Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:34:48 +0100
From:      RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why is Qemu not in Handbook
Message-ID:  <20100414203448.21a3697a@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <t2p54db43991004140824yc08f9f6fk8da053947828a46@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <t2p54db43991004140824yc08f9f6fk8da053947828a46@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:24:11 -0400
Bob Johnson <fbsdlists@gmail.com> wrote:


> Why is Qemu not mentioned in the Handbook?

I don't know if this is the actual reason, but from the ports UPDATING
file:

  Also note the 0.11 stable branch is the last
  qemu branch that still supports kqemu, so if you depend on reasonably
  fast emulation on FreeBSD you should start looking for alternatives
  some time soon.  (VirtualBox?)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100414203448.21a3697a>