From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 17 15:00:57 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF46106566C
	for <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mark@exonetric.com)
Received: from relay0.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [82.138.248.161])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CF78FC21
	for <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:00:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from markimac.fairfx.local (unknown [62.244.179.66])
	by relay0.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C5C57269
	for <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:37:35 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4CE3E8AF.8010604@exonetric.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:37:35 +0000
From: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: global resource accounting on a per-jail basis
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
	<freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>,
	<mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:00:57 -0000

Hi,

Are there any plans to add CPU (at least) accounting
on a per jail basis, so that I can distinguish all
the CPU cycles used by jail X. While sar could be useful,
it only notes user id and that's not unique across jails.

I know that some kind of resource limiting is planned and
that would naturally require the accounting suggested.

Regards,
Mark Blackman
Exonetric