Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      27 Oct 2001 03:49:15 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 64 bit times revisited..
Message-ID:  <xzpwv1hq2ck.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org>
References:  <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> writes:
> > :These programs should *not* be trying to use these functions.  These functions
> > :are meant for manipulating time_t, which is a representation of "now".
> > 
> >     Who says?
> This is the definition of time_t.

Chapter and verse, please.  Not just a repetition of what somebody
else says may or may not be in C90.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwv1hq2ck.fsf>