From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 18:51: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9D137BAFF; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 54A5514C40; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 03:49:16 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Mike Smith Cc: Matthew Dillon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. References: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 27 Oct 2001 03:49:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200110270133.f9R1Xnv06295@mass.dis.org> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith writes: > > :These programs should *not* be trying to use these functions. These functions > > :are meant for manipulating time_t, which is a representation of "now". > > > > Who says? > This is the definition of time_t. Chapter and verse, please. Not just a repetition of what somebody else says may or may not be in C90. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message