >> missing packets: >> >> ping: sendto: Host is down >> ping: sendto: Host is down >> ping: sendto: Host is down >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=0.130 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=60 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=80 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=100 ttl=64 time=0.105 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=116 ttl=64 time=0.135 ms >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=136 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms >> >> DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. >> >> I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results. I >> used another >> Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf) and >> that system >> gets DHCP offer and is online. >> >> Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a >> defective NIC, so I'll >> ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results >> definititely would >> indicate a broken NIC. >> >> Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a >> WiFi NIC, but it >> doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success). >> >> pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste >> from that immature >> vt() terminal. >> >> Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD >> CURRENT using NIC >> and Wifi? >> >> Please CC me. >> >> >> Regards >> oh >> >> >> [...] >> >> none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=0xff0000 card=0x502817aa chip=0x522710ec >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> >> >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' >> >> >> bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, enabled >> >> >> cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 >> >> >> cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit >> >> >> cap 10[70] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) >> >> >> speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) >> >> >> ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected >> >> >> ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 00000001004ce000 >> >> >> re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x502817aa chip=0x816810ec rev=0x10 >> hdr=0x00 >> >> >> subclass = ethernet >> >> >> cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current >> D0 >> di sabled(L0s/L1) >> >> >> cap 11[b0] = MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled >> >> ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected >> >> >> >> ecap 001e[178] = unknown 1 >> >> >> class = network >> >> >> cap 05[d0] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit >> >> >> ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 >> > > I can't comment on the WiFi, I have little Asus box using an 8111/8168B and > it works fine with the driver in 10.1-BETA. The driver in 10.0 recognizes > the device, but did not work. I do notice that your NIC has a rev of 0x10 > while mine is 0x0c. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 02:02:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4036F97 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net [74.53.216.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7089CFC7 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [173.193.161.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9FC3F4115 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431B13107C for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:02:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XcJ4AWbC7kyo for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egeria.internal (114.179.70.115.static.exetel.com.au [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E84A13107B for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54179A2A.8090406@calorieking.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:02:18 +0800 From: Gregory Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remove distribution sets References: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> <20140915120948.569f5458.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140915120948.569f5458.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-ID: 1B9FC3F4115.6599F X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-15, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-From: gregory.orange@calorieking.com X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-Watermark: 1411437746.16879@I8kyYm/BsWqc6QfOPkMO/A X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:02:42 -0000 On 15/09/14 18:09, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:07:30 +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: >> Can one remove distribution sets from FreeBSD 8.x? > > The system doesn't provide a _dedicated_ means to do this. Thank you (despite it being less than ideal news) - I wondered, but couldn't find anything stating it as such. > Basically it's possible to manually remove (delete) things > when you _know_ what you are doing. Removing manpages is > such a possible task that probably won't hurt. Have a > usable source tree at hand, so you can "make install" if > you accidentally removed something important, that's why > don't remove "make". ;-) Yes I neglected to mention this URL: https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=1136 Noone responded to edogawaconan regarding a register of the components installed. I'll have a play with it, and particularly with feebsd-update.conf and see how I go. > The best way to tune an installation is at install time. -snip- Agreed. I've just heard back from hosting provider: They only have one 8.3 OS image to install, and it has this extra material in it. They're not planning a 8.4 image, so I'll have to get us to 9.x or later at some point. > It's also possible to "prepare" a stripped-down system > elsewhere and then use it to replace the installation in > question. I wonder if I'll need to pursue that. I'd rather not. > A comparable way is provided via freebsd-update where parts > to be subject of an update can be selected using its configuration > file; see "man freebsd-update.conf" for the "Components" > keyword. This might be my best option. > Probably you won't save much disk space anyway... I don't care about the disk space. The aim is twofold: 1. Reduce any extra content that widens the risk profile on a machine. If code is present, there is some chance for it to contain bugs, which leads to some chance of a security risk. 2. Ease upgrades. Already the machine has a custom kernel which I need to replace with generic. The upgrade process requires a lot of manual intervention (see below), and I'll be dealing with a number of these machines. Manual intervention: lots of prompting with "these files don't match, what do I do?" and frustratingly, an editor session opens up to compare - in the vast majority (all but a handful) of cases the differences are just the header line which doesn't matter to me. I did find the file locations (I think it was /var/db/freebsd-update somewhere) and run an awk script to clean up those files, but the freebsd-update process still opened up every file, leaving me with a 'quit editor' keystroke - ZZ from vi turned out to be the fastest, but over hundreds of files, that's still messy. Cheers, Greg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 05:36:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D463A9A4 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 786AB628 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s8G5aJn4088572; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:36:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5417CC53.6080900@dreamchaser.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:36:19 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Orange , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: torrent recommendation References: <54147E6D.7020200@dreamchaser.org> <54167E7B.9070804@calorieking.com> In-Reply-To: <54167E7B.9070804@calorieking.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:36:20 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:36:35 -0000 On 09/14/14 23:51, Gregory Orange wrote: > On 14/09/14 01:27, Gary Aitken wrote: >> Looking for recommendations of a simple way to go in terms of a >> ports client. > > I've been using transmission-cli and transmission-daemon (with the > transmission-remote command line tool) for maintaining torrents > (service with a CLI to access it). Mine is on an Ubuntu box, but I do > see a newer version than mine (2.82 cf 2.51) is available in ports > net-p2p/transmission* Thanks, all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 05:39:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6F5A44; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA730645; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00DD71FE027; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5417CCF6.10204@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:39:02 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CeDeROM , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: U3G QDL firmware loader for GOBI2000/HP_UN2420 MiniPCI/USB 3G/GPS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:39:24 -0000 On 09/15/14 17:16, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello world! :-) > > I have changed my machine, there is a built-in GOBI2000 / HP UN2420 > 3G/GPS module installable as MiniPCI card and visible as USB device. I > have added its VID/PID to the usbdevs and u3g.c module, so after > recompilation it gets recognised by u3g module and apropriate > /dev/cuaU* device shows up.. > > The problem is that device does not store firmware inside non-volatile > memory, so user needs to upload it after power-on. I have the firmware > files. I can test modem with success after reboot from Win7 which > uploads firmware into device. Still, I need to upload the firmware > somehow on my FreeBSD. > > The upload protocol is QDL and /dev/cuaU0 shows up waiting for > command. Which utility can I use to upload firmware with QDL? I have > seen one post [1] regarding this problem in the past but the QDL > utility was not named explicitly. > > Any hints welcome! :-) > > Tomek > > [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2010-October/009384.html > Hi, Maybe you can use some tools to sniff the USB protocol under the other operating system. The protocol is probably not too complicated, and just replay the traffic. --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 08:08:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9545A4 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D66764D for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i8so5245963qcq.18 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h206qDrABMqfaxyU/c0Vo2DbbpByV/Mkvy4Q5KShcMk=; b=YSmtFSHblFjApdV5LYRWkDPaAvYmDjyjq0qbGTP7BXYNC+y/4xpt5VCCmeI0R3EEU/ AWLdzvDt9S6ec76k9YoY+LMuMv5bL6WDn9eBln6lKJ/Zg1BFdI1s7KB2s4KGwfYXjPva lzDn0Dl8MipqeRoU9bjf7knR3NTTAPIvXd2zCwZBANlwBjwkO1rdeqLqD4/pFKn9lQ7G blTDpVc3tzcVeZpc6uhc36qp3n7DI0HYKTOuorwY7yGhT12HfsUDudJmetoqaRLq7Zm7 K7/dyH47cnU/4jXfJjrFaKAfM2Yr8Tyb+xmYByW6ewkIz5GttJLK9VYTeAGL08gZXGgN +iUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.31.75 with SMTP id e69mr45709844qge.2.1410854930718; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:08:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54168ADA.6050204@diomedia.be> References: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> <54168ADA.6050204@diomedia.be> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:08:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kK4WadGn28pxAGpNLTp13pD9uWg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listen queue guestion From: Adrian Chadd To: Bram Van Steenlandt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:08:52 -0000 Hm, ok. It's a UNIX domain socket. I kinda thought those also obeyed the sysctl. The sysctl has to be set -before- listen() is called. Also, in BSD, if the listen queue parameter to listen() is < 0, it defaults to the sysctl maximum. -a On 14 September 2014 23:44, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: > Hi, > > I use python, here the parameters are (socket.AF_UNIX,socket.SOCK_STREAM) > > Bram > op 14-09-14 23:05, Adrian Chadd schreef: > >> Hi! >> >> What kind of sockets is it specifically using? >> >> >> -a >> >> >> On 14 September 2014 12:27, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm porting an plc automation system to freebsd and while doing so I got >>> errors like these: >>> sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8000cecc870: Listen queue overflow: 76 already in >>> queue awaiting acceptance >>> >>> With the help of netstat I've found the problem, 2 programs communicate >>> with >>> ipc file like sockets and the "client" was connecting too fast (it was >>> connecting and disconnecting in a small for loop). >>> >>> Still, on linux this worked and there will be cases where I may bump in >>> to >>> this limit again (a lot of different programs communicate with one master >>> program over ipc). >>> >>> I've found kern.ipc.somaxconn but this seems to be only for TCP >>> connections. >>> >>> Is there a sysctl or kernel parameter that allows me to set this queue a >>> bit >>> larger ? >>> >>> Thx >>> Bram >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 08:30:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0FE98B for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net [74.53.216.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B915862 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [173.193.161.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tp2.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A16B3F40EF for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADED1131082 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:02:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by netserv.sl1.us.calorieking.net (mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id l6h0W7RJkVt1 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egeria.internal (114.179.70.115.static.exetel.com.au [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.sl1.us.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA2DB131081 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5417EEA4.401@calorieking.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:02:44 +0800 From: Gregory Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remove distribution sets References: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> <20140915120948.569f5458.freebsd@edvax.de> <54179A2A.8090406@calorieking.com> In-Reply-To: <54179A2A.8090406@calorieking.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-ID: 3A16B3F40EF.987C6 X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-15, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-From: gregory.orange@calorieking.com X-FamilyHealth-MailScanner-Watermark: 1411459381.97847@J4ruj93zKY2tS3IvXnyydQ X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:30:02 -0000 On 16/09/14 10:02, Gregory Orange wrote: > Manual intervention: > lots of prompting with "these files don't match, what do I do?" and > frustratingly, an editor session opens up to compare - in the vast > majority (all but a handful) of cases the differences are just the > header line which doesn't matter to me. Ah, I can ignore the old versions by making MergeChanges in /etc/freebsd-update.conf contain very little, if anything. This greatly reduces the manual labour! That plus making Components in freebsd-update.conf only contain kernel/generic and world/base and I reckon that'll about do it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 08:38:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AE7B6D; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F9E0947; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kx10so8357771pab.17 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:38:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=U5MQzLGn8TpjgYhKOnifjJSUBYGETx31AKJjFjS88B4=; b=B7nGGO05xD+nnIBlZ6UmW3TOOaf9g/0J3yZ2frKKNgG3EDRMvyffehgKG3fjJNLBtP ropMBemn6hV++XpySSqRozJhVn4MuG4e72jIW779L/diKbZEVz5JKBOQ0S3sZoSCFJl6 pFJUm0yWFQfjLF/UnW3OPU2eVXqNiB7GwoJAcHa3gH8RJFgYIiw03hCz8S1Bwjqqr7Ny G/covxW7rUoZJOkUKMDg53PDi8VJc29w0C5UqCc6XRoAzIKIRrMzB//RdpjYycgVsQkl V2KPlb+LcU8YOxkSAWustV2m1ZXbhSmz0zG3n4s0ASsDx6pxYH6dpn4Xiwl7Jtl2azV4 Qj2g== X-Received: by 10.66.243.6 with SMTP id wu6mr12779212pac.157.1410856682477; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([106.247.248.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uf6sm13987544pac.16.2014.09.16.01.37.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Yonghyeon PYUN X-Google-Original-From: "Yonghyeon PYUN" Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:37:49 +0900 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:37:49 +0900 To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Message-ID: <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:38:05 -0000 On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to > >know exact chip revision? > > Here you are. > > jme0: port > 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff > fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 > jme0: MSIX count : 8 > jme0: MSI count : 8 > jme0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI-X vectors (8 supported) > msi: routing MSI-X IRQ 256 to local APIC 0 vector 52 > jme0: using IRQ 256 for MSI-X > jme0: Using 1 MSIX messages. > jme0: PCI device revision : 0x0250 > jme0: Chip revision : 0x11 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Initially I suspected you might have relatively new JMC25x controller but it seems you have early revision of the controller(JMC250 A2). Early revision of the controller has 1000baseT link establishment issue with 802.3az capable switches. The issue is explained in jme(4) man page. The known workaround is to manually set 100baseTX media. I recall you mentioned Linux had no problems so I wonder Linux was able to establish a 1000baseT link. In theory, the workaround could be implemented in driver but it is layering violation and will have to duplicate lots of work done by mii(4). > jme0: ethernet hardware address not found in EEPROM. > jme0: PHY is at address 1. > jme0: Read request size : 512 bytes. > jme0: TLP payload size : 128 bytes. > miibus0: on jme0 > jmphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > jmphy0: OUI 0x00d831, model 0x0021, rev. 1 > jmphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, > 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, > 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, > 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX > -flow-master, auto, auto-flow > jme0: bpf attached > jme0: Ethernet address: e0:cb:4e:54:23:ac > > I do not particularly like JMicron chips (their faulty SSD > controllers have cost me a lot of time and money), but that's I don't have experiences with other JMicron products so can't comment on SSD. JMC25x may not be world best gigabit ethernet controller but I was quite satisfied with its high performance and clear documentation and Vendor's support. > what's on the motherboard of this Asus. So, I need to find a way to > make it work. > > --Brett Glass > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 11:12:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C931A4FA; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tivas.info (85.234.217.139.static.edpnet.net [85.234.217.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF26EC58; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([192.168.3.104]) by mail.tivas.info (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8GBCg2V035927; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:12:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bram@diomedia.be) Message-ID: <54181B2A.7030908@diomedia.be> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:12:42 +0200 From: Bram Van Steenlandt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Listen queue guestion References: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> <54168ADA.6050204@diomedia.be> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:12:59 -0000 Hi, I had not considered the queue size in python/twisted, stupid, I know. I was also asuming I was running into some sysctl limit because of the dmesg error (and the information I found online). Now it works (the queue size is 50 by default), from what I can see/test it works like this: I can set the queue size larger but setting it larger than sysctl kern.ipc.somaxconn has no point. The fact that you get the dmesg message doesn't mean the sysctl is set too low, it's just something freebsd detects. I think the connect/disconnectloop I was testing with just runs slower on the linux machine thus avoiding the problem. On freebsd if I connect & disconnect in a loop (for testing) the number of connection goes up (probably because it's not really closed yet when I do close). The handbook does say: The |kern.ipc.somaxconn| sysctl(8) variable limits the size of the listen queue for accepting new |TCP| connections. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/configtuning-kernel-limits.html Thx Bram op 16-09-14 10:08, Adrian Chadd schreef: > Hm, ok. It's a UNIX domain socket. I kinda thought those also obeyed the sysctl. > > The sysctl has to be set -before- listen() is called. > > Also, in BSD, if the listen queue parameter to listen() is < 0, it > defaults to the sysctl maximum. > > > -a > > > On 14 September 2014 23:44, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I use python, here the parameters are (socket.AF_UNIX,socket.SOCK_STREAM) >> >> Bram >> op 14-09-14 23:05, Adrian Chadd schreef: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> What kind of sockets is it specifically using? >>> >>> >>> -a >>> >>> >>> On 14 September 2014 12:27, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm porting an plc automation system to freebsd and while doing so I got >>>> errors like these: >>>> sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8000cecc870: Listen queue overflow: 76 already in >>>> queue awaiting acceptance >>>> >>>> With the help of netstat I've found the problem, 2 programs communicate >>>> with >>>> ipc file like sockets and the "client" was connecting too fast (it was >>>> connecting and disconnecting in a small for loop). >>>> >>>> Still, on linux this worked and there will be cases where I may bump in >>>> to >>>> this limit again (a lot of different programs communicate with one master >>>> program over ipc). >>>> >>>> I've found kern.ipc.somaxconn but this seems to be only for TCP >>>> connections. >>>> >>>> Is there a sysctl or kernel parameter that allows me to set this queue a >>>> bit >>>> larger ? >>>> >>>> Thx >>>> Bram >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 06:59:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C2AF987; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x22e.google.com (mail-oa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3562D58; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i7so2465120oag.33 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:59:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lp6LCa3ZaznZU93eKYJJovoCzfjfcRjt8eEOaUyrf9U=; b=FQnPSe1AO1a9L2CEvfUVs6LgQ9AFWBsB5smJQINid+DS+XUlAcA5u7n4RGRA8Trcxs AN4GX/AzF6LAaik4mpN9nXzlFxK7MvvIQMJbRAYC52yZUSgzRBwhjhbZWwfqEiY2qT5S pzzlfr/75kdt89ZWCQZzIQlZf85645m0QWx2wccNuX0SMZYq9HSgm1xGYO3IJaeOscW/ sIAD0DMGDTR/CFH3VL9CpEVcsXP/RCMykQZKPUUKuGI9XRsJLoYkE8w69g9x1/1jaZC5 Pl2SsF8EgzCEmDohaFKAsN52GS5AJcRbPdXKIlWIV+fMOT5QxWnOCGR5Nmf7eV0Mb3M6 4v1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.175.166 with SMTP id cb6mr9099996oec.64.1410850758091; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.58.196 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:59:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5417CCF6.10204@selasky.org> References: <5417CCF6.10204@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:59:18 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5fJ56He3INDiygHWWFUADDPeRN8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: U3G QDL firmware loader for GOBI2000/HP_UN2420 MiniPCI/USB 3G/GPS From: CeDeROM To: Hans Petter Selasky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:27 +0000 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Ruslan Bukin , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , "freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:59:19 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 09/15/14 17:16, CeDeROM wrote: >> Hello world! :-) >> I have changed my machine, there is a built-in GOBI2000 / HP UN2420 >> 3G/GPS module installable as MiniPCI card and visible as USB device. I >> have added its VID/PID to the usbdevs and u3g.c module, so after >> recompilation it gets recognised by u3g module and apropriate >> /dev/cuaU* device shows up.. >> The problem is that device does not store firmware inside non-volatile >> memory, so user needs to upload it after power-on. I have the firmware >> files. I can test modem with success after reboot from Win7 which >> uploads firmware into device. Still, I need to upload the firmware >> somehow on my FreeBSD. >> The upload protocol is QDL and /dev/cuaU0 shows up waiting for >> command. Which utility can I use to upload firmware with QDL? I have >> seen one post [1] regarding this problem in the past but the QDL >> utility was not named explicitly. >> Any hints welcome! :-) >> Tomek >> [1] >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2010-October/009384.html>> > Hi, > Maybe you can use some tools to sniff the USB protocol under the other > operating system. The protocol is probably not too complicated, and just > replay the traffic. > --HPS I just got the gobi_loader application sources from Ruslan Bukin! I will try it out and when it works fine I will send patches to the FreeBSD base along with my u3g patches, it may come handy for others as well :-) Thank you!! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 11:19:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DBA1754; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF03CAE; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XTqmi-002gHT-CP>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0200 Received: from g225112153.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.112.153] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XTqmi-000JIM-8u>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:19:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:18:54 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.112.153 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:19:03 -0000 --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:25:34 -0700 Adrian Chadd schrieb: > Hi, >=20 > Try updating to the latest -HEAD. It at least makes dhclient behave bette= r. >=20 >=20 > -a >=20 >=20 > On 15 September 2014 18:19, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT > >> (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Le= novo > >> E540 notebook > >> fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The= NIC > >> shows up as > >> active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". > >> > >> From a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I g= et a > >> result with > >> missing packets: > >> > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> ping: sendto: Host is down > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D26 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.114 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D41 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.130 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D60 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D80 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D100 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.105 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D116 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.135 ms > >> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D136 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.091 ms > >> > >> DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. > >> > >> I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results.= I > >> used another > >> Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf)= and > >> that system > >> gets DHCP offer and is online. > >> > >> Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a > >> defective NIC, so I'll > >> ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results > >> definititely would > >> indicate a broken NIC. > >> > >> Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a > >> WiFi NIC, but it > >> doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success). > >> > >> pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste > >> from that immature > >> vt() terminal. > >> > >> Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD > >> CURRENT using NIC > >> and Wifi? > >> > >> Please CC me. > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> oh > >> > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0xff0000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x52= 2710ec > >> rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 > >> > >> > >> vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > >> > >> > >> bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, = enabled > >> > >> > >> cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > >> > >> > >> cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > >> > >> > >> cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) > >> > >> > >> speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) > >> > >> > >> ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected > >> > >> > >> ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 00000001004ce000 > >> > >> > >> re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec r= ev=3D0x10 > >> hdr=3D0x00 > >> > >> > >> subclass =3D ethernet > >> > >> > >> cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current > >> D0 > >> di sabled(L0s/L1) > >> > >> > >> cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > >> > >> ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected > >> > >> > >> > >> ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 > >> > >> > >> class =3D network > >> > >> > >> cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > >> > >> > >> ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 > >> > > > > I can't comment on the WiFi, I have little Asus box using an 8111/8168B= and > > it works fine with the driver in 10.1-BETA. The driver in 10.0 recogniz= es > > the device, but did not work. I do notice that your NIC has a rev of 0x= 10 > > while mine is 0x0c. > > -- > > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired In my local network (the laptop is working/getting installed in) I use jumb= o frames on several server system including the gateway (also FBSD CURRENT). After I manually set mtu > 1500 (in my case: mtu 6121) the NIC worked as ex= pected. My lab's Dell Latitude E6510 laptop (em0) works without setting explicit jumbo= frames. This is a kind of weird ... Thanks for your patience. Oliver --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGByjAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8PVoH/1vTtuJ/DSZIuJQycl5jAIR5 Qgvc+pzXQUZvqxhX/lRVO3PC8Tv/AMa1cRBzgYbKWJ/0kJMzBSUlwRCuO1S2KDp8 YI+nIx6uycxKwQK6Y6Qn6wjsB0BhhccByJz6BtMaeEDmMcMQtuaLDMZTKTC07rdp kpVlYLQyiNyrav1Z9ysZw1BpbqutSkjrdCQS+gA/Qy6Bxp8NsCcxjNnpWGZFvww3 lw8Mt6xSRzBzIccoZN6HTuBZaegvKGQ9/thiW2CWwk3HIbtY32gIUoaBcbf7uyvc pIvVJoyGYJ3LgTN/c/lIBmJwLfb7DZ/IRS3NiiwWSGrcK37Ke1nRmkavaKJiHpI= =nBey -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6ZEYqHBKuQ_nyeKEg4PHtpN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 12:20:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40336E0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm42-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9012B5E4 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.149] by nm42.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Sep 2014 12:20:05 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.205] by tm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Sep 2014 12:20:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Sep 2014 12:20:05 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 887741.83374.bm@omp1014.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 36811 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Sep 2014 12:20:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1410870005; bh=NRmSGiYlab8QOpEW2zNY1Rbh69XHuBqRFPk73hVt/s4=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=I/52RyLCBiV2rZszintpT9NhjVjE6XLCLsVBdmA2qbPDXSmbXYTZE8wCbsU5rEtLoZzInIBs87nuBquFTYDZaEX+Zj8ulvp/mMYl2hy6lBVYIa3KLcdkYYxHH5RJVZzN6didoG4DKfv+XPmyPRotvQYRUmgd8L4lgGTaj579ubg= X-YMail-OSG: QPBOkhMVM1l20xvH47PPv7fKPVgdEc_3XZC4qvTQW40.zqd Kj2iWcag7vmDjAb.JRGr00oCwcjyW8CajdiDQSQDespTKf3PcH0Nx9i6a99e 4KYrDpgNt3E5g7Wj8VWXiOaHJpbMTOR9xiloMtdbH_rMSijuhnZa8ywKKBoV lPmPBpY3RWsqi7jYbZGGAVatilYHNztZrHgEADEBEFXSoLEf2_ihfDMPp8jn AnX5xzN_ECzsRUqXi8qBAmQr20mzFlvIVCn6IFCWAIFLdVTdHcYpwTGtmET. ZNF_Zx1vNRJQvMU0cKz9WqO_aAWXmXFLDbsqX16kChW_zJclVNL5.mptGM5v lCBTZfPjC5JH6reGc4vjcOcaWl981irrM1ub1WT6rDUJ8uG.NGGVnkL67KU2 Prq9ScwbKQWP1_x5yO4PNJuovsC.6DnsL0oX49IGtrlgXAY9IgQR.gdNyxX_ 2IdBz14eNL4q95nvKJDtvY8jtQLlJ_.WhqbmceavSMu1ck8VpFEaeGOAngm. XVK3FMNO9elqaL3gLZFFg9HRaVH6ABzVzsikSt1oMmXhrdXc3bPwjKLUYPqt 5SlPPmQ-- Received: from [212.92.1.119] by web160702.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:20:05 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGksCgpIYXMgYW55b25lIGNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgQ0FSUCB3aXRoIHB1YmxpYyBJUCBhZGRyZXNzZXM_CklzIGl0IHdvcmtpbmcgZmluZT8KClRoeCEKTGFzemxvATABAQEB X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696 Message-ID: <1410870005.7717.YahooMailNeo@web160702.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:20:05 -0700 From: Laszlo Danielisz Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: CARP public IP To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:20:13 -0000 Hi, Has anyone configured CARP with public IP addresses? Is it working fine? Thx! Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 12:56:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC21C31F for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F3E9DE for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68B727653; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:55:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8GCtwQ9001941; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:55:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:55:58 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Gregory Orange Subject: Re: Remove distribution sets Message-Id: <20140916145558.b731c672.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54179A2A.8090406@calorieking.com> References: <54169E42.5020108@calorieking.com> <20140915120948.569f5458.freebsd@edvax.de> <54179A2A.8090406@calorieking.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:56:09 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:02:18 +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: > On 15/09/14 18:09, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:07:30 +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: > >> Can one remove distribution sets from FreeBSD 8.x? > > > > The system doesn't provide a _dedicated_ means to do this. > > Thank you (despite it being less than ideal news) - I wondered, but > couldn't find anything stating it as such. I had thought of a "make deinstall" command for the particular parts in the /usr/src directory tree, but you can only do "make install" for most components. Removing them, it seems, has to be done manually. > Yes I neglected to mention this URL: > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=1136 > > Noone responded to edogawaconan regarding a register of the components > installed. I'll have a play with it, and particularly with > feebsd-update.conf and see how I go. This involves doing an upgrade of the system, but if this is to be done anyway, it _might_ work and remove parts. > > The best way to tune an installation is at install time. > -snip- > > Agreed. I've just heard back from hosting provider: They only have one > 8.3 OS image to install, and it has this extra material in it. They're > not planning a 8.4 image, so I'll have to get us to 9.x or later at some > point. I'd suggest, if possible, to follow 10.0 / 10.1 as soon as possible. You could probably even do a "network install", preparing a customized 10.0 image with stuff left out, and then "copying" it to the server "over the present install". This of course has to be done with a backup and an emergency recovery plan in mind. ;-) > > It's also possible to "prepare" a stripped-down system > > elsewhere and then use it to replace the installation in > > question. > > I wonder if I'll need to pursue that. I'd rather not. But it seems to be the easiest thing, "easy" in comparison with the alternatives (like manually removing parts from the system). > > A comparable way is provided via freebsd-update where parts > > to be subject of an update can be selected using its configuration > > file; see "man freebsd-update.conf" for the "Components" > > keyword. > > This might be my best option. It _should_ remove the "outdated" components and _not_ install their new counterparts if the configuration file says so. I'm not sure how it handles "hidden" dependencies, but the distribution parts should be quite independent of each other, so for example removing manpages does not break anything, it's just that there are no manpages anymore; removing sendmail, on the other hand, will render the whole system unusable. > > Probably you won't save much disk space anyway... > > I don't care about the disk space. The aim is twofold: > > 1. Reduce any extra content that widens the risk profile on a machine. > If code is present, there is some chance for it to contain bugs, which > leads to some chance of a security risk. Yes, that is a very important aspect (which I'm scared of whenever I have to deal with stock Linux installations). Also for dedicated systems, I tend to strip down the OS and the kernel, as I'm doing source updates anyway from a different system, so for example it's no big deal if there is no C compiler on the target system, no troff, and no loadable kernel modules. > 2. Ease upgrades. Already the machine has a custom kernel which I need > to replace with generic. The upgrade process requires a lot of manual > intervention (see below), and I'll be dealing with a number of these > machines. This also sounds interesting. For binary updates, using a custom kernel makes things more complicated, but if you trim your freebsd-update.conf and rely on "preprocessed" parts, updates should be quick and easy. > Manual intervention: > lots of prompting with "these files don't match, what do I do?" and > frustratingly, an editor session opens up to compare - in the vast > majority (all but a handful) of cases the differences are just the > header line which doesn't matter to me. There is something comparable when doing source upgrades: You can configure mergemaster not to annoy you. The file to do this is /etc/mergemaster.rc, see "man mergemaster" for details. This part of the upgrade process can be adjusted to be less frustrating. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 13:00:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725927D7 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net (mail.kulturflatrate.net [46.163.119.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF72ACB for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A7F5AC105 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:00:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at kulturflatrate.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.414 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.414 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.kulturflatrate.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.kulturflatrate.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otjrpm6xyN-S for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from len-x61s.klaas (205.210.broadband18.iol.cz [109.81.210.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kulturflatrate.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29047F5AC0B4 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by len-x61s.klaas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7160E04FE; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:00:52 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS, Jails, network, routing, domains and IP addresses Message-ID: <20140916130052.GA28361@len-x61s.klaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540F0A3D.4070209@freebsd.org> <540F1F1F.2040600@ssimicro.com> <20140909200327.GD36353@slackbox.erewhon.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:00:50 -0000 Hi, thank your very much for all the replies. Unfortunately, it took me some time to reply since I wanted to finish setting up my virtual test system and check whether I understood everything correctly. Roland Smith [2014-09-09 22:03 +0200] : >If you mount the ports tree with nullfs, you only get the "recipes" for >installing software. OK, thank you for clarifying this. >One way to "automatically" update every jail is to mount /usr/local with a >nullfs in every jail. And then use a unionfs in every jail for the >configuration files in /usr/local/etc. > >This does have limitations; > > * Every jail then has access to *everything* in /usr/local. That might not > be what you want. > * Every jail needs its own /usr/local/etc, hence the need for unionfs. > * You could run into a situation where /usr/local is updated but not a > jail's configuration files in /usr/local/etc. That might mean that you > e.g. cannot restart a service until a config file is updated as well. > >You could also use the host to built packages, and make a repository available >to the jails. In the jails you can then use pkg(8) to keep the packages >updated. This is a good combination of only building a piece of software once >yet being able to keep different packages in different jails. OK, went for the ezjails solution as described below. markham_breitbach@ssimicro.com [2014-09-09 09:39 -0600] : >Jails are a great solution for this. I have used jails to roll out >identical systems across a large geographic area, so that each jail uses >a local configuration file to set some local variables (IP address, >hostname, etc.) that are inserted at jail startup time. In this way, I >can maintain a single "image" that can be deployed and installed to >quickly upgrade dozens of servers. Another trick I have used is to >setup a base "instance" that is nullfs mounted for individual jails >which things like /var and /home remain unique and RW. I am currently >running about 100 apache AMP hosts this way, so I can quickly upgrade >apache once in the single instance and all 100 hosts are instantly upgraded. So, do you use ezjails for this or did you set up everything on your own as described on the following link? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/jails-application.html I haven't had a closer look on the explanations there yet since I already had quite some success with ezjail. I am only wondering whether ezjail will restrict me at some point since it is "only" a wrapper script. >Technically what you are asking is not possible. The server doesn't >know what lookup the client has done, although http can send a header to >identify the domain requested. This will allow you to proxy requests to >the appropriate jail, but I suspect the money you save in IP addresses >will quickly be lost double in support time if you try to >over-complicate things with layer7 proxies and clever routing tricks, >double again when something goes wrong. Yes, of course, I could use proxies for web and mail. I think I won't go for this approach since I want the "end-user" (who gets a jail at our server) to have free hand at his system -- and I don't want to always set up proxies for different services. Matthew Seaman [2014-09-09 15:10 +0100] : >If you're going to be building a lot of jails with much the same >software load-out, then you can make it all quite space efficient by >building a template jail and then using ZFS cloning. Either as a DiY >setup or try ezjail. Thank you for your hint on ezjail. I am currently using it in the test environment and it works great. Are there advantages in doing the DiY setup? >Note: don't turn on ZFS deduplication. It sounds attractive, but you >will need a lot more RAM than you have in order for it to be effective, >and it does entail trading off performance for storage efficiency. OK, thank you! >Read about the -c and -j flags in pkg(8). Also, I recommend managing >your jails entirely through binary packages, rather than mounting ports >trees everywhere. You can either use the standard FreeBSD pkg repos, or >build your own with poudriere or indeed a combination of the two. This is amazing. Great. Since I got in touch with FreeBSD I don't want to stay away from it. It's much much better from what I've seen before. So, concerning pkg -c/-j, I would only need -j wouldn't I? Or do I need to indicate where the jail is with -c ? >This might be possible, but it's not something that is usually done. >Given you've said the applications you'll be supplying are postfix and >apache, then you should be able to have a small instance of either of >those acting as a reverse proxy in front of your jailed environments >(which can just use some private address space). You can then decide >how to route the traffic to the appropriate jail based on the SMTP or >HTTP protocol headers involved. This is bog standard webserver stuff, >and I think it's not uncommon for mail servers either. OK. I think I'll got for IPv6 (thanks to your hint!)... >Yes, this is certainly possible. The technique is called 'thin jails' >-- however, each jail will need a distinct IP, and the idea of the >jailed applications being able to bind to different ports on the same IP >doesn't work. You can do fancy firewall redirects and stuff to make >this sort of thing work, but honestly, I think you'ld be better off >doing the proxying etc. at Layer 7 rather than Layer 3. OK, I would rather go for more IP addresses then... >> I would like to understand this and the technical limitations better to >> get an idea about how many fixed public IP addresses I have to buy. So I >> can eventually save some money. :-) > >Go with IPv6. You'll have more IP numbers than you can possibly consume >thrust upon you... This really made my day. I checked at the page of the provider which I have chose for the new system and I am going to get a IPv6 /64 subnet, so quite an amount of IP addresses... So will there be a problem if I assign the IPv4 address I have to the jails' host and the jails themselves only get IPv6 addresses?[^1] Are there drawbacks if a machine only has a IPv6 address? Only machines that are capable of IPv6 can communicate with it, can't they? This would be important for the jails running a mail server since only mail servers that support IPv6 can communicate with them, am I right? 1: Of course, the host itself also needs the IPv6 addresses attached to it but every connection is forwarded to the appropriate host. This was quite easy to do with ezjails in my test environment. Thank you for your help! Niklaas -- Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff niklaas@kulturflatrate.net http://www.twitter.com/NBvGersdorff http://www.kulturflatrate.net/niklaas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 13:51:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594F3BAF for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28967FA6 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.109]) by pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2014 07:51:15 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=rlpOHkmR3aalKarM4GIWLuzCr1F3/0x4+1dImnr+a3g= c=1 sm=1 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=wZdVXPOajDIA:10 a=PkdmNeFNFVAA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=5mcg790sAAAA:8 a=n6Rz6cHAo1Hwn2occq4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V9bHfo9xCFkA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=bubiOIAWAvsA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO cds005.dcs.int.inet) ([10.0.141.22]) by pd2mr2so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2014 07:51:15 -0600 Subject: courier-authdaemond rc script doesn't report correct status References: <1847909706.35003025.1410820252624.JavaMail.root@cds005> From: Dale Scott Message-Id: <725227D4-0761-4AFF-8EA5-5AF24AE70EDF@shaw.ca> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:51:15 -0600 (MDT) To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (MobileSync - Apple-iPad2C5/1104.257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:51:17 -0000 From: Dale Scott Date: September 15, 2014 at 4:30:52 PM MDT To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: dalescott@shaw.ca Subject: courier-authdaemond rc script isn't reporting correct status? Hi, I installed courier-authlib-0.66.1 as a binary package (on latest patch= level of FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE), added "courier_authdaemond_enable=3D"YES" = to /etc/rc.conf, and started it using "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaem= ond start". However, "courier-authdaemond status" reports courier_authdaemo= nd is *not* running, even though "ps faxd | grep courier" shows it is, /var= /run/authdaemond/pid exists with correct pid value, and "courier-authdaemon= d stop" stops the daemon and deletes the pid file. Could the status option for the courier_authdaemond rc script actually be b= roken, or more likely I'm missing something really stupid? The bigger pictu= re is a simple Postfix/Courier-IMAP mail server to store mail generated by = local apps (replacing Sendmail), although Postfix is working correctly, I g= et "closed by foreign host" when attempting telnet to either port 110 or po= rt 143. Any suggestions? Thanks, Dale --- dalescott.net Transparency with Trust From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 13:54:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD23BD97 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F2DBE8 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-142.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8GDsYp9018177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:54:34 -0500 Message-ID: <54184291.8080908@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:00:49 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: minor XFCE windowing issue .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:54:43 -0000 .... I did a full pkg upgrade yesterday. Since then, various windows I have open on my XFCE desktop won't resize (widen, primarily) with the mouse. This worked before the upgrade (software from several weeks ago). Versions are xfce-4.10_6, xorg-7.7, xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_3 (used because of otherwise unsupported gfx, jaguar radeon 8280), uname: [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:58:24am] 355 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:58:27am] 356 % Minor but irritating issue, I widen windows when using xpdf to get larger text for easier reading, other uses as well. Any help appreciated, any more info happily provided .... TIA. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:05:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D97F19F for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out21.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out114-136.biz.mail.alibaba.com [205.204.114.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6916E21B for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WS-web by r46d02007.xy2.aliyun.com at Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:04:28 +0800 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:04:25 +0800 From: Sender: To: Message-ID: <89abe81b-73ad-428f-9ce6-c44e2542ca97@laptoppartsupply.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsIE1hbnVmYWN0dXJlIExhcHRvcCBBQyBBZGFwdGVyICA=?= X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Alimail-Mailagent MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.3325399|-1; FP=18437547478380499065|6|1|203|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=r41g03021; MF=sales03@laptoppartsupply.com; PH=DW; RN=50; RT=50; SR=0; X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Alimail-Mailagent revision 2658173 Sender: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:05:59 -0000 SGkgDQpkZWFyIEZyaWVuZCwNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCsKg DQoNCldlIGhhdmUgdGhlIHBsZWFzdXJlIG9mIGNvbnRhY3Rpbmcgd2l0aCB5b3UgDQp0b2RheS4N Cg0KwqANCg0KDQpXZSdyZSBhIGxlYWRpbmcgbWFudWZhY3R1cmVyIG9mIGFsbCBraW5kcyBvZiBs YXB0b3AgDQphZGFwdGVycywgY29uY2x1ZGluZyBVbm5pdmVyc2FsIEFDL0NhciBhZGFwdGVyLCBU YWJsZXQgYWRhcHRlciwgV2FsbCBNb3VudCANCmFkYXB0ZXIsIE1pbmkgYWRhcHRlciwgT3JpZ2lu YWwgYWRhcHRlciBhbmQgbW9yZSwgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBsYXB0b3AgYmF0dGVyaWVzIA0KYW5kIElw b25lIGFjY2Vzc29yaWVzLiBBbGwgdGhlc2UgYWNjb3VudCBtb3JlIHRoYW4gMTAwMCBtb2RlbHMg d2l0aCBtb3JlIHRoYW4gMSANCnllYXIgd2FycmFudHkgYW5kIG5vIE1PUS4NCg0KwqANCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQpTaG91bGQgeW91IGhhdmUgYW55IHF1ZXN0aW9ucyBvciBpbnF1aXJl cywgcGxlYXNlIGRvIG5vdCANCmhlc2l0YXRlIHRvIGxldCBtZSBrbm93Lg0KDQrCoA0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCldlIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRoYW5rZnVsIHRvIGNvb3BlcmF0ZSB3aXRoIA0K eW91Lg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KVGhhbmtzIGFuZCBCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMhDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCkJldHR5IChzYWxlcyANCm1hbmFnZXIpDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KwqANCg0K U2hlbnpoZW4gSG9uZ2RhIFNodW4gDQpUZWNobm9sb2d5IERldmVsb3BtZW50IENvLixMdGQuDQoN CkhLIEZseWluZyANCkludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgQ28uLExpbWl0ZWQNCg0KRS1tYWlsOnNhbGVzMDRA aHVuZGFwb3dlci5jb207IFNreXBlOmZ5YWRhcHRlcsKgIA0KSUNROjYxMjYyMzQ0Ng0KDQpXZWJz aXRlOsKgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5meS1hZGFwdGVyLmNvbTvCoGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaHVuZGFwb3dlci5j b207wqBodHRwOi8vaG9uZ2Rhc2h1bi5lbi5hbGliYWJhLmNvbS8NCg0KQWRkcmVzczo0MDEtMixO by4yMTgtMixIZW5hbiANCk5ldyBWaWxsYWdlLERhZnUgQ29tbXVuaXR5LEd1YW5sYW4sTG9uZ2h1 YSBOZXcgDQpEaXN0cmljdCxTaGVuemhlbixHdWFuZ2RvbmcsQ2hpbmEuDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:07:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AA833EB for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [192.99.32.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7841261 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ACD3C56E for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:07:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-ZIecuA1CGS for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:07:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.224] (unknown [69.43.65.27]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B0333B713 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:07:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <54184440.8060901@tysdomain.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:08:00 -0400 From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD and accessibility Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:07:42 -0000 Hello all: I've looked into this before, but I'm really unsure how to proceed. I am somewhat new to BSD, having used it on a server already. I have a lenovo thinkpad from my school, which would be awesome for running BSD on a separate partition. Problem is, I am blind and the installer is not accessible. Would someone be interested in working with me to possibly create an accessible installer? I'd be happy to host them and keep them updated with new BSD releases. I'm just looking for some help getting off the ground and making the installer speech enabled. Eventually I'd really like to see PCBsd get up and running with an accessible installer and orca for the window system, but I'm unsure as of right now what all Orca supports and how hard that would be. Thanks, -- Take care, Ty http://tds-solutions.net He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:15:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1C6949 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB4F3B2 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-142.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8GEFqrU003998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:15:52 -0500 Message-ID: <5418478F.6050102@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:22:07 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ongoing problems w/ flash for Opera/FF31 .... References: <54106E39.7030401@hiwaay.net> <5411A1B0.7080008@hiwaay.net> <5411A773.3000103@gmail.com> <5411BB20.1070709@hiwaay.net> <5412C4AE.5020908@gmail.com> <5412FFC1.4020404@hiwaay.net> <5413162F.4000303@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5413162F.4000303@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:15:55 -0000 On 09/12/14 10:50, Jamie Griffin wrote: > > On 12/09/2014 15:14, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> On 09/12/14 05:02, Jamie Griffin wrote: >>> >>> On 11/09/2014 16:09, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> >>>> On 09/11/14 08:45, Jamie Griffin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 11/09/2014 14:20, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sooooooooo tacky to self-reply, but I persist .... It looks to me >>>>>> like this port is locked-up *fried* .... it depends on another >>>>>> f10 package which is apparently broken, & probably won't be >>>>>> fixed, since f10 support ended about 6 years ago .... Am I >>>>>> reading this correctly ? If so, are there any plans to try to >>>>>> work around this issue w/ this port ? I have a newer curl >>>>>> installed, many versions later than the F10 version, why can't >>>>>> the port use my newer installed version ? FF & Opera both need >>>>>> this plugin to render flash correctly (& yes, I acknowledge that >>>>>> flash *sux*), I sure wish this would get fixed :-) .... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please see this site https://github.com/xmj/linux-ports and follow >>>>> the instructions there for either linux-f10 or linux-c6 base which >>>>> also includes the flash plugin setup instructions. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your prompt & precise response. It puts me in a bit of a >>>> bind, since I have never used github :-/ .... I'm on FBSD 9.3, so >>>> no linux-c6 (apparently) available. My distinfo in my >>>> linux-f10-flashplugin ports directory already shows the same info >>>> on the webpage, i.e. I seem to be already using the software >>>> referenced above, non ? Please advise & thanks for any guidance you >>>> can provide :-) .... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You just install git and clone the repo and then follow the commands >>> in the README. >>> >>> However, I would recommend using youtube-dl and/or mpv. You can >>> stream the videos from youtube with either program or you can >>> download the file and watch with vlc, for example. That is what I >>> do. Flash player is awful software. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> I quite agree on flash, however, several sites useful to me use it. >> Some of these are U.S. Gov't sites (NOAA, NWS), which I suspect >> aren't likely to change on a whim, especially my whim :-) .... Thus, >> I would like to get flash working if possible. I am already using the >> version of the flash plugin referenced above, & it is a nogo for me. >> I was mostly just checking on the status of that port, seeing if it >> was still active, etc. Latest version posted in late August, so it >> seems alive. It might be being maintained only for newer FBSD (10 or >> 11) .... if so, it would be nice to know that .... >> >> > > The version of flash may be the same but some of its dependencies may > not be. I have used that method to install the f10 flash-plugin from > that site recently and use it currently. > > That's all the info I can give on it. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > What version of FBSD are you running ? Just checking .... TIA & thx for help so far :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:23:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAF4C02 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E922688 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017A927783; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8GENWg1002319; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:23:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:23:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: tyler@tysdomain.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD and accessibility Message-Id: <20140916162332.2207b5aa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54184440.8060901@tysdomain.com> References: <54184440.8060901@tysdomain.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:23:36 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:08:00 -0400, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: > Hello all: > I've looked into this before, but I'm really unsure how to proceed. I am > somewhat new to BSD, having used it on a server already. I have a lenovo > thinkpad from my school, which would be awesome for running BSD on a > separate partition. Problem is, I am blind and the installer is not > accessible. Do you have a Braille readout? Text screens should be perfectly readable (either by Braille tactile readout or by synth voice), at least it has been 25 years ago... I've been using such systems in the past. I'm not blind, but highly interested in barrier-free (!) access to computer technology. The systems I've been examining had sliders to select the screen row (1 or 2 out of 25) and then "print" those on a Braille line located infront of the keyboard. This worked without software (!!!) for every text-mode program under any operating system. In addition, a synthetic voice could be requested for the selected line. Today's PCs are too modern to allow this. :-( FreeBSD's text mode installer would be _perfect_ for this kind of use, unlike graphical installers that you can hardly map on a tactile interface. Only voice would be usable here. > Would someone be interested in working with me to possibly create an > accessible installer? I'd be happy to host them and keep them updated > with new BSD releases. I'm just looking for some help getting off the > ground and making the installer speech enabled. The installer itself doesn't include speech synthesis, as it would require a running sound card interface at this early stage. The FreeBSD installation environment is not "advanced" enough to provide this, but a live system might be. For example, like FreeSBIE which enables sound if possible. From such an environment, interfacing with existing voice synthesizer software shouldn't be complicated. > Eventually I'd really like to see PCBsd get up and running with an > accessible installer and orca for the window system, but I'm unsure as > of right now what all Orca supports and how hard that would be. Yes, PC-BSD with its graphical installer could also be a good starting point, as they run X during installation. Loading sound card drivers and adding some synthesizer to the dialog screens could be possible. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 14:46:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DBC717C for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491938FF for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s8GEkQ16091134 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:46:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <54184D43.7020201@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:46:27 -0600 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: firewall rules for torrents Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:46:27 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:46:32 -0000 Can someone point me to or fill me in on what's required in the way of firewall rules for torrent operation? I gather I can configure for a given listening port, and my existing outgoing rules should cover outgoing conversations. But it's unclear to me whether or not the protocol is statefull from inside the firewall (i.e. "ipfw ... setup keep-state" rules for outgoing packets would cover it), or whether the download ports need to be opened up because the a conversation may be initiated by an external peer. Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 15:14:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 948B7F3A for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [192.99.32.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532E3C0E for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1AE3B70A; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHXNJKYOXMzG; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:13:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.224] (unknown [69.43.65.27]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69CC03B6FF; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:13:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <541853D5.20104@tysdomain.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:29 -0400 From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: FreeBSD and accessibility References: <54184440.8060901@tysdomain.com> <20140916162332.2207b5aa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140916162332.2207b5aa.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:14:02 -0000 hello: On 9/16/2014 10:23 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:08:00 -0400, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: >> Hello all: >> I've looked into this before, but I'm really unsure how to proceed. I am >> somewhat new to BSD, having used it on a server already. I have a lenovo >> thinkpad from my school, which would be awesome for running BSD on a >> separate partition. Problem is, I am blind and the installer is not >> accessible. > Do you have a Braille readout? Text screens should be > perfectly readable (either by Braille tactile readout > or by synth voice), at least it has been 25 years ago... I'm not sure how this is supposed to work. The braille readouts you speak of are called braille displays. I have this: http://www.freedomscientific.com/Products/Blindness/Focus40BrailleDisplay I've been using such It presents a line of braille (an 80x24 display doesn't exist apart from research currently). It can be connected via USB to the system. There needs to be a couple things to make that work though, one of which is brltty and another of which is the actual driver for the display. You also mentioned speech synth: that also does exist and is what I was asking about. Sadly it doesn't come for free. You need sound and a software synth such as Espeak, or you need a hardware synth. I do not know of any synths that are USB, but I do think there are a couple, which also requires a driver. You also need a program which will allow you to navigate the screen and read line by line, char by char etc (yasr). systems in the past. I'm not blind, but highly interested in barrier-free (!) access to computer technology. The systems I've been examining had sliders to select the screen row (1 or 2 out of 25) and then "print" those on a Braille line located infront of the keyboard. This worked without software (!!!) for every text-mode program under any operating system. In addition, a synthetic voice could be requested for the selected line. I'd be interested to see what you're requesting. You would need some sort of driver for the characters on the screen to be recognized and then printed to the display, unless this used some sort of OCR (which probably wouldn't be hard given an 80x24 screen), though it would require considerably much more hardware. I know there are people that used something like this for a while, but I don't have anything like this. Today's PCs are too modern to allow this. :-( FreeBSD's text mode installer would be _perfect_ for this kind of use, unlike graphical installers that you can hardly map on a tactile interface. Only voice would be usable here. Well, either braile or voice would work on a text or graphical installer. The screen reader presents the data to the synth and display that is currently in focus. >> Would someone be interested in working with me to possibly create an >> accessible installer? I'd be happy to host them and keep them updated >> with new BSD releases. I'm just looking for some help getting off the >> ground and making the installer speech enabled. The installer itself doesn't include speech synthesis, as it would require a running sound card interface at this early stage. The FreeBSD installation environment is not "advanced" enough to provide this, but a live system might be. For example, like FreeSBIE which enables sound if possible. From such an environment, interfacing with existing voice synthesizer software shouldn't be complicated. this is totally doable, but again requires that I somehow bootstrap brltty+drivers or something else in to the live cd. >> Eventually I'd really like to see PCBsd get up and running with an >> accessible installer and orca for the window system, but I'm unsure as >> of right now what all Orca supports and how hard that would be. > Yes, PC-BSD with its graphical installer could also be > a good starting point, as they run X during installation. > Loading sound card drivers and adding some synthesizer > to the dialog screens could be possible. > > > -- Take care, Ty http://tds-solutions.net He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 15:40:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44094403; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E559DF29; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f51so41251qge.3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U1XDrNVguDwH6SxN8KclAlMO3SVkeWVFnfNWaCJkvSs=; b=qpQxyGSsQQPVVWefHP6garZ63qKitkth2D3ikc3SR6ntW9ZkT9+2BhHBM193w2obPZ 3wiMVFEtB5zBJvsyV7crD6NPuITbMESXGid9lB4zZYZlyfIH+E4ON5Zx1IxRrSOZ4ANh xVDj0Y+9tpkYNASxt92Naq7BEkYv6cf8Q6ZrUARE8pwWP5ue0+ByGqHVydWKR+v76F7z kM4W23bqsr/d+mCkQsWmydDNqWytSn7qeO0+YFASUDKBvW5e9LbR07pRT3NV8sGWK9p0 emKlYl73E1Aw96o6vyz7oFHrOX0TCMCHejqzW8+6+dV4PmPCrgPzBoAojy1u3O5x1vux fbIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.88.198 with SMTP id b6mr20551437qam.37.1410882025998; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WpLqu7o79FwLKvA-wgo4Zn3o3Ls Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI From: Adrian Chadd To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:40:27 -0000 Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500. -a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 16:13:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22275424 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3F75FB for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so82966wes.1 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2gXVPuAh0Aysl16sct1Fm7QF5XUVdGlVUzhUYlCoc5E=; b=ZFdIQeMq/0p19+t06/bqzjMdY119ZEwWT0IR2cuKrUba+5V0F56o4JDp07tGp9iUvp RN04gPgFIbuIRTRfRqFUkiPx/aXLdgezKy8oUDn1IEuhqVAr3YGnfjzG1BCGPTmhIWCX RYYz8TxD2z/LSKpDsbBWM8JaGYTEFFgL9KY41pGF2CStYy9U0hA3sFLi75Eg0Q8l3glj urmJ2LkjIPHcaVUCuuhOIlFBX5WXeC3BvT2VISrWrrblTfvD5wNYWMJwvlhIwU/zTQnk FciuPuYwXQrPiHoLLbeNDeX9Usu9Kd83ShkNYCpn4GLBpkUSyxVFgfsa8jDs2bEmUtgQ njzw== X-Received: by 10.180.84.193 with SMTP id b1mr34619985wiz.40.1410884016855; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([94.195.197.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bj7sm18881118wjc.33.2014.09.16.09.13.35 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:13:34 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall rules for torrents Message-ID: <20140916171334.37f952ee@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <54184D43.7020201@dreamchaser.org> References: <54184D43.7020201@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:13:39 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:46:27 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: > Can someone point me to or fill me in on what's required in the way > of firewall rules for torrent operation? > > I gather I can configure for a given listening port, This depends on the client, older and less sophisticated clients use a separate port for for each torrent and you need to configure a range of ports. > and my existing outgoing rules should cover outgoing conversations. For the most part TCP handling is all the same. > But it's unclear to me whether or not the protocol is statefull from > inside the firewall (i.e. "ipfw ... setup keep-state" rules for > outgoing packets would cover it), or whether the download ports need > to be opened up because the a conversation may be initiated by an > external peer. Whether it's statefull or not doesn't depend on whether it's incoming or outgoing, you can keep-state on either or neither. If you don't keep state you typically pass established TCP traffic early in the script, or for UDP just have a rule to pass packets both ways. Bittorrent can be run without incoming connections but it works better with them because it allows you to connect with any client and not just those that are open to incoming connections. In addition to Bittorrent you probably also need to configure DHT access. This runs over UDP, and does need to accept incoming packets. It may share a port with Bittorrent or use a different one. Don't forget that if you are using a NAT router to connect to the internet and you want to have incoming connections, the router has to let them through and send them to the right lan IP address. Commonly this is setup by UPnP, but if that's not supported by the client or router you will have to setup the router manually. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 16:47:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF271302 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E26EA6A for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q107so175248qgd.1 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:47:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5Dnpz54z7U382EO0UATA6qGCJtRYsjyXr7dwPni2djE=; b=Q7Va3xb4tQDBXTmGv2UPP9koVEAwD29plwmAHx4r4kXQlMYQMNud8jz2Yr0OA5Pout Qf6xVZ70DXAw0GIdG4OhMrVhV7XKOo0GhZd5Sota4Mn6f1yPEWuYDQ3XdwJbQukb6xf4 BGEftes3FMRiNmW6jN/GWnwQzs5wIEOqQkVwoiSbnstOahHuiznRDJGNErMINpTGANbd alxzjwGIGqz0U6AfD9qAtBPqFcjOHeYp+zJ3/tmNext82DAPeBjncj3AIXsNYmSf2Hrw jhtuu1+KM3Lejo/g6mWlD84v77TEEUNYVp81sNKyLOjBprTa0KAp8Yqj+sGhDSY09Fu4 2Cgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.38.3 with SMTP id z3mr5396699qcd.17.1410886030411; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:47:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54181B2A.7030908@diomedia.be> References: <5415EC27.40708@diomedia.be> <54168ADA.6050204@diomedia.be> <54181B2A.7030908@diomedia.be> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:47:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bC2BzYG4G0tuPO8l43TwRUWzz84 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listen queue guestion From: Adrian Chadd To: Bram Van Steenlandt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:47:11 -0000 Hm, would you mind filing a PR about that? I'm pretty sure it limits the general listen queue depth; not just for TCP connections. -a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 17:23:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34643598 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9ACF0B for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s8GHNjcC091643 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:23:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <54187221.9030500@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:23:45 -0600 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: gpart -- label an ntfs partition on usb stick? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:23:46 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:23:50 -0000 I'm trying to reformat a USB stick to take large files. It was my understanding that gpart could do this, and that the proper file type was ntfs. It seems to work with no label, but when I attempt to label the partition, it objects. I thought the label was part of the partitioning scheme, and as such should be independent of the partition type. What am I missing? # gpart show -l da0 => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) 1 31 - free - (15k) 32 125031648 1 (null) (59G) # gpart delete -i 1 da0 da0s1 deleted # gpart show -l da0 => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) 1 125031679 - free - (59G) # gpart add -t ntfs -l ntfs da0 gpart: Invalid argument # gpart add -t ntfs da0 da0s1 added # gpart show -l da0 => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) 1 62 - free - (31k) 63 125031564 1 (null) (59G) 125031627 53 - free - (26k) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 17:27:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE93798; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80BDF6C; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25854; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:27:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:16:40 -0600 To: pyunyh@gmail.com From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... In-Reply-To: <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:27:15 -0000 So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? --Brett Glass At 02:37 AM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > > At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > > > >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to > > >know exact chip revision? > > > > Here you are. > > > > jme0: port > > 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff > > fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 > > jme0: MSIX count : 8 > > jme0: MSI count : 8 > > jme0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI-X vectors (8 supported) > > msi: routing MSI-X IRQ 256 to local APIC 0 vector 52 > > jme0: using IRQ 256 for MSI-X > > jme0: Using 1 MSIX messages. > > jme0: PCI device revision : 0x0250 > > jme0: Chip revision : 0x11 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Initially I suspected you might have relatively new JMC25x >controller but it seems you have early revision of the >controller(JMC250 A2). Early revision of the controller has >1000baseT link establishment issue with 802.3az capable switches. >The issue is explained in jme(4) man page. The known workaround is >to manually set 100baseTX media. I recall you mentioned Linux had >no problems so I wonder Linux was able to establish a 1000baseT >link. >In theory, the workaround could be implemented in driver but it >is layering violation and will have to duplicate lots of work done >by mii(4). > > > jme0: ethernet hardware address not found in EEPROM. > > jme0: PHY is at address 1. > > jme0: Read request size : 512 bytes. > > jme0: TLP payload size : 128 bytes. > > miibus0: on jme0 > > jmphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > > jmphy0: OUI 0x00d831, model 0x0021, rev. 1 > > jmphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, > > 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, > > 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, > > 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX > > -flow-master, auto, auto-flow > > jme0: bpf attached > > jme0: Ethernet address: e0:cb:4e:54:23:ac > > > > I do not particularly like JMicron chips (their faulty SSD > > controllers have cost me a lot of time and money), but that's > >I don't have experiences with other JMicron products so can't >comment on SSD. JMC25x may not be world best gigabit ethernet >controller but I was quite satisfied with its high performance and >clear documentation and Vendor's support. > > > what's on the motherboard of this Asus. So, I need to find a way to > > make it work. > > > > --Brett Glass > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 17:35:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10A4C0C for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 633B1E0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.65] ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lp49C-1XzxwX1fCG-00ew0s for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <54187425.5000003@gmx.us> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:32:21 -0400 From: Dutch Ingraham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Issue with Ports v. Packages Versioning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bww7OrvGA75pIOgrpMbPSKGSiUAC9dhXYeknbBAwJaFRnPhSxLd 7zqhUb3U2fLYDhDvgltzdIphNXZzj8hdaoPyp5Jt6lWWNZQhOMJp/FfUdsH2nT9JkpUJgK+ 3RGuLkzBTxRegdJANDV8vPbl/o/95GcHIygcYCnNUoDkMSD0BuvSCeSoBo6J813sDDLvLpK 2UnA5q49oyciYY94K7EyA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:35:40 -0000 (Sorry if this is a re-post - I got a bounce.) Greetings: I have two desktop units both running FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE from the same ISO. On one, ports are updated with svn (I'll refer to it as the SVN unit) and the other uses portsnap (the PORTSNAP unit). I update both daily. On Sept. 12, the update to the SVN unit borked xorg so that if I open any x-application in my window manager (dwm), except xterm, the server crashes with a segfault. While trying to diagnose this issue, I switched daily use to the PORTSNAP unit. After a few days of fetching/updating and portmaster telling me there were no updates, I started looking at ports versus package versions. Also thrown into the mix was an update to the base system, to p9. On the PORTSNAP unit: root@stoa:~ # pkg version -l "<" dri-7.6.1_5,2 < libGL-7.6.1_5 < libdrm-2.4.17_2,1 < xf86-video-ati-6.14.6_4 < xf86-video-intel-2.7.1_9 < xorg-server-1.7.7_14,1 < but: root@stoa:~ # portmaster -ad ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> All ports are up to date root@stoa:~ # root@stoa:~ # freebsd-version -ku 10.0-RELEASE-p7 10.0-RELEASE-p8 root@stoa:~ # I have the same versions and portmaster result on the SVN unit. Googling around brought me to this[1] exchange, which reflects my understanding that WITH_NEW_XORG was only necessary on pre-10.0 versions. (The Makefiles for the above ports, and the UPDATING file from April 2014 seems to indicate this is the problem.) If WITH_NEW_XORG is not the issue, could someone describe what may be the problem? If it is the issue, is the solution as easy as adding that to make.conf and updating? I don't know if this is what borked the SVN unit, but I would like to work out this issue first, then go from there. (I've already rebuilt all xf86- drivers and, when that failed to correct the issue, rebuilt all 570 ports, which also failed to solve the problem, so I'm pretty much out of ideas anyway.) In addition, are differing patch verrsions in base correct? Any/all help is appreciated. [1]http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/HEADS-UP-WITH-NEW-XORG-is-now-\ the-default-on-FreeBSD-10-and-9-stable-td5904196.html#a5904376 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 17:51:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9044F35F for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D642BB for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] ([unknown] [71.177.216.148]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0NC0001TH9K84Z70@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:51:15 -0500 (CDT) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Port/Package Upgrade Question From: Doug Hardie In-reply-to: <20140915144034.58b7c848@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:51:14 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Message-id: <8D08008B-DA03-4EC0-ACF1-E96CBC26D583@lafn.org> References: <20140915144034.58b7c848@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:51:20 -0000 On 15 September 2014, at 05:40, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:55:10 -0700 Doug Hardie wrote: >> I have a number of systems that I need to upgrade to 9.3. I have one >> system that is the development/test system. Its already at 9.3 and it >> has a number of ports/packages installed that need to be on the >> production systems. In the past I have built packages for each in >> /usr/ports/packages/All and then just mounted that directory via NFS >> on the production machines and used pkg_add to install them on the >> production machines. >> >> Some of these are packages in that they use the default configuration. >> Unfortunately, some of them have to be compiled via the ports system >> as they use non-standard options. I have made a package for each of >> them. >> >> None of the production systems have pkg on them. They all use the >> old packages stuff. I suspect I will first need to convert them over >> to the pkg system. Thats not a big deal as its a fairly quick process. >> However, how do I then upgrade the ports/packages from the test system? >> The production systems can't be used to recompile the ports as that >> would involve too much down time. > > Same as before just "pkg add" instead of "pkg_add". See man pkg-add > for more details. > > Thanks to both who responded. I see two good ways to do it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 19:10:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389D7E7B for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F60D98 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x12so311850wgg.13 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:09:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tNlXOE5lzanm3sLbAWEQccMHaGBoewI/eLQnlW4jrZo=; b=fKlWkmJD58qQjg6F8bTJiFlUwsgr4m1plA48idMV1LDxkwn+2QYfurPIvdqkozh7X0 ulI5NSIc/BtVFkX9dktcv0vk87TavDv5VrqZ0sZiDkbga1FeZGQN7T0uSBJPaQ3HmIdy bvI0HoKWaRkPSAIOG/awloOaM34c+bflaXIzE+/tPCu/2KvX9H3YywH18SNll0u8TOcj b1YL9aRx2K3KXRJQF5zjh3IIzgJUefihV0pd3AZ+zI/EGy//7poCd6hFCw30D4FIIeUN G+CTIFQG01N5a5yGHii94ZcOgjIvCVyRSF+TR5J4oRv0DQ+mRj8BkJcF7jo04DECy5ge 1rCw== X-Received: by 10.180.189.18 with SMTP id ge18mr345781wic.37.1410894597827; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (host31-54-215-236.range31-54.btcentralplus.com. [31.54.215.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wm8sm19360285wjb.40.2014.09.16.12.09.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54188B03.4000003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:55 +0100 From: Jamie Griffin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ongoing problems w/ flash for Opera/FF31 .... References: <54106E39.7030401@hiwaay.net> <5411A1B0.7080008@hiwaay.net> <5411A773.3000103@gmail.com> <5411BB20.1070709@hiwaay.net> <5412C4AE.5020908@gmail.com> <5412FFC1.4020404@hiwaay.net> <5413162F.4000303@gmail.com> <5418478F.6050102@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <5418478F.6050102@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:01 -0000 On 16/09/2014 15:22, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > What version of FBSD are you running ? Just checking .... TIA & thx > for help so far :-) .... > > No problem. I use FreeBSD 10-STABLE. r270438 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 19:58:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61B77E for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8477E315 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8GJvwpZ095130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:57:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8GJvw8t095127; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:57:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:57:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: gpart -- label an ntfs partition on usb stick? In-Reply-To: <54187221.9030500@dreamchaser.org> Message-ID: References: <54187221.9030500@dreamchaser.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:57:58 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:58:09 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Gary Aitken wrote: > I'm trying to reformat a USB stick to take large files. It was my understanding > that gpart could do this, and that the proper file type was ntfs. It seems to > work with no label, but when I attempt to label the partition, it objects. I > thought the label was part of the partitioning scheme, and as such should be > independent of the partition type. What am I missing? > > # gpart show -l da0 > => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) > 1 31 - free - (15k) > 32 125031648 1 (null) (59G) > > # gpart delete -i 1 da0 > da0s1 deleted > # gpart show -l da0 > => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) > 1 125031679 - free - (59G) > > # gpart add -t ntfs -l ntfs da0 > gpart: Invalid argument > # gpart add -t ntfs da0 > da0s1 added > # gpart show -l da0 > => 1 125031679 da0 MBR (59G) > 1 62 - free - (31k) > 63 125031564 1 (null) (59G) > 125031627 53 - free - (26k) With GPT, labels are part of the partition scheme. But MBR does not support partition labels. glabel(8) suggests that NTFS supports volume labels. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 20:29:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A92AA1C for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "PositiveSSL CA 2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB474855 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (ceto.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.30]) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9D147CAF73; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:25:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.201] (unknown [46.44.159.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4B5A47CAF21; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:25:53 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Coert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> In-Reply-To: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ceto.cloudzeeland.nl Cc: Jamie Griffin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:29:11 -0000 Coert: > Upgraded to version 1.3.7, was on an older one indeed. Was running > 1.2.4_1 Still having issues though, for now I just stick to release/0 > and pkg version 1.2.4_1 Going to try an upgrade later I really don't know why pkg should be used in this stage. I seldom have seen so much negative side effects with using a program as with this one. Is the program not tested thouroughly or am I just too stupid to understand? Last time I used it, my complete php port system got damaged and had to reinstall BSD from scratch in order to get my active ports in line again. Please understand that writing this is no offence to the author of pkg; I really respect all effort that is put in it - I just don't understand why it causes me/us so much trouble using it. BR, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 20:41:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F56D103 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F8EA0C for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8GKfqDn087329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:41:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8GKfqlZ087326; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:41:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:41:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems In-Reply-To: <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> Message-ID: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:41:52 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Jamie Griffin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Coert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:41:54 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Coert: >> Upgraded to version 1.3.7, was on an older one indeed. Was running 1.2.4_1 >> Still having issues though, for now I just stick to release/0 and pkg >> version 1.2.4_1 Going to try an upgrade later > I really don't know why pkg should be used in this stage. I seldom have seen > so much negative side effects with using a program as with this one. > Is the program not tested thouroughly or am I just too stupid to understand? > Last time I used it, my complete php port system got damaged and had to > reinstall BSD from scratch in order to get my active ports in line again. > > Please understand that writing this is no offence to the author of pkg; I > really respect all effort that is put in it - I just don't understand why it > causes me/us so much trouble using it. Sometimes there is bad data from previous installations, or usage of the tool is different enough from the previous one that it is misunderstood. Sometimes, that is a doc bug. Two important points: 1. Using pkg to manage installed applications does not require using binary packages. Ports work as before. 2. A total removal and reinstall of packages or ports does not require reinstalling the operating system. At worst, deleting all installed applications with 'pkg delete -afy' is enough. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 20:58:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0817BAE6 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5602B8E for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-123.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8GKwVLE014299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:58:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:04:46 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:58:34 -0000 On 09/16/14 15:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Coert: >> Upgraded to version 1.3.7, was on an older one indeed. Was running >> 1.2.4_1 Still having issues though, for now I just stick to release/0 >> and pkg version 1.2.4_1 Going to try an upgrade later > I really don't know why pkg should be used in this stage. I seldom > have seen so much negative side effects with using a program as with > this one. > Is the program not tested thouroughly or am I just too stupid to > understand? Last time I used it, my complete php port system got > damaged and had to reinstall BSD from scratch in order to get my > active ports in line again. > > Please understand that writing this is no offence to the author of > pkg; I really respect all effort that is put in it - I just don't > understand why it causes me/us so much trouble using it. > > BR, Jos Chrispijn > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I have posted a fair amount of questions/issues w/ pkg as well. I think most of the problems are with documentation. The interactions between ports & pkgs as managed by pkg are not necessarily intuitive, & *ALL* documentation (man pages, 'pkg help ....', & online docs) are mum on that matter. There are some files/metadata/etc. that apparently are used by both packages (ports & pkg), & it is maddeningly easy to run afoul of those interactions, at least for me. I have boiled it down to 'always do whatever you are going to do w/ pkg *1st*, then mess w/ ports' .... That is working for me, but my setup is pretty simplistic .... YMMV, IANAL, & all that rot .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 21:16:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6E1FAA for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ECD9D58 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8GLGOmK096047 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:16:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8GLGO9b096044; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:16:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:16:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems In-Reply-To: <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:16:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:16:26 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I have posted a fair amount of questions/issues w/ pkg as well. I think most > of the problems are with documentation. The interactions between ports & pkgs > as managed by pkg are not necessarily intuitive, & *ALL* documentation (man > pages, 'pkg help ....', & online docs) are mum on that matter. There are some > files/metadata/etc. that apparently are used by both packages (ports & pkg), > & it is maddeningly easy to run afoul of those interactions, at least for me. > I have boiled it down to 'always do whatever you are going to do w/ pkg > *1st*, then mess w/ ports' .... That is working for me, but my setup is > pretty simplistic .... YMMV, IANAL, & all that rot .... There is a simple misunderstanding here. A package is just the binary version of a port. When a port is compiled and installed, it is really creating a package and installing that. pkg is a tracking system. The packages can be built from ports or downloaded as pre-built packages. Mixing both is not generally recommended. The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from ports and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user involvement. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 21:30:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3452530 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B603EE70 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n16so423298oag.10 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZHjZgUYbO1ynkRNdCevp82CzQShBwCcQ7D6UMUIA5eE=; b=GvNYH2JhFYRA152DW5yggDyGEeYOZ9EW4zVHJiLS1LkoZ9PgGckV2p8JjbHWa+ts24 w6WKw5sAe48SzNcyhTbjNBWJ7OH97niPNr3Vp8wIPiX68juwI73cy4tV1K2838FpqCg1 xX1nKyTiPhJ07s9w/URIp3iJosv3oq2NTFQ2yHM5+Paotjv40RpeRF+lXc9wkTDp+dI5 MpDAG6hnlcZZoIQXC7DteR5YejyfaidFlWJumLIl00KeSJVPYHaZ3WC+8v/dMiJyzJB+ PQHxzfZ93fxti0YhtZpb2tbyamb1aF6gnpIn74X3v6+NG11Rp/673eaPIcmrIz0NiSLa xwNw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjKZcJmHX2pr467fd1Tp9575hNv3kSeveh1MXtowfproSv/2qHa9T5LGhRRg8L7WtqxHj3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.87.167 with SMTP id az7mr38758667obb.41.1410903001433; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:30:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:30:09 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Warren Block wrote: > The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with > packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from ports > and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user involvement. And you can always do a 'make package' for a port - with the advantage of being able, in many cases, to answer config questions that can change the behavior and usefulness of a package (e.g., racoon with the control port enabled, disabled by default in the packages). - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 21:33:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C636D8 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6296F15 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:33:24 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: 'Warren Block' , "'William A. Mahaffey III'" Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:33:23 +0200 Subject: RE: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Topic: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Index: Ac/R84kGQxviQXswQMa4q4Kxi7o7xwAAaEDQ Message-ID: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:33:33 -0000 > The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with > packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from > ports and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user > involvement. Chmm. I like packages, because of saving time and should be safe for using = on production servers - thats my idea. But now I am not able to use it, bec= ause a lot of packages are not working, as on the top of this thread descri= bed. And this is complication for me - I rely on packages on production servers,= where saving time is very important. Yes, I can create own repository and = manage own packages but I like this idea. But this idea is not working for = some weeks. Unhappy situation. Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 21:44:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CAEC83D for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1D4FFA for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1410900609912336.1623043408566; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wp18so369997obc.5 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.9.225 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.175.166 with SMTP id cb6mr14359491oec.64.1410900609224; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:50:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mohammad Shokri Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:19:29 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Stack Exchange Q&A site proposal: *BSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:44:02 -0000 Hi! I'm supporting a proposal to create a new Q&A website for users of BSD Variants: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFly, PC-BSD, TrueBSD and so on. It's built on the same software as stackoverflow.com, a hugely popular site where over seven million programmers help each other with difficult programming problems. On Stack Overflow the audience votes for the best answer, so the answer you want is usually right at the top, not on page five. I'm hoping that a site for users of BSD Variants: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFly, PC-BSD, TrueBSD and so on would have the same kind of network effect and turn into an amazing resource. The proposal process is going on here: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76823/bsd?referrer=0reUHvY9WBao7tQ8CcbOfA2 If you're interested in participating, go to that URL and click on the orange "Follow It!" button. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 22:12:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1F024E; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DEB38B; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XU0z5-003Pe9-P0>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:12:27 +0200 Received: from g226063043.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.226.63.43] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XU0z5-002CNU-Mn>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:12:27 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:12:23 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140917001223.526d9560.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/V.pz09ODHFWzNpI38HmflqC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.226.63.43 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:12:30 -0000 --Sig_/V.pz09ODHFWzNpI38HmflqC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 Adrian Chadd schrieb: > Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers > default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500. >=20 >=20 > -a It is not the jumbo frame that makes this specific NIC work, I have to set = the mtu explicitely to make it work. To make this notebook work in different departments, I need to use DHCP. At= the moment I have to set the mtu manually, disbaling and reenabling the NIC (ifconfig re= 0 down, ifconfig re0 mtu xxxx, ifconfig re0 up). This seems to be strange. After that, the NIC seems to work as expected and= the Laptop has connection. Oliver --Sig_/V.pz09ODHFWzNpI38HmflqC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGLXLAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8cfwIAIadAZyy0Qu9cMqWG5f2niKU fhEBJoZOiQM3f+mDYYKfnaQW2/yUbD0m6rrMh7WkRrAQu2dLT3mkWQ7PtlIS9E4N pUdwuoDMWgW88BYoyFmwNHD+sJr10H3J09i3wCVyrllYVfzD8SZMhohoOMh9MF2J n8rFn2T0mejD2+kf0fFzjYM4EaIYklO9RqcvkTEbqMPMsbIhC+Q827k/Rt49k5rv h0+BPN8VoIj05jOyioE/dIsz7X2Mw1qu1JsUyirp/OS8LBwdebw/fk+krCvnskc/ aQxcaVBtKvTKK88Bn9s9mEAYiAEGya9CWch/kzDN5qmEVXpOw9itD9+m2lwOVAI= =YJ+d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V.pz09ODHFWzNpI38HmflqC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 22:33:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B61AA44 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D747CE for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-123.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8GMWxMe000777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:33:00 -0500 Message-ID: <5418BC12.7010108@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:39:14 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:33:02 -0000 On 09/16/14 16:16, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> I have posted a fair amount of questions/issues w/ pkg as well. I >> think most of the problems are with documentation. The interactions >> between ports & pkgs as managed by pkg are not necessarily intuitive, >> & *ALL* documentation (man pages, 'pkg help ....', & online docs) are >> mum on that matter. There are some files/metadata/etc. that >> apparently are used by both packages (ports & pkg), & it is >> maddeningly easy to run afoul of those interactions, at least for me. >> I have boiled it down to 'always do whatever you are going to do w/ >> pkg *1st*, then mess w/ ports' .... That is working for me, but my >> setup is pretty simplistic .... YMMV, IANAL, & all that rot .... > > There is a simple misunderstanding here. A package is just the binary > version of a port. When a port is compiled and installed, it is > really creating a package and installing that. > > pkg is a tracking system. The packages can be built from ports or > downloaded as pre-built packages. Mixing both is not generally > recommended. > > The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with > packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from > ports and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user > involvement. > I try fervently not to mix them, but often the online (freebsd.org) docs recommend doing something through ports which could be done w/ pkg instead. I have slavishly followed some of those recommendations & had a 5+ hour compile session ensue (I'm on a somewhat meager machine, 1.3 GHz AMD quad-core jaguar based), when I (think I) could have installed the pkg (which was available) in a couple of mins. But that isn't the big issue for me, it has been the fact that doing some portmaster or ports commands then preclude pkg from upgrading packages. I like the system overall, mind you, but as a noob, getting spun up on the intricacies of ports/pkg has been a bit of a challenge. I try to use pkg exclusively (I'm with Radel on that point), but I need/want flash browser support (I'm still awaiting the flash port to get working on 9.3), so some ports is unavoidable for me .... Probably more noise than necessary, since I am overall happy w/ FBSD .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 23:43:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FFBB8D for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp002.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtp002.mac.com [17.172.81.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A498E6E for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (66-216-230-25.dhcp.stcd.mn.charter.com [66.216.230.25]) by st11p00mm-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC000AVJN4MAP70@st11p00mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:35 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-16_06:2014-09-16,2014-09-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409160190 Message-id: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:44:17 -0500 From: Brandon Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:43:43 -0000 Hello everyone, a FreeBSD newbie here. I have my server set up with 8 jails or so, and I have been trying to figure out how to get an email when there are out of date applications installed in a jail. I currently have jailaudit installed, but it seems like "pkg version -vIL\= would serve the purpose on the host, but I'm not sure. I'm sure this is a common question, but I cannot seem to find an answer on Google. The jails are a mix of packages and ports if that makes much difference. I also use portmaster for the ports. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 23:51:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491CCCD0; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (e.febed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.254.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D4FF3D; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8GNYFgD046583; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:34:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:27:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... In-Reply-To: <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> Message-ID: References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:51:30 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and > because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs > I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller will not be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable 802.3az on that port, if you can. Just a thought. > > --Brett Glass > > At 02:37 AM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: >> > At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >> > >> > >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to >> > >know exact chip revision? >> > >> > Here you are. >> > >> > jme0: port >> > 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff >> > fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci1 >> > jme0: MSIX count : 8 >> > jme0: MSI count : 8 >> > jme0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI-X vectors (8 supported) >> > msi: routing MSI-X IRQ 256 to local APIC 0 vector 52 >> > jme0: using IRQ 256 for MSI-X >> > jme0: Using 1 MSIX messages. >> > jme0: PCI device revision : 0x0250 >> > jme0: Chip revision : 0x11 >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> Initially I suspected you might have relatively new JMC25x >> controller but it seems you have early revision of the >> controller(JMC250 A2). Early revision of the controller has >> 1000baseT link establishment issue with 802.3az capable switches. >> The issue is explained in jme(4) man page. The known workaround is >> to manually set 100baseTX media. I recall you mentioned Linux had >> no problems so I wonder Linux was able to establish a 1000baseT >> link. >> In theory, the workaround could be implemented in driver but it >> is layering violation and will have to duplicate lots of work done >> by mii(4). >> >> > jme0: ethernet hardware address not found in EEPROM. >> > jme0: PHY is at address 1. >> > jme0: Read request size : 512 bytes. >> > jme0: TLP payload size : 128 bytes. >> > miibus0: on jme0 >> > jmphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 >> > jmphy0: OUI 0x00d831, model 0x0021, rev. 1 >> > jmphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, >> > 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, >> > 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, >> > 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX >> > -flow-master, auto, auto-flow >> > jme0: bpf attached >> > jme0: Ethernet address: e0:cb:4e:54:23:ac >> > >> > I do not particularly like JMicron chips (their faulty SSD >> > controllers have cost me a lot of time and money), but that's >> >> I don't have experiences with other JMicron products so can't >> comment on SSD. JMC25x may not be world best gigabit ethernet >> controller but I was quite satisfied with its high performance and >> clear documentation and Vendor's support. >> >> > what's on the motherboard of this Asus. So, I need to find a way to >> > make it work. >> > >> > --Brett Glass >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 23:54:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80AC6DFE; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8BEF5D; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA00829; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:53:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:53:51 -0600 To: Chris Hill From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... In-Reply-To: References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:54:05 -0000 At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs >>I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? > >The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the >IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller >will not be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable >802.3az on that port, if you can. Just a thought. It's a Netgear "green" switch, model GS105E. It has no way to disable 802.3az. --Brett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 23:59:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAABDFFD for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2A7FB0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005] (2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005) by CY1PR0301MB0844.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1029.13; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:59:29 +0000 Message-ID: <5418CEDB.1000001@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:59:23 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN3PR0301CA0062.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.152.158) To CY1PR0301MB0844.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.150) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03361FCC43 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(53754006)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(110136001)(97736003)(20776003)(59896002)(50986999)(107886001)(42186005)(85306004)(76176999)(65816999)(85852003)(87976001)(92726001)(47776003)(83072002)(105586002)(54356999)(88552001)(33656002)(31966008)(86362001)(2351001)(102836001)(87266999)(77982003)(64126003)(107046002)(106356001)(95666004)(74662003)(83322001)(23676002)(90102001)(65806001)(79102003)(21056001)(92566001)(77096002)(81542003)(46102003)(75432002)(64706001)(83506001)(80316001)(89122001)(4396001)(76482002)(50466002)(74502003)(101416001)(81342003)(99396002)(80022003)(89472002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0844; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:59:38 -0000 On 2014.09.16 17:44, Brandon Schneider wrote: > Hello everyone, a FreeBSD newbie here. I have my server set up with 8 > jails or so, and I have been trying to figure out how to get an email > when there are out of date applications installed in a jail. I currently > have jailaudit installed, but it seems like "pkg version -vIL\= would > serve the purpose on the host, but I'm not sure. I'm sure this is a > common question, but I cannot seem to find an answer on Google. The > jails are a mix of packages and ports if that makes much difference. I > also use portmaster for the ports. Jails are their own userlands, so you would check them as you would the host, but from within their environment. If you set up Poudriere, you can have your own repo that you update as you see fit, compile with the options you want, and simply have the jails install everything from it, automatically updating in a cron job. This is especially useful if you have many jails (or many other real machines) and not terribly difficult or complicated if they can all use the same packages (i.e., you don't need different versions of the same package for different jails). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 00:53:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7575A7F6 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B66174F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005] (2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005) by DM2PR0301MB0848.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.215.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1024.12; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:38:09 +0000 Message-ID: <5418D7DB.1000105@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:37:47 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Schneider Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> <5418CEDB.1000001@my.hennepintech.edu> <5418D37A.4000705@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <5418D37A.4000705@icloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005] X-ClientProxiedBy: CO2PR06CA017.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.242.17) To DM2PR0301MB0848.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.215.146) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0337AFFE9A X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(102836001)(101416001)(42186005)(97736003)(33656002)(47776003)(64706001)(83506001)(15202345003)(65806001)(64126003)(88552001)(95666004)(50466002)(20776003)(90102001)(50986999)(59896002)(31966008)(106356001)(65816999)(89122001)(99396002)(76176999)(87266999)(85852003)(54356999)(46102003)(81542003)(77982003)(105586002)(87976001)(79102003)(77096002)(74662003)(110136001)(80022003)(81342003)(92726001)(19580395003)(75432002)(83072002)(83322001)(23676002)(4396001)(21056001)(15975445006)(86362001)(76482002)(80316001)(85306004)(92566001)(74502003)(107046002)(19273905006)(89472002)(3826002)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0848; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:29ad:4147:aab1:2005]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:53:03 -0000 On 2014.09.16 19:19, Brandon Schneider wrote: > That's actually a really great idea, I think when I have some time I > will explore that. Any links to quickly get me up and running with > documentation? Is the HandBook enough? The handbook won't cover it in detail since it's not part of base, but there is a nice tutorial here: http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/poudriere It also comes with good man pages, of course. Learning about periodic(8) (from both the man pages and reading through /etc/defaults/periodic.conf) would also be a good idea. There is a weekly task that checks for out-of-date packages. I CC'd the list since I assume you meant to reply to it and not just me directly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 00:58:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D10FAC7; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0A2780; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lj1so922223pab.15 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zzReK7VHVwHNOHu5zrkDoO8QX19EBS3ObU0BBqmWWAY=; b=ZZ6Cs1WCTY9jBQejLrmu/bXO0X9BW4+/Jsltoqj0pBtHBt+OEWVoWamplQx74hm5Mw D7sn4I7F3p3CnLPIdTbXqf82HfrDUQCkAW1HD8+8s+Fkfm7Sh840hQra1y+N2gwQutd/ RcJ8D3NjVTrIogoVZDR3J6/QyrB3ZnKJcqTO07DSZyWoAvrFRaSG8O8/qR37RIPtUFFZ X+ZtTBE2xVxRFJYHpl7bt9Z3PGfmVXxQiHkyb+gvF926vo+3rv3agOrzw95r9ndtxucY MDcFOBDmcxLZ5q7YAiszAD2nQfA+PUhwIbORz1VXuA3diziEA+uYSmS+eFexobHCoMUJ yMUA== X-Received: by 10.68.132.225 with SMTP id ox1mr54408814pbb.99.1410915486460; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([106.247.248.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm15208326pdh.56.2014.09.16.17.58.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Yonghyeon PYUN X-Google-Original-From: "Yonghyeon PYUN" Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:57:53 +0900 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:57:53 +0900 To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Message-ID: <20140917005753.GA1102@michelle.fasterthan.com> Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:07 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: > > >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > > > >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and > >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs > >>I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? > > > >The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the > >IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller > >will not be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable > >802.3az on that port, if you can. Just a thought. > > It's a Netgear "green" switch, model GS105E. It has no way to disable > 802.3az. > Then, probably the only available option to establish a link against the switch would be using reduced speed(100Mbps) with ifconfig(8). If you can't reduce the speed due to other reasons I'm afraid there is no way to establish a link at this moment. As I said in previous mail, did you check what resolved speed Linux shows? Also it would be good idea to know whether you're really seeing the PHY hardware issue or not. Directly connect the jme(4) to other box without switch and see whether jme(4) can establish a 1000baseT link. > --Brett > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 01:06:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E0BC89; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723A2864; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj1so938738pad.14 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=D81u4rSFHYDZa0TKVt+TMME4aaA0hbzPOtmcXJeHaY4=; b=BkX69iMAFoo9L0Q9+/sPyEqLH84w1bVwWOhnCop3aPoAFVvpSgZfTX8Ua6EKSKlv69 ZMAbmeS7h8Km9ukl0D9PcTva396aCg/HBKq055G3srZrkPTouab1fYMndPKMKu7ipyb1 rH7QnCSZ32bPoQsjEME1kmOGeKSCqDUNbapeVf7tO1m6SjCZUvc3Rw1yvEb8CQpKAo93 XywURaqNgOR4ho/+yfI1mKVFlBVb56QlJpCk30QH+fMBdfvag4YLmOdWIsfqOQV+5Q2k +y6hAm70eEvU4mlAjvpFZqt8zlekK/BucbVc19x1NycvprJVvlQDj87Y+IbRZb9ApC5P 2Naw== X-Received: by 10.68.103.4 with SMTP id fs4mr55760656pbb.58.1410915987979; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([106.247.248.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fl15sm15162566pdb.92.2014.09.16.18.06.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Yonghyeon PYUN X-Google-Original-From: "Yonghyeon PYUN" Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:06:14 +0900 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:06:14 +0900 To: Jim Thompson Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Message-ID: <20140917010614.GB1102@michelle.fasterthan.com> Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> <27534E06-CC9B-4A4D-8A7A-9C68ECB760BC@netgate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <27534E06-CC9B-4A4D-8A7A-9C68ECB760BC@netgate.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Brett Glass , questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:06:28 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:59:18PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > > > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > >> > >>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and > >>> because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs > >>> I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? > >> > >> The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller will not be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable 802.3az on that port, if you can. Just a thought. > > > > It's a Netgear "green" switch, model GS105E. It has no way to disable 802.3az. > > The linux jmebp-1.0.8.5 driver from the JMicron website > > ftp://driver.jmicron.com.tw/Ethernet/Linux/jmebp-1.0.8.5.tar.bz > > provides a workaround for the issue. It adds the delay_time module parameter, which causes the network card to attempt a fall back to 100 mbps after it cannot connect for several seconds (by default 11). With this, link detection “works”, but the connection is 100Mbps. This is likely the reason the "problem didn't seem to occur with the bundled Linux distro.” > I recall the workaround was suggested by the Vendor but I didn't incorporate it into the driver due to other reasons. The end result is the same if users can manually reduce the speed to 100Mbps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 01:07:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC59E83 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4A8887 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id u20so413428oif.1 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:07:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=Cg60ckZuHaI+olUuHxarSEaG6jlXUPV+staFa5rZHgo=; b=kttJ5DtFmWRA+EI6+nH9Z2jz5RFPMIbyDRCMwF5qgD5OO27/1Ryv7n9k/Alwxl/edI yqMKvTamg0KLNmUpDHOGvpYVLcWWep9G+e0DCwZdE3oFaQGO5Nrm4w9plteylBQ0sEfX nD+vIc6YfqpK+yfxCxe+DfOGz8/xxL/9gX9qq1XUPIPwNcvW/TkskaC3+D9EdxUQzeBL VJshavIm/246QSX/YwJoT3HX4TuM2k2CQCh9ohR2jGyrhTlxwZEw2ggQa3sj50ItDney YygDlMlOop1cMlNhQdrU1dX5hMqnvNs+qsqiyOyssxYNGa3/UD9GJ005cyDBPxNjHLSy x4QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk+Nmaw/7UHR/4/iS5MyTaFSWQg8/moh8TipHqeDjVmz4CF6v0DdE8DBAUNRzK2BZpu7JYX X-Received: by 10.60.92.133 with SMTP id cm5mr22848228oeb.12.1410915560639; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2610:160:11:33:3499:d385:ded3:267c? ([2610:160:11:33:3499:d385:ded3:267c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm9776319oec.14.2014.09.16.17.59.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1974.6\)) Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... From: Jim Thompson In-Reply-To: <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:59:18 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <27534E06-CC9B-4A4D-8A7A-9C68ECB760BC@netgate.com> References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> To: Brett Glass X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1974.6) Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:07:25 -0000 > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote: >=20 > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: >=20 >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: >>=20 >>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and >>> because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs >>> I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? >>=20 >> The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the = IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller will not = be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable 802.3az on that = port, if you can. Just a thought. >=20 > It's a Netgear "green" switch, model GS105E. It has no way to disable = 802.3az. The linux jmebp-1.0.8.5 driver from the JMicron website=20 ftp://driver.jmicron.com.tw/Ethernet/Linux/jmebp-1.0.8.5.tar.bz provides a workaround for the issue. It adds the delay_time module = parameter, which causes the network card to attempt a fall back to 100 = mbps after it cannot connect for several seconds (by default 11). With = this, link detection =E2=80=9Cworks=E2=80=9D, but the connection is = 100Mbps. This is likely the reason the "problem didn't seem to occur = with the bundled Linux distro.=E2=80=9D Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 01:14:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623B7F78; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB51944; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01358; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:14:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201409170114.TAA01358@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:14:32 -0600 To: pyunyh@gmail.com From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... In-Reply-To: <20140917005753.GA1102@michelle.fasterthan.com> References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> <20140917005753.GA1102@michelle.fasterthan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:14:49 -0000 At 06:57 PM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >Then, probably the only available option to establish a link against >the switch would be using reduced speed(100Mbps) with ifconfig(8). >If you can't reduce the speed due to other reasons I'm afraid there >is no way to establish a link at this moment. As I said in previous >mail, did you check what resolved speed Linux shows? I exorcised Linux from the router and replaced it with a little red daemon. ;-) The system has no CD-ROM, but perhaps I can scrounge a USB CD-ROM drive and a live system CD to boot from. >Also it would be good idea to know whether you're really seeing the >PHY hardware issue or not. Directly connect the jme(4) to other >box without switch and see whether jme(4) can establish a 1000baseT >link. Will have to try this as well. In the future, though, I will be wary of buying ANYTHING with hardware from JMicron in it. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 01:15:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4274D117 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-057.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E66E4959 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i7-quad-PC.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-142.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.142]) by mail.computinginnovations.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8H1FIq5016322; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:15:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20140915182105.05448848@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:31:14 -0500 To: User questions , User questions From: Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Convert system to FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20140914115150.1adb766c@scorpio> References: <20140914115150.1adb766c@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140916-1, 09/16/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-computinginnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-computinginnovations-MailScanner-ID: s8H1FIq5016322 X-computinginnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-computinginnovations-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.069, required 6, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 1.34, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 1.62, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, T_REMOTE_IMAGE 0.01) X-computinginnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:15:35 -0000 At 10:51 AM 9/14/2014, Jerry wrote: >Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:47:55 -0400 > >=EF=BB=BFI have a chance to get an HP Envy with 32.0 GB memory, 64-bit sys= tem >with an >Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz. I can get the unit for free at >a fire sale (long story). It is using the Intel=C2=AE Rapid Storage Techno= logy >software with RAID 5 with three 1,863 GB HDs. This is currently being run = on >a Win-8.1 system. > >If I wanted to turn this into a FreeBSD machine, and I am not even sure if >all of the hardware in this unit is supported by FreeBSD, how would I go >about duplicating this setup? Obviously, the Intel software would not work >under FreeBSD. What would/could I use to replace it with the same >functionality? > >-- >Jerry Jerry, The Intel raid is really software raid, and should work fine with FreeBSD. What I would do is: Boot the system to the point it offers the Intel RAID console, usually ctrl-i enters the console. Delete the existing array Create a new array, even if it is the same drives and RAID type. This ensure new meta data on the physical disks and marks them as unused/blank. Boot FreeBSD installation CD/DVD/USB and start the installation. You'll know right-away if it detects the Intel RAID, and can write the new system= =20 to it. -Derek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protec= tion is active. http://www.avast.com --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 01:50:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE233772 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B84CBF8 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8H1o4L0064237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:50:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8H1o4DQ064234; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:50:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:50:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Brandon Schneider Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. In-Reply-To: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> Message-ID: References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:50:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:50:07 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brandon Schneider wrote: > Hello everyone, a FreeBSD newbie here. I have my server set up with 8 jails > or so, and I have been trying to figure out how to get an email when there > are out of date applications installed in a jail. I currently have jailaudit > installed, but it seems like "pkg version -vIL\= would serve the purpose on > the host, but I'm not sure. I'm sure this is a common question, but I cannot > seem to find an answer on Google. The jails are a mix of packages and ports > if that makes much difference. I also use portmaster for the ports. That will not work as-is. It will only look at the host's package database. To check the jails, see the pkg-version(8) man page about the PKG_DBDIR environment variable. Set that to the jail's package database directory, like /usr/jails/myjail/var/db/pkg, and then pkg-version will check the jail's packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 02:05:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B7FAF1 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.blackhelicopters.org (mail.michaelwlucas.com [108.61.84.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B9CD69 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.blackhelicopters.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8H24pCM011824 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:04:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@mail.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by mail.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s8H24pUl011823 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:04:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:04:51 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.2/amd64 silent reboot when I run sa-update or spamd Message-ID: <20140917020450.GA11798@mail.blackhelicopters.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:05:02 -0000 Hi, I have a FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 server running DirectAdmin and ZFS, on KVM virtualization. SpamAssassin makes this machine reboot silently: no panic message, no core dumps, no console messages, no nothing. I'm at my wits end with this thing. After several hours of debugging, I'm giving up and pleading for help. The only useful thing I've seen is from sa-update. When I run "sa-update -D" (debugging mode), the machine consistently reboots here. I've always understood that a userland program should not be able to panic/crash/reboot the system. And yet, it's happening. Silently. Any suggestions, folks? Thanks, ==ml ... Sep 16 20:59:16.277 [1771] dbg: timing: total 350 ms - init: 344 (98.3%), parse: 0.98 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 1.89 (0.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.96 (0.3%) Sep 16 20:59:16.277 [1771] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader=HASH(0x8082f1258) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0 Sep 16 20:59:16.277 [1771] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check=HASH(0x80905e738) implements 'finish_tests', priority 0 Sep 16 20:59:16.278 [1771] dbg: generic: lint check of site pre files succeeded, continuing with channel updates Sep 16 20:59:16.278 [1771] dbg: channel: protocol family available: inet,inet6 Sep 16 20:59:16.278 [1771] dbg: channel: reading MIRRORED.BY file /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY Sep 16 20:59:16.279 [1771] dbg: channel: parsing MIRRORED.BY file for channel updates.spamassassin.org Sep 16 20:59:16.279 [1771] dbg: channel: found mirror http://sa-update.dnswl.org/ weight=1 Sep 16 20:59:16.279 [1771] dbg: channel: selected mirror http://sa-update.dnswl.org Sep 16 20:59:16.279 [1771] dbg: http: url: http://sa-update.dnswl.org/1624971.tar.gz Sep 16 20:59:16.279 [1771] dbg: http: downloading to: /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/1624971.tar.gz, update Sep 16 20:59:16.280 [1771] dbg: util: executable for curl was found at /usr/local/bin/curl Sep 16 20:59:16.280 [1771] dbg: http: /usr/local/bin/curl -s -L -O --remote-time -g --max-redirs 2 --connect-timeout 30 --max-time 300 --fail -o 1624971.tar.gz -z 1624971.tar.gz -- http://sa-update.dnswl.org/1624971.tar.gz -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 02:11:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 602F2C62 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com [17.172.81.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3138DE2D for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (66-216-230-25.dhcp.stcd.mn.charter.com [66.216.230.25]) by st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC000CKITYPA960@st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:11:16 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-16_06:2014-09-16,2014-09-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409170009 Message-id: <5418DFDC.6070507@icloud.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:11:56 -0500 From: Brandon Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> <5418CEDB.1000001@my.hennepintech.edu> <5418D37A.4000705@icloud.com> <5418D7DB.1000105@my.hennepintech.edu> In-reply-to: <5418D7DB.1000105@my.hennepintech.edu> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:11:26 -0000 Correct, I hit the wrong button, sorry about that :) Thanks for the links, I have one more question. I have been trying to have "pkg updating" sent along with my email so I can properly update things when it comes time, but I'm having difficulty with grep. If I do a "pkg updating | grep 2014" , I only get the date and a link. If I do a "grep -A 20 2014" it obviously includes 20 lines, but that may or may not work for every update entry. I'm not very experienced with grep, so how would I have it match only 2014 entries, or even just have pkg only show recent entries and skip the older ones entirely. It seems counter-intuitive to include every update entry a pkg may have ever had. Thanks! On 9/16/2014 7:37 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.16 19:19, Brandon Schneider wrote: >> That's actually a really great idea, I think when I have some time I >> will explore that. Any links to quickly get me up and running with >> documentation? Is the HandBook enough? > The handbook won't cover it in detail since it's not part of base, but there is > a nice tutorial here: http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/poudriere > It also comes with good man pages, of course. > > Learning about periodic(8) (from both the man pages and reading through > /etc/defaults/periodic.conf) would also be a good idea. There is a weekly task > that checks for out-of-date packages. > > > I CC'd the list since I assume you meant to reply to it and not just me directly. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 02:24:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39BFBDC0 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20058EF1 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0160460357D1; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:27 -0700 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:24:29 -0000 --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I just upgraded STABLE: FreeBSD home.parts-unknown.org 10.1-BETA1 FreeBSD 10.1-BETA1 #0 r271662: Mo= n Sep 15 22:54:02 PDT 2014 root@home.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src= /sys/GENERIC amd64 And I've mostly gotten through updating the ports. I've been using mate as a desktop environment/window manager. But mate-session no longer exists. The pkg-message just refers to http://www.freebsd.org/gnome, which is not even relevant. Looking at /usr/ports/UPDATING, there's no mention of mate going back to May. So, ummm, I'm a little mystified. How does one start mate nowadays? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUGPDbAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr0mcQAK8Cf7g487zdgQDIQ8+L3Pv9 nHJsoyvyzV4CHkw4FDjPJ+kxqVAx0GIuMZ8SQiGPCebDhXj+Fh6dTqczdFDrwcrV +vZrvsQjqb18c8cBDP1yuGJJTohR1A/j/RXsJm4PoGK1CAYnrFSEn0Jm/+8mqy+l nJwh1nuUQO9UBOeBQQQgS/9qYzLMTis3thR23kLItnFwHaXf1Tc6i6JZeNiVtvVR 9tIXg6bBVC3KbIju4NaKpXTD7T2zfVzh0hnWDLeqN9fhnK4V7tNqSqOxlgGTaMUd 7QP0nzv+aSxXYpJxG1ozqyugb8oN9sMfSAopvlMsiN/3mnLKz2PifRhGMQKliY7e gL3v16+oRuz1mH87xUPX2Z2pjuYIVNxB5107T2UC3qAGv3DUMgIHDtkhH0B6bwtn MgKKyCabso00gVuIqbGD/zMsVYWO2BPkR9wFqv1Gzg3Ka1WzuqSKRDjBP/CQyrIG J1n5/LFdJB8ITpz4ajYs8fgoTdMg/MPFtiXS05Fjg9sntgV5CgS4t+K300U8cCG1 6oLol89I7esKZPS1VWsykKWhtkzR4A1ifUDYvVZvDdA6+VkBPeU7iq4L86juAhwb XqSbqTW5UZDgC9Z3gwoF7E2WSu2AFAemGHR7+Bn9jo2AKYofa7PhKQHmjW6r1HeJ zQ6WM9WRdrS+vBE2ecuv =WIt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 02:48:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646965B7 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1630418E for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CD3EF60357D1; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:48:42 -0700 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:48:46 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again, A little progress.... On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:24:27PM -0700, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > So, ummm, I'm a little mystified. How does one start mate nowadays? >=20 I found the mate-session-manager port, which gave me mate-session back. But I'm missing key features. The entire window management bit seems to be missing. I don't have title bars to grab windows and move them around. I cannot minimize or maximize windows. It seems like everything else is present. The background appears and all the autostart jobs start up. So I'm still missing a piece. --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUGPaKAAoJEBV64x4SNmArzKMP+wcZNnk+drZz4npw02uuFodf KOibXjYnIckiOW1fKm1ZblEFrtPpv5rlULyZVxXAgmv9jIjoOrppqOs/+dZltQMl elbhnb4ITCTU1twJqLf1I8M0gFlHf6QGFMwTW8k+d5NFPOR0D1ay/ms3BDOgjEUs bCySFdGcdIZ6VFlnJQ5xFSW+Yaqit88uNTMyNRsp5CHgnNv+AR6p3GnJ0krxnOxN tvoJi0YrZQFNjjjToCJZN184Ltl26Cr0Y6w5dzJ/BMuTAawBPQo+ITP0zR5bvWA/ ROLotOPU8b7hP3er4557C3bhSecNrLJjHGXCpF/oyplK/i9G03y/ON3FWSeoZXZu LUIBi2ntKaq3riax4i8wm9KyFXp4C3xNvlBVofhAsnvVa3i0BGU+VmBspKKzcuyB mXrpDyorphF3OZ8i3Bn4UxYpmerod83/bn3GqI1wXgcqB1Qdb/p5vySiTj1DMeLW MVMpbA5pDzEDWUDoRnBmaD+y0sqrrT3wEj353zQbbKd3xPVkcQSBPgcSQaF/ReKK S1eCD9uObbMXYycSO0lUZMx6XSrlPZmUGNsl9cm5MoYgYI2A/XSXBHDSw5ui1YI7 4b3/nDC3YFTnFCa9iWeHhX/Ez750QVnG1cjY8WYe/5zqdUlMWDKYl0SqlDiNxyiK /aJA0rCMkePuB66G8KRu =fd3C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 03:07:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55919A9F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0609360E for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s8H37JUC093241 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:07:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5418FAE7.8000303@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:07:19 -0600 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: freebsd-update install failure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:07:20 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:07:23 -0000 On a 9.2-RELEASE system, just did a freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install and got: Installing updates...ln: ///usr/sbin/lwresd: no such file or directory done Does one need to do a rollback, or is it safe to assume everything was backed out properly? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 03:46:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4527087F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.172.81.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17079A80 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (66-216-230-25.dhcp.stcd.mn.charter.com [66.216.230.25]) by st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC0002QQYDDFK60@st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:46:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-17_01:2014-09-16,2014-09-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409170015 Message-id: <5418F62C.4090707@icloud.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:47:08 -0500 From: Brandon Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:46:35 -0000 Thanks, I actually found out that pkg -j JAILID or JAILNAME then version -vIL]= works as well! On 9/16/2014 8:50 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brandon Schneider wrote: > >> Hello everyone, a FreeBSD newbie here. I have my server set up with 8 >> jails or so, and I have been trying to figure out how to get an email >> when there are out of date applications installed in a jail. I >> currently have jailaudit installed, but it seems like "pkg version >> -vIL\= would serve the purpose on the host, but I'm not sure. I'm >> sure this is a common question, but I cannot seem to find an answer >> on Google. The jails are a mix of packages and ports if that makes >> much difference. I also use portmaster for the ports. > > That will not work as-is. It will only look at the host's package > database. To check the jails, see the pkg-version(8) man page about > the PKG_DBDIR environment variable. Set that to the jail's package > database directory, like /usr/jails/myjail/var/db/pkg, and then > pkg-version will check the jail's packages. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 04:09:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4974B9 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72163D28 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hySJm4s8jz10W; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:38 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: John Case , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:09:41 -0000 --As of September 15, 2014 7:09:46 PM +0000, John Case is alleged to have said: >> Key based auth is definitely the better choice out of those two. > > > Ok, agreed. > > However, just out of curiousity - let's pretend that sshd *did* allow you > to use both an SSH key and a UNIX password at the same time ... would > that be more or less secure than using an SSH key with a built-in > passphrase ? --As for the rest, it is mine. Lots of variables there: How does sshd store the password? (Does it use the system's user password? How are you storing that?) Can you *require* using a password with a SSH key? How does the SSH key store the password? etc. On a basic level, at that point you need both something you have (the SSH key) and something you know (the password). The two pieces are the same in both cases, so the security comes down to implementations - and since one isn't implemented, we can't compare implementations. ;) Chuck mentioned that the storage for passwords with private keys isn't super great, so if it used the system's user password that should be better - because there's been a lot of work on storing those securely. BTW: Since a couple of people have pointed to Google's two-factor system, I thought I'd point to my current favorite: Yubikey[1]. There's a PAM module, so it can be set up moderately easily. (I'll admit I haven't tried: I mostly rely on physical security for my main network...) Daniel T. Staal [1]: --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 06:18:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E46B4A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41346B8B for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id h15so688864igd.10 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:18:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sFQ1qkcG6S348Gx7ygsp6OXrvzw+h6VNusTX0Abhpfs=; b=Y1nLApDoPWLpF6MNIIYohU0EdOijaaOk4QauwfaKCT27HPg7M5mOAynvL0jJDf9x3o XA3NFqtajsXwTO+HtNKT5qpHnytNzzGfvLAnZ2rC1RjjvmdB3nwFQfbLz0QtUi9K//RW N4lIt14S2AgAqGGNgRfX9KNDpIobziH+hC0nirLOD0dQGB6r+CycxwMa/CJZSvNZMkKt GJiVMu8Lwzk3RmVglRMEISzuin22qBNCL4GeZoTkBa3xv4mATwh0+d9qFizB5cTO6O7G e+XkgGj9jKUwym8WK8xOngTICNn7c8GZQll+p9G07pubm6mIlLDvTlWOMMwI62r6LL4v vmLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.138.1 with SMTP id iq1mr3375243icc.11.1410934726317; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.156.143 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:18:46 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KVt8P1EPkka76Km3Z9Dnh0c9OAc Message-ID: Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... From: Olivier Nicole To: Daniel Staal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: John Case , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:18:47 -0000 Hi, On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Staal wrote: > --As of September 15, 2014 7:09:46 PM +0000, John Case is alleged to have > said: > >>> Key based auth is definitely the better choice out of those two. >> >> >> >> Ok, agreed. >> >> However, just out of curiousity - let's pretend that sshd *did* allow you >> to use both an SSH key and a UNIX password at the same time ... would >> that be more or less secure than using an SSH key with a built-in >> passphrase ? > > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > Lots of variables there: How does sshd store the password? (Does it use the > system's user password? How are you storing that?) Can you *require* using > a password with a SSH key? How does the SSH key store the password? etc. > > On a basic level, at that point you need both something you have (the SSH > key) and something you know (the password). The two pieces are the same in > both cases, so the security comes down to implementations - and since one > isn't implemented, we can't compare implementations. ;) Chuck mentioned > that the storage for passwords with private keys isn't super great, so if it > used the system's user password that should be better - because there's been > a lot of work on storing those securely. Is the password for the private key actually stored in the key? That sounds odd to me. I'd better see the password being used to encode/decode the private key, so no need for storage of the password, if you provide the wrong password, you decode the private key into something that is not working, done. Best regards, olivier > > BTW: Since a couple of people have pointed to Google's two-factor system, I > thought I'd point to my current favorite: Yubikey[1]. There's a PAM module, > so it can be set up moderately easily. (I'll admit I haven't tried: I > mostly rely on physical security for my main network...) > > Daniel T. Staal > > [1]: > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you > are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use > the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will > expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, > whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of > local copyright law. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 06:26:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33965E98 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0085C72 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8H6PkQT033581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:25:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8H6PkQT033581 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8H6PkQT033581; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54192961.6010906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:25:37 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Case , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: comparing SSH key and passphrase auth vs. an SSH key *with* a passphrase ... References: <08D7B04D-CBBF-4330-BAD6-2668F9560964@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rr6DRR5veK6EfLB4koGIe3aR0ahQFjdAt" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:26:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Rr6DRR5veK6EfLB4koGIe3aR0ahQFjdAt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/09/2014 20:09, John Case wrote: >> Key based auth is definitely the better choice out of those two. > However, just out of curiousity - let's pretend that sshd *did* allow > you to use both an SSH key and a UNIX password at the same time ... > would that be more or less secure than using an SSH key with a built-in= > passphrase ? That's just like sprinkling sugar on top of honey: it doesn't really achieve anything. You've got maybe 2048 bits of SSH key and you want to add of the order of a hundred bits of password on top of that? It would be better to just use a bigger SSH key. If you are so concerned about security and you need something more than what ssh-key based auth can provide, then look into one-time password style things -- which includes all sorts of hardware tokens -- or kerberos / gssapi setups -- which use cryptographic methods vaguely similar to SSH keys, but store the sensitive keying material in a way that makes it much less likely to be compromised. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --Rr6DRR5veK6EfLB4koGIe3aR0ahQFjdAt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUGSlpXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATi0IP/jnknssds7F96c3GZlHZBjFf r3T3XJDygi/QpkJYm7KLHgL45qMBTKyNxVJJb8DfbpGfCoQ53rx/TVBiUtmaBIok 9Ijt+PJZ+7QzzHgzPFSJ9tU4FzbtBtdFW31mxn435EZVAu8V+RpVdRWC2kvJK3Zq O9j/Ih/A/tnO4kXvK68K7GTxBgPUak2ZkL3YQWkTi+WU+ud70e6Oey8babQIA0BX km1JhbXBWCBEraLOBjUb+1K5DbdAIHMsDU/AdFak9qbJL+JBjIQXCNvx7sJIW7RH GubmvkuN7fE3n8Iqx6CNGlzwrzziAA5GSkmwp3aDcy/oqEXLdcajGdynW0wu3I/G zy5eoxYHsXQMHEkskyk0LH1pGjh8B8g+Cb9zL4mTn80wlGgUQ9dwEhz3TXl6uUHc 6Pu/rqk8TcTqg8vE+enBNlo/HoCIB1+oRBtBpqbGLBKTe/2kOg828V3VMPIlaoOU 5JYjOvstCYFCFhcsvc32ws5YG6EAT4Z0SwQL75fE25rgqLYu0t/9CPSJIusDb/ZZ Y8SqbkMz71aOqazh6bVt+OWg/M1WkCkO+AKkob6AUussdjZkqaWSwcOjfXLaG6/x WTAZ8ll62Quc5NSfC/t/es6FTIZ+186Ll7lduX1GqBHG+6D1LoTn4ntO+uSau3VA FvXtdVquqPkSDcLJNMWL =6ePo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rr6DRR5veK6EfLB4koGIe3aR0ahQFjdAt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 07:22:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DB09270 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39222A6 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8H7MjdB028834; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:22:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:22:45 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= , "'Warren Block'" , "'William A. Mahaffey III'" Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:22:57 -0000 On 16/09/2014 22:33, Radek Krejča wrote: >> The amount of time people are willing to invest in "saving time" with >> packages is interesting. In many cases, they could have built from >> ports and been done quicker overall, or at least with less user >> involvement. > > Chmm. I like packages, because of saving time and should be safe for using > on production servers - thats my idea. But now I am not able to use it, > because a lot of packages are not working, as on the top of this thread > described. > > And this is complication for me - I rely on packages on production servers, > where saving time is very important. Yes, I can create own repository and > manage own packages but I like this idea. But this idea is not working for > some weeks. Unhappy situation. Using poudriere to build your own repo is *very* easy and lets you build only the packages you need (so is quicker than waiting the four-ish days that the main repository takes to build everything), with the options you want. It will probably take a day or two at most, depending on how many packages you need, which has to be better than "not working for weeks". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 07:38:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783FD752 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D89B604 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8H7cVXf028856; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:38:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54193A77.1060508@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:38:31 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jos Chrispijn , Coert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jamie Griffin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:38:35 -0000 On 16/09/2014 21:25, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Coert: >> Upgraded to version 1.3.7, was on an older one indeed. Was running >> 1.2.4_1 Still having issues though, for now I just stick to release/0 >> and pkg version 1.2.4_1 Going to try an upgrade later > I really don't know why pkg should be used in this stage. I seldom have > seen so much negative side effects with using a program as with this one. > Is the program not tested thouroughly or am I just too stupid to > understand? Last time I used it, my complete php port system got damaged > and had to reinstall BSD from scratch in order to get my active ports in > line again. What you're seeing all comes from people who are having problems with pkg. Those of us for whom it just works generally don't bother saying anything. I was a relatively early adopter of pkg and have had exactly one problem, which was caused by forgetting to read /usr/ports/UPDATING first. > Please understand that writing this is no offence to the author of pkg; > I really respect all effort that is put in it - I just don't understand > why it causes me/us so much trouble using it. > Have you tried building your own repository? That would avoid potential version discrepancies between ports and the main repo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:01:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC10D10 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEE393E for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:01:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIIAM0+GVRR8YDT/2dsb2JhbABggw2BKtBkBAIBgRYXAXmEBAEBBDocIxALGAklDyoeBhOIQgG9UgEXj0sHhEsBBJ0JlUeDYDsvgkoBAQE Received: from 211.128-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.128.211]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 10:01:44 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8H81gfx001248; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:01:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:01:42 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: David Benfell Subject: Re: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917100142.5c0ffcad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:01:53 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:48:42 -0700 David Benfell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:24:27PM -0700, David Benfell wrote: >> So, ummm, I'm a little mystified. How does one start mate nowadays? > > I found the mate-session-manager port, which gave me mate-session > back. But I'm missing key features. > > The entire window management bit seems to be missing. I don't have > title bars to grab windows and move them around. I cannot minimize or > maximize windows. > > It seems like everything else is present. The background appears and > all the autostart jobs start up. > > So I'm still missing a piece. Install at least x11/mate-base. It contains the minimum requirements. If you want all applications install x11/mate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:13:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB873F6E for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB1EA42 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id s8AW1o002516WCc018AXLJ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:31 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OOap3EqB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=PBtdaOD29JoA:10 a=fkWdccH4ymcA:10 a=YB-CUvwKhq0A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=cWJIuAPcOo0uAVcL12gA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=nuwhdmuH2wMA:10 a=Asey9UKIWNwA:10 a=Zqad_YyiuvUA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XUAJp-0001Fg-5l; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:29 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4177392.K19bvXC3F9@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5418DFDC.6070507@icloud.com> References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> <5418D7DB.1000105@my.hennepintech.edu> <5418DFDC.6070507@icloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Cc: Brandon Schneider X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:13:41 -0000 On Tuesday 16 Sep 2014 20:11:56 Brandon Schneider wrote: > so how would > I have it match only 2014 entries, or even just have pkg only show > recent entries and skip the older ones entirely. Let pkg updating sort out the dates for you instead of using grep. For example this will show all entries newer than 1 August 2014: pkg updating -d 20140801 See man pkg-updating for full details of all the options. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:50:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646FCB2F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23267E4D for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.138.215] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUAwR-0005mF-7P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:50:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:50:23 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.215 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:50:33 -0000 El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 08:22:45AM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > > Using poudriere to build your own repo is *very* easy and lets you build > only the packages you need (so is quicker than waiting the four-ish days > that the main repository takes to build everything), with the options > you want. I can ACK this. I started in August with poudriere and pkg (before I was used to use the ports tree directly to creat some 1200 pkg_* packages for my farm of laptops/netbook. Ones you have the pieces together and the poudriere server setup, all is very easy and works as it should. The only thing I could not manage until now, was setting up a webserver to monitor the progress of the running poudriere jail. Do you have a small howto for this? I have nginx installed in the host, but can not get the dynamic movie into the browser firefox. Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:52:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB19BF7 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B1FE7B for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:32 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= To: 'Arthur Chance' , 'Warren Block' , "'William A. Mahaffey III'" Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:30 +0200 Subject: RE: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Topic: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Index: Ac/SSDcedR9RGfsRTYi+F1xmM1T63QAC/eCw Message-ID: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:52:36 -0000 SGksDQoNCj4gDQo+IEl0IHdpbGwgcHJvYmFibHkgdGFrZSBhIGRheSBvciB0d28gYXQgbW9zdCwg ZGVwZW5kaW5nIG9uIGhvdyBtYW55DQo+IHBhY2thZ2VzIHlvdSBuZWVkLCB3aGljaCBoYXMgdG8g YmUgYmV0dGVyIHRoYW4gIm5vdCB3b3JraW5nIGZvciB3ZWVrcyIuDQoNCk9mIGNvdXJzZSwgSSBh bSBub3Qgd2FpdGluZywgSSB1c2VkIHBvcnRzLg0KQnV0IGl0cyBuaWNlIHRvIGhhdmUgcG9ydHMg bGlrZSBsaWJyZW9mZmljZSBidWlsZGVkIGFuZCBvbmx5IGRvd25sb2FkIGl0LiBCdWlsZGluZyB0 YWtlcyBhIGxvdCBvZiB0aW1lIGFuZCB0aGlzIHBvcnQgaXMgdXNlZCBvbmx5IG9uIG9uZSBQQy4N ClNvIEkgd3JvdGUgdW5oYXBweSBzaXR1YXRpb24sIG5vdCBjcml0aWNhbCA7KQ0KUmFkZWsNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:55:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32D3CEF; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8117EB0; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 19E0660357F3; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:55:21 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: SOLVED: Re: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917085521.GA29522@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917100142.5c0ffcad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140917100142.5c0ffcad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:55:27 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:01:42AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >=20 > Install at least x11/mate-base. It contains the minimum requirements. > If you want all applications install x11/mate. Apparently x11/mate does not depend on x11/mate-base. I had the former installed but not the latter. Installing mate-base seems to have solved the problem. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUGUx4AAoJEBV64x4SNmArFMIP/1n9fio00S0LNe+RA0nONI7j /y5Z7fqXen7u98y7LAv1f0DAZ4IOawJai8+2PE0toUlm20NYm0Leliv0nEQxVRi5 2ivyH7b46RMfl/64rbe9l3gIIPdw9zaflJZtzwV0jFN8D9cKupnv+NrjZwkezuBG DNQ9owh6R7uWZTXdDStmLDrOBgr1YbVU2aZ95QckN88AnhsFH77M56uujnz0TS0i 3CL7KfJnxI9u7t7v7TYQnBmdezcld4s7v7qiWov29qCcClOtxwz86dqJBSfoje48 JTQi0v9uuImVfTqWTzgL22aRTSVWMTamUwbk0oDFybjxt72UQcItLgXR5v1hvl1U amQ6xs6Ezmzuw4Y+0aeSzl2ZwwLJEiVVyiyH0616WBIZcZi39CRvHNqepqBIntfg TOyJSyzvMon6DfP/AmlnqWxLIo0xLK+Kww5JHNKOBR3e6Jl//NcgnZgSTE8D54OL 1kuTSo0YqPFEYet6aSncl9rMzuLVYAwH4oxo/qp5qrEyWFrjFqT+30qhW7Ii2D0D vWtulz2MHymCTL/TrCvKkxFP2L6Yjz4sonOgtVluVYSUaTM4M/+BGkn/IjpZlCz4 6DWWQRdSbCCENbN51UqXBhsvStW42xdLHYgKldzY6Q48K7Ag2f3nLhJHT8tF5opu EigRHj8PIFo+MgpvG5BO =Vjfw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 08:57:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E127DEF for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.172.81.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF0AEDB for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (66-216-230-25.dhcp.stcd.mn.charter.com [66.216.230.25]) by st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC100LLGFK44540@st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:41 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-17_03:2014-09-16,2014-09-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409170079 Message-id: <54194D2F.5090805@icloud.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:58:23 -0500 From: Brandon Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to have jails checked for out of date applications. References: <5418BD41.4020602@icloud.com> <5418D7DB.1000105@my.hennepintech.edu> <5418DFDC.6070507@icloud.com> <4177392.K19bvXC3F9@curlew.lan> In-reply-to: <4177392.K19bvXC3F9@curlew.lan> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:43 -0000 That is fantastic! Thank you Mike, I will do that. It just seems like every day I learn another amazing thing pkg can do. It is a great utility. On 9/17/2014 3:10 AM, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Tuesday 16 Sep 2014 20:11:56 Brandon Schneider wrote: > >> so how would >> I have it match only 2014 entries, or even just have pkg only show >> recent entries and skip the older ones entirely. > Let pkg updating sort out the dates for you instead of using grep. > > For example this will show all entries newer than 1 August 2014: > > pkg updating -d 20140801 > > See man pkg-updating for full details of all the options. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:04:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CF4FD2 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbox.is.co.za (mailbox.is.co.za [196.35.45.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0E7FAF for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:04:43 +0000 (UTC) X-AuthUser: vikashb@where-ever.za.net Received: from laptop.where-ever.za.net ([196.35.45.20]:51816) by mailbox.is.co.za with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <5419479E.10309@where-ever.za.net> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:34:38 +0200 From: Vikash Badal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: X blank screen with NVIDIA Quadro K1100M on FreeBSD 10.1-BETA1 #26 r271693 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:04:45 -0000 Greetings Can someone provide assistance ? X starts up with a black ( blank ) screen /var/log/Xorg.0.log ======================= [ 2140.756] (II) Module ABI versions: [ 2140.756] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [ 2140.756] X.Org Video Driver: 12.1 [ 2140.756] X.Org XInput driver : 16.0 [ 2140.756] X.Org Server Extension : 6.0 [ 2140.756] (--) PCI:*(0:0:2:0) 8086:0416:1028:060d rev 6, Mem @ 0xf7400000/4194304, 0xd0000000/268435456, I/O @ 0x0000f000/64, BIOS @ 0x????????/65536 [ 2140.756] (--) PCI: (0:2:0:0) 10de:0ff6:1028:060d rev 161, Mem @ 0xf6000000/16777216, 0xe0000000/268435456, 0xf0000000/33554432, I/O @ 0x0000e000/128 [ 2140.780] (WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support [ 2140.780] (**) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32 [ 2140.780] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888 [ 2140.780] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor [ 2140.780] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) [ 2140.780] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "UseEdidDpi" "FALSE" [ 2140.780] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "DPI" "96x96" [ 2140.820] (**) NVIDIA(0): Option "MetaModes" "DFP: 1920x1080 +0+0, CRT: 1920x1080 +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0, CRT: nvidia-auto-select +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto -select +0+0; DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0" [ 2140.821] (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU Quadro K1100M (GK107GL) at PCI:2:0:0 (GPU-0) [ 2140.974] (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 2097152 kBytes [ 2140.974] (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 80.07.b3.00.0c [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 16X [ 2140.974] (--) NVIDIA(0): Valid display device(s) on Quadro K1100M at PCI:2:0:0 [ 2140.974] (--) NVIDIA(0): none [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated MetaModes: [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA(0): "NULL" [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 640 x 480 [ 2140.974] (**) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (96, 96); computed from "DPI" X config option [ 2140.974] (WW) NVIDIA(0): UBB is incompatible with the Composite extension. Disabling [ 2140.974] (WW) NVIDIA(0): UBB. [ 2140.974] (--) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA: Reserving 3072.00 MB of virtual memory for indirect memory [ 2140.974] (II) NVIDIA: access. [ 2140.977] (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "NULL" [ 2140.977] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initiate mode change. [ 2140.977] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to complete mode change [ 2140.986] (II) NVIDIA(0): Built-in logo is bigger than the screen. pciconfig -lv vgapci0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x030200 card=0x060d1028 chip=0x0ff610de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' class = display subclass = 3D There is no option to disable the optimus in the bios Is there a way do disable from commandline or /boot/loader.conf or sysctl ? Thanks Vikash From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:05:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4ECED for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0DFC0 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIIAOZMGVRR8YDT/2dsb2JhbABggw2BKtBpBAIBgRgXAXmEBAEBBDocIxALGAklDyoeBhOIQgG9aRiPSweESwEEnQmVR4NgOy+CSgEBAQ Received: from 211.128-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.128.211]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 11:05:24 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8H95Mrv003948; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:05:22 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: David Benfell Subject: Re: SOLVED: Re: What happened to mate? Message-ID: <20140917110522.08468cd3@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140917085521.GA29522@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20140917022427.GB19351@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917024842.GA33509@home.parts-unknown.org> <20140917100142.5c0ffcad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140917085521.GA29522@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:05:32 -0000 On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:55:21 -0700 David Benfell wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:01:42AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Install at least x11/mate-base. It contains the minimum requirements. >> If you want all applications install x11/mate. > > Apparently x11/mate does not depend on x11/mate-base. I had the former > installed but not the latter. Installing mate-base seems to have > solved the problem. Hmm, x11/mate does depend on x11/mate-base. It may be best to remove it and then reinstall it, in case any other components are missing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:06:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D6617E; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC36FD6; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m8so831517obr.13 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C4RLhy3lJ0oCf3Wsy/xoCde7OEDehT06yYo+/TWPzhc=; b=sxg8XTlNWm4IkG8SqH8M23v9G2Izkl8XyAIDByFKh0hrhf2MeNtgDGM/x+BmrUlHhV Vkkc7Ou77goJr3l65xb1RdXDLYgtBpkDwITFNxlEdJ9cYxZA8++dntwuzndktSZ/+0hb uwRBnCNIpjPr80W7JxMGnOl3tJmgipBkkn8NrR+X9KBP91/RgoQv8PVrcNEfGtYM6s+u Me9dXL2OuJ0+Amg4OmLtUT2ECfrx3ARl5/DYaP23YAvNOjgDn9TZogiohgwUaXpMsF4Y pHv4ngolQecExcfYBfZ6xQhiLRRnBDU+YMl2sP/mAktIBNwC2CosC4v18vgNQOj0UfuL 66vg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.177.161 with SMTP id cr1mr41705825oec.8.1410944796732; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.58.196 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:06:36 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xZAvrxEXj3KcXWnGNh-xTqz4Mf0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD and WiDi / Miracast / WiFi Direct HDMI streaming From: CeDeROM To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:06:37 -0000 On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:25 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > PTV3000 does not seems to work even with the stock Android/Nexus > (Streamcast) nor Windows 7 (Intel WiDi). > > I have ordered a Streamcast dongle from Google, lets give it a try :-) I have just received a Chromecast from Google dongle =) IT WORKS! Amazingly from start, on my old Nexus7, seems to work on OSX as well. Now time for FreeBSD :-) I think Chromecast would be the way to go.. Google must have it already implemented in open-source, it can stream sound so it could be also good alternative for Bluetooth A2DP.. and it cost only $35 :-) Best regards! :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:10:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD75445 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCA4136 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.138.215] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUBGF-00017S-1F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:10:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:10:50 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140917091050.GA1583@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.215 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:10:53 -0000 El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 10:52:30AM +0200, Radek Krejča escribió: > Hi, > > > > > It will probably take a day or two at most, depending on how many > > packages you need, which has to be better than "not working for weeks". ahh, and java/eclipse can't be built at the moment in poudriere; see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 09:14:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9A550A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x22d.google.com (mail-oa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD89B16A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i7so871580oag.18 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:14:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0B5ef9LXu4zA7CwAuaQuV1LKxE6hVzov2Z/qqBw4hdw=; b=ZdZKRbK9Vdc2lvgDwHj1+HmYJPMxZOe74M9A38w0GzOVD3kcWYYkAYpeIQj/mCzSeN UFWaxcbKVKo0TN+9NLeqg6AUnG1O7/IsNhmkSNdvjG7SoerqXtVtWkJVow2Ahwz6ruHb tIqevBrDKnZUY954ZZIbkFfkmgnDutkZpU9an7ReHrhbXGbu/pXAtoJaSLAYx/3uzEeM Xw2Lgj6X5CJz4Wf4zeMgXP3AqiTILkQ01zjbc5LhIvlOEKr561eD4zFYDSfLaYhvx9ua Za2ROlz4dTrm7qKrgfU0PcIC3HgohdC6GC6Kqp+8pnXHX4DnrxeoIhA5ig84oYyPUIFQ 9nDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.87.102 with SMTP id w6mr22963292obz.35.1410945272086; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.58.196 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:14:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140202184546.1aa51b6f@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140202184546.1aa51b6f@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:14:32 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WprHE1LqRHzHlTr_1A7TcsEsoP4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS From: CeDeROM To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:14:33 -0000 On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:45 PM, RW wrote: > In FreeBSD 10 the new fuse ntfs is much better than any previous ntfs > support. I use that for multimedia storage these days. So far it's > worked just fine on FreeBSD, Windows and my Samsung TV - I don't have > Linux but I doubt it's any worse. msdosfs may be more mature, but it's > still an accident waiting to happen. I have switched to a new laptop and did NTFS as data storage partition. For those few days I encountered several corruption incidents. NTFS3G/FUSE still seems not reliable for everyday work :-( I think porting UFS drivers for other OS, or better, porting a good UDF driver to FreeBSD seems a good idea :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 10:52:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64308A22 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D461AC88 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8HAq16D029150; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:52:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:52:01 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> In-Reply-To: <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:06 -0000 On 17/09/2014 09:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 08:22:45AM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > >> >> Using poudriere to build your own repo is *very* easy and lets you build >> only the packages you need (so is quicker than waiting the four-ish days >> that the main repository takes to build everything), with the options >> you want. > > I can ACK this. I started in August with poudriere and pkg (before I was > used to use the ports tree directly to creat some 1200 pkg_* packages > for my farm of laptops/netbook. > > Ones you have the pieces together and the poudriere server setup, all is > very easy and works as it should. > > The only thing I could not manage until now, was setting up a webserver > to monitor the progress of the running poudriere jail. Do you have a > small howto for this? I have nginx installed in the host, but can not > get the dynamic movie into the browser firefox. It's probably not the most elegant way of working, but this works for me. In my nginx.conf the poudriere related bits are location /pkgs/ { alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/; autoindex on; autoindex_exact_size off; autoindex_localtime on; } location /logs/ { alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/; index index.html; autoindex on; autoindex_exact_size off; autoindex_localtime on; default_type text/html; types { text/plain log; } } That's with poudriere's BASEFS=/usr/local/poudriere My repo URL is http://${HOST}/pkgs/${JAIL}-default and my URL for monitoring the build is http://${HOST}/logs/bulk/${JAIL}-default/latest/index.html where ${JAIL} is the poudriere jail I'm using. If you use -z SET for different options, replace "default" with ${SET}. You might want to add URL_BASE=file://${BASEFS}/data/logs or URL_BASE=http://${HOST}${BASEFS}/data/logs to your poudriere.conf as well, so it can give you helpful pointers on the build machine. Note there's no slash before ${BASEFS} in those URLs as it begins with one already. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 13:41:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA8AA29 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C597EE6 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.138.215] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUFUD-0003Xj-Et for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:41:33 +0200 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:41:33 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.215 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:41:37 -0000 El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 11:52:01AM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > It's probably not the most elegant way of working, but this works for > me. In my nginx.conf the poudriere related bits are > > location /pkgs/ { > alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/; > autoindex on; > autoindex_exact_size off; > autoindex_localtime on; > } > > location /logs/ { > alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/; > index index.html; > autoindex on; > autoindex_exact_size off; > autoindex_localtime on; > > default_type text/html; > types { > text/plain log; > } > } > > That's with poudriere's BASEFS=/usr/local/poudriere Thanks. Is this with a recent version of poudriere. The presentation of the logs has changed to use 'json'. See here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/internal/pkg.FreeBSD.org/PortmgrSetup As I said, I could not manage to get this to work until now. But, it is not so important, 'tail -f ...' does its job too :-) matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 14:53:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B45B326 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [192.99.32.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340B7923 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tds-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6663B39F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:53:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tds-solutions.net Received: from tds-solutions.net ([127.0.0.1]) by tds-solutions.net (tds-solutions.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFsFYB4a1OuH for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:53:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.224] (unknown [69.43.65.27]) (Authenticated sender: sorressean) by tds-solutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50EF83B38B for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:53:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5419A071.2080800@tysdomain.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:53:37 -0400 From: "Littlefield, Tyler" Reply-To: tyler@tysdomain.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: jails, IPS and firewalls, oh my! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:53:10 -0000 Hello all: I asked this question a while back and was a bit unclear how exactly to word what I want, so I'll try again now that I've spent time with this. My goal is to end up with separate systems. For example, I want to run a mailman setup on my server. Right now I already have postfix running as well as nginx in a jail and did not want to try to work around my current configuration. I wanted to set up a lists subdomain and point it at 1.2.3.4 which is assigned to my server and just treat that as a separate system. So, on the advice of others who know BSD a lot more than I do I tried a few things. Mainly I assigned the IP to a jail and tried to firewall it off. The IP address though still is being used by em0, which means that even if I open port 80 it will point to my main server and not the jail. I am looking for a solution where I can assign the jail an interface, assign that interface to an IP address and then just protect it through a firewall on the host system. I read about epairs, tap devices and etc, but I'm not sure exactly which would be the best solution. Any advice/examples or pointers would be awesome. TIA, -- Take care, Ty http://tds-solutions.net He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 14:57:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0754E9 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E57964 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8HEuwRU029557; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:56:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:56:58 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> In-Reply-To: <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:57:02 -0000 On 17/09/2014 14:41, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 11:52:01AM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > >> It's probably not the most elegant way of working, but this works for >> me. In my nginx.conf the poudriere related bits are >> >> location /pkgs/ { >> alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/; >> autoindex on; >> autoindex_exact_size off; >> autoindex_localtime on; >> } >> >> location /logs/ { >> alias /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/; >> index index.html; >> autoindex on; >> autoindex_exact_size off; >> autoindex_localtime on; >> >> default_type text/html; >> types { >> text/plain log; >> } >> } >> >> That's with poudriere's BASEFS=/usr/local/poudriere > > Thanks. Is this with a recent version of poudriere. The presentation of > the logs has changed to use 'json'. See here: root@arthur:1# poudriere version 3.0.17 I tend to upgrade at weekends, so haven't got yesterday's 3.0.18 version. > https://wiki.freebsd.org/internal/pkg.FreeBSD.org/PortmgrSetup My logs are plain text and I see nothing in that link that suggests they should be JSON. Are you sure that's the link you meant? It was last updated 2013-07-16 so wouldn't contain anything new. > As I said, I could not manage to get this to work until now. But, it is > not so important, 'tail -f ...' does its job too :-) Are you sure you're pointing your browser at the right place? The /logs/bulk/${JAIL}-default/latest/index.html page I use dynamically updates during a poudriere bulk build session, but you do have to have Javascript enabled. If you use the NoScript browser add-on like I do, you have to enable JS on your local server. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 16:02:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8AEDE6D for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8521C127 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D712255FE; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:02:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8HG2Tsc002308; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:02:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:02:29 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Radek =?UTF-8?B?S3JlasSNYQ==?= Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-Id: <20140917180229.c1b31c00.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <2509308.9rytrV7MvD@penguin> <5411A89B.4010707@gmail.com> <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:02:38 -0000 On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:52:30 +0200, Radek Krejča wrote: > But its nice to have ports like libreoffice builded and only > download it. Building takes a lot of time and this port is > used only on one PC. This has been possible in the past. You could do things like # pkg_add -r de-openoffice and get OpenOffice _including_ dictionaries for the german language. It's nice to have that functionality, especially when you're installing software on a non-plentycore system with few RAM and (don't even think of it) little hard disk capacity. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 16:43:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F17C6F for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6217E6 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1D9277EB; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8HGhq8P002464; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:43:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:43:52 +0200 From: Polytropon To: tyler@tysdomain.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD and accessibility Message-Id: <20140917184352.ac85ff24.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <541853D5.20104@tysdomain.com> References: <54184440.8060901@tysdomain.com> <20140916162332.2207b5aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <541853D5.20104@tysdomain.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:43:57 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:14:29 -0400, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: > I'm not sure how this is supposed to work. The braille readouts > you speak of are called braille displays. I'm also not entirely sure how they worked, but I can imagine the following way: The text output on the screen is directly correlated with a specific region in the RAM. If I remember correctly, that is 0x8800 for color screens (VGA, EGA, CGA) and 0x8000 for b/w screens (MDA, "Hercules"). The regions are 4000 bytes in size: 80x25 characters are 2000 bytes text, plus another 2000 bytes color (one byte to hold background, foreground, attributes). So a TSR was installed to "scan" that memory region and transfer the character information (and stripping color information) via serial port to the Braille display which would then output it. Having _that_ kind of access to the screen content is quite easy. I know because I once wrote a program that copied the text of the color screen to the b/w screen. In Pascal. Real programmers don't use Pascal, but I was young and stupid. :-) I don't remember if there are any PC displays which don't take "pre-processed" analog signals do show on the screen. There _were_ displays in the late 1970's that were sent a _data stream_ (like with a daisywheel or dotmatrix or even laser printer), so you could say the "graphics card" was inside the screen. If you duplicated that stream, you'd have the characters. The robotron ANA-000 series is an example of such displays. Even though today's flatscreens usually are called "digital", I don't think you could easily capture the text displayed from their data stream. > I have this: > http://www.freedomscientific.com/Products/Blindness/Focus40BrailleDisplay Yes, this looks much more advanced than what I tried. It was an accessory to a regular 102 key PC keyboard. Sadly, this was _before_ the dawn of the WWW, so it's hard to find images of how they looked like. I must have some printed product sheets somewhere... > It presents a line of braille (an 80x24 display doesn't exist > apart from research currently). It can be connected via USB > to the system. Okay, so USB is the way to get the data in. This is logical. > There needs to be a couple things to make that work though, > one of which is brltty and another of which is the actual > driver for the display. You also mentioned speech synth: > that also does exist and is what I was asking about. This explanation makes sense, I understand the problem now. If you're old, things look easy in retrospect. :-) > Sadly it doesn't come for free. You need sound and a > software synth such as Espeak, or you need a hardware > synth. Yes, such "external voices" also have been part of the machinery I've been trying back then. They were probably also connected to a serial port to receive the text data. > I do not know of any synths that are USB, but I do think > there are a couple, which also requires a driver. Probably they're proprietary and only support a very narrow range of operating systems. And they're probably expensive. :-( Having that functionality in (free) software would be much better and could enable blind people to access computers more easily and more flexible (!), as they aren't tied to proprietary operating systems. The components are basically available, it's just the question of how you can integrate them into a "working conglomerate" that is available right after booting from a CD / DVD or USB stick - so a live system for performing the installation would be good, as well as a preconfigured installation set that would contain those parts, so you can start using what you have installed right away. > You also need a program which will allow you to navigate > the screen and read line by line, char by char etc (yasr). Exactly. The systems I've seen had sliders beneath and next to the keyboard, to select which region of the 80x25 screen to display in Braille (usually 80x1 or 40x2). The voice system also used those. > You would need some sort of driver for the characters > on the screen to be recognized and then printed to the > display, unless this used some sort of OCR (which probably > wouldn't be hard given an 80x24 screen), though it would > require considerably much more hardware. When you have "BIOS access", it's easy: You just need to read from a memory region. However, with VESA based text modes, or worse, inside X, this option doesn't exist anymore. It relies on the fact that the graphics card contains a character set and will render your text. > Well, either braile or voice would work on a text or graphical > installer. The screen reader presents the data to the synth > and display that is currently in focus. The only problem (or task) would be to transfer the data in the required (!) format to USB. > this is totally doable, but again requires that I somehow > bootstrap brltty+drivers or something else in to the live cd. Exactly. And I'm not sure if it's possible to attach _all_ kinds of Braille displays, as I assume they're using different data protocols which aren't documented publicly (even though I hope I'm wrong). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 18:20:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3091C1C for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85A0304 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:20:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1410977300; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Subject:To:Reply-To:From:Message-ID:Date:Feedback-ID; bh=lsC5RNdAMupNeWs8M/QOL1tgWcCFixRwybLOCBVUqxg=; b=nD0oS+KheBH6hqf1XnqZT5fzpmlqeVlpO7voomFU827Bv5LmMhqVy/k1Wds/TXvc IvWUynbB3CkZUtBHjoQrJpyxxhhEBhiy2DB6TEzSiKLx3V9twDTSOVDY9E43jkGPTMe H32d8wyiWQ0pjgTThjCUhsIZm2HgjRHd7rgWBvM8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: building an educational resource list To: Webmaster Reply-To: Kelly Campbell From: Kelly Campbell Message-ID: <0000014884ccfe13-05e59ffe-7f23-4338-baa7-c0cc8f791876-000000@email.amazonses.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:08:20 +0000 X-SES-Outgoing: 2014.09.17-54.240.8.31 Feedback-ID: us-east-1.ay5jYW1wYmVsbEBlZHVjYXRvcmxhYnMub3Jn:AmazonSES Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:20:01 -0000 Hi! I=E2=80=99m collecting a broad array of fun, educational resources after receiving several similar resource requests (http://educatorlabs.org/request-a-resource/) from educators across the nation. The common theme is a desire for fun, hands-on lessons to entertain and educate their students. So, I set off on a fun adventure to collect as many as possible. I have several I want to share with you, in hopes you=E2=80=99ll share them with others on your site (maybe this page: http://nsa.kpu-m.ac.jp/gijutu/tex/linux/link.html?), but before I do, I wondered whether you had any you could recommend (other than those you=E2=80=99ve listed)? If not, no problem! Here is the list so far - I hope you enjoy them as much as I have and that you=E2=80=99ll share them with your other visitors: Learning and Teaching Resources http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/Pages/default.aspx=20 Crunch the Numbers: Do More Math, Eat More Fruits and Vegetables http://www.scholastic.com/browse/unitplan.jsp?id=3D277 Calculators for Kids: Teach Children Math! http://www.mortgagecalculator.org/helpful-advice/calculators-for-kids.php=20 ZoomSci: Science and Engineering Projects for Kids http://pbskids.org/zoom/activities/sci/=20 The Kids' Guide to Simple Machines in Cars https://www.kanetix.ca/simple-machines-in-cars Wildlife and Nature Lesson Plans and Resources for Educators http://www.nwf.org/what-we-do/kids-and-nature/educators.aspx=20 Forest Fire Safety and Prevention for Kids http://www.treeremoval.com/kids-guide-to-forest-fires/ Kids Know It Network http://www.kidsknowit.com/=20 Building & Rebuilding the White House http://www.improvenet.com/a/story-of-building-and-rebuilding-white-house=20 And, here is a list of fun, educational resources on our site that I thought may be of interest to you: Fun While Learning - Lesson Plans, Activities and Printables http://educatorlabs.org/resources/listing-category/fun-educational-lesson-plans-activities-and-printables/=20 Thank you in advance for any contributions you have and for sharing these resources on your site! Have a great remainder of the week! Kelly Kelly Campbell k.campbell@educatorlabs.org=20 EducatorLabs.org :: Cultivating. Connecting. Curating. EducatorLabs | 2054 Kildaire Farm Rd. #204 | Cary, NC | 27518 P.S. Please let me know in an email response if your inbox is overloaded! If that=E2=80=99s the case, I will make a note not to contact you in the future. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 21:24:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04DF8FF9 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out-05.shaw.ca (smtp-out-05.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC889B53 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:24:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=EE1YNWrmHkZ7CGDLFJuuVRk2fksVIUvL4LZRHWJDZ98= c=1 sm=1 a=P_5alXuAMkUA:10 a=-AfZYmOWdm4A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=TnnSnozJutt0IcAQwEzKEw==:17 a=5mcg790sAAAA:8 a=oFwaQURuj_5ScSNuvysA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V9bHfo9xCFkA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO dalet61) ([68.144.182.135]) by smtp-out-05.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 15:24:35 -0600 From: "Dale Scott" To: Subject: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:25:04 -0600 Message-ID: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac/SvEt2Kohdt7gLSyioQqdfjwvJlw== Content-Language: en-us Cc: dalescott@shaw.ca X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:24:37 -0000 I'm following the recipe in Hong's v7 guide, trying to setup a mail server that will collect all the mail generated by web apps running on the same box. I installed courier-imap first and believe I'm not authenticating. The rc script doesn't report status correctly, which makes me wonder if other parts aren't working (but the rc script seems to start and stops things that seems reasonable). I then installed the main courier pkg thinking there might be undocumented dependencies. Pkg reported during install that courier was incompatible with Postfix, and would be uninstalling Postfix for me. I hoped I could re-install Postfix later, but now pkg is telling me it needs to delete courier to install Postfix, so it seems there is some incompatibility between the two. It seems a) installing courier-imap and courier-imap-base in fbsd 10 isn't the same as building from ports was with fbsd 7 (and I remember configuring mail following the book on fbsd7 when I first bought it, and eventually got things to work, but it seemed overly complicated for just getting mail from A to B), and b) the current courier suite 0.65.3 (I want to also use courier-authlib-ldap) seems incompatible with current Postfix v2.11.1. Is this correct? Is this still the textbook example? What do people do? Thanks, Dale --- www.dalescott.net Transparency with Trust From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 00:03:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F16CEF2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994A9C22 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s8I03c2B034635 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 02:03:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <541A215A.3070900@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 02:03:38 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "free >> questions FreeBSD" Subject: Problem building port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:03:53 -0000 Hello list! I'm trying to build brlcad from ports on FreeBSD 9.3-PRERELEASE #1 r266465 I get as far as this [ 96%] Building C object src/libtclcad/CMakeFiles/libtclcad.dir/tclcad.c.o In file included from /usr/ports/cad/brlcad/work/brlcad-7.24.0/src/libtclcad/tclcad.c:32: /usr/local/include/tk8.6/tk.h:21:3: error: #error Tk 8.6 must be compiled with tcl.h from Tcl 8.6 or better *** [src/libtclcad/CMakeFiles/libtclcad.dir/tclcad.c.o] Error code 1 1 error *** [src/libtclcad/CMakeFiles/libtclcad.dir/all] Error code 2 Linking C executable ../../bin/rttherm [ 96%] Built target rttherm 1 error *** [all] Error code 2 1 error ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/cad/brlcad. I've deinstalled tcl and tk and rebuilt them but all the same, build stops at the same place. How to proceed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 00:18:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09DA118 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8908FD10 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hyzKz6KBjz17Y for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:18:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:18:31 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? Message-ID: <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:18:34 -0000 --As of September 17, 2014 3:25:04 PM -0600, Dale Scott is alleged to have said: > I then installed the main courier pkg thinking there might be undocumented > dependencies. Pkg reported during install that courier was incompatible > with Postfix, and would be uninstalling Postfix for me. I hoped I could > re-install Postfix later, but now pkg is telling me it needs to delete > courier to install Postfix, so it seems there is some incompatibility > between the two. --As for the rest, it is mine. This is correct - Courier (the 'main' port/package) and Postfix are mutually incompatible, in the same way Postfix and Sendmail are. Courier-main is a mail server - the same as Postfix, Sendmail, Exim, etc. You aren't going to want more than one of those installed on your system at the same time. The Courier project though developed several other mail-handing programs - the most popular of which (and more common than the mail server itself) is the IMAP server, and associated authentication server. That's what you are trying to install, and it works just fine with Postfix - I was using it until very recently in that capacity. (I switched to Dovecot, which a lot of people like. It seems to be more up-to-date, although I haven't seen the speed increases people claim.) So, yes you've departed significantly from the howto you were using. ;) Courier-main you need to uninstall. Courier-IMAP and Courier-auth you'll need to keep. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 04:34:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F335D2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC483B for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2mr1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.110]) by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 22:34:43 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=s+0R4JzlRBUW8GXF//6L4/AwYJegyFoFyppZH3AfVto= c=1 sm=1 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=EZcv4ilsBBkA:10 a=vyJAdnRk0OcA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Fa5_YPFaAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=p1TNafwyvlnj1P7QywQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=2mYow5eUDuQA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO cds005.dcs.int.inet) ([10.0.141.22]) by pd2mr1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2014 22:34:43 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> From: Dale Scott MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:34:43 -0600 (MDT) To: Daniel Staal X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (MobileSync - Apple-iPad2C5/1104.257) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:34:51 -0000 > On Sep 17, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Daniel Staal wrote: >=20 > --As of September 17, 2014 3:25:04 PM -0600, Dale Scott is alleged to hav= e said: >=20 >> I then installed the main courier pkg thinking there might be undocument= ed >> dependencies. Pkg reported during install that courier was incompatible >> with Postfix, and would be uninstalling Postfix for me. I hoped I could >> re-install Postfix later, but now pkg is telling me it needs to delete >> courier to install Postfix, so it seems there is some incompatibility >> between the two. >=20 > --As for the rest, it is mine. >=20 > This is correct - Courier (the 'main' port/package) and Postfix are mutua= lly incompatible, in the same way Postfix and Sendmail are. Courier-main is= a mail server - the same as Postfix, Sendmail, Exim, etc. You aren't going= to want more than one of those installed on your system at the same time. That makes sense. Thanks=20 > The Courier project though developed several other mail-handing programs = - the most popular of which (and more common than the mail server itself) i= s the IMAP server, and associated authentication server. That's what you a= re trying to install, and it works just fine with Postfix - I was using it = until very recently in that capacity. So courier-authlib-ldap is a full LDAP server? I'm already using OpenLDAP, = which I would prefer to leave it as-is. I thought courier-authlib-ldap migh= t be an interface from courier-authlib to a 3rd-party LDAP server (i.e. Ope= nLDAP). > (I switched to Dovecot, which a lot of people like. It seems to be more= up-to-date, although I haven't seen the speed increases people claim.) Do you know if it's difficult to setup Dovecot to authenticate a webmail us= ername and password using /etc/master.passwd (like the Hong recipe with cou= rier-authlib), or authenticate using an OpenLDAP server? > So, yes you've departed significantly from the howto you were using. ;) = Courier-main you need to uninstall. Courier-IMAP and Courier-auth you'll n= eed to keep. >=20 > Daniel T. Staal >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you > are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use > the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will > expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, > whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of > local copyright law. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 06:01:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F18756 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB65CF58 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8I615j7064970 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:01:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8I615j7064970 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8I615j7064970; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:00:56 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WdUcb4KTksjte8AMEtC88ci2ducJoU3AW" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:01:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WdUcb4KTksjte8AMEtC88ci2ducJoU3AW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/09/2014 05:34, Dale Scott wrote: > Do you know if it's difficult to setup Dovecot to authenticate a > webmail username and password using /etc/master.passwd (like the Hong > recipe with courier-authlib), or authenticate using an OpenLDAP > server? Yes, this is pretty easy in fact. I just went through setting up a new mail system where I work, using postfix+dovecot+openldap. Works like a charm. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --WdUcb4KTksjte8AMEtC88ci2ducJoU3AW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUGnUgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATK8gP/jT/dqCZfUe+yRBfvW4S77X+ iJjInpvpz+1PqcjbcmfcDywtNjt6F+T47kxoDsjsDJH5rZbK4s5EQbl2erwaHJnE qwp4/isguC+AjkzCjcDx66lAX1AE/zdDbdH1Ji6x3tQXm+1QyV1UzwbCFNj0Gxl7 Y5/J9BxqRVtaaDTLvIGV7rU5l5aEgYVfd/DN6CfMp16Bp7ox6X1yjsCkUuIK3xHt TmClRDECOPyyocd7mHDo2t28UntkvZ/8csgNbIKsxI5iI8WG3Psd0oVFl5UrKSLW OKtAXUOyCa3EYW62olE9ymxFRbvUIUUKBjMU/+fZVVZ7sO1PCsCYNKnh0qJAzw9r rLCYE1OjOWOMsdmB1oesk4wA+dfvgGWyOSZkNh5FuFtLNVPkT6ziZO5RlgB+ukMC ozeuA76Ll1u9fUVQqJ+0uIjdhI7AELANSV8KU5dmkkNs5BTQOo5AO1vuDM932XDZ M8jBdcQAYpDT62RAjnzFpmXqyspeENIVx5BzRbAVo/ifmtcgdccnKHbytwdi6KHb LehOFZVv0iePvd8HdmMu+OAJENIUhiD5WPmyrzQtkOgiNDvQh3CKaw5QV8JoSAPf GCZbS/tIvb7ND7zXJlqWJ3ZOfRlMXjWl83o0v5XC5q/2mqkpK5PUWK/dOcFoFRYM 52sbhzj/S79BTrgiY7aM =+4i7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WdUcb4KTksjte8AMEtC88ci2ducJoU3AW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 06:41:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36B497 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E2F351 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.135.65] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUVOp-0006PF-PW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:41:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:41:03 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.135.65 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:41:07 -0000 El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 03:56:58PM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > > Thanks. Is this with a recent version of poudriere. The presentation of > > the logs has changed to use 'json'. See here: > > root@arthur:1# poudriere version > 3.0.17 I'm using a poudriere version 3.1pre from around mid of August (I have not updated since this the host itself, only the ports tree in the jail). > I tend to upgrade at weekends, so haven't got yesterday's 3.0.18 version. > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/internal/pkg.FreeBSD.org/PortmgrSetup > > My logs are plain text and I see nothing in that link that suggests they > should be JSON. Are you sure that's the link you meant? It was last > updated 2013-07-16 so wouldn't contain anything new. Yes, at the very end in the mime types. Check also this page: http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/poudriere "... There’s even a very useful JSON-based web frontend to poudriere that’s included. Point your webserver or FTP server to show /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/91x64/latest and take a look. This is an easy way to monitor the status of bulk port builds without looking at the terminal. ..." As I said, until now I could make this working, maybe because it's nearly at the end of my todo list :-) matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 07:59:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCC111A; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692A2BF7; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XUWcg-002tfb-E3>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:59:26 +0200 Received: from [141.89.176.137] (helo=hermann.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XUWcg-001v1C-Bf>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:59:26 +0200 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:58:51 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140918095851.6e743183.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/i6_ltTCC7X_25xxFW8TX27N"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 141.89.176.137 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:59:35 -0000 --Sig_/i6_ltTCC7X_25xxFW8TX27N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 Adrian Chadd schrieb: > Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers > default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500. >=20 >=20 > -a After all, I managed to get the NIC up and running. But the culprit is that= I have to take the NIC down and then up to make it working once the system has bootet= . That is annoying. Lucckily, I can provide better informations since the box s now a= ttached to the network. Here we go: LAN: re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec rev=3D= 0x10 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' device =3D 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x3000, size 256, enabled bar [18] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d04000, size 4096, enabl= ed bar [20] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d00000, size 16384, enab= led cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit=20 cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint IRQ 1 max data 128(128) link x1(x= 1) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x800] cap 03[d0] =3D VPD ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected ecap 0002[140] =3D VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0003[160] =3D Serial 1 01000000684ce000 ecap 0018[170] =3D LTR 1 ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 PCI-e errors =3D Correctable Error Detected Corrected =3D Receiver Error WiFi (supposed to be Intel ): none2@pci0:5:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x42628086 chip=3D0x08b2808= 6 rev=3D0x73 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' class =3D network bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1c00000, size 8192, enabl= ed cap 01[c8] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit=20 cap 10[40] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) FLR link x1(x1) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L1(L0s/L1) ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 1 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 ecap 0018[14c] =3D LTR 1 ecap 000b[154] =3D Vendor 1 ID 51966 The WiFi NIC isn't recognized by any driver in CURRENT (11.0-CURRENT #5 r27= 1728: Thu Sep 18 01:18:25 CEST 2014 amd64) Maybe this is of help. Oliver --Sig_/i6_ltTCC7X_25xxFW8TX27N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGpDAAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8zOQIAMo1pjBg61+Jo8LvYdJMyKrA 4l7D44TYT6SDWLDf9t+MkOqx9ZUu1W5Wth8oJucVykZU03t5ovIE+I327ulnJLEr H+5cwclRXMZWkOq4zpkxOLiyu77y2x1MjdDtKVts4FLhFruT1XJIRgPSYUFFg3v2 XlNUTn/eQ0osbYPm5Ou2F8oziA43qn9cMrLXZX+zBD1sexnj0tqMiBMa/79CX1DQ NlYP7zpxsIlBfP2CudzJUCDEcTugdLRY8vtAYtkNtvhUnMRKIYF4ZSPt5Ke6BGY4 WF9drnd/P+WA3yAtI09v0UXoDGii9stSKZrnG3JzHeAZiUoJwqLyNTmzkW9XPSk= =Gy5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/i6_ltTCC7X_25xxFW8TX27N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 08:08:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F89422 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x243.google.com (mail-pa0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071B6CD7 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id rd3so443674pab.2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:08:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zD4CPSqMN+TvzcxZGp6J+53VH40nHF2HbAGeGBWzgHo=; b=yaW5QkwW6ksnMDXW3MuBc+pJodMvO8fL90Hje9Hun40d/Mlnn+ljmSFuYpwtUCz3D2 IIbF24WKvH58YiDJF7fJ+AfnlTlRRqHiasKI7vrsJA1HinTrEHriSDbvunCpSCY65gGb 8cQQp5qCDYwaJkEdNt9iPHjL1eWHBNisncAGn8we8LHvxacm6CuDpkcDOFPu7JeeAk8H tZbvfeYs25kUW4+uE8v4/EHsxlb32st3rD2ikAMxRrzRoxD1654hOew8hlWfdCwaIDuz qeAF30pHcmUdcpNlTO2vQlq+E8ch1hC74CV1eYHWvmpY+MeCQ1LjbBxffDdx26eDl/pY K5fA== X-Received: by 10.66.65.195 with SMTP id z3mr3396709pas.116.1411027727598; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([117.195.179.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm9826567pdj.34.2014.09.18.01.08.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <541A9309.7000101@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:38:41 +0530 From: John Campbell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Google Algorithms for Websites - ROI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:08:48 -0000 Hello Team , Warm greetings! If you are looking only for an SEO expert you can stop reading this email right away as website promotions need much more to attract relevant and high quality traffic. You must be aware that Google tweaks its algorithm frequently and after several years of fine tuning, their algorithm is able to differentiate between good and bad websites just like a human. Therefore traditional promotion methods or only reliance on SEO/AdWords is going to be risky as far as your business interest is concerned. What you need is an online marketing process that can harness the synergies of different online marketing in an effective way ensuring high quality traffic, optimum website usability and incremental revenue. To promote a website successfully you would need only 20% of Technical SEO, 30% content marketing and Social Media, 35% AdWords efforts and 15% conversion rate optimization/website usability. After all you must get sales out of your marketing initiatives. You should entrust your website with a company that is good at working on all these processes to make sure you get both short and long term benefit and bring a change in your business revenue. Now, how would you make sure that you get the combination right? It is simple; don't give your website promotions work to a company who only talk about PageRank and link building activities. As I said above these things make up meager 20% of the total promotional activities. Let me also stress here that an integrated marketing service (SEO+SMO+AdWords) is not an expensive proposition. The total package of SEO+SMO+Adwords comes within an affordable range and with the right mix. Sounds interesting? Feel free to email/Skype us. Sincerely, John Campbell Skype ID (24/7 Support): tsi.sales Expert in SEO, SMO & Reputation Management. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Note: If you are not interested then you can reply with a simple "NO" or "CONTACT LATER" (2 months), we will act as requested by you. (N) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 08:17:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE9B7E9; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [78.47.75.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CA2DAF; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hz9yL25NwzFfCw; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1411028228; x=1412842629; bh=nKFC8ijVKEtu5LISexfeXu+oQosJtQe16asLi3W8JaY=; b= gtzCNT6WcpGX6VZpg35s7LPRg+yFvvh0HXip7EuK0Qo0KAJrHHjYA/7B2YDUYBks 5NmyGOZb76twKWkwgLohCnDT3EsmMQ/LutwIjvsA0PcrDsVWEs3SJcmPeQw7/v9T /ejDHqyD97z0dNwu3KDEEM6Hl/503w+Rp69anmmFVgI= Received: from winston.madpilot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAUhL4yPWyLh; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <541A9504.1010502@madpilot.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:08 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" , Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140918095851.6e743183.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20140918095851.6e743183.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:17:16 -0000 On 09/18/14 09:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 > Adrian Chadd schrieb: > >> Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers >> default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500. >> >> >> -a > > > After all, I managed to get the NIC up and running. But the culprit is that I have to > take the NIC down and then up to make it working once the system has bootet. That is > annoying. Lucckily, I can provide better informations since the box s now attached to the > network. Here we go: > I have a similar situation with my nick on a tower system. I need to change at least one flag on the card to have it working, I can also just set the flag to the value it already has. I'm using a small startup script which actually does this: start_cmd="ifconfig ${refix_if} tso" > LAN: > re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x502817aa chip=0x816810ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > device = 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x3000, size 256, enabled > bar [18] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d04000, size 4096, enabled > bar [20] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d00000, size 16384, enabled > cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > cap 10[70] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint IRQ 1 max data 128(128) link x1(x1) > speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) > cap 11[b0] = MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x800] > cap 03[d0] = VPD > ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected > ecap 0002[140] = VC 1 max VC0 > ecap 0003[160] = Serial 1 01000000684ce000 > ecap 0018[170] = LTR 1 > ecap 001e[178] = unknown 1 > PCI-e errors = Correctable Error Detected > Corrected = Receiver Error > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x11c01734 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x07 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' device = 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' class = network subclass = ethernet bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xd000, size 256, enabled bar [18] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf2104000, size 4096, enabled bar [20] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf2100000, size 16384, enabled cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit cap 10[70] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint IRQ 1 max data 128(128) link x1(x1) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) cap 11[b0] = MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x800] cap 03[d0] = VPD ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected ecap 0002[140] = VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0003[160] = Serial 1 0100000004000001 PCI-e errors = Correctable Error Detected Unsupported Request Detected Corrected = Advisory Non-Fatal Error it's similar hardware, same chip, different revision. I already reported this on net@ but no patch could really solve the issue. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 08:49:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D13C35D; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48BE123; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XUXOh-003Hgw-20>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:49:03 +0200 Received: from [141.89.176.137] (helo=hermann.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XUXOh-0021lw-0m>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:49:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:48:33 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Guido Falsi Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140918104833.3a473d7e.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <541A9504.1010502@madpilot.net> References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140916131854.46acc5fb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20140918095851.6e743183.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <541A9504.1010502@madpilot.net> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/cMSIMgDXmMySkuIiJUqzZir"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 141.89.176.137 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: Kevin Oberman , Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:49:05 -0000 --Sig_/cMSIMgDXmMySkuIiJUqzZir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:08 +0200 Guido Falsi schrieb: > On 09/18/14 09:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:40:25 -0700 > > Adrian Chadd schrieb: > >=20 > >> Ah, jumbo frames. Maybe you got lucky and some ethernet drivers > >> default to accepting larger frames even if the MTU is 1500. > >> > >> > >> -a > >=20 > >=20 > > After all, I managed to get the NIC up and running. But the culprit is = that I have to > > take the NIC down and then up to make it working once the system has bo= otet. That is > > annoying. Lucckily, I can provide better informations since the box s n= ow attached to > > the network. Here we go: > >=20 >=20 > I have a similar situation with my nick on a tower system. >=20 > I need to change at least one flag on the card to have it working, I can > also just set the flag to the value it already has. >=20 > I'm using a small startup script which actually does this: >=20 > start_cmd=3D"ifconfig ${refix_if} tso" >=20 >=20 > > LAN: > > re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec re= v=3D0x10 hdr=3D0x00 > > vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > > device =3D 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controll= er' > > class =3D network > > subclass =3D ethernet > > bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x3000, size 256, enab= led > > bar [18] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d04000, size 4096, e= nabled > > bar [20] =3D type Memory, range 64, base 0xf1d00000, size 16384, = enabled > > cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > > cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit=20 > > cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint IRQ 1 max data 128(128) link = x1(x1) > > speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) > > cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > > Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x800] > > cap 03[d0] =3D VPD > > ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected > > ecap 0002[140] =3D VC 1 max VC0 > > ecap 0003[160] =3D Serial 1 01000000684ce000 > > ecap 0018[170] =3D LTR 1 > > ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 > > PCI-e errors =3D Correctable Error Detected > > Corrected =3D Receiver Error > > >=20 > re0@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x11c01734 chip=3D0x816810ec rev= =3D0x07 > hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > device =3D 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller' > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet > bar [10] =3D type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xd000, size 256, enabled > bar [18] =3D type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf2104000, > size 4096, enabled > bar [20] =3D type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xf2100000, > size 16384, enabled > cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint IRQ 1 max data 128(128) link x1= (x1) > speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1) > cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > Table in map 0x20[0x0], PBA in map 0x20[0x800] > cap 03[d0] =3D VPD > ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 1 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected > ecap 0002[140] =3D VC 1 max VC0 > ecap 0003[160] =3D Serial 1 0100000004000001 > PCI-e errors =3D Correctable Error Detected > Unsupported Request Detected > Corrected =3D Advisory Non-Fatal Error >=20 > it's similar hardware, same chip, different revision. I already reported > this on net@ but no patch could really solve the issue. >=20 Hello. Well, it seems the same here with taht specific NIC. Changing ANYTHING, eve= n already enabled features, or bringing the NIC down and then up seem to solve this p= roblem. I guess, I file a PR to make this issue memorized. Regards, Oliver --Sig_/cMSIMgDXmMySkuIiJUqzZir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGpxhAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8ff4H/2IveS1fSLUXMN5S/ZSos6Jg ZQN3FWd5RShlKSVhutKwDNmqAtQVIIS3ezm2sYnTs2JUjXk9tn6EerQzzHr4ox5v NSI0QWSVRFP+YHBohOqcIn4yZV6CM9stv32ay2SEbpjCuwpBQ8mZA4rTWpb3KtpO JILrbCDuvC93E7Ig1MzWWBD1Uxa20bb7bqoRV4gXAbcfKbNgjIpgR8SmuIwkxvv2 +mlTKQrURYEQUX/IgbK7csx/uG+C0oslFw1uWZTHyexbXFzYPOz9t7STxk2aNDKd /XPdDAvq2/ccQ7R3czDrMRPRoOo4/MP3H3d1cmN0fPBmGTSolGTzCzBCVxfcGgU= =p2V6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cMSIMgDXmMySkuIiJUqzZir-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 09:32:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996CD617 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.rapsoodia.eu (188-92-162-176.fiber.ee [188.92.162.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34280830 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.rapsoodia.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EEB122572 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:32:51 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at www.rapsoodia.eu Received: from www.rapsoodia.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.rapsoodia.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9sdUjKI6Lm0 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:32:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: from gn04.dco.fusa.be (gn04.dco.fusa.be [81.95.123.216]) (Authenticated sender: info@rapsoodia.eu) by www.rapsoodia.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B15AB122570 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:32:46 +0300 (EEST) From: "HorseSupplements" Subject: _straw pellets and wood shavings_ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: OY Rapsoodia Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:32:39 +0300 Message-Id: <20140918093251.96EEB122572@www.rapsoodia.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:32:53 -0000 R A P S O O D I A OU=20 Reg Nr.11460101, Tel +372 56 617 695, Fax +372 6070148 , info@rapsoodia.ee Suur-Sojamae poik 9 , Tallinn=3D , 11415 , Estonia ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------- _Dear Sirs , Our company Rapsoodia OU from Estonia sells straw pellets for horse be= dding or another animals in the 1000kg big-bag and 16 kg plastic bags = =2E If you are interested in cooperation with us,please report on the your= wishes and quantities . The price-135 EUR /per tonne into 1000 kg bags on the our warehouse in= Tallinn.=20 145 EUR /per tonne in 16 kg plastic bags . Wood shavings=20 Bale weight-25 kg/ 120 l Pallet size-1,2 m x 1,5 m x 2,7 m or 40 bales Trailer can mount-18 pallet or 720 bales or 18 000 kg=20 Price -3 .80 EUR per one bale on the our warehouse in Tallinn . Also is possible the organisation of delivery to the buyer . We have the good reputation and positive recommendations of our client= s in your country. We hope to hear from you soon. The best regards, Mr .Sergey Bogomolov Sales Manager of=20 Rapsoodia OU =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 11:05:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F933C5 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC271A0 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8IB52YV031812; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:05:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:05:02 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lot of pkg problems References: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> In-Reply-To: <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:05:13 -0000 On 18/09/2014 07:41, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, September 17, 2014 a las 03:56:58PM +0100, Arthur Chance escribió: > >>> Thanks. Is this with a recent version of poudriere. The presentation of >>> the logs has changed to use 'json'. See here: >> >> root@arthur:1# poudriere version >> 3.0.17 > > I'm using a poudriere version 3.1pre from around mid of August (I have > not updated since this the host itself, only the ports tree in the > jail). I take it that's the development version of the port? >> I tend to upgrade at weekends, so haven't got yesterday's 3.0.18 version. >> >>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/internal/pkg.FreeBSD.org/PortmgrSetup >> >> My logs are plain text and I see nothing in that link that suggests they >> should be JSON. Are you sure that's the link you meant? It was last >> updated 2013-07-16 so wouldn't contain anything new. > > Yes, at the very end in the mime types. That's just a generic directive for nginx, as already exists in the current mime.types. > Check also this page: > http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/poudriere > "... There’s even a very useful JSON-based web frontend to poudriere > that’s included. Point your webserver or FTP server to show > /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/91x64/latest and take a look. This > is an easy way to monitor the status of bulk port builds without looking > at the terminal. ..." Does you have an index.html in the latest log directory? If you do, what do you get if you point your browser at it? Using the URL just ending in "latest" should do the usual web server tap dance to redirect it to the directory form of the URL with a trailing slash and that should pick up index.html but will only work if you have an nginx index directive in your config. By default nginx won't do that. > As I said, until now I could make this working, maybe because it's > nearly at the end of my todo list :-) > > matthias > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 12:06:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB2E47A; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E76D97A; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z107so913139qgd.17 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 05:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cgfKMscdAemPG7MK0ZDQZ5Cixd+QXY3gDwxvufDOx+8=; b=VPSZ4yCB1UvGKJ63Py30zNj5f7zQ3vhm56oKQECbfqsWsFpGdbl7q0AC+7MPc4RsLx yq+PDjyOnSNYhsI0/9uNkDKrDIcg+vl/oqOgbJosTFcAqlr2IgcK3nv032hSXNiEA225 B3DyM3E8kdWt8JrzWx61KE8lMJ+oh2lBLOR4ZZxi6MIByAyTPOvWVJnkSBYSv8CF4PEy khCPfI6DSalYy2qzbm7lien8hx7m53KlaE8f9tTztdAOVMg4vINSVLAPRDVlan6S7HNh g1Mc8LOpxreXm3K9w4+d3aceru7+lIl0HisEhRX6z33eiqNxXeWJrmOYhfM/m+3A1ThV od3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.155.10 with SMTP id i10mr3721830yhk.108.1411041959601; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 05:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.156.139 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 05:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:05:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Freebsd 11 usb image zfs on root install on DN2820FYKH From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:06:00 -0000 Has anyone got freebsd booting on an intel NUC DN2820FYKH? It installs fine just wont boot (doesnt see boot loader). I'm doing legacy not efi mode. I'm starting to bang my head against the wall on this one. Time to leave it for a bit i think.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 12:34:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D529C31 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F586C56 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25FDD21 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:34:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=u5cvRAfsiNIXwk+ztAzk4Mi62Qc=; b=Srz W+gVB3SOD8v38FQiSAV9Uzh/uw6b9uLTW/1NOpucV3lj00gSMpyZqMtHrxV+FRbU MQDvP+LrRrMzafkUQ5T4XEfHXqvD3orRurpcBr+vkZY2MUfFIDesRMYPDP5+o4I4 yyc9cOH1mothy+UQ3RxlgNttR7bYoeqkqQhP0hkU= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 893B710EE90; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1411043663.650970.168986121.79B70425@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: DkOxLx/79cxchVBM+HVuvu/jEVicyBcUVNDdobLavkmp 1411043663 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-68d12f42 In-Reply-To: <5419A071.2080800@tysdomain.com> References: <5419A071.2080800@tysdomain.com> Subject: Re: jails, IPS and firewalls, oh my! Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:34:23 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:34:25 -0000 On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 09:53, Littlefield, Tyler wrote: > > So, on the advice of others who know BSD a lot more than I do I tried a > few things. Mainly I assigned the IP to a jail and tried to firewall it > off. The IP address though still is being used by em0, which means that > even if I open port 80 it will point to my main server and not the jail. > But the process listening on port 80 is in the jail, which is really all that matters in this scenario. It's possible for you to assign an IP to the jail and have zero services outside the jail listening on that IP. This should cover your concerns as well. If you really want an "interface" that is only assigned to the jail you'll have to look at using VNET jails. Failing that, perhaps run a full FreeBSD bhyve VM instead? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 14:47:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5475B1E for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E112EF8 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by gateway2.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8AD20A3F for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:39:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:39:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh=LXA1YcLPzuaE0o8ikVlH11K xSZU=; b=HfttNtd8TdKDxj/4bDaTn1dS+N7PF3ZemZNym2qWOIYneR9uChhEp+E g5TPcNsHGG2OYzkDCCbx0Pst5qfVJ/E0HDM+wO5m/EK9kiPVMbtmaWz/39qt8KPP dZ5dx9+PXkKDFxga2NT5QOMw51GvmlbInCkpLdKa0yjaNE15VXr0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=LXA1YcLPzuaE0o8ikVlH11KxSZU=; b=lM9VDO66TZjHJc+Bk4ZcWss0F0dl ttWtn64OQKmplwYVrWwoAkMEa8LHsF7GcBn+d/F96gMdtdTvvvB0aGkNh/bxt4jy YZErDzeEuw2sU+VQPpKqrzIs7m794E8rZ+WnoDbTZ7MGLFzYKCtjGO//CqfWetmQ +1FQ2FczWmeyk40= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id B37DB10F36A; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:39:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1411051185.691334.169031045.4CA5EE7D@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: H4kJes4ceRDAl6PSk5z21ARC4hPd+nXxbxuNTUyg3Vd/ 1411051185 From: Ross Penner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-68d12f42 Subject: problems connecting with IPv6 over PPPoE Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:39:45 -0700 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:47:55 -0000 Everything seems to be set up fine, but I don't seem to get an IPv6 address assigned. I know that my ISP supports it because when I connect directly with my Ubuntu desktop, IPv6 is configured. I'm hoping somebody can provide some insight into the what configuration I've set up wrong or missed completely. I'm running 10.0 Release My ppp.conf follows: default: set log Phase tun command set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 TekSavvy: set device PPPoE:ue0 set authname #loginname set authkey #password set dial set login add default HISADDR add default HISADDR6 enable dns ifconfig tun0: tun0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1460 options=80000 inet6 fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx --> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21 Opened by PID 924 relevant rc.conf enteries: ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_profile="TekSavvy" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 14:51:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA131EA for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC1CFC3 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-33.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8IEphDO007362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:51:44 -0500 Message-ID: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:57:58 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: VirtualBox question .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:51:51 -0000 .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho smaller than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be able to use that for the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 14:55:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219C4579 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30D6AB for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8IEe05M055524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:40:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:40:00 -0500 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: FreeBSD 10 Multiple IPs in a jail Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: <480aebf1080d12f717695748ef92b4d4@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:55:21 -0000 I know that we can now do multiple IPs in a jail, and I have a configuration that works for it. jail.conf: testjail { jid = 100; host.hostname = testjail.local; ip4.addr = 'em0|10.20.190.190/24'; ip4.addr += 'em0|10.20.190.191/24'; path = /jails/devel/ROOT; allow.mount.devfs; mount.devfs; allow.sysvipc; exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc"; exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown"; exec.prestart = "/jails/devel/prestart.sh"; exec.poststop = "/jails/devel/poststop.sh"; exec.consolelog = "/jails/devel/console.log"; } This works great, my question is now that I have this figured out and I am done testing it, how can I apply it to a running jail without rebooting the jail? I tried using: jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr='em0|10.20.190.191/24' This replaces the IP on the jail. Then I tried using: jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr+='em0|10.20.190.191/24' I get an error "unknown parameter ip4.addr+" Am I stuck waiting until after hours to add the secondary IP when I can reboot the production jail? Or is there another way I haven't figured out yet to add the secondary IP to the running jail? -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 15:02:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453788BA; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2001D6; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-33.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8IF2D1b015363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:02:13 -0500 Message-ID: <541AF56C.3040304@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:08:28 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" , FreeBSD X11 mailing list Subject: xf86 login problem .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:02:15 -0000 .... The last 2 times I have pkg-upgraded, the X server (xf86-video-vesa for me) was upgraded. When I rebooted, I got an error trying to login under graphical login, resulting from a mismatch between the X server & various components (kbd & mouse drivers) .... When I manually reinstall all 3, all is well & I can graphically login (XFCE xfce-4.10_6, BTW) .... This is messy at best, if the graphical login barfs in the wrong way, I get a desktop w/ no kbd or mouse control, have to login from another machine & fix the problem .... *ick* .... Others have posted a similar problem on this list, that's how I found the sol'n (manually reinstall server & offending drivers) .... Could this be escalated as a problem that needs fixing :-) ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 15:05:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5605B7E; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8168A213; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8IF5dcH056627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:05:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:05:39 -0500 From: dweimer To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: <4259d6adf252cfa08c55f5025474e7c8@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:05:41 -0000 On 09/18/2014 9:57 am, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, > virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho smaller > than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be able to use > that for the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA .... > > As long as the VM has internet access this should work, the NET install ISO will want to get to the internet to download packages, if I remember correctly its been a while since I used one. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 15:07:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC01C1D for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC82232 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j5so1265595qga.36 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xiOQXidQRix4NP9C+8RD/L4AJYhfBWYwDhOmelateuo=; b=U/dzJRUIm6G8l83Pm0cFBP+01IjWffw7n/GuhjJT7f9Pi1to4pdi/zO7dEHDGFjZ+n GfO6/s9Ggw58vkwdqtdejsI7RQyn4fcOEdwmfKCZitp/3ZoCQXOodFF5DSOKNovKMtZZ +F3KquDtxDdoSC9yV8MJRJMCr9KTcOckCThBo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xiOQXidQRix4NP9C+8RD/L4AJYhfBWYwDhOmelateuo=; b=HqZr/pi/+6CtLqb8R+aXbWwCrcNisKd5G5LqEZuc8lmpqXLSYhfaSEqkqpthDD4EOG 6rfK+hZQXLux68gyJKdX7mKlWeZfm/UXiGFVGuBjYid6FlIlt6LnEfxV9HfSy7wigxvP tOhv8IqgbjGDke7oW3wrdRfxsojiwh/KeZJYgqpHAO3wVTPVlbi2MDk+Mj+Ubtf+wpAj +MzLxoTyF4+lCuYERTUPfLuR//Fqat7M5E6a8Xlmi9EFEUeDF/dX4sQ4V9kXhuUjh2vk b0xhtU0f0eJJzaEPb+eTLttTj9Em5GEv43lMTXUxRb9ckMLK+x3QS5MoFhdlMUrAMC6O hjRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkOSipnF3ZDaGDtxnhSPcKlpJlzD7+F1g+WHpMzGvrVPV8KKV+BaXYNYaeK/yhRWu/wbgml MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.46.6 with SMTP id h6mr9794051qaf.45.1411052853030; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.109.129 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:07:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... From: Mario Lobo To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:07:34 -0000 2014-09-18 11:57 GMT-03:00 William A. Mahaffey III : > > > .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, > virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho smaller than > the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be able to use that for > the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA .... > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi; That is a question for CentOS, not virtualbox! You have to read the specs of these iso images to see what they are for. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 16:27:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF2CF2B for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638B12F for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hzNrM4Q2Tz1Dt for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:27:47 -0400 From: Daniel Staal Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? Message-ID: <5317747AE6C76A2CB9FD4061@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:27:55 -0000 --As of September 17, 2014 10:34:43 PM -0600, Dale Scott is alleged to have said: >> The Courier project though developed several other mail-handing programs >> - the most popular of which (and more common than the mail server >> itself) is the IMAP server, and associated authentication server. >> That's what you are trying to install, and it works just fine with >> Postfix - I was using it until very recently in that capacity. > > So courier-authlib-ldap is a full LDAP server? I'm already using > OpenLDAP, which I would prefer to leave it as-is. I thought > courier-authlib-ldap might be an interface from courier-authlib to a > 3rd-party LDAP server (i.e. OpenLDAP). No: it's the authentication agent/server for the Courier programs. It operates as a separate daemon and provides some service to check who can log in, etc. I don't think it does LDAP itself - just that it can communicate with an LDAP server. I believe the point was so that Courier (the mail server) and Courier-IMAP, etc. didn't have to separately implement LDAP/password/etc. for every possible user authentication method. >> (I switched to Dovecot, which a lot of people like. It seems to be >> more up-to-date, although I haven't seen the speed increases people >> claim.) > > Do you know if it's difficult to setup Dovecot to authenticate a webmail > username and password using /etc/master.passwd (like the Hong recipe with > courier-authlib), or authenticate using an OpenLDAP server? It wasn't hard to use password auth, and I assume they've got LDAP auth set up fairly easily as well. There are guides out there. Dovecot is slightly more straightforward to set up, since it wasn't designed as an add-on to something else. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 17:21:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280C7BF2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (si-002-i152.relay.mailchannels.net [108.178.49.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4E28CD for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:21:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|184.56.208.198 Received: from mail-24.name-services.com (ip-10-237-13-110.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.237.13.110]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73DEA60969; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:10:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|184.56.208.198 Received: from mail-24.name-services.com (mail-24.name-services.com [10.227.41.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.2.13); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:10:49 GMT X-MC-Relay: Forwarding X-MailChannels-SenderId: _forwarded-from|184.56.208.198 X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: demandmedia X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1411060248801:1845925976 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1411060248800 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-184-56-208-198.neo.res.rr.com [184.56.208.198]) by mail-24.name-services.com with SMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:10:40 -0700 Message-ID: <541B120D.1000606@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:10:37 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 Multiple IPs in a jail References: <480aebf1080d12f717695748ef92b4d4@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: <480aebf1080d12f717695748ef92b4d4@dweimer.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:21:09 -0000 dweimer wrote: > I know that we can now do multiple IPs in a jail, and I have a > configuration that works for it. > > jail.conf: > testjail { > jid = 100; > host.hostname = testjail.local; > ip4.addr = 'em0|10.20.190.190/24'; > ip4.addr += 'em0|10.20.190.191/24'; > path = /jails/devel/ROOT; > allow.mount.devfs; > mount.devfs; > allow.sysvipc; > exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc"; > exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown"; > exec.prestart = "/jails/devel/prestart.sh"; > exec.poststop = "/jails/devel/poststop.sh"; > exec.consolelog = "/jails/devel/console.log"; > } > > This works great, my question is now that I have this figured out and I > am done testing it, how can I apply it to a running jail without > rebooting the jail? > > I tried using: > jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr='em0|10.20.190.191/24' > This replaces the IP on the jail. > > Then I tried using: > jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr+='em0|10.20.190.191/24' > I get an error "unknown parameter ip4.addr+" > > Am I stuck waiting until after hours to add the secondary IP when I can > reboot the production jail? Or is there another way I haven't figured > out yet to add the secondary IP to the running jail? > How about jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr='em0|10.20.190.190/24,em0|10.20.190.191/24' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 17:28:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F773A4 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DB99C2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8IHSXmc062353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:28:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:28:33 -0500 From: dweimer To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 Multiple IPs in a jail Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <541B120D.1000606@a1poweruser.com> References: <480aebf1080d12f717695748ef92b4d4@dweimer.net> <541B120D.1000606@a1poweruser.com> Message-ID: <2da1b5a5a27199828a8cf5595962262e@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:28:37 -0000 On 09/18/2014 12:10 pm, Fbsd8 wrote: > dweimer wrote: >> I know that we can now do multiple IPs in a jail, and I have a >> configuration that works for it. >> >> jail.conf: >> testjail { >> jid = 100; >> host.hostname = testjail.local; >> ip4.addr = 'em0|10.20.190.190/24'; >> ip4.addr += 'em0|10.20.190.191/24'; >> path = /jails/devel/ROOT; >> allow.mount.devfs; >> mount.devfs; >> allow.sysvipc; >> exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc"; >> exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown"; >> exec.prestart = "/jails/devel/prestart.sh"; >> exec.poststop = "/jails/devel/poststop.sh"; >> exec.consolelog = "/jails/devel/console.log"; >> } >> >> This works great, my question is now that I have this figured out and >> I am done testing it, how can I apply it to a running jail without >> rebooting the jail? >> >> I tried using: >> jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr='em0|10.20.190.191/24' >> This replaces the IP on the jail. >> >> Then I tried using: >> jail -n testjail -m 'ip4.addr+='em0|10.20.190.191/24' >> I get an error "unknown parameter ip4.addr+" >> >> Am I stuck waiting until after hours to add the secondary IP when I >> can reboot the production jail? Or is there another way I haven't >> figured out yet to add the secondary IP to the running jail? >> > > How about > jail -n testjail -m > 'ip4.addr='em0|10.20.190.190/24,em0|10.20.190.191/24' That's the ticket, thanks. Just an FYI ran first time without errors but didn't add it to the jail. Then I tried "ifconfig em0 alias 10.20.190.191/24" on the host (10.20.190.190 was in the original jails configuration) and ran it a second time, and success, at least in my test environment, time to try and repeat on the production server. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 18:12:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8EA646C; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FA4E61; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 19so239323ykq.1 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:12:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=x7rBFiOC3c8YIRrvKYoP6e0u4ry+3eKxAVeJPHIcoHk=; b=G9igzekdn4/OyZj4q/CH6CZMgFUtQoIG763k6nZ0UlnG8bz9BM9AGARLFJ9A4Gve8Z e5YQO23msHSjPmHiT9S/M2t4pw9zhClp8O2boEnVfBo40pBBRHD7Gxst2+DyOos4zJoB g4bXp4vo75XqyGFNMgG1cm0egNt6Y4NZ1SQk8cVOBTEFMXy4qi74BHereu1Xh8mPu38h kNxSQ5WRF9Hs+GMfEXgXIsE7IJkO7RGCU5VMrCf6lhU0AAscf5MY55ggvhiwFBXij+6z DbaGFVZdYdK/MAPnaPU5vkKZKMMPktmMyyGm6nhsKQmX/mXG2NcVNw8FFk1RC7ewbMWX dLNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.141.148 with SMTP id g20mr6603387yhj.34.1411063947304; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.156.139 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:12:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:12:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Freebsd 11 usb image zfs on root install on DN2820FYKH From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:12:28 -0000 hmm, got it working by downgrading to v32 firmware. It seems the is a bug in intels wonderful uefi code, which of course the blame freebsd for 8/ On 18 September 2014 13:05, krad wrote: > Has anyone got freebsd booting on an intel NUC DN2820FYKH? > > It installs fine just wont boot (doesnt see boot loader). I'm doing legacy > not efi mode. > > I'm starting to bang my head against the wall on this one. Time to leave > it for a bit i think.... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 19:19:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBF2E5C1 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33707CE for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1411067965670197.43159483429213; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a3so873460oib.27 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.9.225 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.94.230 with SMTP id df6mr757095obb.36.1411067964912; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:19:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mohammad Shokri Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:48:44 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: No Package for "KDevelop-KDE4" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:19:33 -0000 There is no PKG for KDE KDevelop: `pkg install devel/kdevelop-kde4` says: pkg: No packages available to install matching 'devel/kdevelop-kde4' have been found in the repositories. I'm using "latest" & "new_xorg" repositories with pkg 1.4.0.pre-alpha15. ______________________________________________________________________ *Mohammad* [/s=CE=B2in] { =E2=9C=89 mail@slashsbin.com | =E2=9C=BC http://slashsbin.com } cat /dev/infinity/mysteries | /s=CE=B2in/cyberRoze.md -0 > /dev/null 2>&1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 19:58:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB6E790 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73EA4BAF for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-30.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8IJwr6I005806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:58:54 -0500 Message-ID: <541B3AF4.1060009@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:05:08 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:58:56 -0000 On 09/18/14 10:07, Mario Lobo wrote: > 2014-09-18 11:57 GMT-03:00 William A. Mahaffey III >: > > > > .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, > virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho > smaller than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be > able to use that for the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA > .... > > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > Hi; > > That is a question for CentOS, not virtualbox! > > You have to read the specs of these iso images to see what they are for. > > -- > Mario Lobo > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes > FREE) I'm afraid I don't follow .... I don't think the netinstall iso cares at all, I wasn't sure whether virtualbox was ready to do that .... In any event, I got to the point of trying to setup the actual VM & the install program asked for the name of an ISO to install .... I already burned a CD & mounted it, what do I tell the installer to look at ? I tried various files in the top directory & the installer crashed the OS (!!!!!) .... Any advice ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 20:05:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBDAB2F for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E4DC7A for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:05:05 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= To: 'Arthur Chance' , 'Matthias Apitz' , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:05:03 +0200 Subject: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Topic: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Index: Ac/TMHMhJgVhC2QESoSjxkkS3ngQXQASwKTQ Message-ID: References: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:05:14 -0000 SGVsbG8sDQoNCmJlY2F1c2UgcGtnIHN5c3RlbSBzdGlsbCBub3Qgd29ya2luZyBmb3IgbWUsIEkg YW0gZ29pbmcgdG8gdHJ5IHBvdWRyaWVyZS4gSSBoYXZlIGZpcnN0IHF1ZXN0aW9uIC0gaXMgYW55 IHdheSB0byBidWlsZCBwYWNrYWdlcyBvbiBvbmUgZmJzZCBib3ggZm9yIG1vcmUgZmJzZCB2ZXJz aW9ucyAoOS4zLCAxMC4wLi4uKT8gSSBkb250IHRoaW5rIHNvIGJ1dCAuLi4uDQoNClJhZGVrDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 21:19:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1BBC52 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEFC6774 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8ILIupL084793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:18:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8ILIupL084793 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8ILIupL084793; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <541B4C37.4080706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:18:47 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems References: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1rUe8Eh6qjrPsneNwijGG2l4lHCCajMTW" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:19:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1rUe8Eh6qjrPsneNwijGG2l4lHCCajMTW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/09/2014 21:05, Radek Krej=C4=8Da wrote: > because pkg system still not working for me, I am going to try > poudriere. I have first question - is any way to build packages on > one fbsd box for more fbsd versions (9.3, 10.0...)? I dont think so > but .... poudriere can do this pretty easily. It can create jails for any version of FreeBSD you want. Only constraint is that the host system must be a higher version than the jails. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --1rUe8Eh6qjrPsneNwijGG2l4lHCCajMTW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUG0w/XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATztgP/2k4MysJXHU2e3HEIEaCQECh 51kUxdOGuUlgii+2O52V/mTIb3ir1ZRiSBkmxAT7CeUVrfAXo2n/HY8c3iS8NPNk E1zGe2kEjiPlduPplpWOURJr9euyZaDGCG7ERKeurrISYftSPM33aLFNfGsXAZRv fi4BBZX+uKAqy+TccyiSVkAZuoxIBr8vWxUJ7e6/uEnF/izOjsX+4i9ImsQrlZyz d79DvQhYhFdt+82WFFLtycGDHe9jvvHGzK01opre2M5PF1kq0Pd5kQoTQFQ3tb0y 0v/0lwZsmhRdvIa9HqAcIKFvAVR+uQsgkm7WfuRXz7piJFQJoNiaoxVL3igoxgcj FXugE5vpFVNT0aldgs9cuNBHnKyGo+ME81hVrHjUs+zXnRXXaM5GbO/viRes3KGE AC93UfQdoqwYpXUgFKpdPM2HS3l23iF9mqHZFiYvvuCZ9y9Pky2tIG5XhyirrRhG bPxQKUh0uBkNdo8YLQBThYOsa8W+gWm5n3zTTM7xflZunOvXjMBZR4HsOMdAGyg3 zcvg23NHdE+tlG5O2rF4UFRww9/uEwf8D+v9zke753G12P78xRuMSSx7elQ1c7wB RPINEhja660Kkl2z2Lk+lE7GgfWcCILB0y63BnoBqcBCF7ex/6kJatvKj3bWTcZh LMiGb1TyrZAeH18VUiwv =KcAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1rUe8Eh6qjrPsneNwijGG2l4lHCCajMTW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 21:31:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E88C26B for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com (mail-yh0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7311902 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f10so141929yha.37 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:31:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=c4eEmAN6GVuJl4O4RynDY156LS77UWgp/OIBi73qpLY=; b=zkjHv3/BeVWR7U2IyElzvHrBjlnOX1Qzi4HXQGdkv8s/MzkjY/c0R2pGo4CM/SvNV+ Eym/5X2mvpc3iM2OKugA9QwQN5uMkiWxPEVvW3ZhTyVaFufAWg0PJskqj+LdhJTsqdQT rFzet4CMET5aEDT7nEOFdFSQ/qm31flXvxUGTgi1rQ1Wz6Wi8ad/QOdGB2tYeG998sLt rH5QHaDlfV+TWYQmgR4saia8wQl93DlrTy0lBzPl2lQUyaaR8vMktE41GvVKX1PGNEwT +ry8nNdS9EVMSOhPi7Ib2XiM04CSc45kvTZ770+TLV6gTW649HaCIp73V7py2fDZwezc a54Q== X-Received: by 10.236.216.1 with SMTP id f1mr6704645yhp.87.1411075910863; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:31:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.60.151 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:31:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <541B3AF4.1060009@hiwaay.net> References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> <541B3AF4.1060009@hiwaay.net> From: Ernesto Celis Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:31:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:31:52 -0000 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:05 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > On 09/18/14 10:07, Mario Lobo wrote: >> >> 2014-09-18 11:57 GMT-03:00 William A. Mahaffey III > >: >> >> .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, >> virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho >> smaller than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be >> able to use that for the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA >> >> Hi; >> >> That is a question for CentOS, not virtualbox! >> >> You have to read the specs of these iso images to see what they are for. > > I'm afraid I don't follow .... I don't think the netinstall iso cares at > all, I wasn't sure whether virtualbox was ready to do that .... In any > event, I got to the point of trying to setup the actual VM & the install > program asked for the name of an ISO to install .... I already burned a CD & > mounted it, what do I tell the installer to look at ? I tried various files > in the top directory & the installer crashed the OS (!!!!!) .... Any advice > ? Your question is Off Topic, since its not a problem with FreeBSD itself. If you already got VirtualBox running on FreeBSD, you only need to tell VirtualBox which is your iso file, from where it will boot the CentOS installer, beign this the netinstall ISO you must be sure your VirtualBox VM has a NAT or Bridged NIC, inorder to the installer can reach the Internet. Beyond that you should read CentOS install documentation and when in doubt ask in the CentOS support channels. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 22:07:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31AC5CAD for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3E1C04 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-30.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8IM7jBE025253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:07:45 -0500 Message-ID: <541B5928.9000002@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:14:00 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> <541B3AF4.1060009@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:07:48 -0000 On 09/18/14 16:31, Ernesto Celis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:05 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 09/18/14 10:07, Mario Lobo wrote: >>> 2014-09-18 11:57 GMT-03:00 William A. Mahaffey III >> >: >>> >>> .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, >>> virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO (mucho >>> smaller than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... Will I be >>> able to use that for the install, or do I need the full DVD1 ? TIA >>> >>> Hi; >>> >>> That is a question for CentOS, not virtualbox! >>> >>> You have to read the specs of these iso images to see what they are for. >> I'm afraid I don't follow .... I don't think the netinstall iso cares at >> all, I wasn't sure whether virtualbox was ready to do that .... In any >> event, I got to the point of trying to setup the actual VM & the install >> program asked for the name of an ISO to install .... I already burned a CD & >> mounted it, what do I tell the installer to look at ? I tried various files >> in the top directory & the installer crashed the OS (!!!!!) .... Any advice >> ? > Your question is Off Topic, since its not a problem with FreeBSD > itself. If you already got VirtualBox running on FreeBSD, you only > need to tell VirtualBox which is your iso file, from where it will > boot the CentOS installer, beign this the netinstall ISO you must be > sure your VirtualBox VM has a NAT or Bridged NIC, inorder to the > installer can reach the Internet. > > Beyond that you should read CentOS install documentation and when in > doubt ask in the CentOS support channels. Very well, sorry for the noise (twice) :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 22:33:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C6F955 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x22e.google.com (mail-yh0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F14E99 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z6so171471yhz.5 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UeR4i0d1CCF0wu9EV4CXG3Axwm53mYZrftihyDqq/7I=; b=Su5lEGd2fj0eofK63nL0ScP146+zl+GcMlbJhTlZeQeZEHHf4f6wL2g6FJRzc6Sf/q XwTFtc7qwNXKCN5gDA9jsIQZ3L2VtJasTCC0zoi38AFxG+ldSIvIf78c3ePkqFAZKNQM /zbU2xTwE0fRwfjMvX+G8oSaV1y1nbH53WRP4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UeR4i0d1CCF0wu9EV4CXG3Axwm53mYZrftihyDqq/7I=; b=TSpGwrdeW46gD/o5C23RDQeuFeuZhPHIKnHzWqHpX5o/m3TNz2dcjUZO+ih1/fghSe sRAzGgaqkzLAT7ie/GGbqvVD5qMYVy95ui6DKcl+2G32DPX8J1UZvPFw5C4HTjSisVqJ /Yg/pBwW5+3zsgMJh9sJJFN6wJtc0C67GurTihR5mXlrq8TFOEyPhOSF1N2XFi7uF7Md xG59EmJ7TQH5wklEN6GurMBkqLt6NahmGXIbM9R2rHywM6TTDH92a0lGx7PpuXFNZjiB NTGpriwXhY0DM9JGpnq3pK5Z1oyqBZHWYxQu4b1HSJxv8H2UvLVj7CFwZPXhmiwQtXHw 9/Vw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknShsD5AMGM1vPKcQYL82vGY/N+/IN8K0bUb282dySghcJpfym+LAKIEd9DSVzSIB+L/Ep X-Received: by 10.236.227.162 with SMTP id d32mr8474924yhq.100.1411079618667; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Papi ([177.134.200.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm65188yhb.15.2014.09.18.15.33.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:33:51 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox question .... Message-ID: <20140918193351.16d845ef@Papi> In-Reply-To: <541B5928.9000002@hiwaay.net> References: <541AF2F6.1080103@hiwaay.net> <541B3AF4.1060009@hiwaay.net> <541B5928.9000002@hiwaay.net> Organization: BSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:33:40 -0000 On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:14:00 -0500 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > > On 09/18/14 16:31, Ernesto Celis wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:05 PM, William A. Mahaffey III > > wrote: > >> On 09/18/14 10:07, Mario Lobo wrote: > >>> 2014-09-18 11:57 GMT-03:00 William A. Mahaffey III >>> >: > >>> > >>> .... I am trying to setup a CentOS 5.n VM under FBSD 9.3, > >>> virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_1. I have a CentOS netinstall ISO > >>> (mucho smaller than the full DVD1 req'd for local install) .... > >>> Will I be able to use that for the install, or do I need the full > >>> DVD1 ? TIA > >>> > >>> Hi; > >>> > >>> That is a question for CentOS, not virtualbox! > >>> > >>> You have to read the specs of these iso images to see what they > >>> are for. > >> I'm afraid I don't follow .... I don't think the netinstall iso > >> cares at all, I wasn't sure whether virtualbox was ready to do > >> that .... In any event, I got to the point of trying to setup the > >> actual VM & the install program asked for the name of an ISO to > >> install .... I already burned a CD & mounted it, what do I tell > >> the installer to look at ? I tried various files in the top > >> directory & the installer crashed the OS (!!!!!) .... Any advice ? > > Your question is Off Topic, since its not a problem with FreeBSD > > itself. If you already got VirtualBox running on FreeBSD, you only > > need to tell VirtualBox which is your iso file, from where it will > > boot the CentOS installer, beign this the netinstall ISO you must be > > sure your VirtualBox VM has a NAT or Bridged NIC, inorder to the > > installer can reach the Internet. > > > > Beyond that you should read CentOS install documentation and when in > > doubt ask in the CentOS support channels. > > > Very well, sorry for the noise (twice) :-/ .... > > William, on the settings page of the VM, there is basically 2 things you need to do before you start the VM: 1) Attach the CD to it and tell VBox to boot from the CD/DVD 2) It would be best if you have a DHCP server on your network and set the network card of the VM to "bridge". After that, fire up the VM and see what happens on the screen. If the ISO is for a network install, it should "see" the interface and ask for an IP. After that it should start pulling whatever it needs to complete the install. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 23:02:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E95FE3 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out-02.shaw.ca (smtp-out-03.shaw.ca [64.59.136.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EC8219 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:02:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=ryrf5q5p6c4dCQYR2lAej91p2ozDt6sfPnRAuS/Q8hc= c=1 sm=1 a=mimgIqt4n1wA:10 a=9kIkDyjSo28A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=FiKivyMtPrdXzzi6W66qBw==:17 a=nzgGcyYQxw8kFDP1a0gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO dalet61) ([24.244.29.141]) by smtp-out-02.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2014 17:02:10 -0600 From: "Dale Scott" To: Subject: postfix config - root not receiving mail, but others are Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:02:10 -0600 Message-ID: <008901cfd394$939f87c0$bade9740$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac/Tk6g6VjRXvDWrQKu8fu3s53reEA== Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:02:18 -0000 Hi, I'm building a self-contained proof-of-concept, and configuring Postfix in place of Sendmail. I'm using Mutt on the command line view mail sent by the local web apps to the users (step #2 will be providing IMAP/POP3 access via Dovecot). Just using Mutt, it seems root can email local users, and local users can email each other, but local users can't email root - or at least mail to root isn't received. Any ideas? Where might I have gone wrong? Fwiw, I have *not* set an alias for root in /etc/mail/aliases, on the basis that all mail to root needs to end up in root's Maildir Thanks, Dale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 23:29:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A795FA; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out-05.shaw.ca (smtp-out-05.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAE5613; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:29:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=dwjLhcNAn+N65iW9oApC92yF2BXVJAhWBlCn9pRWT9g= c=1 sm=1 a=EZcv4ilsBBkA:10 a=vyJAdnRk0OcA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=LDgtEy9YHbG/0DC1xeAUGQ==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=j4QhA7_skfAg_sPWonsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=2OV95RkNLh1rjSBZ:21 a=irgCg8EE7_fh0eZ3:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO dalet61) ([24.244.29.148]) by smtp-out-05.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2014 17:28:58 -0600 From: "Dale Scott" To: "'Matthew Seaman'" , References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:28:57 -0600 Message-ID: <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIYqFMcyBRSgCevJwMli0osyE1G/QKG3C1/Awj07BEBzAiyLJs6+vkQ Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:29:05 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:01 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? >=20 > On 18/09/2014 05:34, Dale Scott wrote: > > Do you know if it's difficult to setup Dovecot to authenticate a > > webmail username and password using /etc/master.passwd (like the = Hong > > recipe with courier-authlib), or authenticate using an OpenLDAP > > server? >=20 > Yes, this is pretty easy in fact. I just went through setting up a = new mail system > where I work, using postfix+dovecot+openldap. Works like a charm. Thanks Matthew, good to hear. I had planned to first test basic mailing = from web apps with mail going to local system users, and use mutt to see = mail in local Maildir/ mailboxes. After seeing it work, I then want to = provide imap/pop3 access to mail. Finally, switch to virtual or = non-system-users (to avoid need to create system users). =20 I installed postfix-2.11.1_4,1 as a pkg and just noticed "pkg info = postfix" reports DOVECOT and OPENLDAP options are off. Do I need these = in my scenarios? I didn't put a ports tree on this system to see if it = was possible to build a system from packages only, but am also not = averse to recognizing it was pipe dream (and remember how to use = portmaster again). Is there anything special needed in Dovecot? Fwiw, I'm also finding I can demo workflows with emails much faster = using Mutt (and multiple terminal sessions), than could be done demoing = with Outlook and mousing/clicking around.=20 Regards, Dale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 00:05:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B25E3E for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AC29E4 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 363C027698; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 01:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8INubKN002948; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 01:56:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 01:56:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Dale Scott" Subject: Re: postfix config - root not receiving mail, but others are Message-Id: <20140919015637.73dd4854.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <008901cfd394$939f87c0$bade9740$@shaw.ca> References: <008901cfd394$939f87c0$bade9740$@shaw.ca> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:05:21 -0000 On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:02:10 -0600, Dale Scott wrote: > Hi, I'm building a self-contained proof-of-concept, and configuring Postfix > in place of Sendmail. I'm using Mutt on the command line view mail sent by > the local web apps to the users (step #2 will be providing IMAP/POP3 access > via Dovecot). Just using Mutt, it seems root can email local users, and > local users can email each other, but local users can't email root - or at > least mail to root isn't received. > > Any ideas? Where might I have gone wrong? Fwiw, I have *not* set an alias > for root in /etc/mail/aliases, on the basis that all mail to root needs to > end up in root's Maildir What does # sendmail -bv root say? Is root's mailbox present in /var/mail? Can root properly execute "mail -f" (local mailbox /root/mbox)? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 02:15:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE86E116 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtpout001.mac.com [17.172.81.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (112/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.me.com", Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A7A783 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:15:38 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from [192.168.1.10] (66-216-230-25.dhcp.stcd.mn.charter.com [66.216.230.25]) by st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC400LAFM9SC930@st11p00mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:15:30 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-09-19_01:2014-09-18,2014-09-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1409190014 Message-id: <541B91F4.6090207@icloud.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:16:20 -0500 From: Brandon Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems References: <1812950.bWcWxrzvJI@penguin> <54189CD1.7070102@webrz.net> <5418A5EE.1030304@hiwaay.net> <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:15:39 -0000 I may be mistaken since I'm a newbie with FreeBSD, but I believe that is poudriere's entire purpose isn't it? To build packages in jails for different versions of FreeBSD? On 9/18/2014 3:05 PM, Radek Krejča wrote: > Hello, > > because pkg system still not working for me, I am going to try poudriere. I have first question - is any way to build packages on one fbsd box for more fbsd versions (9.3, 10.0...)? I dont think so but .... > > Radek > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 02:31:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A665E29B for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3418FA for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so1353453wes.27 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:31:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:to:from:subject:date:mime-version:content-type; bh=8luQgl4EBdI8RN66Vd9KwpPpw+D9Qu+C2wQeMavoWT8=; b=SyU3xQ84B2MiaTpfi69b5mdHFNIGVLR+zKqYd8Qw7CEfORgV6bzVg1UWdUJ0jUdkuk eqXEMp7PF2IanuUzVFi+lB8Ud9NJ5IfDuXLsIYhhR8/eTx30GgV82LFS5EQ3TOu7Y6Ex 3LvNIz7d/QS/18coHM7tXo3tAzziD5jkLbYL9kj41/ZR+IwbAf4XLc7C5mhtSx5A2Bvu nGwbltmQvM7IEw20O9WBu68lGoC25xPO3JVX+K5YhZviyZcUpf8Mn6GgIUdjH9b6HfXF BwaGg4iyov7Gyjbjniokj30N0MFzQBs2veUtYakBGGfz7TfMXJ5ysd5Ov9iwerXGC5vn m+fA== X-Received: by 10.180.91.133 with SMTP id ce5mr29991021wib.62.1411093911150; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.71.254.193] ([202.69.11.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id js2sm630006wjc.9.2014.09.18.19.31.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <541b9596.82c8c20a.79fc.2a11@mx.google.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "=?utf-8?B?bmFkZWVtYWJiYXM0NjFAZ21haWwuY29t?=" Subject: =?utf-8?B?TmV0bG9nIHVwZGF0ZTogMiBuZXcgbWVzc2FnZXM=?= Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:31:36 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:31:53 -0000 CgpTZW50IGZyb20gbXkgSFRDCgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 04:58:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032573E1 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B476474D for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.4.156] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUqGW-0007ug-TH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:57:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:57:48 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140919045748.GA1248@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> <541B91F4.6090207@icloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <541B91F4.6090207@icloud.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 93.104.4.156 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:58:03 -0000 El día Thursday, September 18, 2014 a las 09:16:20PM -0500, Brandon Schneider escribió: > I may be mistaken since I'm a newbie with FreeBSD, but I believe that is > poudriere's entire purpose isn't it? To build packages in jails for > different versions of FreeBSD? Do not top-post. > On 9/18/2014 3:05 PM, Radek Krejča wrote: > > Hello, > > > > because pkg system still not working for me, I am going to try poudriere. I have first question - is any way to build packages on one fbsd box for more fbsd versions (9.3, 10.0...)? I dont think so but .... > > Yes, you can. But your host should more recent o very close to your jail, for example if you do: # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head i.e. pulling out 'head' from SVN into the jail, your host will of course be a bit older than the jail, but should be close to 'head'. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 06:44:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40424437 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC37FEE for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8J6iOje096777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:44:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8J6iOje096777 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8J6iOje096777; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <541BD0C1.6080509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:44:17 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dale Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eGknAG9pKHQAr0WsS6mgf5VqIw5bvmRJ9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:44:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eGknAG9pKHQAr0WsS6mgf5VqIw5bvmRJ9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/09/2014 00:28, Dale Scott wrote: > I installed postfix-2.11.1_4,1 as a pkg and just noticed "pkg info > postfix" reports DOVECOT and OPENLDAP options are off. Do I need > these in my scenarios? I didn't put a ports tree on this system to > see if it was possible to build a system from packages only, but am > also not averse to recognizing it was pipe dream (and remember how to > use portmaster again). You can use postfix with dovecot without having to enable the DOVECOT option -- as I recall, that's something to do with postfix using the dovecot authentication mechanisms. You only need OPENLDAP turned on for postfix if you want to use ldap lookups. (Well Duh!) For a stand-alone system without many users, ldap is overkill, and you would generally be better off using lmdb or bdb files instead (I prefer lmdb -- seems simpler and to have fewer overheads= ). > Is there anything special needed in Dovecot? No. Either you configure postfix to use dovecot's delivery agent, or you make postfix speak LMTP to dovecot: from dovecot's perspective it doesn't need to know anything about or do anything differently depending on what MTA you're using. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --eGknAG9pKHQAr0WsS6mgf5VqIw5bvmRJ9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUG9DIXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATR4kP/RcFY2mRPzlnoyHwN4TGbBWW eQsqGmGPcXzXhRonu0sh+NM16OyD5Yusxv1537ipHOj2jgnn+ze+mvqfYRftozFY KqGFrTVD0shxCUc9nnk8ncZEON/AXiNYFAQhQncwTXPYBJKfCdml39toOX2a0FEV 3x6BR/TkOuaxcx+UwqmwvqS/mTLbedKeyAN76f3Lpulp1b9fX3nYfoAZ1HuSplTq J+m6XLpWYB4RmHmoJwkIOm+I0Z5DyCsClw3fjiAa+OCTtfoX4HDiAb18kkNTevHC LqV4LytQCCT0RrXG/v75JacIbwkYUlRjzG+XSDRlt7QPJNS+TzFm60oNCl1s/ALU 1TKCuAGutwZ3ulj6NZFAwvIwfd2q+2nuJ9etkKBoUM2H13u/zGW+IvI40LrLGVHf hSka5AnMl6wgi9U3P1b3c6Y+wmwSWH/5DDyEqX87FQzBfW0x4ynIZnCVHDesXJ+h pkrIY9D8wpE6YXqgwnz//RJtLK4sRthpLHgEoozuU+nljjlwhx0P1qywDP9Fdkab BWzpox7lMmLPGTxLdr3OamoTfhUuOO+zSNk0k0tx8QIRYwxQjDS3G0vJKRzgDM+p aWLaQyqh3WcEa/kTohrMFLqRHMWiEnXdavkx7F0Dkidf5oJm+v0QrGZWNaY5/8zN U24pWhmtDf5Ekkc18aam =xh0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eGknAG9pKHQAr0WsS6mgf5VqIw5bvmRJ9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 07:21:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CCA7CA8 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz", Issuer "STARNET" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9946E3F6 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:21:00 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?UmFkZWsgS3JlasSNYQ==?= To: 'Matthias Apitz' , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:20:59 +0200 Subject: RE: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Topic: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Thread-Index: Ac/TxlFVfM7Jrir7QeuMz2Urx2sYnwAE9YtA Message-ID: References: <541936C5.3080601@qeng-ho.org> <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> <541B91F4.6090207@icloud.com> <20140919045748.GA1248@tiny-r269739> In-Reply-To: <20140919045748.GA1248@tiny-r269739> Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:21:04 -0000 PiA+ID4NCj4gDQo+IFllcywgeW91IGNhbi4gQnV0IHlvdXIgaG9zdCBzaG91bGQgbW9yZSByZWNl bnQgbyB2ZXJ5IGNsb3NlIHRvIHlvdXINCj4gamFpbCwgZm9yIGV4YW1wbGUgaWYgeW91IGRvOg0K PiANCj4gIyBwb3VkcmllcmUgamFpbCAtYyAtaiBmcmVlYnNkLWhlYWQgLW0gc3ZuK2h0dHAgLXYg aGVhZA0KPiANCj4gaS5lLiBwdWxsaW5nIG91dCAnaGVhZCcgZnJvbSBTVk4gaW50byB0aGUgamFp bCwgeW91ciBob3N0IHdpbGwgb2YNCj4gY291cnNlDQo+IGJlIGEgYml0IG9sZGVyIHRoYW4gdGhl IGphaWwsIGJ1dCBzaG91bGQgYmUgY2xvc2UgdG8gJ2hlYWQnLg0KPiANCg0KSGVsbG8sDQoNCnNv IHdpbGwgSSBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGJ1aWxkIHBhY2thZ2VzIG9uIDkuMSBmb3IgMTAuMD8NCg0KUmFk ZWsNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 07:25:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1094F51; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D2860B; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8J7PX9Z034012; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:25:34 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <541BDA6D.3060702@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:25:33 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , Dale Scott , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> <541BD0C1.6080509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <541BD0C1.6080509@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:25:38 -0000 On 19/09/2014 07:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 19/09/2014 00:28, Dale Scott wrote: >> I installed postfix-2.11.1_4,1 as a pkg and just noticed "pkg info >> postfix" reports DOVECOT and OPENLDAP options are off. Do I need >> these in my scenarios? I didn't put a ports tree on this system to >> see if it was possible to build a system from packages only, but am >> also not averse to recognizing it was pipe dream (and remember how to >> use portmaster again). > > You can use postfix with dovecot without having to enable the DOVECOT > option -- as I recall, that's something to do with postfix using the > dovecot authentication mechanisms. That's correct, it's to enable postfix to use dovecot's SASL interface to authorise users when postfix requires authorisation for mail submission. Much nicer to have one mechanism rather than two that might get out of sync. However, if authorisation is enforced via /etc/passwd or LDAP, you've already got your mechanism so don't need dovecot's. > You only need OPENLDAP turned on for postfix if you want to use ldap > lookups. (Well Duh!) For a stand-alone system without many users, ldap > is overkill, and you would generally be better off using lmdb or bdb > files instead (I prefer lmdb -- seems simpler and to have fewer overheads). And it's fast, if you have a lot of mail to process. >> Is there anything special needed in Dovecot? > > No. Either you configure postfix to use dovecot's delivery agent, or > you make postfix speak LMTP to dovecot: from dovecot's perspective it > doesn't need to know anything about or do anything differently depending > on what MTA you're using. LMTP has the advantage that postfix and dovecot can be in separate jails for extra security. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 07:50:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0AF534 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57241831 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.106.22] (helo=tiny-r269739) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUsxV-0002mD-QJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:50:26 +0200 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:50:26 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: poudriere, packages for more fbsd version - was: A lot of pkg problems Message-ID: <20140919075026.GA1023@tiny-r269739> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" References: <20140917085023.GA1534@tiny-r269739> <541967D1.90108@qeng-ho.org> <20140917134133.GA2080@tiny-r269739> <5419A13A.30301@qeng-ho.org> <20140918064103.GA1195@tiny-r269739> <541ABC5E.6010903@qeng-ho.org> <541B91F4.6090207@icloud.com> <20140919045748.GA1248@tiny-r269739> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.106.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 07:50:29 -0000 El día Friday, September 19, 2014 a las 09:20:59AM +0200, Radek Krejča escribió: > > > > > > > > Yes, you can. But your host should more recent o very close to your > > jail, for example if you do: > > > > # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head > > > > i.e. pulling out 'head' from SVN into the jail, your host will of > > course > > be a bit older than the jail, but should be close to 'head'. > > > > Hello, > > so will I be able to build packages on 9.1 for 10.0? No. I run into the same problem/question; my host was 10-CURRENT and I wanted to build packages for 11-CURRENT (i.e. in a 'head' jail and with ports tree of 'head'); this will not work. You should setup a VM or a machine with 10.0 as host and run a poudriere jail for 9.1 in it. Please move the thread to ports@ matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 14:12:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9564522; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFC399C; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd3mr1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.177]) by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2014 08:12:34 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=f4k+QOQAUVVyUsimtis07Gw713bD4Z1Za/89m//jKIc= c=1 sm=1 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=EZcv4ilsBBkA:10 a=vyJAdnRk0OcA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hh-AbDVbAAAA:8 a=6Rl5958_U6lf-uVtYqsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=rtZ51jQm6NYA:10 a=9_rMVyaSODHYqI1_:21 a=WIgJ3FVlqr1jMr39:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO cds005.dcs.int.inet) ([10.0.141.22]) by pd3mr1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2014 08:12:33 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> <541BD0C1.6080509@FreeBSD.org> <541BDA6D.3060702@qeng-ho.org> From: Dale Scott MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <541BDA6D.3060702@qeng-ho.org> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:12:33 -0600 (MDT) To: Arthur Chance X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (MobileSync - Apple-iPad2C5/1104.257) Cc: Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:12:42 -0000 > On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: >=20 >> On 19/09/2014 07:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 19/09/2014 00:28, Dale Scott wrote: >>> I installed postfix-2.11.1_4,1 as a pkg and just noticed "pkg info >>> postfix" reports DOVECOT and OPENLDAP options are off. Do I need >>> these in my scenarios? I didn't put a ports tree on this system to >>> see if it was possible to build a system from packages only, but am >>> also not averse to recognizing it was pipe dream (and remember how to >>> use portmaster again). >>=20 >> You can use postfix with dovecot without having to enable the DOVECOT >> option -- as I recall, that's something to do with postfix using the >> dovecot authentication mechanisms. >=20 > That's correct, it's to enable postfix to use dovecot's SASL interface to= authorise users when postfix requires authorisation for mail submission. M= uch nicer to have one mechanism rather than two that might get out of sync.= However, if authorisation is enforced via /etc/passwd or LDAP, you've alre= ady got your mechanism so don't need dovecot's. >=20 >> You only need OPENLDAP turned on for postfix if you want to use ldap >> lookups. (Well Duh!) For a stand-alone system without many users, ldap >> is overkill, and you would generally be better off using lmdb or bdb >> files instead (I prefer lmdb -- seems simpler and to have fewer overhead= s). >=20 > And it's fast, if you have a lot of mail to process. >=20 >>> Is there anything special needed in Dovecot? >>=20 >> No. Either you configure postfix to use dovecot's delivery agent, or >> you make postfix speak LMTP to dovecot: from dovecot's perspective it >> doesn't need to know anything about or do anything differently depending >> on what MTA you're using. >=20 > LMTP has the advantage that postfix and dovecot can be in separate jails = for extra security. Thanks for all the help. I'm building a fully *self-contained* proof-of-con= cept business system with MantisBT as an ISO9000 issue tracker, Tryton for = managing equipment and material loaned to client jobs and returned, OpenLDA= P for single point of authentication (enterprise is MS AD), and mail workin= g between users, Mantis and Tryton. I'll use Mutt in the first round of dem= os, but will provide RoundCube for demo users to access mail themselves (on= ce virtual mail users are working). I'm ignoring security for now, too much= to learn, create keys and configure, and the IT group will have their own = ideas anyway if the POC proceeds to production. Hopefully it won't look too= disjointed, the alternative is maybe funding in 2016 for the IT team to bu= ild the same thing but with better icons (and by clicking through MS wizard= s ;-)) It could be a nice bonus if I could use my desktop Outlook client to retrie= ve all the mail from Dovecot via pop3 and forward it into the enterprise sy= stem so demo users could really experience the POC, but the POC can't conne= ct directly to any enterprise services (e.g mail) for now. Any comments on = this approach? Dale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 15:38:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D804C9A; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D1434D; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8JFcSjK034768; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:38:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <541C4DF4.1070204@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:38:28 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dale Scott Subject: Re: is pkg saying courier and postfix are incompatible? References: <005201cfd2bd$d8ac34d0$8a049e70$@shaw.ca> <9745AE56F096E150A334CBD1@[192.168.1.50]> <541A7518.7030603@FreeBSD.org> <009601cfd398$51ca0ec0$f55e2c40$@shaw.ca> <541BD0C1.6080509@FreeBSD.org> <541BDA6D.3060702@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthew Seaman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:38:39 -0000 On 19/09/2014 15:12, Dale Scott wrote: >> On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Arthur Chance wrote: >> >>> On 19/09/2014 07:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>>> On 19/09/2014 00:28, Dale Scott wrote: >>>> I installed postfix-2.11.1_4,1 as a pkg and just noticed "pkg info >>>> postfix" reports DOVECOT and OPENLDAP options are off. Do I need >>>> these in my scenarios? I didn't put a ports tree on this system to >>>> see if it was possible to build a system from packages only, but am >>>> also not averse to recognizing it was pipe dream (and remember how to >>>> use portmaster again). >>> >>> You can use postfix with dovecot without having to enable the DOVECOT >>> option -- as I recall, that's something to do with postfix using the >>> dovecot authentication mechanisms. >> >> That's correct, it's to enable postfix to use dovecot's SASL interface >> to authorise users when postfix requires authorisation for mail submission. >> Much nicer to have one mechanism rather than two that might get out of sync. >> However, if authorisation is enforced via /etc/passwd or LDAP, you've >> already got your mechanism so don't need dovecot's. >> >>> You only need OPENLDAP turned on for postfix if you want to use ldap >>> lookups. (Well Duh!) For a stand-alone system without many users, ldap >>> is overkill, and you would generally be better off using lmdb or bdb >>> files instead (I prefer lmdb -- seems simpler and to have fewer overheads). >> >> And it's fast, if you have a lot of mail to process. >> >>>> Is there anything special needed in Dovecot? >>> >>> No. Either you configure postfix to use dovecot's delivery agent, or >>> you make postfix speak LMTP to dovecot: from dovecot's perspective it >>> doesn't need to know anything about or do anything differently depending >>> on what MTA you're using. >> >> LMTP has the advantage that postfix and dovecot can be in separate jails for >> extra security. > > Thanks for all the help. I'm building a fully *self-contained* proof-of-concept > business system with MantisBT as an ISO9000 issue tracker, Tryton for managing > equipment and material loaned to client jobs and returned, OpenLDAP for single > point of authentication (enterprise is MS AD), and mail working between users, > Mantis and Tryton. I'll use Mutt in the first round of demos, but will provide > RoundCube for demo users to access mail themselves (once virtual mail users are > working). I'm ignoring security for now, too much to learn, create keys and > configure, and the IT group will have their own ideas anyway if the POC proceeds > to production. Hopefully it won't look too disjointed, the alternative is maybe > funding in 2016 for the IT team to build the same thing but with better icons > (and by clicking through MS wizards ;-)) > > It could be a nice bonus if I could use my desktop Outlook client to retrieve > all the mail from Dovecot via pop3 and forward it into the enterprise system > so demo users could really experience the POC, but the POC can't connect > directly to any enterprise services (e.g mail) for now. Any comments on this > approach? I've never used Outlook in my life, so can't comment on that side of it, but dovecot does POP3 as well as IMAP. It's not as good as IMAP, but for a demo should be good enough. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/POP3Server From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 16:24:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5FFA169 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41978ACA for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n3so5271413wiv.1 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3b2sffiBSDBEKD7spY1UmM0+H1dxHvTLP3LmXtCo41E=; b=yBdnSq4y1X/kQsuk6vsx7GRcvpbsfBNOHwUAT2RNgSfEleZJWgxERMIG1Ib+e1eZ/q KQYvWBLc+f1b2ZFtMm9cFnA7s+g4hXWqxzH2BPWa0pHgexm3LHFf4nD66RFbfHmhnIQV fI+ftfv+FLsOiOPyFrAfoVMc2NGkZykXq5k4Xp95frMqzuUa3igDVFDcLQAxxF4Uwi1U VQz1i6bhE0Un6IOBixnL0KMWROuc2Eu9KckkB+QuoJLq+lmEFmPSIHYf2hCX0fT4JZXf tdHgfMHl3OjfLednrNdCC1tiI0yzKrM+urJU22UArx6KjBGKuXdX50vCG/iZ19KVF6dp Yh0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.218.99 with SMTP id pf3mr56470980wic.19.1411143882488; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.116.138 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.116.138 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:24:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Broken my pkg set up... From: Peter Harrison To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:24:44 -0000 Dear list, I seem to have broken my pkg beyond all repair (that I can find at least). The problem seems to stem from having used postmaster to update chromium (and a couple of other ports) when there was a bit of a delay in the official repository being update. pkg now refuses to update those ports. I get: "pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" Consistently for those ports which were updated by hand. I've gone so far as to delete all ports (pkg delete -a), verify that the pkg database is empty (pkg info) run pkg check -Ba. But on reinstall I get the exact same message on the exact same ports - including slim, xfce4, and chromium. What am I doing wrong? This is on 10-RELEASE i386 Thanks Peter Harrison From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 17:17:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD17F29 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209E0F8F for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2mr1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.110]) by pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2014 11:17:43 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=s+0R4JzlRBUW8GXF//6L4/AwYJegyFoFyppZH3AfVto= c=1 sm=1 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=aHwfBhZkTx0A:10 a=8mBSrlGg-1AA:10 a=2nVR-lrW0_4A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ILZ70N8wH84HbGOdL9AA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO cds005.dcs.int.inet) ([10.0.141.22]) by pd2mr1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2014 11:17:43 -0600 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:17:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Dale Scott To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <423939037.38173448.1411147063733.JavaMail.root@cds005> In-Reply-To: <12060296.38163745.1411146395694.JavaMail.root@cds005> Subject: pkg, packages and ports - what is pkg saying? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [147.108.253.252] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (ZimbraWebClient - [unknown] (Win)/7.1.4_GA_2555) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:17:45 -0000 I'm on fbsd 10 release, installed most software as packages, but recently compiled postfix and dovecot2 from ports to enable their ldap/OpenLDAP option. Afterwhich I thought I'd check and see if anything needed updating. If I let pkg upgrade everything, as I understand it, postfix and dovecot2 will revert to the options in the distributed package, and I won't have ldap support anymore. Is this correct? What is the "simplest" approach? (meaning no poudriere etc.). Can I just let pkg do it's thing first, then pkg delete and make install postfix and dovecot2 from ports again? Is there a better way? Thanks, Dale root@whizzer:~ # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (31 candidates): 100% The following 13 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be UPGRADED: t1lib: 5.1.2_3,1 -> 5.1.2_4,1 cairo: 1.10.2_10,2 -> 1.12.16_1,2 openldap-server: 2.4.39_3 -> 2.4.39_4 openldap-client: 2.4.39_1 -> 2.4.39_2 python27: 2.7.8_4 -> 2.7.8_5 p5-Net-SSLeay: 1.65 -> 1.66 p5-IO-Socket-IP: 0.31 -> 0.32 curl: 7.37.1_4 -> 7.38.0_1 rsync: 3.1.1_2 -> 3.1.1_3 procmail: 3.22_7 -> 3.22_8 Installed packages to be REINSTALLED: postfix-2.11.1_4,1 (options changed) dovecot2-2.2.13_3 (options changed) dialog4ports-0.1.5_2 (options changed) The process will require 250 KB more space. 16 MB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: N root@whizzer:~ # From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 17:41:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F189907 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3196322F for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU437-SMTP74 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22724); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:41:01 -0700 X-TMN: [IRUigRPuVlUlI6893EGN92BwHLnu5xgZ] X-Originating-Email: [f.toscan@hotmail.it] Message-ID: Received: from pillow.thwn ([95.244.36.39]) by BLU437-SMTP74.smtp.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.0.9200.16384); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:40:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (1001@localhost [local]); by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 3ece51c7; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:40:45 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: OpenSMTPD enqueuer (Demoostik) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:40:45 +0200 From: Francesco Toscan To: Dale Scott Subject: Re: pkg, packages and ports - what is pkg saying? Mail-Followup-To: Francesco Toscan , Dale Scott , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <12060296.38163745.1411146395694.JavaMail.root@cds005> <423939037.38173448.1411147063733.JavaMail.root@cds005> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <423939037.38173448.1411147063733.JavaMail.root@cds005> X-Celebrating: Building ports since FreeBSD 3.4 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2014 17:40:59.0824 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFF9C300:01CFD430] Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:41:08 -0000 On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:17:43AM -0600, Dale Scott wrote: > If I let pkg upgrade everything, as I understand it, postfix and dovecot2 will revert to the options in the distributed package, and I won't have ldap support anymore. Is this correct? > > What is the "simplest" approach? (meaning no poudriere etc.). Can I just let pkg do it's thing first, then pkg delete and make install postfix and dovecot2 from ports again? > > Is there a better way? You can lock postfix and dovecot with pkg lock: when you'll run pkg upgrade again, locked packages will be left alone. f. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 18:02:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E513DB2 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7FD6AA for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s8JHqmuB057805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:52:48 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <541C6D70.6010207@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:52:48 -0600 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: VNET/VIMAGE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:02:35 -0000 I looked at VNET/VIMAGE a couple of years ago under FreeBSD 8 and it was not really stable enough for production use.=20 I have looked around a bit and can't seem to find any recent documentation on the state of VNET. I'm wondering where VNET/VIMAGE is at under FreeBSD 10. Thanks, -Markham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 22:43:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40B2139 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6321607 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD3346B0C; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:42:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s8JMgxEA079708; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:42:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s8JMgwN5079705; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:42:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:42:58 -0400 (EDT) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: Peter Harrison Subject: Re: Broken my pkg set up... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:42:59 -0400 (EDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:43:05 -0000 On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Peter Harrison wrote: > Dear list, > > I seem to have broken my pkg beyond all repair (that I can find at least). > > The problem seems to stem from having used postmaster to update chromium > (and a couple of other ports) when there was a bit of a delay in the > official repository being update. > > pkg now refuses to update those ports. > > I get: > > "pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" > > Consistently for those ports which were updated by hand. > > I've gone so far as to delete all ports (pkg delete -a), verify that the > pkg database is empty (pkg info) run pkg check -Ba. But on reinstall I get > the exact same message on the exact same ports - including slim, xfce4, and > chromium. > > What am I doing wrong? > > This is on 10-RELEASE i386 > This is shooting in the dark because you did not list what errors you were getting: 1) check your version of pkg, it should be [at least] 1.3.7 2) somewhere between 1.1.4 and the current version the format of pkg.conf changed. This keeps pkg from updating. pkg.conf.sample should be okay. Rename it and update pkg if that is your issue. 3) Various threads have talked about deleting old meta data. I have never used pkg in a way to have the directories and/or files discussed on my system. 4) Make sure to set make.conf: WITH_PKGNG=yes Given that you have cleared everything and still get the problem, make sure what version you have. I had my problems on a 9.2 system, so your issue is probably not what I had. However seeing if you have the latest version of pkg and updating to that version if not, is a good place to start. Post the command and the errors you are getting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 02:29:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B5DF6C0 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.g16.pair.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f440::4227:4116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192B7ABB for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 02:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atomizer (c-71-60-227-57.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.227.57]) by mail1.g16.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E6EF5C58 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:29:22 -0400 From: Rod Person To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: HELP! GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA Message-ID: <20140919222922.1cf95b53@atomizer> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 02:29:47 -0000 Hi, I don't know what happened, but I have a 2 TB hard drive that has mainly multimedia on it. After a reboot I get the message: GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, GPT) I found the gdisk utility and when I run I get the following information: root@atomizer:/ # gdisk /dev/ada0 GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10 Partition table scan: MBR: protective BSD: not present APM: not present GPT: present Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. Warning! Secondary partition table overlaps the last partition by 10035073 blocks! Try reducing the partition table size by 40140292 entries. (Use the 's' item on the experts' menu.) At this point, I don't want to go any further, it would seem that I can restore the partition table and everything would be right again, but having never done this I am a bit nervous. Can anyone lend a hand with this? -- Rod http://www.rodperson.com He who knows himself to be one way and pretends it is another way is a thief who robs his own soul. The Mahabharata Sakuntala 25 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 10:11:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70D89ED for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E89A937 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0SCl4g7zzCy1q for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id L2jnRRJE-s51 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100891B757D for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:12 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Operation not supported by device X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:11:14 -0000 Hello! I'm still migratning servers from linux to FreeBSD. This one I have added a hard disk, intalled 10.0-RELEASE, mounted linux partitions and started moving data. Then, while I was waiting, I did a freebsd-update, rebooted, and now if I try to mount the very same partition I get: root@vodka:~ # mount -t ext2 /dev/ada1s3 /mnt mount: /dev/ada1s3: Operation not supported by device lsvfs says: root@vodka:~ # lsvfs Filesystem Num Refs Flags -------------------------------- ---------- ----- --------------- cd9660 0x000000bd 0 read-only ufs 0x00000035 1 msdosfs 0x00000032 0 nfs 0x0000003a 0 network devfs 0x00000071 1 synthetic, jail procfs 0x00000002 0 synthetic, jail ext2fs 0x000000f3 0 The partition is ok, I can even fsck it: root@vodka:~ # e2fsck !:3 e2fsck /dev/ada1s3 e2fsck 1.42.10 (18-May-2014) /dev/ada1s3: clean, 234263/9445376 files, 2007039/37761485 blocks What did I wrong? Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 10:45:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F63E62; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F91BB7; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XVIAl-001v4I-SS>; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:47 +0200 Received: from g225119140.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.119.140] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XVIAl-002jpv-Oh>; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:47 +0200 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:45:40 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: 11.0-CURRENT and Lenovo ThinkPad E540: No LAN, no WiFI Message-ID: <20140920124540.76a9abae.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140915233833.5bdd0725.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Y2b9rJzbwFe2mlhYDW_TE95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.119.140 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:45:57 -0000 --Sig_/Y2b9rJzbwFe2mlhYDW_TE95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:19:32 -0700 Kevin Oberman schrieb: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann > wrote: >=20 > > > > Trying to install and run FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT > > (FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990-memstick.img) on a new Len= ovo > > E540 notebook > > fails in activating the NIC (Realtek RTL8111/8168B, driver re[0]). The = NIC > > shows up as > > active and with carrier when issuing "ifconfig re0". > > > > From a desktop machine, I tried to ping the system in question and I ge= t a > > result with > > missing packets: > > > > ping: sendto: Host is down > > ping: sendto: Host is down > > ping: sendto: Host is down > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D26 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.114 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D41 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.130 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D60 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D80 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.119 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D100 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.105 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D116 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.135 ms > > 64 bytes from 192.168.0.130: icmp_seq=3D136 ttl=3D64 time=3D0.091 ms > > > > DHCP configuration fails, since no DHCP offer is discovered. > > > > I swapped the switches, the cabling and I had always the same results. I > > used another > > Laptop, Dell Latitude E6510 with the same configuration (/etc/rc.conf) = and > > that system > > gets DHCP offer and is online. > > > > Since the notebook is brandnew, the last thing I'll "suspect" is a > > defective NIC, so I'll > > ask whether this phenomenon is known - or, if not, the results > > definititely would > > indicate a broken NIC. > > > > Another point is the WiFI adaptor. This notebook is supposed to have a > > WiFi NIC, but it > > doesn't get revealed by FreeBSD (I tried iwn/iwi without success). > > > > pciconf output below, sorry for the messy shape, it is a copy-and-paste > > from that immature > > vt() terminal. > > > > Has anyone successfully installed that type of Notebook with FreeBSD > > CURRENT using NIC > > and Wifi? > > > > Please CC me. > > > > > > Regards > > oh > > > > > > [...] > > > > none1@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0xff0000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x522= 710ec > > rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 > > > > > > vendor =3D 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.' > > > > > > bar [10] =3D type Memory, range 32, base 0xf1e00000, size 4096, e= nabled > > > > > > cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > > > > > > cap 05[50] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > > > > > > cap 10[70] =3D PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(128) link x1(x1) > > > > > > speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM L0s/L1(L0s/L1) > > > > > > ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected > > > > > > ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 00000001004ce000 > > > > > > re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x502817aa chip=3D0x816810ec re= v=3D0x10 > > hdr=3D0x00 > > > > > > subclass =3D ethernet > > > > > > cap 01[40] =3D powerspec 3 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current > > D0 > > di sabled(L0s/L1) > > > > > > cap 11[b0] =3D MSI-X supports 4 messages, enabled > > > > ecap 0001[100] =3D AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 4 corrected > > > > > > > > ecap 001e[178] =3D unknown 1 > > > > > > class =3D network > > > > > > cap 05[d0] =3D MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > > > > > > ecap 0003[140] =3D Serial 1 ac7ba1ffffa06fd6 > > >=20 > I can't comment on the WiFi, I have little Asus box using an 8111/8168B a= nd > it works fine with the driver in 10.1-BETA. The driver in 10.0 recognizes > the device, but did not work. I do notice that your NIC has a rev of 0x10 > while mine is 0x0c. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired I tried a 10.1-BETA also and it shows the very same symptomes as in 11.0-CU= RRENT. As Guido Falsi stated later in this thread, the device gets recognized but is = inoperable after initialized and setup by the OS until the administrator takes some st= range actions. In Guido's case a setting/resetting of NIC features helps, in my case I hav= e to bring down the device first via "ifconfig re0 down" and then bring it up. After t= hat, the NIC works as expected. This seems clearly to be a bug in the driver code and it= might indeed have to do something with a new revision used, but the NIC is since at leas= t a year on the market and floating around (my laptop was manufactured in April of this= year). Well, I hope this report doesn't get lost, so I filed a PR. Oliver --Sig_/Y2b9rJzbwFe2mlhYDW_TE95 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUHVraAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8qzUIAJWake6B6rO7uj4FPQa4a7pG +lxP38T26h/+3z6Kc+oc/W4FQv4/eQRRS1DOSGvoS92Fg8lTBP4JrSXXA2wxVLUj QbtKzb1WrdezomA6w1FbsAoYIZB6Kqn9C6uvmLkgstiIDhy8UeSaBoGyy4DHcqH3 mYyFEooaAbpVVHqH3moiiTmfABSiELoLK6Lc3MSKgevwYWINHa2srfK9y7zzZ/TQ Wsy0s1RCRe57711Ca+sHPihhxGgpRQVbEm0FHfa/1sf5uyHwgmf0D+8FdLd0ikAv HQMNigabz+lGN6Oy5qVKizWWxsfTRGT+m2lpByMip3SxnNVqCav0/EPjoij1jwQ= =EIfl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Y2b9rJzbwFe2mlhYDW_TE95-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 11:10:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B867344 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm30-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm30-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DF7DA4 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1411211225; bh=Szq2mbmZLaA9Ypv/tbouvHWiQBeP30W28ciYKOKHtHk=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject; b=oTHv7kwQlut5DAAQ3hptM4om5tDbj2Ax5+bKP/bXipOlpCOnCcmtxCO06yYjq8cPI9Qrac1P0R7vKTGqFfTpIafZevSGNmr5kneHNFOl+OTtisBUSzstNjVuC9jeENfaSIVhcQpCPc/WPjpLdDPzYc7fXgNa5z+DPahPayyir/VG5wxnpskf9zJof4+NfJZ+kWU31fCpLAn37h54rx2HQEGj5fjD7pYpToDn06gs509pm38WhcsHhBbowo3y7wcyd+WRjVrNuyoLZ0DweJEaQtc7JeJhqRrEb8j7ZuCFMevizzAcKxdC9sHLS6vFioV0z97PdA8KZ5/CdadlMSnwuw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048; d=yahoo.es; b=M8ob22eAGG2QgKEHs52M3vQ0yVf+1vYlxDIp6zpXL6r65ugiF8oph1efL9m2Nh0vYOZVtNmwv7o8jytXEQxcVo/jHf5BOck5JqJnQSFj45MROmrkyPbd25SegVPbgxuZrYGARl6JlLrCnRUWZpXm61BmgmLB/PhFn6i5YPR9eSzE9Fb0RHB9XXd12KtTq8/PunhnyypJuQGb9zkye8yLTkVgOEzKo5iUEyMuRmhIQxnRNqT80tjhw/fJfkdn6gxizqfLPXHmzmYZlhYUkOu9laAnb2fyZlicSdKtJOMOpArECm67hmNSOCTcOh5i0ZZH0tf2otNsGG5j2IDXd5JDYA==; Received: from [212.82.98.49] by nm30.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2014 11:07:05 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.74] by tm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2014 11:07:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2014 11:07:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s1024; t=1411211225; bh=Szq2mbmZLaA9Ypv/tbouvHWiQBeP30W28ciYKOKHtHk=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Disposition-Notification-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QoeKx9wkYYXklopND46/lkKuE50zVrr10qESDJkRu5qsDGjO7nzj5mAzvgKW9aBOmpdJW2VLkSO3G1ogJ+uVPzkoSOqSG8nujp/PCM5tANJV7hmHSX2DwjvLCetZjL5MVqdah1P4UUfpXeJkptgDKgfmoVYCHpm9Nf1CUhJbYMU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 693270.87892.bm@smtp111.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: C5A1ov8VM1mMizUfy6WxTEq7.lGIA6bTeHejSEdIwuqCxCL faP4TWXbg5hJHExdmQiioiuX8brC3p4nMrNGb2WTkR2SNEWA9DNg2l93zfZC ZvAhX4qP99qSsIUN0jN.N_11TAUqnW5k1HcDJAzrz0wNwo2_EgDEg6k_J0NB dA0j7WkgXezjDOehdHhkvtu7uq_C3fufPLQpobxW5BrLD5xWTQM8PZAXHGmx Un5nZhxNNb_EZzKxVAAfLgYA_EZmhq02vBGMF5IDeeSJ3D_hAg2XLFRmpeYG 0EJUpmGSz0Hbl6qS3pVlSwtryvaq7Mh0RrRv0UX.NuznllwCJHg92SgY919s sFpRiUQ.lh_B1KRVRjE7BQ_BzyYS7KdW_Fv9h0OxJC8yEIht1HlzK5WpYLJm 1tC8OkRBofTzVeIK_rdBb6.5WQ7wzaggALfBYSBjdNGUYMEB3MSD3x_SXprq CJaCvXCS6lSNfGrVjdW8IfnfjTpGLF7JisGdjPFHyxbs1oc_fndoOxNVxGef gJmtwadbMB1C4DLa7lpp7hSKym8aql4KxhgDNRGgOwjo5qw3GVa0b2ejxy2o 7EzI- X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:07:29 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device Message-Id: <20140920130729.341e8f56a557d867b8bbe590@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:10:30 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:12 +0200 Luciano Mannucci wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm still migratning servers from linux to FreeBSD. This one I have > added a hard disk, intalled 10.0-RELEASE, mounted linux partitions and > started moving data. Then, while I was waiting, I did a > freebsd-update, rebooted, and now if I try to mount the very same > partition I get: > > root@vodka:~ # mount -t ext2 /dev/ada1s3 /mnt > mount: /dev/ada1s3: Operation not supported by device > > lsvfs says: > > root@vodka:~ # lsvfs > Filesystem Num Refs Flags > -------------------------------- ---------- ----- --------------- > cd9660 0x000000bd 0 read-only > ufs 0x00000035 1 > msdosfs 0x00000032 0 > nfs 0x0000003a 0 network > devfs 0x00000071 1 synthetic, jail > procfs 0x00000002 0 synthetic, jail > ext2fs 0x000000f3 0 > > The partition is ok, I can even fsck it: > > root@vodka:~ # e2fsck !:3 > e2fsck /dev/ada1s3 > e2fsck 1.42.10 (18-May-2014) > /dev/ada1s3: clean, 234263/9445376 files, 2007039/37761485 blocks > > What did I wrong? Perhaps it's automatically mounted at startup. Try to umount it #umount /dev/ada1s3 and mount again. > Luciano. > -- > /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) > \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 > X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG > / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 13:15:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326744CE for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A7CA30 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8KDFK8i006371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:15:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8KDFJgD006365; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:15:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:15:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Rod Person Subject: Re: HELP! GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA In-Reply-To: <20140919222922.1cf95b53@atomizer> Message-ID: References: <20140919222922.1cf95b53@atomizer> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:15:20 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:15:28 -0000 On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Rod Person wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know what happened, but I have a 2 TB hard drive that has > mainly multimedia on it. After a reboot I get the message: > > GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA > GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, GPT) > > I found the gdisk utility and when I run I get the following > information: > > root@atomizer:/ # gdisk /dev/ada0 > GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10 > > Partition table scan: > MBR: protective > BSD: not present > APM: not present > GPT: present > > Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. > > Warning! Secondary partition table overlaps the last partition by > 10035073 blocks! > Try reducing the partition table size by 40140292 entries. > (Use the 's' item on the experts' menu.) > > At this point, I don't want to go any further, it would seem that I > can restore the partition table and everything would be right again, > but having never done this I am a bit nervous. Can anyone lend a hand > with this? What happened? Was this new partition just created, and with what tool? gpart normally will not allow creating partitions that overlap other structures. Was dd(1) used to copy it from another disk? Is there data on this new partition? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 13:43:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C818A88 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.g16.pair.com (mail1.g16.pair.com [66.39.65.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081EDC92 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atomizer (c-71-60-227-57.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.227.57]) by mail1.g16.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C0FF5C71; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:43:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 09:43:11 -0400 From: Rod Person To: Warren Block Subject: Re: HELP! GEOM: ada0: the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA Message-ID: <20140920094311.16e9725e@atomizer> In-Reply-To: References: <20140919222922.1cf95b53@atomizer> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:43:24 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:15:19 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > > What happened? Was this new partition just created, and with what > tool? gpart normally will not allow creating partitions that > overlap other structures. Was dd(1) used to copy it from another > disk? > > Is there data on this new partition? > Thanks for the reply, but I was actually able to repair the partition table by using the gdisk tool, once I decided to just go for it. As far as I can figure, I had booted into Windows 7 disk that I have on this machine. I was trying to format an external drive as NTFS...something in disk manager must have screwed up the partition table, even though this is not the disk I was working on. I've had this disk for 3 or 4 years and been in 3 different machines and never had a problem with it. I think it was the 1st disk I ever used gpt and labels on - thanks to your guide! -- Rod http://www.rodperson.com He who knows himself to be one way and pretends it is another way is a thief who robs his own soul. The Mahabharata Sakuntala 25 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 15:03:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A72503 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA5A5E5 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0ZtG6RhpzCy1r for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:03:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id ucZG2-0AHQwF for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0ZtG5XRDzCy1q for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC2A1B7515 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:03:32 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device In-Reply-To: <20140920130729.341e8f56a557d867b8bbe590@yahoo.es> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <20140920130729.341e8f56a557d867b8bbe590@yahoo.es> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3j0ZtG5XRDzCy1q@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:03:37 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:07:29 +0200 Eduardo Morras wrote: > Perhaps it's automatically mounted at startup. Try to umount it > > #umount /dev/ada1s3 Doesn't seem to work: root@vodka:~ # umount !$ umount /dev/ada1s3 umount: /dev/ada1s3: unknown file system Thanks anyeay, Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 16:10:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9354CB01 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1BDC00 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0cMG6khFzCy1s for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id 9gV-TbDjy3r9 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7121B757D for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:15 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device In-Reply-To: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:10:20 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:12 +0200 Luciano Mannucci wrote: > root@vodka:~ # mount -t ext2 /dev/ada1s3 /mnt > mount: /dev/ada1s3: Operation not supported by device Hmmm... I don't see mount_ext2 anywhere, is it normal? Nothing in the manuals, nothink /sbin nor in /usr/src... Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 18:00:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFAD36B1 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B00279A for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u56so1102434wes.11 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hsCPS4gguVF8eGm32zXw8+UHPJvQCfMQrjOeOuCT3YM=; b=cFpIxCPdCNseES5d5Sw182mdXzWjYJADzf9zLCd+eKtGKdsUHP3hDpKYO262sssOcg bfd45nKBwXs1ZBcvezYFx+yk5gOkhV+Onipo2qwzUBKReC00W7Krvmg6QyF3nmJImSOh mJFC1NVpZUFlhHTiQj4KEYg9xiQw0Wa+G6wBOqDkD8Me92nWXmxajKYW3bu1WkgkCQxp 56mrFOL8pcxNkh6iQudc9N7W1GedXfB23WluPGVGqDK6nw3rhxmGgYXmJ++Nl+rK+Fyg pdr3UbCUtiGoGHhHA7BxnyNLKduZWP5tW1WTBkZ4wKV5fiQ6wYdRXUIgTM7FALl6fEbl nuWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.78.243 with SMTP id e19mr3254145wjx.119.1411236046751; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.116.138 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.116.138 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:00:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Broken my pkg set up... From: Peter Harrison To: doug@safeport.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:00:49 -0000 Peter Harrison On 19 Sep 2014 23:43, "doug" wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Peter Harrison wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> I seem to have broken my pkg beyond all repair (that I can find at least). >> >> The problem seems to stem from having used postmaster to update chromium >> (and a couple of other ports) when there was a bit of a delay in the >> official repository being update. >> >> pkg now refuses to update those ports. >> >> I get: >> >> "pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" >> >> Consistently for those ports which were updated by hand. >> >> I've gone so far as to delete all ports (pkg delete -a), verify that the >> pkg database is empty (pkg info) run pkg check -Ba. But on reinstall I get >> the exact same message on the exact same ports - including slim, xfce4, and >> chromium. >> >> What am I doing wrong? >> >> This is on 10-RELEASE i386 >> > This is shooting in the dark because you did not list what errors you were getting: > > 1) check your version of pkg, it should be [at least] 1.3.7 > > 2) somewhere between 1.1.4 and the current version the format of pkg.conf > changed. This keeps pkg from updating. pkg.conf.sample should be okay. > Rename it and update pkg if that is your issue. > > 3) Various threads have talked about deleting old meta data. I have never > used pkg in a way to have the directories and/or files discussed on my > system. > > 4) Make sure to set make.conf: WITH_PKGNG=yes > > Given that you have cleared everything and still get the problem, make sure what version you have. I had my problems on a 9.2 system, so your issue is probably not what I had. However seeing if you have the latest version of pkg and updating to that version if not, is a good place to start. > > Post the command and the errors you are getting. Thanks. I managed to resolve the problem by forcibly deleting all ports, including pkg; deleting /var/db/pkg/; then reinstalling pkg and all subsequent pkgs. I have encountered another problem but I'll cover that in another mail. Cheers. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 18:29:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A0FE8F for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD02CA3E for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m1so2227132oag.5 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gJQVmNZQez/cxN7tHN95+7NYcu77fJmx/NXc0a/kNB4=; b=hV3e7wjy7iIQr1UROWPRjnjci/mIWVEqOP1x4tYlPNTwD/asU88lBIBC0CsnPTe8Lh 46VEI5SGjAEb203hrs9vSKTCZOVSyKjTzejeC7AY2/Lid7eAij41aWje2ojEYUpqoFIU mZzluwggV6wb9lvlNHmVpHQf6ImCNOonH4PeMFU0qhMRhskpClrGBmgsxxylrJhk3N4M niTxDIfObzB/ukBzy7JIarPO8QBYq4u7Iz9F9v18ZnwoZhzwqWPvRPb21E0nBRRNd4fM fEBKVK87T3/iHtglPJP1sYOVvPFZCuCTFQwdmhR3RZ6mNh6XFsCE8an3OqgNghsn5rDv Q+Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1yKNNuLeeR5E03QWQXOFq8nwJp2BTlXW9p0WsNanOPHx5pfjRjn8mpUG6S8NzYZ1DkuqU MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.20.242 with SMTP id q18mr16577574obe.52.1411236204688; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.220.134 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device From: Michael Sierchio To: Luciano Mannucci Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:29:56 -0000 On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:12 +0200 > Luciano Mannucci wrote: > >> root@vodka:~ # mount -t ext2 /dev/ada1s3 /mnt >> mount: /dev/ada1s3: Operation not supported by device You'll either need to compile it in the kernel options EXT2FS or load the kernel module kldload ext2fs which you can do in /boot/loader.conf if you need it early. You will also find it useful, if not essential, to install the package 'sysutils/e2fsprogs' - filesystems do sometimes need to be fscked Auguri! - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 18:34:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5EBF9A for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99757AE4 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-162-184.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.162.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCEA27841; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:33:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s8KIXrNg002032; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:33:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:33:53 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Luciano Mannucci Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device Message-Id: <20140920203353.baa3cfae.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:34:03 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:10:15 +0200, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:03:12 +0200 > Luciano Mannucci wrote: > > > root@vodka:~ # mount -t ext2 /dev/ada1s3 /mnt > > mount: /dev/ada1s3: Operation not supported by device > Hmmm... I don't see mount_ext2 anywhere, is it normal? > Nothing in the manuals, nothink /sbin nor in /usr/src... Did it go away during the update you mentioned? Did the update somehow remove ext2 support (in favour of using "fuse" tools)? Did you update your source tree? Check if the directory /usr/src/sbin/mount_ext2fs exists and if you can run a "make install" from there. The command should then be "mount_ext2fs" (not mount_ext2), and similarly the command "mount -t ext2fs /dev/ada1s3 /mnt". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 19:14:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8A8C1E for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56C0BE70 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r10so1917818pdi.11 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qTP9Bhym1275uU2ybNt1YlLOlCG3b7qSvXA3r96doZ0=; b=QiEecPm2KjzrFg132JSouX/oxIXBlMEZQc484NoHZW4zxmZ9uqWAempJZWLJ7UOtgI mFsJg1b9O73ukGma6wIZbmHH25ZTslGCqb6k1PQIZc8TEU+vsyggawoqfBy7EPDTCAR7 h4sCOH6kHKC+7GAGVmswLL1I5m9l1ltunG977msRy0VxBve7A3C0nZsguh9W9dr2EMxr AL7A5HikkHGt67DURxk9i5yw6VmIqnhin5ixLRvZ9MfCWQ+T29cTyFsjNmCfkhsyW/+F V/XA0Cq/Gd7sAPWcRTeJiy0JHAz1gA2aLKJ0UNEYh/H7RdAcmjCWKDGX3PNIzKyqw9Y7 tAFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.242.134 with SMTP id wq6mr11082762pbc.135.1411240466858; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.64.195 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:14:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Trying 10.1 Beta2 From: Brian Wood To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Brian Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:14:27 -0000 I would like to try 10.1 beta2 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/VM-IMAGES/10.1-BETA2/amd64/Latest/ I don't know what those files are. I installed from a memstick.img in the past. What do you suggest? Thanks. -- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 19:59:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3668D70C for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.koukaam.se (mail.koukaam.se [193.86.201.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.koukaam.se", Issuer "KOUKAAM Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915AF29F for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (unassigned-84-246-167-13.ujezd.net [84.246.167.13] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.koukaam.se (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8KJnrbV089677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:49:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from knezour@weboutsourcing.cz) Message-ID: <541DDA2D.20805@weboutsourcing.cz> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 21:49:01 +0200 From: Ondra Knezour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Wood , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trying 10.1 Beta2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:59:35 -0000 Dne 20.9.2014 21:14, Brian Wood napsal(a): > I would like to try 10.1 beta2 > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/VM-IMAGES/10.1-BETA2/amd64/Latest/ > > I don't know what those files are. I installed from a memstick.img > in the past. What do you suggest? Thanks. Those are images for virtual machines. If you are looking for the memstick images, try ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/10.1/ Ondra From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 22:32:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5F9E5B for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67012D7 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0mqs0B6RzCy1s; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:32:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id zaZUOK9ISrVV; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0mqr3qp0zCy1r; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014A61B757D; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:32:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 00:32:05 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device In-Reply-To: <20140920203353.baa3cfae.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> <20140920203353.baa3cfae.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3j0mqr3qp0zCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:32:11 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:33:53 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > Did it go away during the update you mentioned? Did > the update somehow remove ext2 support (in favour of > using "fuse" tools)? Thats what I suspect, yes. Though I thougth fuse tools were for ext4fs, not ext2/ext3. > > Did you update your source tree? Check if the directory > /usr/src/sbin/mount_ext2fs exists and if you can run > a "make install" from there. The command should then > be "mount_ext2fs" (not mount_ext2) No, it doesn't exist. (and yes, I ment mount_ext2fs, my typo). Thanks for now, luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 23:00:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C591410C for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBBB6EB for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0nSk2QMkzCy1s; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 01:00:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id fs-Nf4Rsoeb6; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 01:00:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3j0nSj6F3hzCy1r; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 01:00:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E011B757D; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 01:00:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 01:00:34 +0200 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Operation not supported by device Solved! In-Reply-To: <20140920203353.baa3cfae.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <3j0SCl1nnSzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <3j0cMG4GZxzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> <20140920203353.baa3cfae.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3j0nSj6F3hzCy1r@baobab.bilink.it> Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:00:39 -0000 On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:33:53 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > command "mount -t ext2fs /dev/ada1s3 /mnt". You're right. Whith that very command it works! I tryed ext3fs and ext2 but not ext2fs! Maaany thanks! Luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/