From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Mon Nov 30 16:33:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768304A241F; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (cross.sbone.de [195.201.62.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cl9l54Kdgz3ssp; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577848D4A23C; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8600E707D8; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FPeAyZDgr3Pa; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:59d5:6d49:9c08:9559]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B6F9E707AD; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: cglogic Cc: "Matt Macy" , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r368163 - in head: sbin/ifconfig sys/dev/if_wg sys/dev/if_wg/include sys/dev/if_wg/include/crypto sys/dev/if_wg/include/sys sys/dev/if_wg/include/zinc sys/dev/if_wg/module sys/dev/if_wg... Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:01 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6151) Message-ID: <6C2E5C72-BBB7-42D1-9615-07EC536F07ED@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <-0GA0tF-2zZxdb99WE9WoUnv9YVf9efjJnMin4IL0bctNp-Bab2Qw2RbUuZTa6y9hP7r0UEUUXGkRSz-OF4k5yR5YmUgU-JJxNWcl48tVSQ=@protonmail.com> References: <202011291938.0ATJc4Z3081193@repo.freebsd.org> <20201130102758.c600f147a801933bb66529c7@bidouilliste.com> <01F4B070-2CBE-4662-ACDC-20F5E87B751A@lists.zabbadoz.net> <-0GA0tF-2zZxdb99WE9WoUnv9YVf9efjJnMin4IL0bctNp-Bab2Qw2RbUuZTa6y9hP7r0UEUUXGkRSz-OF4k5yR5YmUgU-JJxNWcl48tVSQ=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Cl9l54Kdgz3ssp X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net designates 195.201.62.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:195.201.62.131]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zabbadoz.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[195.201.62.131:from]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[195.201.62.131:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[protonmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:195.201.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[svn-src-all,svn-src-head] X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:33:06 -0000 On 30 Nov 2020, at 14:53, cglogic wrote: > So you propose to make it dependent on linuxkpi? What have to do a > user who does not compile linuxkpi, but wants to use if_wg? If we’d move the implementations into linuxkpi you’d have to compile it to use if_wg. So that this however is only a question. Effectively you are using parts of linuxkpi now already, just copy&pasted (duplicated) into local files under if_wg; for as much as I can see for most of that would however not require linuxkpi to be loaded, just present at compile time like any other kernel headers. /bz