From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  5 13:28:12 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B764B16A4BF
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2003 13:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw1.internett.de (fw1.internett.de [195.30.142.24])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3426843FE9
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2003 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from michael@nettmail.de)
Received: from mx5.internett.de (mx5.internett.de [195.30.142.17])
	with ESMTP id h85KS8o26426
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:28:08 +0200
Received: (from wwwrun@localhost)id h85KS7R31543
	for freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:28:07 +0200
To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1062793687.3f58f1d78476d@mx5.internett.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:28:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: michael <michael@nettmail.de>
References: <20030905190041.E059216A4E8@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030905190041.E059216A4E8@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: 80.184.155.144
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Subject: Re: dummynet and modem pipes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 20:28:12 -0000


> 
> when simulating modem pipes using dummynet, how do we simulate the
> modem compressions? one way is to pick a compress rate, say 2, and
> setup
> fake larger bandwidth, but do different traffic (html, jpg, mpg) affect
> 
> the compression latency or compression rate significantly? tia
> 
> -yuchung
> 
Hi,

my idea was may a little bit idiotic or stupid may have you
probed an ppp-tunnel through 2 Nic's and throug 2 Modempipes on each
host. 

Teh compression can not be directly the sam as Hardware-Compression,
may the Compression in the ppp-protocoll should be good to deal with it.

may be for test's it's enough accuracy

regards

michael