Date: 27 Oct 2001 03:49:15 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <xzpwv1hq2ck.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org> References: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> writes: > > :These programs should *not* be trying to use these functions. These functions > > :are meant for manipulating time_t, which is a representation of "now". > > > > Who says? > This is the definition of time_t. Chapter and verse, please. Not just a repetition of what somebody else says may or may not be in C90. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwv1hq2ck.fsf>